<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Klijn, J.G.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/664/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Correlation of breast cancer susceptibility loci with patient characteristics, metastasis-free survival, and mRNA expression of the nearest genes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24041/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-07-12T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To understand the biology of low-risk breast cancer alleles, and to investigate whether these loci also contribute to disease progression that was once established, we examined the association of SNPs tagging the low-risk breast cancer loci in or near FGFR2, LSP1, MAP3K1,H19, TOX3, POU5F1P1, MYC, and 2q35, with clinical, pathological characteristics, prognosis, and mRNA expression of the nearest genes. Tumor DNA samples of 2,480 breast cancer patients were available. Out of this cohort, 1,290 patients with lymph-node negative disease who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, the SNP status was associated with metastasis-free survival (MFS). In 1,401 patients, the mRNA expression levels of FGFR2, LSP1, MAP3K1,H19, TOX3, POU5F1P1, and MYC were determined and correlated with SNP genotypes. The SNP rs2981582 in FGFR2 was significantly associated with positive ER and PgR status (P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). No other significant associations with patient or tumor characteristics were observed. Only rs2107425 near H19 was significantly associated with shorter MFS in uni- and multi-variate analysis (HR: 1.53, CI: 1.12-2.08, P = 0.006 and HR: 1.59, CI: 1.16-2.20, P = 0.004, respectively), with the more aggressive minor allele displaying a recessive trait. The minor allele of SNP rs3803662 located near the TOX3 gene was associated with lower mRNA expression of this gene. In conclusion, except for the association of rs13283662 with TOX3 gene expression indicating a tumor suppressor role of TOX3, our findings suggest that breast cancer low-risk loci generally do not affect expression of the nearest gene in breast tumor tissue. Also the prognosis of patients is largely not affected by low-risk breast cancer loci except for the SNP near H19. How, this SNP affects prognosis warrants further study as it does not operate through altering H19 mRNA expression. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Gene expression profiling assigns CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers to the luminal intrinsic subtypes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26314/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-26T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>CHEK2 1100delC is a moderate-risk cancer susceptibility allele that confers a high breast cancer risk in a polygenic setting. Gene expression profiling of CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers may reveal clues to the nature of the polygenic CHEK2 model and its genes involved. Here, we report global gene expression profiles of a cohort of 155 familial breast cancers, including 26 CHEK2 1100delC mutant tumors. In line with previous work, all CHEK2 1100delC mutant tumors clustered among the hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. In the hormone receptor-positive subset, a 40-gene CHEK2 signature was subsequently defined that significantly associated with CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers. The identification of a CHEK2 gene signature implies an unexpected biological homogeneity among the CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers. In addition, all 26 CHEK2 1100delC tumors classified as luminal intrinsic subtype breast cancers, with 8 luminal A and 18 luminal B tumors. This biological make-up of CHEK2 1100delC breast cancers suggests that a relatively limited number of additional susceptibility alleles are involved in the polygenic CHEK2 model. Identification of these as-yet-unknown susceptibility alleles should be aided by clues from the 40-gene CHEK2 signature. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Randomized phase II study comparing efficacy and safety of combination-therapy trastuzumab and docetaxel vs. sequential therapy of trastuzumab followed by docetaxel alone at progression as first-line chemotherapy in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer: Hertax trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31168/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Because chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is associated with relevant toxicity, sequential monotherapy trastuzumab followed by cytotoxic therapy at disease progression might be an attractive approach. Methods: In a multicenter phase II trial, 101 patients with overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) MBC were randomized between combination-therapy trastuzumab (Herceptin) plus docetaxel (H + D) and sequential therapy of single-agent trastuzumab followed at disease progression by docetaxel alone (H→D) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after completed sequential or combination therapy. Results: For the H + D group the median PFS was 9.4 vs. 9.9 months for the H→D group and 1-year PFS rates were 44% vs. 35%, respectively. However the overall response rates (ORRs) were 79% vs. 53%, respectively (P =.016), and overall survival was 30.5 vs. 19.7 months, respectively (P =.11). In the H→D group, response rates to monotherapy trastuzumab and subsequent docetaxel were 34% and 39%, respectively, with a median PFS during single-agent trastuzumab of 3.9 months. The incidence and severity of neuropathy were significantly higher in the H + D group. Retrospective analysis of trastuzumab treatment beyond progression (applied in 46% of patients in the H + D group and 37% in the H→D group) showed a correlation with longer overall survival in both treatment arms (36.0 vs. 18.0 months and 30.3 vs. 18.6 months, respectively). Conclusion: First-line treatment in patients with MBC with H→D resulted in a similar PFS compared with H + D, but the response rate was lower and the overall survival nonsignificantly shorter. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Distinct gene mutation profiles among luminal-type and basal-type breast cancer cell lines (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27720/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Breast cancer has for long been recognized as a highly diverse tumor group, but the underlying genetic basis has been elusive. Here, we report an extensive molecular characterization of a collection of 41 human breast cancer cell lines. Protein and gene expression analyses indicated that the collection of breast cancer cell lines has retained most, if not all, molecular characteristics that are typical for clinical breast cancers. Gene mutation analyses identified 146 oncogenic mutations among 27 well-known cancer genes, amounting to an average of 3.6 mutations per cell line. Mutations in genes from the p53, RB and PI3K tumor suppressor pathways were widespread among all breast cancer cell lines. Most important, we have identified two gene mutation profiles that are specifically associated with luminal-type and basal-type breast cancer cell lines. The luminal mutation profile involved E-cadherin and MAP2K4 gene mutations and amplifications of Cyclin D1, ERBB2 and HDM2, whereas the basal mutation profile involved BRCA1, RB1, RAS and BRAF gene mutations and deletions of p16 and p14ARF. These subtype-specific gene mutation profiles constitute a genetic basis for the heterogeneity observed among human breast cancers, providing clues for their underlying biology and providing guidance for targeted pharmacogenetic intervention in breast cancer patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Early diagnosis of hereditary breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging: What is realistic? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28015/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment of false-negative cases of breast MR imaging in women with a familial or genetic predisposition (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27708/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In order to assess the characteristics of malignant breast lesions those were not detected during screening by MR imaging. In the Dutch MRI screening study (MRISC), a non-randomized prospective multicenter study, women with high familial risk or a genetic predisposition for breast cancer were screened once a year by mammography and MRI and every 6 months with a clinical breast examination (CBE). The false-negative MR examinations were subject of this study and were retrospectively reviewed by two experienced radiologists. From November 1999 until March 2006, 2,157 women were eligible for study analyses. Ninety-seven malignant breast tumors were detected, including 19 DCIS (20%). In 22 patients with a malignant lesion, the MRI was assessed as BI-RADS 1 or 2. One patient was excluded because the examinations were not available for review. Forty-three percent (9/21) of the false-negative MR cases concerned pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with invasive foci, in eight of them no enhancement was seen at the review. In six patients the features of malignancy were missed or misinterpreted. Small lesion size (n = 3), extensive diffuse contrast enhancement of the breast parenchyma (n = 2), and a technically inadequate examination (n = 1) were other causes of the missed diagnosis. A major part of the false-negative MR diagnoses concerned non-enhancing DCIS, underlining the necessity of screening not only with MRI but also with mammography. Improvement of MRI scanning protocols may increase the detection rate of DCIS. The missed and misinterpreted cases are reflecting the learning curve of a multicenter study. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25360/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Preclinical as well as a few small retrospective, neoadjuvant studies suggest that breast cancer (cells) without functional BRCA1 or BRCA2 protein have an increased sensitivity to some chemotherapeutic agents causing double-strand DNA breaks. In this study we assessed the sensitivity to standard first-line chemotherapy of metastatic BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer, compared with sporadic breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods: From the Family Cancer Clinic database, we selected 93 BRCA1- and 28 BRCA2-associated breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease before January 1, 2007. Objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after start of first-line chemotherapy were compared with those of sporadic patients, matched for year of birth, age at diagnosis of primary breast cancer, and year of detection of metastatic disease. Results: The chemotherapy regimens most frequently used were anthracycline-based (n = 147) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)/CMF like (n = 68). As compared to sporadic patients, BRCA2-associated patients had a significantly higher OR (89% v 50%; P = .001), a longer PFS (hazard ratio multivariate [HRmult] 0.64; P = .04) and a prolonged OS (HRmult, 0.53; P = .005) after start of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. For BRCA1-associated patients, a nonsignificant trend for an increased OR (66% v 50%; P = .07), and a longer PFS (HRmult, 0.79; P = .14) after first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was observed, but not for OS. Conclusion: BRCA2-associated breast cancer is more sensitive to standard first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in comparison with sporadic breast cancer, especially to anthracyclines. For BRCA1-associated breast cancer no statistically significant higher sensitivity was observed. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Low-risk susceptibility alleles in 40 human breast cancer cell lines (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17054/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-07-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Low-risk breast cancer susceptibility alleles or SNPs confer only modest breast cancer risks ranging from just over 1.0 to 1.3 fold. Yet, they are common among most populations and therefore are involved in the development of essentially all breast cancers. The mechanism by which the low-risk SNPs confer breast cancer risks is currently unclear. The breast cancer association consortium BCAC has hypothesized that the low-risk SNPs modulate expression levels of nearby located genes. Methods: Genotypes of five low-risk SNPs were determined for 40 human breast cancer cell lines, by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified genomic templates. We have analyzed expression of the four genes that are located nearby the low-risk SNPs, by using real-time RT-PCR and Human Exon microarrays. Results: The SNP genotypes and additional phenotypic data on the breast cancer cell lines are presented. We did not detect any effect of the SNP genotypes on expression levels of the nearby-located genes MAP3K1, FGFR2, TNRC9 and LSP1. Conclusion: The SNP genotypes provide a base line for functional studies in a well-characterized cohort of 40 human breast cancer cell lines. Our expression analyses suggest that a putative disease mechanism through gene expression modulation is not operative in breast cancer cell lines.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25348/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Women at increased (genetic) risk of breast cancer have to weigh the personal pros and cons of prophylactic mastectomy (PM) as an option to reduce their cancer risk. So far, no routine referral to a psychologist has been investigated for women considering PM. Aim of this study was to asses: 1) the acceptance of the offer of a standard psychological consultation as part of pre-surgical decision-making in high-risk women, 2) reasons for PM and reasons for postponing it, 3) the need for additional psychological interventions, and factors associated, and 4) the frequency of psychiatric/psychological treatment history.Methods: During a 30 months period, women at high risk considering PM were offered a psychological consultation. The content of these, and follow-up, consultations were analyzed.Results: Most women (70 out of 73) accepted the psychological consultation, and 81% proceeded with PM. Main reasons for undergoing PM were to reduce anxiety about cancer, and to reduce the cancer risk. Uncertainty about surgery and the need for further information were the reasons given most frequently for postponing PM. Additional psychological support was given to 31% before and 14% after PM. The uptake of additional support was significantly higher in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation. A history of psychiatric/psychological treatment was present in 36%, mainly consisting of depression and grief after death of a mother.Conclusion: The uptake-rate of the standard psychological consultation indicates a high level of acceptability of this service for women deciding about PM. Since anxiety is one of the main reasons for considering PM, and depression and grief were present in a third, a standard consultation with a psychologist for high-risk women considering PM may be indicated. This may help them arrive at an informed decision, to detect and manage psychological distress, and to plan psychological support services. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Four human breast cancer cell lines with biallelic inactivating α-catenin gene mutations (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17410/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Mutations of E-cadherin have been identified in half of lobular breast cancers and diffuse-type gastric cancers, two tumor subtypes with remarkably similar pathological appearances including small rounded cells with scant cytoplasm and a diffuse growth pattern. A causal role for E-cadherin gene mutations in the lobular breast cancer phenotype was recently demonstrated in E-cadherin knock-out mice. These observations suggested that another gene in the E-cadherin tumor suppressor pathway might be mutated in lobular breast cancers with wild-type E-cadherin genes. Here, we identified E-cadherin gene mutations exclusively in human breast cancer cell lines that grow with a rounded cell morphology. Using expression analyses and gene mutation analyses, we have identified four biallelic inactivating α-catenin mutations among 55 human breast cancer cell lines. All four α-catenin mutations predicted premature termination of the encoded proteins, and concordantly, none of the four mutant cell lines expressed α-catenin proteins. Importantly, three of the α-catenin mutant cell lines had the rounded cell morphology and all 14 cell lines with the rounded cell morphology had mutations of either E-cadherin or α-catenin. As anticipated, loss of α-catenin protein expression was associated with the lobular subtype in primary breast cancers. Together, our observations suggest that α-catenin may be a new tumor suppressor gene that operates in the E-cadherin tumor suppressor pathway.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Deleterious CHEK2 1100delC and L303X mutants identified among 38 human breast cancer cell lines (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25021/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The CHEK2 protein plays a major role in the regulation of DNA damage response pathways. Mutations in the CHEK2 gene, in particular 1100delC, have been associated with increased cancer risks, but the precise function of CHEK2 mutations in carcinogenesis is not known. Human cancer cell lines with CHEK2 mutations are therefore of main interest. Here, we have sequenced 38 breast cancer cell lines for mutations in the CHEK2 gene and identified two cell lines with deleterious CHEK2 mutations. Cell line UACC812 has a nonsense truncating mutation in the CHEK2 kinase domain (L303X) and cell line SUM102PT has the well-known oncogenic CHEK2 1100delC founder mutation. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the two CHEK2 mutant cell lines expressed neither CHEK2 nor P-Thr68CHEK2 proteins, implying abrogation of normal CHEK2 DNA repair functions. Cell lines UACC812 and SUM102PT thus are the first human CHEK2 null cell lines reported and should therefore be a major help in further unraveling the function of CHEK2 mutations in carcinogenesis. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Distant disease-free interval, site of first relapse and post-relapse survival in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated compared to sporadic breast cancer patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29454/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Data on distant disease-free interval (DDFI) and the localization of the first distant metastasis (DM) in BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer (BC) patients are as yet scarcely available. Patients and methods: We identified 57 BRCA1-associated and 31 BRCA2-associated BC patients, diagnosed between 1980 and 2001, and developing DM disease before 2004, July 1. DDFI, the site(s) of first DM and post-relapse survival of these patients were compared with those of 192 sporadic BC patients. Results: As compared to sporadic patients, BRCA1 patients developed less often bone DM (30% vs. 51%; P = 0.005), but tended to develop more often lung DM (26% vs. 16%; P = 0.07), and DM at multiple sites (44% vs. 32%; P = 0.11). In BRCA2-associated compared to sporadic patients, first DM more commonly occurred in lymph nodes (23% vs. 7%; P = 0.007) and at multiple sites (48% vs. 32%; P = 0.08). Adjuvant systemic therapy appeared to be most effective in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Post-relapse survival was worse for BRCA1- and better for BRCA2-associated patients as compared to sporadic patients, but differences disappeared after adjustment for ER-status, site of first DM and DDFI. Conclusion: The site of first DM is different between BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated and sporadic BC patients. Differences in post-relapse survival could be explained by differences in site of first DM, in ER-status and in DDFI. Treatment efficacy may differ dependent on genetic status. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Association of an extracellular matrix gene cluster with breast cancer prognosis and endocrine therapy response (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30212/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: We previously discovered an extracellular matrix (ECM) gene cluster associated with resistance to first-line tamoxifen therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In this study, we determined whether the six individual ECM genes [collagen 1A1 (COL1A1), fibronectin 1 (FN1), lysyl oxidase (LOX), secreted protein acidic cysteine-rich (SPARC), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), and tenascin C (TNC)] were associated with treatment response, prognosis, or both. Experimental Design: In 1,286 primary breast tumors, mRNA expression (quantitative realtime PCR) was related to clinicopathologic factors and disease outcome in univariate and multivariate analysis including traditional factors. Results: TIMP3, FN1, LOX, and SPARC expression levels (continuous variables) were significantly associated with distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) in 680 lymph node-negative untreated patients (P &lt; 0.03). Using a calculated linear prognostic score, these patients were evenly divided into five prognostic groups with a significant difference in 10-year MFS of ∼40% between the two extreme prognostic groups. Furthermore, high TNC expression as continuous variable was associated with (a) shorter MFS in 139 estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-positive patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (hazard ratio, 1.53; P = 0.001), and (b) no clinical benefit (odds ratio, 0.81; P = 0.035) and shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.19; P = 0.002) in 240 patients in whom recurrence was treated with tamoxifen as first-line monotherapy. These results were also significant in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: FN1, LOX, SPARC, and TIMP3 expression levels are associated with the prognosis of patients with breast cancers, whereasTNC is associated with resistance to tamoxifen therapy. Further validation and functional studies are necessary to determine the use of these ECM genes in decisions regarding treatment and whether they can serve as targets for therapy. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>CHEK2 1100delC is a susceptibility allele for HNPCC-related colorectal cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15221/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: The pathogenic CHEK2 HOOdelC variant is firmly established as a breast cancer susceptibility allele. Dutch CHEK2 HOOdelC breast cancer families frequently also include colorectal cancer cases, and the variant is particularly prevalent among breast cancer families with hereditary breast and colorectal cancer. Yet, it is still unclear whether CHEK2 HOOdelC also confers a colorectal cancer risk independent of its breast cancer risk. Experimental Design: CHEK2 HOOdelC was genotyped in the index cases of 369 Dutch colorectal cancer families that had been excluded for familial breast cancer. The cohort included 132 cases with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and FAP-related disease, and 237 cases with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and HNPCC-related disease. Results: None of the FAP/FAP-related cases carried the CHEK2 HOOdelC variant. In contrast, CHEK2 HOOdelC was present in 10 of 237 (4.2%) HNPCC/HNPCC-related cases that was significantly more prevalent than the 1.0% Dutch population frequency (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-10.7; P = 0.002). Nine of the 10 CHEK2 HOOdelC colorectal cancer cases met the revised Amsterdam and/or Bethesda criteria. The 10 CHEK2 HOOdelC colorectal cancer families had a high-risk cancer inheritance pattern, including 35 colorectal cancer cases, 9 cases with polyps, and 21 cases with other tumor types. Conclusion: Our analysis provides strong evidence that the HOOdelC variant of CHEK2 confers a colorectal cancer risk in HNPCC/HNPCC-related families, supporting the hypothesis that CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A family history of breast cancer will not predict female early onset breast cancer in a population-based setting (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30303/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: An increased risk of breast cancer for relatives of breast cancer patients has been demonstrated in many studies, and having a relative diagnosed with breast cancer at an early age is an indication for breast cancer screening. This indication has been derived from estimates based on data from cancer-prone families or from BRCA1/2 mutation families, and might be biased because BRCA1/2 mutations explain only a small proportion of the familial clustering of breast cancer. The aim of the current study was to determine the predictive value of a family history of cancer with regard to early onset of female breast cancer in a population based setting. Methods: An unselected sample of 1,987 women with and without breast cancer was studied with regard to the age of diagnosis of breast cancer. Results: The risk of early-onset breast cancer was increased when there were: (1) at least 2 cases of female breast cancer in first-degree relatives (yes/no; HR at age 30: 3.09; 95% CI: 128-7.44), (2) at least 2 cases of female breast cancer in first or second-degree relatives under the age of 50 (yes/no; HR at age 30: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.12-10.08), (3) at least 1 case of female breast cancer under the age of 40 in a first- or second-degree relative (yes/no; HR at age 30: 2.06; 95% CI: 0.83-5.12) and (4) any case of bilateral breast cancer (yes/no; HR at age 30: 3.47; 95%: 1.33-9.05). The positive predictive value of having 2 or more of these characteristics was 13% for breast cancer before the age of 70, 11% for breast cancer before the age of 50, and 1% for breast cancer before the age of 30. Conclusion: Applying family history related criteria in an unselected population could result in the screening of many women who will not develop breast cancer at an early age. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28950/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Several options for cancer prevention are available for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, including prophylactic surgery, chemoprevention and screening. The authors report on preventive practices in women with mutations from 9 countries and examine differences in uptake according to country. Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were contacted after receiving their genetic test result and were questioned regarding their preventive practices. Information was recorded on prophylactic mastectomy, prophylactic oophorectomy, use of tamoxifen and screening (MRI and mammography). Two thousand six hundred seventy-seven women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation from 9 countries were included. The follow-up questionnaire was completed a mean of 3.9 years (range 1.5-10.3 years) after genetic testing. One thousand five hundred thirty-one women (57.2%) had a bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy. Of the 1,383 women without breast cancer, 248 (18.0%) had had a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. Among those who did not have a prophylactic mastectomy, only 76 women (5.5%) took tamoxifen and 40 women (2.9%) took raloxifene for breast cancer prevention. Approximately one-half of the women at risk for breast cancer had taken no preventive option, relying solely on screening. There were large differences in the uptake of the different preventive options by country of residence. Prophylactic oophorectomy is now generally accepted by women and their physicians as a cancer preventive measure. However, only the minority of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation opt for prophylactic mastectomy or take tamoxifen for the prevention of hereditary breast cancer. Approximately one-half of women at risk for breast cancer rely on screening alone. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Heterogeneity of breast cancer associations with five susceptibility loci by clinical and pathological characteristics (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30480/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A three-stage genome-wide association study recently identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five loci (fibroblast growth receptor 2 (FGFR2), trinucleotide repeat containing 9 (TNRC9), mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 K1 (MAP3K1), 8q24, and lymphocyte-specific protein 1 (LSP1)) associated with breast cancer risk. We investigated whether the associations between these SNPs and breast cancer risk varied by clinically important tumor characteristics in up to 23,039 invasive breast cancer cases and 26,273 controls from 20 studies. We also evaluated their influence on overall survival in 13,527 cases from 13 studies. All participants were of European or Asian origin. rs2981582 in FGFR2 was more strongly related to ER-positive (per-allele OR (95%CI) = 1.31 (1.27-1.36)) than ER-negative (1.08 (1.03-1.14)) disease (P for heterogeneity = 10-13). This SNP was also more strongly related to PR-positive, low grade and node positive tumors (P = 10-5, 10-8, 0.013, respectively). The association for rs13281615 in 8q24 was stronger for ER-positive, PR-positive, and low grade tumors (P = 0.001, 0.011 and 10-4, respectively). The differences in the associations between SNPs in FGFR2 and 8q24 and risk by ER and grade remained significant after permutation adjustment for multiple comparisons and after adjustment for other tumor characteristics. Three SNPs (rs2981582, rs3803662, and rs889312) showed weak but significant associations with ER-negative disease, the strongest association being for rs3803662 in TNRC9 (1.14 (1.09-1.21)). rs13281615 in 8q24 was associated with an improvement in survival after diagnosis (per-allele HR = 0.90 (0.83-0.97). The association was attenuated and non-significant after adjusting for known prognostic factors. Our findings show that common genetic variants influence the pathological subtype of breast cancer and provide further support for the hypothesis that ER-positive and ER-negative disease are biologically distinct. Understanding the etiologic heterogeneity of breast cancer may ultimately result in improvements in prevention, early detection, and treatment.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>CHEK2 1100delC and male breast cancer in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15959/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 are known risk factors for female breast cancer. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 also are associated with male breast cancer (MBC). Similarly, it had been suggested in the original CHEK2 identification report that the CHEK2 1100delC mutation confers an increased risk for MBC. Here, we have evaluated the risk of CHEK2 1100delC for MBC by genotyping CHEK2 1100delC in 23 familial and 71 unselected Dutch MBC cases. None of the 23 familial MBC cases carried the CHEK2 1100delC mutation. In contrast, CHEK2 1100delC was present in 3 of the 71 (4.2%) unselected MBC cases, which was significantly more prevalent than the 1.1% Dutch population frequency assessed in 1,692 individuals (P = 0.05, OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-14.3). Our data suggest that, in the Netherlands, CHEK2 1100delC is associated with an increased risk for MBC.