<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Bonnier, J.J.R.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6319/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Five year clinical effect of coronary stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting in renal insufficient patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13793/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: To compare coronary stent implantation and bypass surgery for multivessel coronary disease in patients with renal insufficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the ARTS trial, 142 moderate renal insufficient patients (Ccr&lt;60 mL/min) with multivessel coronary disease were randomly assigned to stent implantation (n=69) or CABG (n=73). At 5 years, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality (14.5% in the stent group vs. 12.3% in the CABG group, P=0.81), or combined endpoint of death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or myocardial infarction (MI) (30.4% in the stent group vs. 23.3% in the CABG group, P=0.35). Among patients who survived without CVA or MI, 18.8% in the stent group underwent a second revascularization procedure when compared with 8.2% in the surgery group (P=0.08). The event-free survival at 5 years was 50.7% in the stent group and 68.5% in the surgery group (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: At 5 years, the differences in mortality and combined incidence of death, CVA, and MI between coronary stenting and surgery did not reach statistically significant level. However, the occurrence of MACCE in the stent group was higher than in the CABG group, mainly driven by the higher incidence of repeat revascularization in the stent group.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13701/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-02-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) for drug-eluting stents is unknown. We sought to prospectively investigate the incidence and extent of ISA after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with bare metal stents (BMS) and survey the clinical significance of ISA over a period of 12 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy included patients who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6 months (BMS, 240 patients; SR, 113; MR, 116). The qualitative and quantitative analyses of ISA were performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. More than half of the instances of ISA observed after the procedure resolved at 6 months in all groups. No difference in the incidence of late-acquired ISA was observed among the 3 groups (BMS, 5.4%; SR, 8.0%; MR, 9.5%; P=0.306), with a similar ISA volume (BMS, 11.4 mm3; SR, 21.7 mm3; MR, 8.5 mm3; P=0.18). Late-acquired ISA was the result of an increase of vessel area without change in plaque behind the stent. Predictive factors of late-acquired ISA were lesion length, unstable angina, and absence of diabetes. No stent thrombosis occurred in the patients diagnosed with ISA over a period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and extent of late-acquired ISA are comparable in paclitaxel-eluting stents and BMS. ISA is a pure IVUS finding without clinical repercussions.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intracoronary beta-radiation to reduce restenosis after balloon angioplasty and stenting; the Beta Radiation In Europe (BRIE) study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9962/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AIMS: The BRIE trial is a registry evaluating the safety and performance of (90)Sr delivered locally (Beta-Cath TM system of Novoste) to de-novo and restenotic lesions in patients with up to two discrete lesions in different vessels. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 149 patients (175 lesions) were enrolled; 62 treated with balloons and 113 with stents. The restenosis rate, the minimal luminal diameter and the late loss were determined in three regions of interest: (a) in a subsegment of 5mm containing the original minimal luminal diameter pre-intervention termed target segment; (b) the irradiated segment, 28 mm in length, and (c) the entire analysed segment, 42 mm in length, termed the vessel segment. Binary restenosis was 9.9% for the target segment, 28.9% for the irradiated segment, and 33.6% for the vessel segment. These angiographic results include 5.3% total occlusions. Excluding total occlusions binary restenosis was 4.9%, 25% and 29.9%, respectively. At 1 year the incidence of major adverse cardiac events placed in a hierarchical ranking were: death 2%, myocardial infarction 10.1%, CABG 2%, and target vessel revascularization 20.1%. The event-free survival rate was 65.8%. Non-appropriate coverage of the injured segment by the radioactive source termed geographical miss affected 67.9% of the vessels, and increased edge restenosis significantly (16.3% vs 4.3%, P=0.004). It accounted for 40% of the treatment failures. CONCLUSION: The results of this registry reflect the learning process of the practitioner. The full therapeutic potential of this new technology is reflected by the restenosis rate at the site of the target segment. It can only be unravelled once the incidence of late vessel occlusion and geographical miss has been eliminated by the prolonged use of thienopyridine, the appropriate training of the operator applying this new treatment for restenosis prevention, and the use of longer sources.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The influence of stent length on clinical and angiographic outcome in patients undergoing elective stenting for native coronary artery lesions; final results of the Magic 5L Study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4821/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-09-12T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aims To prospectively evaluate the influence of stent length on 6 month clinical and angiographic outcome, in patients with native coronary lesions up to 45mm in length, undergoing elective Magic Wallstent implantation.

