<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vermeer, F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/619/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Continuously improving the practice of cardiology (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5722/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Guidelines for the management of patients with
cardiovascular disease are designed to assist
cardiologists and other physicans in their practice.
Surveys are conducted to assess whether guidelines
are followed in practice. The results of surveys on
acute coronary syndromes, coronary revascularisation,
secondary prevention, valvular heart disease
and heart failure are presented. Comparing surveys
conducted between 1995 and 2002, a gradual improvement
in use ofsecondary preventive therapy
is observed. Nevertheless, important deviations
from established guidelines are noted, with a
significant variation among different hospitals in
the Netherlands and in other European countries.
Measures for fiuther improvement of clinical
practice indude more rapid treatment of patients
with evolving myocardial infarction, more frequent
use of clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
receptor blockers in patients with acute coronary
syndromes, more frequent use of 5-blockers in
patients with heart failure and more intense
measures to encourage patients to stop smoking.
Targets for the proportion ofpatients who might
receive specific therapies are presented.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Behandeling van patiënten met acute coronaire syndromen in Nederland in 2000/2001; een vergelijking met andere Europese landen en met de richtlijnen (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5733/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Doel. Beschrijven of richtlijnen voor de behandeling van acuut coronair syndroom (ACS) in de dagelijkse praktijk worden toegepast, en op welke punten de behandeling verschilt tussen Nederland en de overige lidstaten van de European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Opzet. Prospectief observationeel onderzoek. Methode. In de periode 4 september 2000-15 mei 2001 werden in Nederland in 6 ziekenhuizen, en in 24 andere ESC-lidstaten in 97 ziekenhuizen, patiënten met een bevestigde diagnose van ACS geïncludeerd. Gegevens werden verzameld over de acute behandeling en secundaire preventie bij patiënten met ST-elevatie en over medicamenteuze behandeling, risicostratificatie en secundaire preventie bij patiënten zonder ST-elevatie. De bevindingen werden vergeleken met de aanbevelingen in de richtlijnen van de ESC. Resultaten. In Nederland werden 223 patiënten met ST-elevatie geïncludeerd en 198 zonder, en in de overige Europese landen respectievelijk 4208 en 5169 patiënten. De mediane leeftijd was 64-67 jaar. Het percentage mannen was 64-73. Van de patiënten met ST-elevatie die binnen 12 uur na het ontstaan van de symptomen in het ziekenhuis arriveerden, ontving 35% noch trombolyse, noch primaire percutane coronaire interventie. Zowel in Nederland als in de andere Europese landen onderging de helft van de patiënten met ST-elevatie trombolyse later dan 40 minuten en primaire percutane coronaire interventie later dan 90 minuten, na binnenkomst in het ziekenhuis. Risicoschatting door een troponinebepaling werd in Nederland vaker toegepast. Van de hoogrisicopatiënten zonder ST-elevatie onderging ruim 50% in zowel Nederland als de rest van Europa coronairangiografie. Bijna 70% en 80% van de laag-risicopatiënten zonder ST-elevatie onderging een inspanningstest en/of coronairangiografie. In Nederland werden clopidogrel, glycoproteïne-IIb/IIIa-antagonisten en statinen vaker voorgeschreven en ACE-remmers minder vaak. Conclusie. Richtlijnen voor de behandeling van ACS werden zowel in Nederland als in de rest van Europa matig gevolgd. De behandeling verschilde op diverse punten tussen Nederland en de andere landen.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Argatroban and alteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the ARGAMI study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5636/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>ARGAMI was designed to assess safety and efficacy of argatroban compared with heparin as adjunctive treatment to alteplase in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. ARGAMI consisted of an open-dose finding study (35 patients) followed by a placebo-controlled study with double dummy technique and 2:1 (argatroban:heparin) randomization. An argatroban dosage of 100 microg/kg bolus plus 3 microg/kg/min infusion for 72 hours was selected for the randomized study in which 82 patients were allocated to argatroban and 45 to heparin (5000 U intravenous bolus, 1000 U/h infusion). Patency of the infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3 flow) after 90 minutes was obtained in 62 patients (76%) allocated to argatroban versus 37 patients (82%) allocated to heparin (p=ns). Angiograms after 24 hours and 5 to 10 days showed low reocclusion rates in both groups. Bleeding complications were observed in 16 patients allocated to argatroban (19.5%) and in 9 patients allocated to heparin (20.0%). One patient allocated to heparin suffered from hemorrhage stroke. Argatroban, given as adjunctive treatment to alteplase, is tolerated well in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Safety and efficacy of the combination alteplase and argatroban (with this dose regimen) are similar to those of alteplase and heparin.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sustained benefit at 10-14 years follow-up after thrombolytic therapy in myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9101/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To investigate whether the benefit of thrombolytic therapy was