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>BRCA1 mutation and young age predict fast breast cancer growth in the Dutch, United Kingdom, and Canadian magnetic resonance imaging screening trials (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36539/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening enables early detection of breast cancers in women with an inherited predisposition. Interval cancers occurred in women with a BRCA1 mutation, possibly due to fast tumor growth. We investigated the effect of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and age on the growth rate of breast cancers, as this may influence the optimal screening frequency. Experimental Design: We reviewed the invasive cancers from the United Kingdom, Dutch, and Canadian MRI screening trials for women at hereditary risk, measuring tumor size at diagnosis and on preceding MRI and/or mammography. We could assess tumor volume doubling time (DT) in 100 cancers. Results: Tumor DT was estimated for 43 women with a BRCA1 mutation, 16 women with a BRCA2 mutation, and 41 women at high risk without an identified mutation. Growth rate slowed continuously with increasing age (P = 0.004). Growth was twice as fast in BRCA1 (P = 0.003) or BRCA2 (P = 0.03) patients as in high-risk patients of the same age. The mean DT for women with BRCA1/2 mutations diagnosed at ages ≤40, 41 to 50, and &gt;50 years was 28, 68, and 81 days, respectively, and 83, 121, and 173 days, respectively, in the high-risk group. Pathologic tumor size decreased with increasing age (P = 0.001). Median size was 15 mm for patients ages ≤40 years compared with 9 mm in older patients (P = 0.003); tumors were largest in young women with BRCA1 mutations. Conclusion: Tumors grow quickly in women with BRCA1 mutations and in young women. Age and risk group should be taken into account in screening protocols. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The common sense model of self-regulation and psychological adjustment to predictive genetic testing: A prospective study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36544/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This prospective study explored the contribution of illness representations and coping to cancer-related distress in unaffected individuals undergoing predictive genetic testing for an identified mutation in BRCA1/2 (BReast CAncer) or an HNPCC (Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer)-related gene, based on the common sense model of self-regulation. Coping with hereditary cancer (UCL), illness representations (IPQ-R) and risk perception were assessed in 235 unaffected applicants for genetic testing before test result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress (IES) and cancer worry (CWS) were assessed before, 2 weeks after and 6 months after result disclosure. Timeline (r = 0.30), consequences (r = 0.25), illness coherence (r = 0.21) and risk perception (r = 0.20) were significantly correlated to passive coping. Passive coping predicted hereditary cancer distress and cancer worry from pre-test (β= 0.46 and 0.42, respectively) up to 6 months after result disclosure (β= 0.32 and 0.19, respectively), Illness coherence predicted hereditary cancer distress up to 6 months after result disclosure (β= 0.24), too. The self-regulatory model may be useful to predict the cognitive and emotional reactions to genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Identifying unhelpful representations and cognitive restructuring may be appropriate interventions to help distressed individuals undergoing genetic susceptibility testing for a BRCA1/2 or a HNPCC-related mutation. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at risk of hereditary breast cancer: Long-term experiences at the Rotterdam family cancer clinic (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36550/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women from a hereditary breast(/ovarian) cancer family have a highly increased risk of developing breast cancer (BC). Prophylactic mastectomy (PM) results in the greatest BC risk reduction. Long-term data on the efficacy and sequels of PM are scarce. Methods: From 358 high-risk women (including 236 BRCA1/2 carriers) undergoing PM between 1994 and 2004, relevant data on the occurrence of BC in relation to PM, complications in relation to breast reconstruction (BR), mutation status, age at PM and preoperative imaging examination results were extracted from the medical records, and analyzed separately for women without (unaffected, n = 177) and with a BC history (affected, n = 181). Results: No primary BCs occurred after PM (median follow-up 4.5 years). In one previously unaffected woman, metastatic BC was detected almost 4 years after PM (primary BC not found). Median age at PM was younger in unaffected women (P &lt; .001), affected women more frequently were 50% risk carriers (P &lt; .001). Unexpected (pre)malignant changes at PM were found in 3% of the patients (in 5 affected, and 5 unaffected women, respectively). In 49.6% of the women opting for BR one or more complications were registered, totaling 215 complications, leading to 153 surgical interventions (71%). Complications were mainly related to cosmetic outcome (36%) and capsular formation (24%). Conclusions: The risk of developing a primary BC after PM remains low after longer follow-up. Preoperative imaging and careful histological examination is warranted because of potential unexpected (pre)malignant findings. The high complication rate after breast reconstruction mainly concerns cosmetic issues. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Age at first birth and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35723/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>An early age at first full-term birth is associated with a reduction in the subsequent development of breast cancer among women in the general population. A similar effect has not yet been reported among women who carry an inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. We conducted a matched case-control study on 1816 pairs of women with a BRCA1 (n = 1405) or BRCA2 (n = 411) mutation in an attempt to elucidate the relationship between age at first full-term pregnancy and the risk of developing breast cancer. Information about the age at first childbirth and other pregnancy-related variables was derived from a questionnaire administered to women during the course of genetic counselling. There was no difference in the mean age at first full-term birth in the cases and controls (24.9 years vs. 24.8 years; P = 0.81, respectively). Compared to women whose first child was born at or before 18 years of age, a later age at first full-term birth did not influence the risk of developing breast cancer (OR = 1.00 per year; 95% CI 0.98-1.03; P-trend = 0.67). Stratification by mutation status did not affect the results. These findings suggest that an early first full-term birth does not confer protection against breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Nonetheless, BRCA mutation carriers opting for a prophylactic oophorectomy as a breast and/or ovarian cancer risk-reducing strategy should complete childbearing prior to age 40 when this prevention modality is most effective. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Passive coping and psychological distress in women adhering to regular breast cancer surveillance (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36597/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Since 2000 the MRISC study evaluates the psychological consequences of regular breast cancer surveillance for women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Coping style way influence these psychological consequences. In a cohort of 357 women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer, the impact of coping styles on the course, divided into level and trend of psychological distress (general and breast cancer specific) was examined, around two consecutive surveillance appointments. With structural equation modelling we found passive coping to be associated with higher levels of both general and breast cancer specific distress. Seeking social support, expression of emotions and thinking comforting thoughts were associated with lower levels of psychological distress. Coping style was not associated with the trend of psychological distress around the two surveillance appointments. it is recommendable to take coping styles into account when counselling these high-risk women. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>GnRH and LHR gene variants predict adverse outcome in premenopausal breast cancer patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36885/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Breast cancer development and progression are dependent on estrogen activity. In premenopausal women, estrogen production is mainly regulated through the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Methods: We have investigated the prognostic significance of two variants of genes involved in the HPG-axis, the GnRH (encoding gonadotropin-releasing hormone) 16Trp/Ser genotype and the LHR (encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor) insLQ variant, in retrospectively collected premenopausal breast cancer patients with a long follow-up (median follow-up of 11 years for living patients). Results: Carriership was not related with breast cancer risk (the case control study encompassed 278 premenopausal cases and 1,758 premenopausal controls). A significant adverse relationship of the LHR insLQ and GnRH 16Ser genotype with disease free survival (DFS) was observed in premenopausal (hormone receptor positive) breast cancer patients. In particular, those patients carrying both the GnRH 16Ser and LHR insLQ allele (approximately 25%) showed a significant increased risk of relapse, which was independent of traditional prognostic factors (hazard ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 3.45; P = 0.002). Conclusion: We conclude that the LHR insLQ and GnRH 16Ser alleles are independently associated with shorter DFS in premenopausal patients. When validated, these findings may provide a lead in the development of tailored treatment for breast cancer patients carrying both polymorphisms. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>MDM2 SNP309 accelerates familial breast carcinogenesis independently of estrogen signaling (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35763/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP309T&gt;G) in the intronic promoter of MDM2 was recently found to accelerate carcinogenesis in early-onset cancer cases. This cancer acceleration presumably was due to increased SP1 binding, resulting in enhanced MDM2 transcriptional activation by estrogens. We evaluated MDM2 SNP309 in 343 familial breast cancer cases with known mutation status for CHEK2 1100delC, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer acceleration was indeed observed in early-onset familial breast cancer cases (diagnosed ≤ 51 years), with 16% of cases carrying the MDM2 SNP309 GG genotype as compared to 4% of late-onset cases (P = 0.029). The cancer acceleration was even more pronounced in the non-mutant familial breast cancer cases, with 17% of early-onset cases carrying MDM2 SNP309 GG as compared to 2% of late-onset cases (n = 214; P = 0.015). There was no evidence for an influence of estrogen signaling in the cancer acceleration by MDM2 SNP309, as there were no differences in the prevalence of MDM2 SNP309 GG among CHEK2 1100delC and BRCA2 mutant cases (with 90% ER-positive cancers) or BRCA1 mutant cases (10% ER-positive cancers). Nor did we observe differences in MDM2 SNP309 frequencies among 75 familial breast cancer cases of our cohort with known ER status. Overall, our data suggest that MDM2 SNP309 accelerates familial breast carcinogenesis, but that this acceleration is not influenced by estrogen signaling. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Concentrations of TIMP1 mRNA splice variants and TIMP-1 protein are differentially associated with prognosis in primary breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35334/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: TIMP-1 protein is a prognostic factor for recurrence-free and overall survival (OS) time in breast cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of TIMP1 mRNA and a novel TIMP1 mRNA splice variant in 1301 primary breast cancer patients. Methods: We measured mRNA transcripts of full-length TIMP1 (TIMPl-v1) and the novel splice variant lacking exon 2 (TIMP1-v2) by use of real-time RT-PCR in frozen primary tumor samples. Transcript concentrations are correlated with histomorphological and biological factors, TIMP-1 protein, and distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) and OS time. Results: TIMP1-v1 and TIMP1-v2 alone were not informative with respect to predicting prognosis. However, the PCR assay designed to measure the combination of v1 + v2 showed that high concentrations of this combination were associated with good prognosis. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, which also included the traditional prognostic factors, increasing concentrations were independently associated with prolonged MFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.048). Including TIMP-1 protein and TIMP1-v1+v2 mRNA together in the multivariate model revealed that protein and mRNA were both independently associated with prognosis, with hazard ratios pointing in opposite directions. Conclusion: High concentrations of TIMP1-v1+2 mRNA are associated with good prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. Since high concentrations of TIMP-1 protein are associated with poor prognosis, the presence of possible posttranscriptional mechanisms requires further investigation. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35363/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-06-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Breast cancer exhibits familial aggregation, consistent with variation in genetic susceptibility to the disease. Known susceptibility genes account for less than 25% of the familial risk of breast cancer, and the residual genetic variance is likely to be due to variants conferring more moderate risks. To identify further susceptibility alleles, we conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study in 4,398 breast cancer cases and 4,316 controls, followed by a third stage in which 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested for confirmation in 21,860 cases and 22,578 controls from 22 studies. We used 227,876 SNPs that were estimated to correlate with 77% of known common SNPs in Europeans at r2&gt; 0.5. SNPs in five novel independent loci exhibited strong and consistent evidence of association with breast cancer (P &lt; 10-7). Four of these contain plausible causative genes (FGFR2, TNRC9, MAP3K1 and LSP1). At the second stage, 1,792 SNPs were significant at the P &lt; 0.05 level compared with an estimated 1,343 that would be expected by chance, indicating that many additional common susceptibility alleles may be identifiable by this approach. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Strong time dependence of the 76-gene prognostic signature for node-negative breast cancer patients in the TRANSBIG multicenter independent validation series (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36638/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Recently, a 76-gene prognostic signature able to predict distant metastases in lymph node-negative (N-) breast cancer patients was reported. The aims of this study conducted by TRANSBIG were to independently validate these results and to compare the outcome with clinical risk assessment. Experimental Design: Gene expression profiling of frozen samples from 198 N-systemically untreated patients was done at the Bordet Institute, blinded to clinical data and independent of Veridex. Genomic risk was defined by Veridex, blinded to clinical data. Survival analyses, done by an independent statistician, were done with the genomic risk and adjusted for the clinical risk, defined by Adjuvant! Online. Results: The actual 5- and 10-year time to distant metastasis were 98% (88-100%) and 94% (83-98%), respectively, for the good profile group and 76% (68-82%) and 73% (65-79%), respectively, for the poor profile group. The actual 5- and 10-year overall survival were 98% (88-100%) and 87% (73-94%), respectively, for the good profile group and 84% (77-89%) and 72% (63-78%), respectively, for the poor profile group. We observed a strong time dependence of this signature, leading to an adjusted hazard ratio of 13.58 (1.85-99.63) and 8.20 (1.10-60.90) at 5 years and 5.11 (1.57-16.67) and 2.55 (1.07-6.10) at 10 years for time to distant metastasis and overall survival, respectively. Conclusion: This independent validation confirmed the performance of the 76-gene signature and adds to the growing evidence that gene expression signatures are of clinical relevance, especially for identifying patients at high risk of early distant metastases. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Tumor characteristics and detection method in the MRISC screening program for the early detection of hereditary breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35809/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In the MRISC study, women with an inherited risk for breast cancer were screened by a 6-month clinical breast examination (CBE) and yearly MRI and mammography. We found that the MRISC screening scheme could facilitate early breast cancer diagnosis and that MRI was a more sensitive screening method than mammography, but less specific. In the current study we investigated the contribution of MRI in the early detection of breast cancer in relation to tumor characteristics. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 women were included and 50 breast cancers were detected, of which 45 were evaluable and included in the current study. We compared the characteristics of tumors detected by MRI-only with those of all other (non-palpable) screen-detected tumors. Further, we compared the sensitivity of mammography and MRI within subgroups according to different tumor characteristics. Twenty-two (49%) of the 45 breast cancers were detected by MRI and not visible at mammography, of which 20 (44%) were also not palpable (MRI-only detected tumors). MRI-only detected tumors were more often node-negative than other screen-detected cancers (94 vs. 59%; P = 0.02) and tended to be more often ≤1 cm (58 vs. 31%; P = 0.11). MRI was more sensitive than mammography for a wide spectrum of invasive tumor characteristics i.e., size, nodal status, histology, grade and ER status. Half of the breast cancers detected in this study were visible by MRI only and these tumors were smaller and significantly more often node-negative than other screen-detected tumors, suggesting that MRI makes an important contribution to the early detection of hereditary breast cancer. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Identification of women with an increased risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer: A case only study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36918/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-04-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: Radiation exposure at a young age is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. Germline mutations in genes involved in the DNA-damage repair pathway (DDRP) may render women more susceptible to radiation-induced breast cancer. Methods: We evaluated the contribution of germline mutations in the DDRP genes BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and ATM to the risk of radiation-induced contralateral breast cancer (CBC). The germline mutation frequency was assessed, in a case-only study, in women who developed a CBC after they had a first breast cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, and who were (n = 169) or were not (n = 78) treated with radiotherapy for their first breast tumour. Results: We identified 27 BRCA1, 5 BRCA2, 15 CHEK2 and 4 truncating ATM germline mutation carriers among all CBC patients tested (21%). The mutation frequency was 24.3% among CBC patients with a history of radiotherapy, and 12.8% among patients not irradiated for the first breast tumour (odds ratio 2.18 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 4.62); p = 0.043). The association between DDRP germline mutation carriers and risk of radiation-induced CBC seemed to be strongest in women who developed their second primary breast tumour at least 5 years after radiotherapy. Those patients had an odds ratio of 2.51 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 6.10; p = 0.049) of developing radiation-induced breast cancer, in comparison with non-carriers. Conclusion: This study shows that carriers of germline mutations in a DDRP gene have an increased risk of developing (contralateral) breast cancer after radiotherapy; that is, over and above the risk associated with their carrier status. The increased risk indicates that knowledge of germline status of these DDRP genes at the time of breast cancer diagnosis may have important implications for the choice of treatment. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36670/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study assessed the impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility on family relationships and determinants of adverse consequences for family relationships. Applicants for genetic testing of a known familial pathogenic mutation in BRCA1/2 or a HNPCC related gene (N=271) rated the prevalence and nature of changes in family relationships, familial difficulties and conflicts due to genetic testing 6 months after receiving the test result. The level of family functioning, differentiation from parents, support and familial communication style regarding hereditary cancer were assessed before receiving the test result. Genetic testing affected some family relationships in a positive way (37%), i.e. by feeling closer, improved communication and support, more appreciation of the relative and relief of negative test result. A minority reported unwanted changes in relationships (19%), problematic situations (13%) or conflicts (4%). Adverse effects comprised feelings of guilt towards children and carrier siblings, imposed secrecy and communication problems. Predictors of adverse consequences on family relationships were reluctance to communicate about hereditary cancer with relatives and disengaged-rigid or enmeshed-chaotic family functioning. Open communication between relatives should be stimulated because a lack of open communication may be an important determinant of familial adverse effects. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long-term risk of cardiovascular disease in 10-year survivors of breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35533/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Radiotherapy for breast cancer as delivered in the 1970s has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, but recent studies of associations with modern regimens have been inconclusive. Few data on long-term cardiovascular disease risk according to specific radiation fields are available, and interaction with known cardiovascular risk factors has not been examined. Methods: The studied treatment-specific incidence of cardiovascular disease in 4414 10-year survivors of breast cancer who were treated from 1970 through 1986. Risk of cardiovascular disease in these patients was compared with general population rates and evaluated in Cox proportional hazards regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: After a median follow-up of 18 years, 942 cardiovascular events were observed (standardized incidence ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22 to 1.38; corresponding to 62.9 excess cases per 10 000 patient-years). Breast irradiation only was not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, radiotherapy to either the left or right side of the internal mammary chain was associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk for the treatment period 1970-1979 (for myocardial infarction, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.55 to 4.19; P&lt;.001; for congestive heart failure, HR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.22 to 2.41; P = .002) compared with no radiotherapy. Among patients who received internal mammary chain radiotherapy after 1979, risk of myocardial infarction declined over time toward unity, whereas the risks of congestive heart failure (HR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.27 to 5.61; P = .01) and valvular dysfunction (HR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.90 to 5.29; P&lt;.001) remained increased. Patients who underwent radiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) after 1979 had a higher risk of congestive heart failure than patients who were treated with radiotherapy only (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.25 to 2.73; P = .002). Smoking and radiotherapy together were associated with a more than additive effect on risk of myocardial infarction (HR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.03 to 4.55; P for departure from additivity = .039). Conclusions: Radiotherapy as administered from the 1980s onward is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Irradiated breast cancer patients should be advised to refrain from smoking to reduce their risk for cardiovascular disease. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Tumour characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of hereditary breast cancer from BRCA2-, BRCA1- and non-BRCA1/2 families as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36503/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Aim of the study: Results on tumour characteristics and survival of hereditary breast cancer (BC), especially on BRCA2-associated BC, are inconclusive. The prognostic impact of the classical tumour and treatment factors in hereditary BC is insufficiently known. Methods: We selected 103 BRCA2-, 223 BRCA1- and 311 non-BRCA1/2 BC patients (diagnosis 1980-2004) from the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. To correct for longevity bias, analyses were also performed while excluding index patients undergoing DNA testing ≥2 years after BC diagnosis. As a comparison group, 759 sporadic BC patients of comparable age at and year of diagnosis were selected. We compared tumour characteristics, the occurrence of ipsilateral recurrence (LRR) and contralateral BC (CBC) as well as distant disease-free (DDFS), BC-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between these groups. By multivariate modelling, the prognostic impact of tumour and treatment factors was investigated separately in hereditary BC. Results: We confirmed the presence of the particular BRCA1-phenotype. In contrast, tumour characteristics of BRCA2-associated BC were similar to those of non-BRCA1/2 and sporadic BC, with the exception of a high risk of CBC (3.1% per year) and oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positivity (83%). No significant differences between BRCA2-associated BC and other BC subgroups were found with respect to LRR, DDFS, BCSS and OS. Independent prognostic factors for BC-specific survival in hereditary BC (combining the three subgroups) were tumour stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, histologic grade, ER status and a prophylactic (salpingo-)oophorectomy. Conclusions: Apart from the frequent occurrence of contralateral BC and a positive ER-status, BRCA2-associated BC did not markedly differ from other hereditary or sporadic BC. Our observation that tumour size and nodal status are prognostic factors also in hereditary BC implies that the strategy to use these factors as a proxy for ultimate mortality appears to be valid also in this specific group of patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>HOXB13-to-IL17BR expression ratio is related with tumor aggressiveness and response to tamoxifen of recurrent breast cancer: A retrospective study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36221/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-20T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: A HOXB13-to-IL17BR expression ratio was previously identified to predict clinical outcome of breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. However, this ratio may predict a tumor's response to tamoxifen, its intrinsic aggressiveness, or both. Patients and Methods: We have measured the HOXB13 and IL17BR expression levels by real-time polymerase chain reaction in 1,252 primary breast tumor specimens. Expression levels were normalized to housekeeper gene levels and related to clinicopathologic factors for all patients. The primary objective of this study was to determine the relationship of a HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio with tumor aggressiveness and/or with response to tamoxifen therapy in estrogen receptor (ER) -positive disease. We selected ER-positive tumors, and clinical end points for the HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio were disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary breast cancer (N = 619) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with first-line tamoxifen monotherapy (N = 193). The odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) and their 95% CI were calculated, and all P values were two-sided. Results: The HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio was significantly associated with DFS and PFS. In multivariate analysis, HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio expression levels were associated with a shorter DFS for node-negative patients only. Corrected for traditional predictive factors, the dichotomized HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio was the strongest predictor in multivariate analysis for a poor response to tamoxifen therapy (OR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.45; P &lt; .001) and a shorter PFS (HR = 2.97; 95% CI, 1.82 to 4.86; P &lt; .001). Conclusion: High HOXB13-to-IL17BR ratio expression levels associate with both tumor aggressiveness and tamoxifen therapy failure. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Comparison of individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing with regard to coping, illness perceptions, illness experiences, family system characteristics and hereditary cancer distress (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36225/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To study differences between individuals opting for genetic cancer susceptibility testing of a known familial BRCA1/2 and HNPCC related germline mutation. Methods: Coping, illness perceptions, experiences with cancer in relatives and family system characteristics were assessed in 271 applicants for genetic testing before test result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress, worry and cancer risk perception were assessed before, 1 week after, and 6 months after disclosure. Results: Individuals from BRCA1/2 and HNPCC mutation families did not differ with regard to the number of experiences with cancer in relatives, grief symptoms, the course of cancer distress, worry and risk perception through time and most illness perceptions, coping responses and family characteristics. Individuals from BRCA1/2 families perceived hereditary cancer as more serious. They reported more frequently a passive coping style, cancer worry and a less open communication with their partner and children. Conclusion: Besides subtle differences, psychological mechanisms may be mainly identical in individuals opting for BRCA1/2 and HNPCC susceptibility testing. Practice implications: Based on our findings, using a similar counseling approach for individuals opting for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing is justified. In this approach, attention should be directed more to individual aspects than to the type of disorder. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months after BRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36526/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study explored predictors for hereditary cancer distress six months after genetic susceptibility testing for a known familial BRCA1/2 or HNPCC related mutation, in order to gain insight into aspects relevant for the identification of individuals needing additional psychosocial support. Coping, illness representations, experiences with cancer in relatives and family system characteristics were assessed in 271 applicants for genetic testing before result disclosure. Hereditary cancer distress was assessed prospectively up to six months after disclosure. Regression analysis revealed that the pretest level of distress, complicated grief, the number of affected first-degree relatives and strong emotional illness representations were factors that best explained hereditary cancer distress. Other significant predictors were illness coherence, passive coping, distraction seeking, being aged &lt;13 years when a parent was affected by cancer and family communication. Individuals who may benefit from additional support may be identified before result disclosure using a short instrument assessing the relevant aspects. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The course of distress in women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to an (identified) genetic susceptibility who opt for prophylactic mastectomy and/or salpingo-oophorectomy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36527/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The levels and course of psychological distress before and after prophylactic mastectomy (PM) and/or prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy (PSO) were studied in a group of 78 women. General distress was measured through the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), cancer-related distress using the impact of events scale (IES). Measurement moments were baseline (2-4 weeks prior to prophylactic surgery), and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. After PM, anxiety and cancer-related distress were significantly reduced, whereas no significant changes in distress scores were observed after PSO. At one year after prophylactic surgery, a substantial amount of women remained at clinically relevant increased levels of cancer-related distress and anxiety. We conclude that most women can undergo PM and/or PSO without developing major emotional distress. More research is needed to further define the characteristics of the women who continue to have clinically relevant increased scores after surgery, in order to offer them additional counselling. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>How ADAM-9 and ADAM-11 differentially from estrogen receptor predict response to tamoxifen treatment in patients with recurrent breast cancer: a retrospective study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13955/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of the disintegrin and metalloproteinases, ADAM-9, ADAM-10, ADAM-11, and ADAM-12, and of the matrix metalloproteinases, MMP-2 and MMP-9, in patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A retrospective study was done on 259 frozen specimens of estrogen receptor-positive primary breast carcinomas from patients who developed recurrent disease and were treated with tamoxifen as the first line of therapy. The expression levels of the biological factors were assessed by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. RESULTS: Using log-transformed continuous variables, increasing levels of ADAM-9 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41; P = 0.015] and decreasing levels of MMP-9 (OR, 0.81; P = 0.035) predicted favorable disease control independent from the traditional predictive factors. Furthermore, when tumors were dichotomized at the median level of 70% tumor cell nuclei, our univariate analysis showed particularly strong results for the group of 153 patients with primary tumors containing 30% or more stromal cells. Although estrogen receptor levels lost their predictive power for this group of patients, high levels of ADAM-9 (OR, 1.59; P = 0.007) and ADAM-11 (OR, 1.65; P = 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher efficacy of tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that especially for primary tumors containing stromal elements, the assessment of mRNA expression levels of ADAM-9 and ADAM-11 could be useful to identify patients with recurrent breast cancer who are likely to benefit or fail from tamoxifen therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Association of DNA methylation of phosphoserine aminotransferase with response to endocrine therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13806/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-05-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To understand the biological basis of resistance to endocrine therapy is of utmost importance in patients with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Not only will this allow us prediction of therapy success, it may also lead to novel therapies for patients resistant to current endocrine therapy. DNA methylation in the promoter regions of genes is a prominent epigenetic gene silencing mechanism that contributes to breast cancer biology. In the current study, we investigated whether promoter DNA methylation could be associated with resistance to endocrine therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. Using a microarray-based technology, the promoter DNA methylation status of 117 candidate genes was studied in a cohort of 200 steroid hormone receptor-positive tumors of patients who received the antiestrogen tamoxifen as first-line treatment for recurrent breast cancer. Of the genes analyzed, the promoter DNA methylation status of 10 genes was significantly associated with clinical outcome of tamoxifen therapy. The association of the promoter hypermethylation of the strongest marker, phosphoserine aminotransferase (PSAT1) with favorable clinical outcome was confirmed by an independent quantitative DNA methylation detection method. Furthermore, the extent of DNA methylation of PSAT1 was inversely associated with its expression at the mRNA level. Finally, also at the mRNA level, PSAT1 was a predictor of tamoxifen therapy response. Concluding, our work indicates that promoter hypermethylation and mRNA expression of PSAT1 are indicators of response to tamoxifen-based endocrine therapy in steroid hormone receptor-positive patients with recurrent breast cancer.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The prognostic value of BCAR1 in patients with primary breast cancer. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13506/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-09-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: BCAR1, the human homologue of the rat p130Cas protein, was
      identified in a functional screen for human breast cancer cell
      proliferation resistant to antiestrogen drugs. Here, we study the
      prognostic value of quantitative BCAR1 levels in a large series of breast
      cancer specimens. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A specific ELISA was developed to
      measure BCAR1 protein levels in 2593 primary breast tumor cytosols. Tumor
      levels of BCAR1 were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and
      overall survival (OS) and compared with collected data on urokinase-type
      plasminogen activator (uPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1).
      RESULTS: In tumor cytosols, BCAR1 protein levels varied between 0.02 and
      23 ng/mg protein. BCAR1 levels exhibited a positive correlation with
      steroid hormone receptor levels, age and menopausal status, and uPA and
      PAI-1 levels. The level of BCAR1 (continuous or categorized as low,
      intermediate, or high) was inversely related with RFS and OS time.
      Multivariate analysis showed that BCAR1 levels contributed independently
      to a base model containing the traditional prognostic factors for both RFS
      and OS (both P &lt; 0.0001). When added together with uPA and PAI-1 in the
      multivariate model, BCAR1 contributed independently of PAI-1 and was
      favored over uPA. Interaction tests allowed for additional analyses of
      BCAR1 protein levels in clinically relevant subgroups stratified by nodal
      and menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative BCAR1 protein level
      represents a prognostic factor for RFS and OS in primary breast cancer,
      independent of the traditional prognostic factors and the other novel
      marker PAI-1.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Application of a newly developed ELISA for BCAR1 protein for prediction of clinical benefit of tamoxifen therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13395/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in breast cancer: association with tamoxifen therapy in recurrent disease. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13436/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The prognostic value of components of the urokinase-type plasminogen
      activator (uPA) system, its receptor uPAR (CD87), and plasminogen
      activator inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 is well established. We studied the
      predictive value of these proteolytic factors by evaluating the
      association of their tumor expression level and the efficacy of tamoxifen
      therapy in patients with recurrent breast cancer. The antigen levels of
      the four factors were determined by ELISA in cytosols prepared from
      estrogen receptor-positive primary breast tumors of 691 hormone-naive
      breast cancer patients with recurrent disease and treated with tamoxifen
      as first-line systemic therapy. High tumor levels of uPA (P &lt; 0.001), uPAR
      (P &lt; 0.01), and PAI-1 (P = 0.01) were associated with a lower efficacy of
      tamoxifen therapy. In the multivariable analysis, uPA (P &lt; 0.001) provided
      additional information independent of the traditional predictive factors
      to predict benefit from tamoxifen therapy. High levels of uPA, uPAR, and
      PAI-1 predicted a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on tamoxifen in
      an analysis of the first 9 months of therapy. However in the analysis
      during the total follow-up period, high PAI-2 levels (P = 0.01) showed a
      longer response to tamoxifen. In conclusion, uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1,
      components of the urokinase system, are predictive for the efficacy of
      tamoxifen therapy in patients treated for recurrent breast cancer.
      Knowledge of their tumor expression levels might be helpful for future
      individualized therapy protocols, including possible new-targeted
      therapies based on the interference in the urokinase system.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8450/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The value of regular surveillance for breast cancer in women
      with a genetic or familial predisposition to breast cancer is currently
      unproven. We compared the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
      with that of mammography for screening in this group of high-risk women.
      METHODS: Women who had a cumulative lifetime risk of breast cancer of 15
      percent or more were screened every six months with a clinical breast
      examination and once a year by mammography and MRI, with independent
      readings. The characteristics of the cancers that were detected were
      compared with the characteristics of those in two different age-matched
      control groups. RESULTS: We screened 1909 eligible women, including 358
      carriers of germ-line mutations. Within a median follow-up period of 2.9
      years, 51 tumors (44 invasive cancers, 6 ductal carcinomas in situ, and 1
      lymphoma) and 1 lobular carcinoma in situ were detected. The sensitivity
      of clinical breast examination, mammography, and MRI for detecting
      invasive breast cancer was 17.9 percent, 33.3 percent, and 79.5 percent,
      respectively, and the specificity was 98.1 percent, 95.0 percent, and 89.8
      percent, respectively. The overall discriminating capacity of MRI was
      significantly better than that of mammography (P&lt;0.05). The proportion of
      invasive tumors that were 10 mm or less in diameter was significantly
      greater in our surveillance group (43.2 percent) than in either control
      group (14.0 percent [P&lt;0.001] and 12.5 percent [P=0.04], respectively).