Methods and Results On the basis of pre-procedural angiography, 276 patients (aged 61·3±10·2 years; 78·6% male; 41·7% unstable angina) with a total of 302 lesions were prospectively assigned to one of five different length categories of Magic Wallstent. Angiography in multiple matched projections before and after implantation and at 6 months follow-up was analysed at the core laboratory. Primary end-points for the efficacy analysis were cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events and quantitative coronary angiography analysis 6 months after stent implantation. Magic Wallstent implantation was successful in 301 of 302 lesions and in 98·6% a residual stenosis &lt;20% by online quantitative coronary angiography was achieved. At 30 days, 6·2% (1·8% subacute occlusion) of patients had experienced major adverse cardiac events, 27·5% at 6 months and 30·4% at 9 months. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 37%. Restenosis rates for the mini, extra-short, short, medium and long Wallstent groups were 25·9%, 25%, 22·6%, 36·2% and 67·5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed stent length to be independently associated with greater angiographic restenosis and major adverse cardiac events.

Conclusions While shorter Magic Wallstents provided late outcomes comparable with short balloon-expandable stents, excessive restenosis with longer Wallstents should obviate their use in elective percutaneous intervention. Long coronary lesions provide a challenging substrate for emerging antirestenosis therapies, such as stent coatings and brachytherapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8448/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The recent recognition that coronary-artery stenting has improved the short- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with angioplasty has made it necessary to reevaluate the relative benefits of bypass surgery and percutaneous interventions in patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: A total of 1205 patients were randomly assigned to undergo stent implantation or bypass surgery when a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist agreed that the same extent of revascularization could be achieved by either technique. The primary clinical end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at one year. The costs of hospital resources used were also determined. RESULTS: At one year, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the rates of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Among patients who survived without a stroke or a myocardial infarction, 16.8 percent of those in the stenting group underwent a second revascularization, as compared with 3.5 percent of those in the surgery group. The rate of event-free survival at one year was 73.8 percent among the patients who received stents and 87.8 percent among those who underwent bypass surgery (P&lt;0.001 by the log-rank test). The costs for the initial procedure were $4,212 less for patients assigned to stenting than for those assigned to bypass surgery, but this difference was reduced during follow-up because of the increased need for repeated revascularization; after one year, the net difference in favor of stenting was estimated to be $2,973 per patient. CONCLUSION: As measured one year after the procedure, coronary stenting for multivessel disease is less expensive than bypass surgery and offers the same degree of protection against death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. However, stenting is associated with a greater need for repeated revascularization.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Carvedilol for prevention of restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy : final results of the European carvedilol atherectomy restenosis (EUROCARE) trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9300/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: In addition to its known properties as a competitive,
      nonselective beta and alpha-1 receptor blocker, carvedilol directly
      inhibits vascular myocyte migration and proliferation and exerts
      antioxidant effects that are considerably greater than those of vitamin E
      or probucol. This provides the basis for an evaluation of carvedilol for
      the prevention of coronary restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a
      prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 25 mg of
      carvedilol was given twice daily, starting 24 hours before scheduled
      directional coronary atherectomy and continuing for 5 months after a
      successful procedure. The primary end point was the minimal luminal
      diameter as determined during follow-up angiography 26+/-2 weeks after the
      procedure. Of 406 randomized patients, 377 underwent attempted
      atherectomy, and in 324 (88.9%), a &lt;/=50% diameter stenosis was achieved
      without the use of a stent. Evaluable follow-up angiography was available
      in 292 eligible patients (90%). No differences in minimal luminal diameter
      (1.99+/-0.73 mm versus 2.00+/-0.74 mm), angiographic restenosis rate
      (23.4% versus 23.9%), target lesion revascularization (16.2 versus 14.5),
      or event-free survival (79.2% versus 79.7%) between the placebo and
      carvedilol groups were observed at 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum
      recommended daily dose of the antioxidant and beta-blocker carvedilol
      failed to reduce restenosis after successful atherectomy. These findings
