<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Schalekamp, M.A.D.H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/639/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>New renin inhibitor VTP-27999 alters renin immunoreactivity and does not unfold prorenin (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40148/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Renin inhibitors like aliskiren not only block renin but also bind prorenin, thereby inducing a conformational change (like the change induced by acid) allowing its recognition in a renin-specific assay. Consequently, aliskiren can be used to measure prorenin. VTP-27999 is a new renin inhibitor with an aliskiren-like IC50 and t1/2, and a much higher bioavailability. This study addressed (pro)renin changes during treatment of volunteers with VTP-27999 or aliskiren. Both drugs increased renin immunoreactivity. Treatment of plasma samples from aliskiren-treated subjects with excess aliskiren yielded higher renin immunoreactivity levels, confirming the presence of prorenin. Unexpectedly, this approach did not work in VTP-27999-treated subjects, although an assay detecting the prosegment revealed that their blood still contained prorenin. Subsequent in vitro analysis showed that VTP-27999 increased renin immunoreactivity for a given amount of renin by ≥30% but did not unfold prorenin. Yet, it did bind to acid-activated, intact prorenin and then again increased immunoreactivity in a renin assay. However, no such increase in immunoreactivity was seen when measuring acid-activated prorenin bound to VTP-27999 with a prosegment-directed assay. The VTP-27999-induced rises in renin immunoreactivity could be competitively prevented by aliskiren, and antibody displacement studies revealed a higher affinity of the active site-directed antibodies in the presence of VTP-27999. In conclusion, VTP-27999 increases renin immunoreactivity in renin immunoassays because it affects the affinity of the active site-directed antibody. Combined with its lack of effect on prorenin, these data show that VTP-27999 differs from aliskiren. The clinical relevance of these results needs to be established. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Newly developed renin and prorenin assays and the clinical evaluation of renin inhibitors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29536/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen the introduction of renin inhibitors and new plasma renin and prorenin assays, which has led to a better understanding of the tissue renin-angiotensin system. AIM OF THE STUDY: To clarify the consequences of these developments for the methodology and interpretation of measurements of renin and prorenin. METHODS: The principles and application of the newly developed immunosorbent assays (ISAs) are surveyed and the results are compared with those of enzyme-kinetic assays (EKAs). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin (Ang) II in cardiac, renal and adrenal tissue is known to originate mainly from locally produced Ang I. Experimental evidence and theoretical considerations show that a simple relation between Ang II receptor occupancy, in tissue micromilieu, and the circulating levels of Ang II or renin may not exist. This supports the clinicians' view that the plasma level of renin tells more about the mechanisms regulating its release into the circulation than about the Ang II-dependency of hypertension. ISAs are a welcome addition to clinical studies of renin inhibitors. By comparing the results of ISAs with those of EKAs, the inhibitor-bound forms of renin and prorenin can be distinguished from the unbound forms. ISAs also provide important information on the molecular basis of prorenin activation. We propose a single kinetic model to incorporate the conformational changes of prorenin induced by cryo-activation and acid-activation, and by binding to renin inhibitors. It explains why renin ISAs can overestimate the rise of renin in response to these drugs, and shows how to deal with this artefact. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prorenin-induced myocyte proliferation: no role for intracellular angiotensin II (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9867/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-03-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Cardiomyocytes bind, internalize, and activate prorenin, the inactive
      precursor of renin, via a mannose 6-phosphate receptor (M6PR)--dependent
      mechanism. M6PRs couple directly to G-proteins. To investigate whether
      prorenin binding to cardiomyocytes elicits a response, and if so, whether
      this response depends on angiotensin (Ang) II, we incubated neonatal rat
      cardiomyocytes with 2 nmol/L prorenin and/or 150 nmol/L angiotensinogen,
      with or without 10 mmol/L M6P, 1 micromol/L eprosartan, or 1 micromol/L
      PD123319 to block M6P and AT(1) and AT(2) receptors, respectively. Protein
      and DNA synthesis were studied by quantifying [(3)H]-leucine and
      [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation. For comparison, studies with 100 nmol/L
      Ang II were also performed. Neither prorenin alone, nor angiotensinogen
      alone, affected protein or DNA synthesis. Prorenin plus angiotensinogen
      increased [(3)H]-leucine incorporation (+21 +/- 5%, mean +/- SEM, P&lt;0.01),
      [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation (+29 +/- 6%, P&lt;0.01), and total cellular
      protein (+14 +/- 3%, P&lt;0.01), whereas Ang II increased DNA synthesis only
      (+34 +/- 7%, P&lt;0.01). Eprosartan, but not PD123319 or M6P, blocked the
      effects of prorenin plus angiotensinogen as well as the effects of Ang II.