      sustained beyond the first decade. We report the 10-14 year outcome of 533
      patients who were randomized to treatment with intracoronary streptokinase
      or to conventional therapy during the years 1980-1985. METHODS AND
      RESULTS: Details of survival and cardiac events were obtained from the
      civil registry, from medical records or from the patient's physician. At
      follow-up, 158 patients (59%) of the 269 patients allocated to
      thrombolytic treatment and only 129 patients (49%) of the 264
      conventionally treated patients were alive. The cumulative 1-, 5- and
      10-year survival rates were 91%, 81% and 69% in patients treated with
      streptokinase and 84%, 71% and 59% in the control group, respectively
      (P=0.02). Reinfarction during 10-years of follow-up was more frequent
      after thrombolytic therapy, particularly during the first year. Coronary
      bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty were more frequently performed
      after thrombolytic therapy. At 10 years approximately 30% of the patients
      were free from subsequent cardiac events.Independent determinants of
      mortality were elderly age, indicators of impaired residual left
      ventricular function, multivessel disease and an inability to perform an
      exercise test at the time of hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Improved
      survival after thrombolytic therapy is maintained beyond the first decade.
      Age, left ventricular function, multivessel disease and an inability to
      perform an exercise test were independent predictors for long-term
      mortality, as they are predictors for early mortality.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Vroege trombolyse verbetert de prognose op lange termijn voor patienten met een hartinfarct (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5408/</link>
      <pubDate>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In a previously reported clinical study treatment of myocardial infarction with intracoronary streptokinase (269 patients) was compared with conventional therapy (264 patients). To determine the long-term effects of thrombolytic therapy patient data were collected from 3 to 7 years after admission. Three-year survival rates were 87% after thrombolysis and 79% after conventional therapy. Bypass surgery was done in 19% versus 16%, and PTCA in 9% versus 6% of patients. Patients treated with thrombolysis also had a better prognosis after discharge. The difference in survival between the two treatment groups was 6% after 1 year and 10% after 5 years. Benefit was largest in patients with an anterior infarction, patients with extensive myocardial ischaemia and patients treated shortly after onset of infarction. Left ventricular function appeared to be the best determinant predicting survival after discharge. The findings show that early thrombolysis after acute myocardial infarction also results in improved long-term survival.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5402/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Patients (n = 533) who participated in the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands Trial were followed up for 3 to 7 years. The 5 year survival rate after thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase was 81% (269 patients) compared with 71% after conventional therapy (264 patients). The greatest improvement in survival was observed in patients with anterior infarction (81% versus 64% with thrombolytic therapy or conventional therapy, respectively), in those with heart failure on admission or a previous infarction and in those with extensive myocardial ischemia on admission. Left ventricular ejection fraction at the time of hospital discharge was better after thrombolytic therapy. In the hospital survivors, long-term outcome was related to left ventricular function at the time of discharge and, to a lesser extent, to the underlying coronary artery disease. The initial therapy (thrombolysis or conventional) was not an independent additional determinant of long-term survival when left ventricular function and coronary status at the time of hospital discharge were taken into account. Thus, the salutary effects of thrombolytic therapy appear to be the result of myocardial salvage. Reinfarction within 3 years was observed more frequently after thrombolytic therapy, particularly in patients with inferior wall infarction and those with greater than or equal to 90% stenosis of the infarct-related vessel at discharge. Coronary bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty were performed more frequently after thrombolytic therapy than in conventionally treated patients. At 5 years, approximately 40% of patients in both groups had an uneventful course without reinfarction or additional revascularization procedures. These observations demonstrate that the benefits of thrombolytic therapy are maintained throughout 5 years of follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Immediate PTCA after successful thrombolysis with intracoronary streptokinase, three years follow-up. A matched pair analysis of the effect of PTCA in the randomized multicentre trial of intracoronary streptokinase, conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4282/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Immediate PTCA following thrombolysis with streptokinase was performed in 46 out of 533 patients enrolled in a multicentre randomized trial of early reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Additional effects of PTCA in patients with a