      are in contrast to those of the Multivitamins and Probucol Trial, which
      raises doubts regarding the validity of the interpretation that restenosis
      reduction by probucol was via antioxidant effects. The relationship
      between antioxidant agents and restenosis remains to be elucidated.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A randomized placebo-controlled trial of fluvastatin for prevention of restenosis after successful coronary balloon angioplasty; final results of the fluvastatin angiographic restenosis (FLARE) trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9059/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase
      inhibitors competitively inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor
      of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation. Experimental
      evidence suggests that fluvastatin may, independent of any lipid lowering
      action, exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular
      myocytes than other statins. The FLARE (Fluvastatin Angioplasty
      Restenosis) Trial was conceived to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40
      mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful coronary balloon
      angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS: Patients were randomized to either placebo or
      fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily beginning 2-4 weeks prior to planned PTCA
      and continuing after a successful PTCA (without the use of a stent), to
      follow-up angiography at 26+/-2 weeks. Clinical follow-up was completed at
      40 weeks. The primary end-point was angiographic restenosis, measured by
      quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory, as the loss in
      minimal luminal diameter during follow-up. Clinical end-points were death,
      myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or
      re-intervention, up to 40 weeks after PTCA. RESULTS: Of 1054 patients
      randomized, 526 were allocated to fluvastatin and 528 to placebo. Among
      these, 409 in the fluvastatin group and 427 in the placebo group were
      included in the intention-to-treat analysis, having undergone a successful
      PTCA after a minimum of 2 weeks of pre-treatment. At the time of PTCA,
      fluvastatin had reduced LDL cholesterol by 37% and this was maintained at
      33% at 26 weeks. There was no difference in the primary end-point between
      the treatment groups (fluvastatin 0.23+/-0.49 mm vs placebo 0.23+/-0.52
      mm, P=0.95) or in the angiographic restenosis rate (fluvastatin 28%,
      placebo 31%, chi-square P=0.42), or in the incidence of the composite
      clinical end-point at 40 weeks (22.4% vs 23.3%; logrank P=0.74). However,
      a significantly lower incidence of total death and myocardial infarction
      was observed in six patients (1.4%) in the fluvastatin group and 17 (4.0%)
      in the placebo group (log rank P=0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment with
      fluvastatin 80 mg daily did not affect the process of restenosis and is
      therefore not indicated for this purpose. However, the observed reduction
      in mortality and myocardial infarction 40 weeks after PTCA in the
      fluvastatin treated group has not been previously reported with statin
      therapy. Accordingly, a priori investigation of this finding is indicated
      and a new clinical trial with this intention is already underway.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. Benestent Study Group. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5048/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives. This study sought to determine the 1-year clinical follow-up of patients included in the Benestent trial.
Background. The Benestent trial is a randomized study comparing elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and a de novo coronary artery lesion. Seven-month follow-up data have shown a decreased rate of restenosis and fewer clinical events in the stent group. It is not established whether this favorable clinical outcome is maintained for longer periods or whether coronary stenting defers restenosis and its subsequent clinical manifestations.
Methods. To clarify this uncertainty, we updated clinical information on all but 1 of 516 patients enrolled in the Benestent trial (257 in balloon group, 259 in stent group) at least 12 months after the intervention. Major clinical events (primary clinical end point) were tabulated according to the intention to treat principle myocardial infarction, the need for bypass surgery or a further percutaneous intervention in the previously treated lesion.
Results. After 1 year, no significant differences in mortality (1.2% vs. 0.8%), stroke (0.0% vs 0.8%), myocardial infarction (5.0% vs. 4.2%) or coronary bypass graft surgery (6.9% vs. 5.1%) were found between the stent and balloon angioplasty groups, respectively. However, the requirement for a repeat angioplasty procedure was significantly lower in the stent group (10%) than the balloon angioplasty group (21%, relative risk [RR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31 to 0.75, p = 0.001), and overall primary end points were less frequently reached by stent group patients (23.2%) than those in the balloon group (31.5%, RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98, p = 0.04). No differences were found between groups with respect to functional class angina and prescribed medication at the time of follow-up.