      Medium Ang II levels during prorenin and angiotensinogen incubation were
      &lt;1 nmol/L. In conclusion, prorenin binding to M6PRs on cardiomyocytes per
      se does not result in enhanced protein or DNA synthesis. However, through
      Ang II generation, prorenin is capable of inducing myocyte hypertrophy and
      proliferation. Because this generation occurs independently of M6PRs, it
      most likely depends on the catalytic activity of intact prorenin in the
      medium (because of temporal prosegment unfolding) rather than its
      intracellular activation. Taken together, our results do not support the
      concept of Ang II generation in cardiomyocytes following intracellular
      prorenin activation.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Vasoconstriction is determined by interstitial rather than circulating angiotensin II. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13005/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>1. We investigated why angiotensin (Ang) I and II induce vasoconstriction
      with similar potencies, although Ang I-II conversion is limited. 2.
      Construction of concentration-response curves to Ang I and II in porcine
      femoral arteries, in the absence or presence of the AT(1) or AT(2)
      receptor antagonists irbesartan and PD123319, revealed that the
      approximately 2 fold difference in potency between Ang I and II was not
      due to stimulation of different AT receptor populations by exogenous and
      locally generated Ang II. 3. Measurement of Ang I and II and their
      metabolites at the time of vasoconstriction confirmed that, at equimolar
      application of Ang I and II, bath fluid Ang II during Ang I was
      approximately 18 times lower than during Ang II and that Ang II was by far
      the most important metabolite of Ang I. Tissue Ang II was 2.9+/-1.5% and
      12.2+/-2.4% of the corresponding Ang I and II bath fluid levels, and was
      not affected by irbesartan or PD123319, suggesting that it was located
      extracellularly. 4. Since approximately 15% of tissue weight consists of
      interstitial fluid, it can be calculated that interstitial Ang II levels
      during Ang II resemble bath fluid Ang II levels, whereas during Ang I they
      are 8.8 - 27 fold higher. Consequently at equimolar application of Ang I
      and II, the interstitial Ang II levels differ only 2 - 4 fold. 5.
      Interstitial, rather than circulating Ang II determines vasoconstriction.
      Arterial Ang I, resulting in high interstitial Ang II levels via its local
      conversion by ACE, may be of greater physiological importance than
      arterial Ang II.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cardiomyocytes bind and activate native human prorenin : role of soluble mannose 6-phosphate receptors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9601/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Cardiomyocytes bind, internalize, and activate recombinant human prorenin
          through mannose 6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II (M6P/IGFII)
          receptors. To investigate whether this also applies to native human
          prorenin, neonatal rat myocytes were incubated for 4 hours at 37 degrees C
          with various prorenin-containing human body fluids. Uptake and activation
          by M6P/IGFII receptors were observed for plasma prorenin from subjects
          with renal artery stenosis and/or hypertension and for follicular fluid
          prorenin. The total amount of cellular renin and prorenin (expressed as
          percentage of the levels of renin and prorenin in the medium) after 4
          hours of incubation was 4 to 10 times lower than after incubation with
          recombinant human prorenin. Although plasma contains alkaline phosphatases
          capable of inactivating the M6P label as well as soluble M6P/IGFII
          receptors that block prorenin binding in a competitive manner and proteins
          (eg, insulin, IGFII) that increase the number of cell-surface M6P/IGFII
          receptors, these factors were not responsible for the modest uptake of
          native human prorenin. Uptake did not occur during incubation of myocytes
          with plasma prorenin from anephric subjects or with amniotic fluid
          prorenin, and this was not due to the presence of excessively high levels
          of M6P/IGFII receptors and/or phosphatase activity in these fluids. In
          conclusion, myocytes are capable of binding, internalizing, and activating
          native human prorenin of renal and ovarian origin through M6P/IGFII
          receptors. Differences in prorenin glycosylation and/or phosphorylation as
          well as the concentration of soluble M6P/IGFII receptors and growth
