<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Raemaekers, J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6393/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>A phase II study of enzastaurin, a protein kinase C beta inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29952/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Protein kinase C beta (PKCβ), a pivotal enzyme in B-cell signaling and survival, is overexpressed in most cases of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Activation of PI3K/AKT pathway is involved in pathogenesis of MCL. Enzastaurin, an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, suppresses signaling through PKCβ/PI3K/AKT pathways, induces apoptosis, reduces proliferation, and suppresses tumor-induced angiogenesis. Patients and methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, and no more than four regimens of prior therapy, received 500 mg enzastaurin, orally, once daily. Results: Sixty patients, median age 66 years (range 45-85), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to two (48% had baseline International Prognostic Index of 3-5), were enrolled. Most patients had prior CHOP-like chemotherapy and/or rituximab (median = 2 regimens). No drug-related deaths occurred. There was one case each of grade 3 anemia, diarrhea, dyspnea, vomiting, hypotension, and syncope. Fatigue was the most common toxicity. Although no objective tumor responses occurred, 22 patients (37%, 95% CI 25% to 49%) were free from progression (FFP) for ≥3 cycles (one cycle = 28 days); 6 of 22 were FFP for &gt;6 months. Two patients remain on treatment and FFP at &gt;23 months. Conclusion: Freedom from progression for &gt;6 months in six patients and a favorable toxicity profile with minimal hematological toxicity indicate that enzastaurin warrants evaluation as maintenance therapy and combination chemotherapy in MCL. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiation in early-stage Hodgkin's disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35106/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-11-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Treatment of early-stage Hodgkin's disease is usually tailored in line with prognostic factors that allow for reductions in the amount of chemotherapy and extent of radiotherapy required for a possible cure. METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, we identified 1538 patients (age, 15 to 70 years) who had untreated stage I or II supradiaphragmatic Hodgkin's disease with favorable prognostic features (the H8-F trial) or unfavorable features (the H8-U trial). In the H8-F trial, we compared three cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) combined with doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (ABV) plus involved-field radiotherapy with subtotal nodal radiotherapy alone (reference group). In the H8-U trial, we compared three regimens: six cycles of MOPP-ABV plus involved-field radiotherapy (reference group), four cycles of MOPP-ABV plus involved-field radiotherapy, and four cycles of MOPP-ABV plus subtotal nodal radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 92 months. In the H8-F trial, the estimated 5-year eventfree survival rate was significantly higher after three cycles of MOPP-ABV plus involved-field radiotherapy than after subtotal nodal radiotherapy alone (98% vs. 74%, P&lt;0.001). The 10-year overall survival estimates were 97% and 92%, respectively (P = 0.001). In the H8-U trial, the estimated 5-year event-free survival rates were similar in the three treatment groups: 84% after six cycles of MOPP-ABV plus involved-field radiotherapy, 88% after four cycles of MOPP-ABV plus involved-field radiotherapy, and 87% after four cycles of MOPP-ABV plus subtotal nodal radiotherapy. The 10-year overall survival estimates were 88%, 85%, and 84%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy plus involved-field radiotherapy should be the standard treatment for Hodgkin's disease with favorable prognostic features. In patients with unfavorable features, four courses of chemotherapy plus involved-field radiotherapy should be the standard treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00379041.) Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Involved-field radiotherapy for patients in partial remission after chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36151/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The use of radiotherapy in patients with advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to describe the role of radiotherapy in patients with advanced HL who were in partial remission (PR) after chemotherapy. Methods: In a prospective randomized trial, patients &lt;70 years old with previously untreated Stage III-IV HL were treated with six to eight cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/doxorubicin, bleomycine, vinblastine hybrid chemotherapy. Patients in complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy were randomized between no further treatment and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT). Those in PR after six cycles received IF-RT (30 Gy to originally involved nodal areas and 18-24 Gy to extranodal sites with or without a boost). Results: Of 739 enrolled patients, 57% were in CR and 33% in PR after chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 7.8 years. Patients in PR had bulky mediastinal involvement significantly more often than did those in CR after chemotherapy. The 8-year event-free survival and overall survival rate for the 227 patients in PR who received IF-RT was 76% and 84%, respectively. These rates were not significantly different from those for CR patients who received IF-RT (73% and 78%) or for those in CR who did not receive IF-RT (77% and 85%). The incidence of second malignancies in patients in PR who were treated with IF-RT was similar to that in nonirradiated patients. Conclusion: Patients in PR after six cycles of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone/doxorubicine, bleomycine, vinblastine treated with IF-RT had 8-year event-free survival and overall survival rates similar to those of patients in CR, suggesting a definite role for RT in these patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A novel method to compensate for different amplification efficiencies between patient DNA samples in quantitative real-time PCR (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9632/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Quantification of residual disease by real-time polymerase chain reaction
      (PCR) will become a pivotal tool in the development of patient-directed
      therapy. In recent years, various protocols to quantify minimal residual
      disease in leukemia or lymphoma patients have been developed. These assays
      assume that PCR efficiencies are equal for all samples. Determining
      t(14;18) and albumin reaction efficiencies for sixteen follicular lymphoma
      patient samples revealed higher efficiencies for blood samples than for
      lymph node samples in general. However, within one sample both reactions
      had equivalent efficiencies. Differences in amplification efficiencies
      between patient samples (low efficiencies) and the calibrator in
      quantitative analyses result in the underestimation of residual disease in
      patient samples whereby the weakest positive patient samples are at
      highest error. Based on these findings for patient samples, the efficiency
      compensation control was developed. This control includes two reference
      reactions in a multiplex setting, specific for the beta-actin and albumin
      housekeeping genes that are present in a constant ratio within DNA
      templates. The difference in threshold cycle values for both reference
      reactions, ie, the Ct(2) value, is dependent on the amplification
      efficiency, and is used to compensate for efficiency differences between
      patient samples and the calibrator. The beta-actin reference reaction is
      also used to normalize for DNA input. Furthermore, the efficiency
      compensation control facilitates identification of patient samples that
      are so contaminated with PCR inhibitory compounds that different
      amplification reactions are affected to a different extent. Accurate
      quantitation of residual disease in these samples is therefore impossible
      with the current quantitative real-time PCR protocols. Identification and
      exclusion of these inadequate samples will be of utmost importance in
      quantitative retrospective studies, but even more so, in future molecular
      diagnostic analyses.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>