Conclusions. These clinical follow-up data show that the benefit of elective native coronary artery stenting in patients with stable angina is maintained to at least 1 year after the procedure and results in a significantly reduced requirement for repeat intervention.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Heparin-coated Palmaz-Schatz Stents in Human Coronary Arteries. . (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5047/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background The purpose of the Benestent-II Pilot Study was to evaluate the safety of delaying and eliminating anticoagulant therapy in patients receiving a heparin-coated stent in conjunction with antiplatelet drugs.

Methods and Results The study consisted of three initial phases (I, II, III) during which resumption of heparin therapy after sheath removal was progressively deferred by 6, 12, and 36 hours. In phase IV, coumadin and heparin were replaced by 250 mg ticlopidine and 100 mg aspirin. Of the 207 patients with stable angina pectoris and a de novo lesion in whom heparin-coated stent implantation was attempted, implantation was successful in 202 patients (98%). Stent thrombosis did not occur during all four phases, and the overall clinical success rate at discharge was 99%. Bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion or surgery fell from 7.9% in phase I to 5.9%, 4%, and 0% in the three following phases. Hospital stay was 7.4, 6.1, 7.2, and 3.1 days for the consecutive phases. The restenosis rate for the combined four phases was 13% (15% in phase I, 20% in phase II, 11% in phase III, and 6% in phase IV). The overall rate of reintervention for the four phases was 8.9%. At 6 months, 84%, 75%, 94%, and 92% of the patients of phases I to IV, respectively, were event free. For the four phases, the event-free rate was 86%, which compares favorably with the rate observed in the Benestent-I study (80%; relative risk, 0.68 [0.45 to 1.04]).

Conclusions The implantation of stents coated with polyamine and end-point–attached heparin in stable patients with one significant de novo coronary lesion is well tolerated, is associated with no (sub)acute stent thrombosis, and results in a favorable event-free survival after 6 months.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: rationale and design of the Fluvavastatin Angioplasty Restenosis (FLARE) Trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4604/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Prevention of restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) continues to present the greatest therapeutic challenge in interventional cardiology. Experimental and pathological studies describe restenosis as no more than the biologic healing response to arterial injury. Studies of serial quantitative coronary angiography have demonstrated that this biologic process may be measured as the loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography and that it is essentially ubiquitous and normally distributed. Thus, quantitative coronary angiography has become the gold standard for evaluation of the angiographic outcome of clinical trials of new agents and devices aimed at prevention of restenosis. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors inhibit biosynthesis of mevalonate, a precursor of non-sterol compounds involved in cell proliferation, and thus may control the neointimal response, which forms the kernel of restenosis. Experimental evidence suggests that fluvastatin may exert a greater direct inhibitory effect on proliferating vascular myocytes than other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, independent of any lipid-lowering action. The Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis (FLARE) Trial was conceived, in collaboration between the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Sandoz Pharma, to evaluate the ability of fluvastatin 40 mg twice daily to reduce restenosis after successful single-lesion PTCA. Treatment of suitable patients begins 2 weeks before PTCA and continues after successful PTCA (residual diameter stenosis &lt; 50%, without major cardiac complications) to follow-up angiography at 26 +/- 2 weeks. Restenosis is measured by quantitative coronary angiography at a core laboratory as the loss in MLD from post-PTCA to follow-up angiography. It is calculated (90% power, alpha = 0.05) that 730 evaluable patients will be needed to test the hypothesis that fluvastatin will reduce the expected post-PTCA loss in MLD by 40%. Serial lipid analysis will be carried out at a central laboratory. Trial evaluation is focused on the primary endpoint (change in MLD) but includes primary clinical endpoints (death, myocardial infarction, or the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery or reintervention up to 40 weeks after PTCA) as well as secondary and tertiary clinical, angiographic, and laboratory endpoints. According to this methodologic approach, the effect of fluvastatin in luminal renarrowing and clinical events after successful PTCA as well as possible associations of lipid parameters with restenosis can be comprehensively investigated.