          factors affecting cell-surface M6P/IGFII receptor density determine the
          amount of prorenin entering the heart and thus cardiac angiotensin II
          production.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High-affinity prorenin binding to cardiac man-6-P/IGF-II receptors precedes proteolytic activation to renin (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9611/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Mannose-6-phosphate (man-6-P)/insulin-like growth factor-II
      (man-6-P/IgF-II) receptors are involved in the activation of recombinant
      human prorenin by cardiomyocytes. To investigate the kinetics of this
      process, the nature of activation, the existence of other prorenin
      receptors, and binding of native prorenin, neonatal rat cardiomyocytes
      were incubated with recombinant, renal, or amniotic fluid prorenin with or
      without man-6-P. Intact and activated prorenin were measured in cell
      lysates with prosegment- and renin-specific antibodies, respectively. The
      dissociation constant (K(d)) and maximum number of binding sites (B(max))
      for prorenin binding to man-6-P/IGF-II receptors were 0.6 +/- 0.1 nM and
      3,840 +/- 510 receptors/myocyte, respectively. The capacity for prorenin
      internalization was greater than 10 times B(max). Levels of internalized
      intact prorenin decreased rapidly (half-life = 5 +/- 3 min) indicating
      proteolytic prosegment removal. Prorenin subdivision into man-6-P-free and
      man-6-P-containing fractions revealed that only the latter was bound.
      Cells also bound and activated renal but not amniotic fluid prorenin. We
      concluded that cardiomyocytes display high-affinity binding of renal but
      not extrarenal prorenin exclusively via man-6-P/IGF-II receptors. Binding
      precedes internalization and proteolytic activation to renin thereby
      supporting the concept of cardiac angiotensin formation by renal prorenin.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prorenin accumulation and activation in human endothelial cells: importance of mannose 6-phosphate receptors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9651/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>ACE inhibitors improve endothelial dysfunction, possibly by blocking
          endothelial angiotensin production. Prorenin, through its binding and
          activation by endothelial mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) receptors, may
          contribute to this production. Here, we investigated this possibility as
          well as prorenin activation kinetics, the nature of the
          prorenin-activating enzyme, and M6P receptor-independent prorenin binding.
          Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were incubated with
          wild-type prorenin, K/A-2 prorenin (in which Lys42 is mutated to Ala,
          thereby preventing cleavage by known proteases), M6P-free prorenin, and
          nonglycosylated prorenin, with or without M6P, protease inhibitors, or
          angiotensinogen. HUVECs bound only M6P-containing prorenin (K(d) 0.9+/-0.1
          nmol/L, maximum number of binding sites [B(max)] 1010+/-50
          receptors/cell). At 37 degrees C, because of M6P receptor recycling, the
          amount of prorenin internalized via M6P receptors was &gt;25 times B(max).
          Inside the cells, wild-type and K/A-2 prorenin were proteolytically
          activated to renin. Renin was subsequently degraded. Protease inhibitors
          interfered with the latter but not with prorenin activation, thereby
          indicating that the activating enzyme is different from any of the known
          prorenin-activating enzymes. Incubation with angiotensinogen did not lead
          to endothelial angiotensin generation, inasmuch as HUVECs were unable to
          internalize angiotensinogen. Most likely, therefore, in the absence of
          angiotensinogen synthesis or endocytosis, M6P receptor-mediated prorenin
          internalization by endothelial cells represents prorenin clearance.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Functional importance of angiotensin-converting enzyme-dependent in situ angiotensin II generation in the human forearm (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9290/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To assess the importance for vasoconstriction of in situ angiotensin (Ang)
          II generation, as opposed to Ang II delivery via the circulation, we
          determined forearm vasoconstriction in response to Ang I (0.1 to 10 ng.
          kg(-1). min(-1)) and Ang II (0.1 to 5 ng. kg(-1). min(-1)) in 14
          normotensive male volunteers (age 18 to 67 years). Changes in forearm
          blood flow (FBF) were registered with venous occlusion plethysmography.