residual diameter stenosis in the infarct-related coronary artery of 70% or more after thrombolysis were compared with successful thrombolysis alone in a matched pair analysis. Thirty six pairs of patients were formed identical with respect to the infarct related coronary artery, presence or absence of previous myocardial infarction, total ST segment elevation on the ECG at admission to the trial, and delay between onset of symptoms and hospital admission. PTCA after thrombolysis did not lead to additional limitation of infarct size, nor to further preservation of left ventricular function. Infarction rate during the three-year follow-up was 14% after PTCA versus 30% after thrombolysis alone (P = 0.05). Similarly, patients had less angina or heart failure after PTCA, since on average 128 out of 156 weeks follow-up were symptom free, while this was only 102 weeks after thrombolysis alone (P = 0.03). Immediate PTCA after thrombolysis with intracoronary streptokinase seems to prevent recurrent ischemia and reinfarction. Further studies should address the proper indication and timing of PTCA after thrombolysis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Enzyme tests in the evaluation of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5370/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The activity of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB and aspartate aminotransferase was measured on serial plasma samples from patients with acute myocardial infarction. The study was part of a multicentre randomised trial of the effect of thrombolytic treatment in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction. The applicability and comparability of enzyme tests for the estimation of myocardial injury were studied in 76 control patients and 74 patients treated with streptokinase. Treatment with streptokinase caused a considerable acceleration of enzyme release after acute myocardial infarction, both in patients with persistent coronary occlusion and in those with successful reperfusion. But this changed pattern of enzyme release did not affect the rate of enzyme elimination from plasma or the released proportions of different enzymes. Thus the assessment of infarct size by measurement of these enzyme activities can also be applied to patients treated with streptokinase. Moreover, the enzymes measured in the present study are all equally valid markers of myocardial injury.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cost benefit analysis of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase. Twelve month follow up report of the randomised multicentre trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5371/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The costs and benefits of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction were compared in a randomised trial. All hospital admissions were recorded and the functional class was assessed at visits to the outpatient clinic during a 12 month follow up of 269 patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment and of 264 allocated to conventional treatment. Mean survival during the first year was calculated for patients with inferior and with anterior infarction and adjusted for impaired quality of life in cases where there were symptoms or hospital admission. In patients with inferior infarction mean survival was 337 days (out of a total follow up of 365 days) for patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment and 327 days for controls. Quality adjusted survival was seven days longer in the thrombolysis group (307 vs 300 days in controls). In patients with anterior infarction mean survival was significantly longer (35 days) in the thrombolysis group than in the control group as was quality adjusted survival (38 days) (304 vs 266 days in controls). The gain in life expectancy with thrombolytic treatment was 0.7 years for patients with inferior infarction, 2.4 years for patients with anterior infarction, and 3.6 years for the subset of patients with large anterior infarction who were admitted within two hours of the onset of symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intracoronary thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: The Netherlands randomized trial and current status (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4240/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>--</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Value of immediate coronary angioplasty following intracoronary thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4249/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A total of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 4-h duration were enrolled in the multicenter randomized trial of intracoronary thrombolysis compared to conventional treatment. In two of the five participating centers, an additional coronary angioplasty immediately after thrombolysis was attempted in 46 patients. According to the treatment allocation and early and late patency of the infarct related vessel, patients were subdivided into three groups: conventionally treated (group A); successful coronary angioplasty following thrombolysis with persistent patent infarct related vessel (group B); and late patency of the infarct related vessel postthrombolytic therapy without angioplasty (group C). The highest global ejection fractions were observed in group B (54% +/- 10%) and group C (55% +/- 13%), while the lowest ejection fraction was found in group A (47% +/- 14%). The sequential changes in global ejection fraction from the acute to the chronic stage was + 4% (p = 0.05) in group B, while no significant changes could be demonstrated in group C. Furthermore, in the group successfully treated