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiographic predictors of recurrence of restenosis after Wiktor stent implantation in native coronary arteries (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4528/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Intracoronary stenting has been proposed as an adjunct to balloon angioplasty to improve the immediate and long-term results. However, late luminal narrowing has been reported following the implantation of a variety of stents. One of the studies conducted with the Wiktor stent is a prospective registry designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of elective stent implantation in patients with documented restenosis of a native coronary artery. To identify angiographic variables predicting recurrence of restenosis, the angiograms of the first 91 patients with successful stent implantation and without clinical evidence of (sub)acute thrombotic stent occlusion were analyzed with the Computer Assisted Angiographic Analysis System using automated edge detection. The incidence of restenosis was 44% by patient and 45% by stent according to the 0.72 mm criterion, and 30% by patient and 29% by stent according to the 50% diameter stenosis criterion. The risk for restenosis for several angiographic variables was determined using an univariate analysis and is expressed as odds ratio with corresponding confidence interval. The only statistically significant predictor of restenosis was the relative gain when it exceeded 0.48 using the 0.72 mm criterion (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-6.4). Furthermore, the relation between the relative gain (increase in minimal luminal diameter normalized to vessel size) as angiographic index of vessel wall injury and relative loss (decrease in minimal luminal diameter normalized to vessel size) as index of neointimal thickening was analyzed using a linear regression analysis. When using the categorical approach to address restenosis, there is an increased risk for recurrent restenosis when the relative gain exceeds 0.48. The continuous approach underscores this concept by indicating a weak but positive relation between the relative gain and relative loss.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thrombolysis and interventional cardiology; experiences from the 80's (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40166/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-10-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In October 1978 I assumed the position of cardiologist
at the Catharina Hospital in Eindhoven at the time
when the cardiothoracic surgery programm began in
this hospital. At that time I did not know the number of
patients that had to be treated daily. During our fellowship
training in cardiology, particularly in a university
hospitaL there was time to discuss problems with
teachers and to consider solutions. In a large nonacademic
cardiology department like that of the Catharina
hospitaL the situation is different: quick decisions
are necessary.
From 1978 onwards. clinical cardiology changed at
such pace that even some universities had difficulty to
implement new therapeutic developments such as percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty and
thrombolysis. In those early years we had a relatively
small staff which made it difficult to keep up with these
rapid changes. I was in a privileged position. since my
colleagues gave me the opportunity to visit leading
centres and to learn about new developments and implement
them in our daily practice of cardiology. It was
necessary to critically assess the clinical value of these
developments by continuous monitoring and evaluation
of the results.
The fact. that we could start a fellowship programm in
cardiology in 1980 was of great significance. We considered
this a recognition that we were successful in
both implementing and critically assessing these new
developments. In this thesis aspects of new treatment
modalities in modern cardiology are addressed: thrombolysis
and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Urate production by human heart (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4332/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Xanthine oxidoreductase has been demonstrated in the heart of various species. However, its presence in human heart is still debated. In the literature, high to undetectable levels have been reported. We studied the arterial-venous urate difference across the heart of patients undergoing both routine cardiac catheterization and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Urate is the end product of the reaction catalysed by xanthine oxidoreductase. In 10 patients, studied before angioplasty, the plasma urate level in the great cardiac vein exceeded the arterial one by 26 +/- 10 nmol/ml (P = 0.028). In a further 13 patients, urate production was maximal immediately after the last of four consecutive occlusions (23 +/- 8 nmol/ml, P = 0.018) and concomitant with increased coronary sinus hypoxanthine levels. We conclude that xanthine oxidoreductase is probably present in the heart of patients, suffering from ischemic heart disease, and responsible for the increase in urate production during transient myocardial ischemia.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Ventriculaire ritmestoornissen tijdens lichamelijke inspanning. Een vergelijkend onderzoek bij gezonde mannen en bij patienten met coronaire hartziekten. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5231/</link>
      <pubDate>1977-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>