          Arterial and venous blood samples were collected under steady-state
          conditions to quantify forearm fractional Ang I-to-II conversion. Ang I
          and II exerted the same maximal effect (mean+/-SEM 71+/-4% and 75+/-4%
          decrease in FBF, respectively), with similar potencies (mean EC(50)
          [range] 5.6 [0.30 to 12.0] nmol/L for Ang I and 3.6 [0.37 to 7.1] nmol/L
          for Ang II). Forearm fractional Ang I-to-II conversion was 36% (range 18%
          to 57%). The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalaprilat (80
          ng. kg(-1). min(-1)) inhibited the contractile effects of Ang I and
          reduced fractional conversion to 1% (0.1% to 8%), thereby excluding a role
          for Ang I-to-II converting enzymes other than ACE (eg, chymase). The Ang
          II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan (3 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)) inhibited
          the vasoconstrictor effects of Ang II. In conclusion, the similar
          potencies of Ang I and II in the forearm, combined with the fact that only
          one third of arterially delivered Ang I is converted to Ang II, suggest
          that in situ-generated Ang II is more important for vasoconstriction than
          circulating Ang II. Local Ang II generation in the forearm depends on ACE
          exclusively and results in vasoconstriction via Ang II type 1 receptors.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9304/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis are often
          treated with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. However, the
          long-term effects of this procedure on blood pressure are not well
          understood. METHODS: We randomly assigned 106 patients with hypertension
          who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis (defined as a decrease in
          luminal diameter of 50 percent or more) and a serum creatinine
          concentration of 2.3 mg per deciliter (200 micromol per liter) or less to
          undergo percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or to receive drug
          therapy. To be included, patients also had to have a diastolic blood
          pressure of 95 mm Hg or higher despite treatment with two antihypertensive
          drugs or an increase of at least 0.2 mg per deciliter (20 micromol per
          liter) in the serum creatinine concentration during treatment with an
          angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Blood pressure, doses of
          antihypertensive drugs, and renal function were assessed at 3 and 12
          months, and patency of the renal artery was assessed at 12 months.
          RESULTS: At base line, the mean (+/-SD) systolic and diastolic blood
          pressures were 179+/-25 and 104+/-10 mm Hg, respectively, in the
          angioplasty group and 180+/-23 and 103+/-8 mm Hg, respectively, in the
          drug-therapy group. At three months, the blood pressures were similar in
          the two groups (169+/-28 and 99+/-12 mm Hg, respectively, in the 56
          patients in the angioplasty group and 176+/-31 and 101+/-14 mm Hg,
          respectively, in the 50 patients in the drug-therapy group; P=0.25 for the
          comparison of systolic pressure and P=0.36 for the comparison of diastolic
          pressure between the two groups); at the time, patients in the angioplasty
          group were taking 2.1+/-1.3 defined daily doses of medication and those in
          the drug-therapy group were taking 3.2+/-1.5 daily doses (P&lt;0.001). In the
          drug-therapy group, 22 patients underwent balloon angioplasty after three
          months because of persistent hypertension despite treatment with three or
          more drugs or because of a deterioration in renal function. According to
          intention-to-treat analysis, at 12 months, there were no significant
          differences between the angioplasty and drug-therapy groups in systolic
          and diastolic blood pressures, daily drug doses, or renal function.
          CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of patients with hypertension and
          renal-artery stenosis, angioplasty has little advantage over
          antihypertensive-drug therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade prevent cardiac remodeling in pigs after myocardial infarction: role of tissue angiotensin II (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9471/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The mechanisms behind the beneficial effects of
      renin-angiotensin system blockade after myocardial infarction (MI) are not
      fully elucidated but may include interference with tissue angiotensin II
      (Ang II). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-nine pigs underwent coronary artery
      ligation or sham operation and were studied up to 6 weeks. To determine
      coronary angiotensin I (Ang I) to Ang II conversion and to distinguish
      plasma-derived Ang II from locally synthesized Ang II, (125)I-labeled and
      endogenous Ang I and II were measured in plasma and in infarcted and
      noninfarcted left ventricle (LV) during (125)I-Ang I infusion. Ang II type
      1 (AT(1)) receptor-mediated uptake of circulating (125)I-Ang II was
      increased at 1 and 3 weeks in noninfarcted LV, and this uptake was the
      main cause of the transient elevation in Ang II levels in the noninfarcted
      LV at 1 week. Ang II levels and AT(1) receptor-mediated uptake of
      circulating Ang II were reduced in the infarct area at all time points.
      Coronary Ang I to Ang II conversion was unaffected by MI. Captopril and
      the AT(1) receptor antagonist eprosartan attenuated postinfarct
      remodeling, although both drugs increased cardiac Ang II production.
      Captopril blocked coronary conversion by &gt;80% and normalized Ang II uptake
      in the noninfarcted LV. Eprosartan did not affect coronary conversion and
      blocked cardiac Ang II uptake by &gt;90%. CONCLUSIONS: Both circulating and
      locally generated Ang II contribute to remodeling after MI. The rise in
      tissue Ang II production during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition
      and AT(1) receptor blockade suggests that the antihypertrophic effects of
      these drugs result not only from diminished AT(1) receptor stimulation but
      also from increased stimulation of growth-inhibitory Ang II type 2
      receptors.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Improved immunoradiometric assay for plasma renin (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9107/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Our renin IRMA overestimated renin in plasmas with high
          prorenin-to-renin ratios. We suspected that the overestimation of renin
          was caused less by cross-reactivity of the renin-specific antibody with
          prorenin than by a conformational change of prorenin into an enzymatically
          active form during the assay. METHODS: Because the inactive form of
          prorenin converts slowly into an active form at low temperature, we raised
          the assay temperature from 22 degrees C to 37 degrees C, simultaneously
          shortening the incubation time from 24 to 6 h. The former IRMA was
          performed in &lt;1 working day with these modifications. RESULTS: The
          comeasurement of prorenin as renin was eliminated. Reagents were stable at
          37 degrees C, and the new and old IRMAs were comparable in terms of
          precision and accuracy. The functional lower limit of the assay (4 mU/L)
          was below the lower reference limit (9 mU/L). The modified IRMA agreed
          closely with the activities measured with an enzyme-kinetic assay. Results
          were not influenced by the plasma concentration of angiotensinogen. At
          normal angiotensinogen concentrations, the IRMA closely correlated with
          the classical enzyme-kinetic assay of plasma renin activity. CONCLUSION:
          The modified IRMA, performed at 37 degrees C, avoids interference by
          prorenin while retaining the desirable analytical characteristics of the
          older IRMA and requiring less time.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Plasma renin and prorenin and renin gene variation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and nephropathy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9155/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The most striking abnormality in the renin angiotensin system
      in diabetic nephropathy (DN) is increased plasma prorenin. Renin is
      thought to be low or normal in DN. In spite of altered (pro)renin
      regulation the renin gene has not been studied for contribution to the
      development of DN. METHODS: We studied plasma renin, prorenin, and four
      polymorphic markers of the renin gene in 199 patients with IDDM and DN,
      and in 192 normoalbuminuric IDDM controls matched for age, sex, and
      duration of diabetes. Plasma renin and total renin were measured by
      immunoradiometric assays. Genotyping was PCR-based. RESULTS: Plasma renin
      was increased in patients with nephropathy (median (range), 26.3
      (5.2-243.3) vs 18.3 (4.2-373.5) microU/ml in the normoalbuminuric group,
      P&lt;0.0001). Prorenin levels were elevated out of proportion to renin levels
      in nephropathic patients (789 (88-5481) vs 302 (36-2226) microU/ml,
      P&lt;0.0001). Proliferative retinopathy had an additive effect on plasma
      prorenin, but not on renin. DN was associated with a BglI RFLP in the
      first intron of the renin gene (bb-genotype: n=106 vs 82 in DN and
      normoalbuminuric patients respectively, P=0.037), but not with three other
      polymorphisms in the renin gene. A trend for association of higher
      prorenin levels with the DN-associated allele of this renin polymorphism
      was observed in a subgroup of patients with DN (bb vs Bb+BB, P=0.07).
      CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that in DN there is an increase in both
      renin and prorenin levels. A renin gene polymorphism may contribute weakly
      to DN. Although speculative, one of the renin gene alleles could lead to
      increased renin gene expression, leading to higher renin and prorenin
      levels. These may play a role in the pathogenesis of DN.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Localization and production of angiotensin II in the isolated perfused rat heart (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8817/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We used a modification of the isolated perfused rat heart, in which
          coronary effluent and interstitial transudate were separately collected,
          to investigate the localization and production of angiotensin II (Ang II)
          in the heart. During combined renin (0.7 to 1.5 pmol Ang I/mL per minute)
          and angiotensinogen (6 to 12 pmol/mL) perfusion (4 to 8 mL/min) for 60
          minutes (n=3), the steady-state levels of Ang II in interstitial
          transudate in two consecutive 10-minute periods were 4.3+/-1.5 and
          3.6+/-1.5 fmol/mL compared with 1.1+/-0.4 and 1.1+/-0.6 fmol/mL in
          coronary effluent (mean+/-half range). During perfusion with Ang II (n=5),
          steady-state Ang II in interstitial transudate was 32+/-19% of arterial
          Ang II compared with 65+/-16% in coronary effluent (mean+/-SD, P&lt;.02).
          During perfusion with Ang I (n=5), Ang II in interstitial transudate was
          5.1+/-0.6% of arterial Ang I compared with 2.2+/-0.3% in coronary effluent
          (P&lt;.05). The tissue concentration of Ang II in the combined
          renin/angiotensinogen perfusions (per gram) was as high as the
          concentration in interstitial transudate (per milliliter). Addition of
          losartan (10(-6) mol/L) to the renin/angiotensinogen perfusion (n=3) had
          no significant effect on the tissue level of Ang II, whereas losartan in
          the perfusions with Ang I (n=5) or Ang II (n=5) decreased tissue Ang II to
          undetectably low levels. The results indicate that the heart is capable of
          producing Ang II and that this can lead to higher levels in tissue than in
          blood plasma. Cardiac Ang II does not appear to be restricted to the
          extracellular fluid. This is in part due to AT1-receptor-mediated cellular
          uptake of extracellular Ang II, but our results also raise the possibility
          of intracellular Ang II production.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Angiotensin production by the heart: a quantitative study in pigs with the use of radiolabeled angiotensin infusions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8864/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors on the heart may be
          mediated by decreased cardiac angiotensin II (Ang II) production. METHODS
          AND RESULTS: To determine whether cardiac Ang I and Ang II are produced in
          situ or derived from the circulation, we infused 125I-labeled Ang I or II
          into pigs (25 to 30 kg) and measured 125I-Ang I and II as well as
          endogenous Ang I and II in cardiac tissue and blood plasma. In untreated
          pigs, the tissue Ang II concentration (per gram wet weight) in different
          parts of the heart was 5 times the concentration (per milliliter) in
          plasma, and the tissue Ang I concentration was 75% of the plasma Ang I
          concentration. Tissue 125I-Ang II during 125I-Ang II infusion was 75% of
          125I-Ang II in arterial plasma, whereas tissue 125I-Ang I during 125I-Ang
          I infusion was &lt;4% of 125I-Ang I in arterial plasma. After treatment with
          the ACE inhibitor captopril (25 mg twice daily), Ang II fell in plasma but
          not in tissue, and Ang I and renin rose both in plasma and tissue, whereas
          angiotensinogen did not change in plasma and fell in tissue. Tissue
          125I-Ang II derived by conversion from arterially delivered 125I-Ang I
          fell from 23% to &lt;2% of 125I-Ang I in arterial plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Most
          of the cardiac Ang II appears to be produced at tissue sites by conversion
          of in situ-synthesized rather than blood-derived Ang I. Our study also
          indicates that under certain experimental conditions, the heart can
          maintain its Ang II production, whereas the production of circulating Ang
          II is effectively suppressed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>AT1 receptor A/C1166 polymorphism contributes to cardiac hypertrophy in subjects with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8935/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in subjects with
          hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is variable, suggesting a role for
          modifying factors such as angiotensin II. We investigated whether the
          angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) A/C1166 polymorphism, the
          angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism,
          and/or plasma renin influence LVH in HCM. Left ventricular mass index
          (LVMI) and interventricular septal thickness were determined by
          2-dimensional echocardiography in 104 genetically independent subjects
          with HCM. Extent of hypertrophy was quantified by a point score (Wigle
          score). Plasma prorenin, renin, and ACE were measured by immunoradiometric
          or fluorometric assays, and ACE and AT1-R genotyping were performed by
          polymerase chain reactions. The ACE D allele did not affect any of the
          measured parameters except plasma ACE (P&lt;0.04). LVMI was higher (P&lt;0.05)
          in patients carrying the AT1-R C allele (190+/-8.3 g/m2) than in AA
          homozygotes (168+/-7.2 g/m2), and similar patterns were observed for
          interventricular septal thickness (23.0+/-0.7 versus 21. 6+/-0.7 mm) and
          Wigle score (7.0+/-0.3 versus 6.3+/-0.3). Plasma renin was higher (P=0.05)
          in carriers of the C allele than in AA homozygotes. Multivariate
          regression analysis, however, revealed no independent role for renin in
          the prediction of LVMI. Plasma prorenin and ACE were not affected by the
          AT1-R A/C1166 polymorphism, nor did the ACE and AT1-R polymorphisms
          interact with regard to any of the measured parameters. We conclude that
          the AT1-R C1166 allele modulates the phenotypic expression of hypertrophy
          in HCM, independently of plasma renin and the ACE I/D polymorphism.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Human renal and systemic hemodynamic, natriuretic, and neurohumoral responses to different doses of L-NAME (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8977/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Experimental evidence indicates that the renal circulation is more
          sensitive to the effects of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis inhibition than
          other vascular beds. To explore whether in men the NO-mediated vasodilator
          tone is greater in the renal than in the systemic circulation, the effects
          of three different intravenous infusions of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl
          ester (L-NAME; 1, 5, and 25 microg. kg-1. min-1 for 30 min) or placebo on
          mean arterial pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), renal
          blood flow (RBF), renal vascular resistance (RVR), glomerular filtration
          rate (GFR), and fractional sodium and lithium excretion (FENa and FELi)
          were studied in 12 healthy subjects, each receiving randomly two of the
          four treatments on two different occasions. MAP was measured continuously
          by means of the Finapres device, and stroke volume was calculated by a
          model flow method. GFR and RBF were estimated from the clearances of
          radiolabeled thalamate and hippuran. Systemic and renal hemodynamics were
          followed for 2 h after start of infusions. During placebo, renal and
          systemic hemodynamics and FENa and FELi remained stable. With the low and
          intermediate L-NAME doses, maximal increments in SVR and RVR were similar:
          20.4 +/- 19.6 and 23.5 +/- 16.0%, respectively, with the low dose and 31.4
          +/- 26.7 and 31.2 +/- 14.4%, respectively, with the intermediate dose
          (means +/- SD). With the high L-NAME dose, the increment in RVR was
          greater than the increment in SVR. Despite a decrease in RBF, FENa and
          FELi did not change with the low L-NAME dose, but they decreased by 31.2
          +/- 11.0 and 20.2 +/- 6.3%, respectively, with the intermediate dose and
          by 70.8 +/- 8.1 and 31.5 +/- 15.9% with the high L-NAME dose,
          respectively. It is concluded that in men the renal circulation is not
          more sensitive to the effects of NO synthesis inhibition than the systemic
          circulation and that the threshold for NO synthesis inhibition to produce
          antinatriuresis is higher than the threshold level to cause renal
          vasoconstriction.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Circadian variation of heart rate but not of blood pressure after heart transplantation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5285/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>