by angioplasty, the improvement in global ejection fraction was more pronounced and persisted up to three months after the intervention. This was supported by analysis of regional myocardial function of the infarct zone (+ 16% improvement, p = 0.01). The long-term clinical follow-up (median 24 months) of the patients successfully treated by combined procedure of thrombolysis and angioplasty (group B) was most favourable with a lower incidence of re-infarction (6%), and late coronary bypass surgery (13%) and/or (re)-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (3%) was performed less frequently. These results suggest that reperfusion may need to be supplemented by additional revascularization procedures in order to optimize the changes of obtaining full functional recovery and so to improve the prognosis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thrombolysetherapie beim frischen Myokardinfarkt (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5309/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In this overview the characteristics have been defined of those patients with acute myocardial infarction to whom early thrombolytic therapy would offer a major benefit. However, this concerns only the 20% of all patients who are admitted to the hospital with acute myocardial infarction within the specified time limit. It is still unclear whether later thrombolytic therapy with the newer agents might offer benefit to other patients with acute myocardial infarction. Presently, it seems unlikely that patients admitted to the hospital more than six hours after onset of symptoms will benefit from any reperfusion strategy. Patients admitted up to 24 hours after onset of symptoms with symptomatic and extensive ischemia (usually located anteriorly) or with signs of cardiogenic shock constitute a group of high risk patients who might derive further benefit from late reperfusion (42). It is likely that in the near future the new generation of thrombolytic agents (rt-PA, rscu-PA and APSAC) will become first choice for the intravenous initiation of thrombolytic therapy. Then, the indications for either acute or delayed angiography might be different from the present ones. Further cost/benefit analysis will certainly be required to assess the additional value of intracoronary thrombolysis and coronary angioplasty after intravenous administration of rt-PA, rscu-PA or APSAC. The required capacity of catheterization laboratories and facilities for coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery will depend on the results of those analyses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Value of admission electrocardiogram in predicting outcome of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5347/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To determine the value of the admission 12-lead electrocardiogram to predict infarct size limitation by thrombolytic therapy, data were analyzed in 488 of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from a randomized multicenter study. All patients had typical electrocardiographic changes diagnostic for an AMI and were admitted within 4 hours after the onset of chest pain; 245 patients were allocated to thrombolytic treatment and 243 to conventional treatment. Cumulative 72-hour release into plasma of myocardial alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH) was used as a measure of infarct size. In general, the amount of infarct limitation due to thrombolytic therapy was proportional to the size of the area at risk. Patients with new Q waves, high QRS score and high ST-segment elevation or depression had the largest enzymatic infarct size in both treatment groups, irrespective of location of the AMI. Compared with conventionally treated patients, patients with anterior AMI treated with streptokinase had significant infarct size limitation (480 U/liter HBDH, 37%), and limitation was most prominent in those with Q waves (820 U/liter HBDH) or high ST elevation (750 U/liter HBDH). Infarct size limitation in inferior AMI was less impressive (330 U/liter HBDH, 33%) and patients with high ST-segment elevation (460 U/liter HBDH) or marked contralateral ST-segment depression (430 U/liter HBDH) had the most notable infarct limitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Verbeterde prognose als gevolg van vroeg thrombolyse bij patienten met een acuut hartinfarct (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4179/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Twee behandelingen werden vergeleken in een gerandomiseerd onderzoek waaraan 533 patiënten met een acuut infarct deelnamen, 264 patiënten werden conventioneel behandeld (groep 1) en 269 kregen een behandeling die gericht was op snelle rekanalisatie van de veelal afgesloten coronairarterie (groep 2). Bij de eerste 152 patiënten in groep 2 werd uitsluitend intracoronair streptokinase gegeven (250.000 eenheden), onmiddellijk na coronariografie. Bij de volgende 117 patiënten werd deze intracoronaire behandeling voorafgegaan door intraveneuze toediening van streptokinase (500.000 eenheden). Bij 198 van de 234 patiënten bij wie angiografie werd verricht in de acute fase van het infarct, was de met het infarct samenhangende coronairarterie doorgankelijk aan het eind van de ingreep (85).

De sterfte was lager bij patiënten uit groep 2 gedurende de gehele follow-up-periode. De éénjaarsoverleving was 91 bij patiënten in groep 2 en 84 in groep 1. Het voorkomen van ventrikelfibrilleren, pericarditis en cardiogene shock in groep 2 was lager dan in de controlegroep. Daarentegen traden bij patiënten uit groep 2 vaker bloedingen en, in het bijzonder bij patiënten met een onderwandinfarct, vaker recidiefinfarcering op.

Op grond van deze gegevens concluderen wij dat trombolyse een aanwinst is bij de behandeling van patiënten met een acuut hartinfarct.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Preservation of global and regional left ventricular function after early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4184/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of early myocardial reperfusion (within 4 hours after onset of symptoms) on regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction has been quantitated by analysis of segmental wall motion. Of 533 patients randomized either to conventional coronary care unit therapy or to a reperfusion strategy, in 332 high quality angiograms were obtained 2 to 8 weeks after the onset of myocardial infarction. In those assigned to thrombolytic therapy, angiographic data were also available after acute reperfusion. Analysis on an "intention to treat" basis revealed significant preservation of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy (ejection fraction 53%) compared with conventional treatment (ejection fraction 47%). In addition, wall motion analysis showed significant improvement of regional function in the infarct zone in both inferior and anterior infarction. In addition, significant changes occurred in regional function of the remote "noninfarct zone" in the acute as well as the chronic stage. It is concluded that improved regional and global left ventricular function can be achieved with early reperfusion and that this is the likely explanation for the reduction of early and late mortality after thrombolysis observed in this study.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: limitation of infarct size and improved survival (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4185/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on infarct size, left ventricular function, clinical course and patient survival was studied in a randomized trial comparing thrombolysis (269 patients) with conventional treatment (264 control patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hours after the onset of symptoms related to the infarction. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Informed consent was requested only of patients allocated to thrombolysis; no angiography was performed in 35. The infarct-related artery was patent in 65 patients and occluded in 169. Recanalization was achieved in 133 patients. The median time to angiographic documentation of vessel patency was 200 minutes after the onset of symptoms. The clinical course in the coronary care unit was more favorable after thrombolysis. Infarct size, estimated from myocardial enzyme release, was 30% lower after thrombolysis. In patients admitted within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms the reduction of infarct size was 51%, in those admitted between 1 and 2 hours it was 31% and in those admitted later than 2 hours it was 13%. Left ventricular function measured by radionuclide angiography before hospital discharge was better after thrombolysis (ejection fraction 48 +/- 15%) than in control patients (44 +/- 15%). Similar improvement was observed in patients with a first infarct only (thrombolysis 50 +/- 14%, control subjects 46 +/- 15%), in patients with anterior infarction (thrombolysis 44 +/- 16%, control subjects 35 +/- 14%) and in those with inferior infarction (thrombolysis 52 +/- 12%, control subjects 49 +/- 12%). Similar results were obtained by contrast angiography. Mortality was lower after thrombolysis. After 28 days 16 patients allocated to thrombolysis and 31 control patients had died. One year survival rates were 91 and 84%, respectively. On the other hand, nonfatal reinfarction occurred more frequently after thrombolysis (36 patients) than in control subjects (16 patients). Early thrombolysis by intracoronary streptokinase leads to a smaller infarct size estimated by enzyme release, preserves left ventricular function at the second week and leads to improved 1 year survival.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Which patients benefit most from early thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4213/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function, and early mortality was studied in subsets of patients in a randomized trial. Early thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase (152 patients) or with intracoronary streptokinase preceded by intravenous streptokinase (117 patients) was compared with conventional treatment (264 patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hr after onset of symptoms indicative of acute myocardial infarction. Four hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for this detailed analysis, and 245 of these were allocated to thrombolytic therapy and 243 to conventional treatment. Early angiographic examinations were performed in 212 patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy. Patency of the infarct-related artery was achieved in 181 patients (85%). Enzymatic infarct size, as measured from cumulative alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase release, was smaller in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (median 760 vs 1170 U/liter in control patients, p = .0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by radionuclide angiography before discharge from the hospital was higher after thrombolytic therapy (median 50% vs 43% in control patients, p = .0001). Three month mortality was lower in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (6% vs 14% in the control group, p = .006). With the use of multivariate regression analysis, infarct size limitation, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, and three month mortality were predicted by sum of the ST segment elevation, time from onset of symptoms to admission, and Killip class at admission. Thrombolysis was most effective in patients admitted within 2 hr after onset of symptoms and in patients with a sum of ST segment elevation of 1.2 mV or more. On the other hand, no beneficial effects of streptokinase on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function, or mortality were observed in the subset of patients with a sum of ST segment elevation of less than 1.2 mV who were admitted between 2 and 4 hr after onset of symptoms.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of early intracoronary streptokinase on infarct size estimated from cumulative enzyme release and on enzyme release rate: A randomized trial of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4214/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effects of early intracoronary streptokinase (SK) on enzymatic infarct size and rate of enzyme release were studied in a randomized multicenter trial. A total of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were allocated to either the SK treatment group (n = 269) or the conventional (control) treatment group (n = 264). Enzymatic infarct size was represented by the cumulative quantity of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH) released by the heart per liter of plasma in the first 72 hours. Rate of enzyme release was represented by the ratio of HBDH quantities released in 24 hours and 72 hours. On an "intention to treat" basis, the SK group had a smaller (by 30%; p = 0.0001) median enzymatic infarct size and a higher (by 35%; p = 0.0001) median rate of enzyme release than the control group. Limitation of infarct size was less apparent in patients treated with intracoronary SK only (25%) than in patients treated with intravenous plus intracoronary SK (34%). Compared to the control group, the enzyme release rate in patients treated with intracoronary SK only was slightly less (34%) than that in patients treated with intravenous plus intracoronary SK (38%). Patients with a patent infarct-related coronary artery at acute angiography had a median infarct size which was 55% (p = 0.0001) smaller than the median infarct size of the control group, and the median rate of enzyme release was 38% (p = 0.001) higher than the median release rate of the control group. Patients with successful recanalization during intracoronary SK infusion had a median infarct size which was 31% (p = 0.002) smaller than the median infarct size of the control group and a median rate of enzyme release which was 42% (p = 0.0001) higher than the median release rate of the control group. Patients with persistent coronary occlusion in spite of thrombolytic therapy had a median infarct size which was 11% (NS) higher than the median infarct size of the control group, although the median rate of enzyme release was still 23% (p = 0.02) higher than the median release rate of the control group. It is concluded that thrombolysis in the early phase of AMI limits infarct size and that intracoronary SK treatment itself accelerates the process of enzyme release from infarcted myocardium, independent of the angiographic result.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term improvement in global left ventricular function after early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4225/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of reperfusion achieved by early intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction on left ventricular function was studied in 533 patients enrolled in a prospective randomised multicentre study. Two hundred and sixty four patients were allocated to conventional treatment and 269 patients to thrombolysis. At the end of the procedure patency of the infarct related vessel was achieved in 198 (85%) of 234 patients in whom coronary angiography was performed. The median interval from onset of symptoms till the angiographic documentation of patency was 200 minutes. Data were analysed according to the original treatment allocation. Global left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide angiography in 418 patients within two days of admission, in 361 patients after two weeks, and in 307 patients after three months. Global left ventricular function remained unchanged throughout the observation period in the control group, whereas it improved during the first two weeks in patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment. Improved function in these patients persisted up to three months after the infarction. Global left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly better in the thrombolysis group than in the control group at two days, two weeks, and at three months. In patients with anterior myocardial infarction the left ventricular ejection fraction was 9% better than in the control group at two weeks and at three months. In the patients with inferior myocardial infarction differences between the two treatment groups were smaller because of photon attenuation within the body. Angiographic evidence suggested that the improvement in function seen after thrombolysis is indeed associated with the patency of the infarct related artery.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bleeding complications of intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of risk in a randomised trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4152/</link>
      <pubDate>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The risk of bleeding associated with intracoronary infusion of streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction was determined in a randomised controlled trial containing 302 patients under the age of 70. Intracoronary streptokinase infusion was given to 152 patients and 150 patients were treated conventionally. Bleeding was seen in 24 (16%) patients in the streptokinase group and in two of the conventionally treated patients. Bleeding was most common (28%) in patients over the age of 60 years. The groin was the site of bleeding in all patients except one. In the first 48 hours after admission the haematocrit in streptokinase treated patients with manifest bleeding fell by 0.07 (0.04) (mean (SD)). The fall in haematocrit in the streptokinase treated patients without manifest bleeding was 0.05 (0.04) and in the conventionally treated patients it fell by 0.03 (0.04). Sixty six units of packed cells were transfused in the streptokinase group (50 units to those who bled); the control group required only 17 units. There were no deaths due to bleeding. The occurrence of bleeding and the fall in haematocrit in the streptokinase group correlated with the occurrence of systemic fibrinolysis but not with the dose of streptokinase given. Thus, in about 15% of patients treatment with intracoronary streptokinase resulted in significant non-fatal bleeding from the femoral puncture site that required substantial transfusion support. Furthermore, there was a significant drop in haematocrit in patients without manifest bleeding. These results emphasise the need for more specific fibrinolytic agents.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>