      The combined incidence of positive axillary nodes and micrometastases in
      invasive cancers in our study was 21.4 percent, as compared with 52.4
      percent (P&lt;0.001) and 56.4 percent (P=0.001) in the two control groups.
      CONCLUSIONS: MRI appears to be more sensitive than mammography in
      detecting tumors in women with an inherited susceptibility to breast
      cancer.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The prognostic value of polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase in patients with primary breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10078/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A variety of serine proteases, including urokinase-type plasminogen
      activator (uPA), plasmin,and polymorphonuclear leukocyte elastase (PMN-E),
      have been implicated in the processes of tumor cell invasion and
      metastasis. Besides degrading of matrix proteins, PMN-E has been shown to
      be able to cleave and inactivate plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
      (PAI-1), the main inhibitor of uPA, and alpha2-antiplasmin, the natural
      inhibitor of plasmin, thus enabling an uncontrolled matrix degradation by
      the fibrinolytic enzymes. Because only limited data are available on a
      relationship between the tumor level of PMN-E and prognosis in primary
      breast cancer patients, in the present study we have measured with an
      ELISA the levels of PMN-E (in complex with alpha1-proteinase inhibitor) in
      cytosolic extracts of 1143 primary breast tumors. Levels of complexed
      PMN-E have been correlated with the lengths of metastasis-free survival
      (MFS), relapse-free survival, and overall survival, and a comparison was
      made with data previously obtained for uPA and PAI-1. Our results show
      that patients with a high PMN-E level in their primary tumor had a rapid
      relapse and an early death compared with patients with a low tumor level
      of PMN-E. This held true for node-negative and node-positive subgroups of
      patients as well. The relationship of PMN-E with a poor prognosis was
      especially obvious during short-term follow-up (0-60 months). In Cox
      multivariate regression analysis, corrected for the traditional prognostic
      factors, PMN-E was an independent prognostic factor, and high levels of
      PMN-E were associated with a poor MFS [hazard ratio (HR), 1.63; 95%
      confidence interval (CI), 1.23-2.16; P &lt; 0.001], relapse-free survival
      (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.89; P = 0.01), and overall survival (HR, 1.64;
      95% CI, 1.20-2.23; P = 0.003). Furthermore, in all three multivariate
      models, PMN-E still added significantly to the model after the additional
      inclusion of the uPA. PMN-E was an independent prognostic factor for MFS
      even in the multivariate analysis including the traditional clinical
      prognostic factors and the strong established biochemical prognostic
      factors uPA and PAI-1. Our present study suggests that PMN-E is associated
      with breast cancer metastasis, and knowledge of the tumor PMN-E status
      might be helpful in selecting the appropriate individualized (adjuvant)
      treatment for patients with breast cancer.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>RNA expression of breast cancer resistance protein, lung resistance-related protein, multidrug resistance-associated proteins 1 and 2, and multidrug resistance gene 1 in breast cancer: correlation with chemotherapeutic response (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10101/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether expression of
      particular drug resistance genes in primary operable breast cancer
      correlates with response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced disease.
      EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We determined mRNA levels of BCRP, LRP, MRP1, MRP2,
      and MDR1 in 59 primary breast tumor specimens of patients who received
      chemotherapy as first-line systemic treatment after diagnosis of advanced
      disease. The relative expression levels were measured by quantitative
      real-time reverse transcription-PCR and subsequently analyzed in relation
      to the type of response to chemotherapy, the length of progression-free
      survival (PFS), and post-relapse overall survival. RESULTS: For each of
      these drug resistance genes, a large variation in expression level was
      observed among the tumors of the different patients. When analyzing mRNA
      expression in relation to overall response, it was found that the median
      expression level of these five drug resistance genes in the responding
      tumors, as compared with nonresponding tumors, was markedly lower.
      Classification of tumors as high versus low with respect to the expression
      level of these genes showed that the overall response in the MDR1-high
      subset (17%), as compared with the MDR1-low subset (68%), was
      significantly lower (P = 0.005). Although similar differences in response
      rate were found for subsets of tumors stratified by the expression level
      of the other drug resistance genes, none of the observed differences were
      statistically significant. However, in the subgroup of patients treated
      with anthracycline-based chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil,
      Adriamycin/epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide), a correlation between
      response and the expression of BCRP and MRP1 (only PFS) was found, whereas
      such an association was not present in the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate,
      and 5-fluorouracil-treated group of patients. Furthermore, high expression
      of LRP as well as MDR1 was found to be significantly associated with a
      poor PFS (P = 0.04 and P &lt; 0.001, respectively). For lung
      resistance-related protein, this association was limited to
      5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin/epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide. Expression
      levels of BCRP, MRP1, or MRP2 were not related with the length of PFS.
      Furthermore, no correlation between the expression level of these drug
      resistance genes and post-relapse overall survival was found. CONCLUSIONS:
      In this pilot study, MDR1 expression in primary breast tumors was
      inversely related with the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, and high
      expression level was a significant predictor of poor prognosis for
      patients with advanced disease. Apart from MDR1, the expression levels of
      BCRP, LRP, and MRP1 might have some additional predictive value for
      clinical outcome.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Combined vascular endothelial growth factor and TP53 status predicts poor response to tamoxifen therapy in estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10121/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: In recent studies, we showed that TP53 gene mutation or high
      levels of cytosolic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in estrogen
      receptor (ER)-alpha-positive primary breast tumors predict a poor disease
      outcome for patients treated with first-line tamoxifen for advanced
      disease. Mutant TP53 may up-regulate VEGF, whereas, on the other hand,
      wild-type TP53 may decrease VEGF production. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the
      present study, we aimed to assess the combined predictive value of TP53
      gene mutation and VEGF status of 160 advanced breast cancer patients with
      ER-positive tumors who were treated with tamoxifen (median follow-up from
      start of tamoxifen treatment, 64 months). To assess TP53 gene mutation
      status, the entire open reading frame was sequenced; for VEGF status, an
      ELISA was used. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, both TP53 gene mutation
      (28% of the tumors) and a VEGF level above the median value were
      significantly associated with a short progression-free survival,
      post-relapse overall survival, and a poor rate of response to tamoxifen.
      In Cox multivariate regression analysis including the traditional
      predictive factors, the addition of TP53 gene mutation and VEGF status,
      alone or in combination, significantly predicted a poor efficacy of
      tamoxifen treatment. When the two factors were combined, a significantly
      decreased odds ratio was seen for the rate of response (odds ratio, 0.27).
      Similarly, an increased hazard ratio (HR) was seen for progression-free
      survival (HR, 2.32) and post-relapse overall survival (HR, 1.68) in the
      group with mutant TP53 and high VEGF compared with the group with both
      risk factors absent. CONCLUSIONS: Combined TP53 gene mutation status and
      high VEGF levels of ER-positive primary breast tumors independently
      predict a poor course of the disease of patients with advanced breast
      cancer treated with tamoxifen. These patients, having unfavorable tumor
      characteristics, might benefit more from other types of (individualized)
      treatment protocols.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The CHEK2 1100delC mutation identifies families with a hereditary breast and colorectal cancer phenotype (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8489/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Because of genetic heterogeneity, the identification of breast
      cancer-susceptibility genes has proven to be exceedingly difficult. Here,
      we define a new subset of families with breast cancer characterized by the
      presence of colorectal cancer cases. The 1100delC variant of the cell
      cycle checkpoint kinase CHEK2 gene was present in 18% of 55 families with
      hereditary breast and colorectal cancer (HBCC) as compared with 4% of 380
      families with non-HBCC (P&lt;.001), thus providing genetic evidence for the
      HBCC phenotype. The CHEK2 1100delC mutation was, however, not the major
      predisposing factor for the HBCC phenotype but appeared to act in synergy
      with another, as-yet-unknown susceptibility gene(s). The unequivocal
      definition of the HBCC phenotype opens new avenues to search for this
      putative HBCC-susceptibility gene.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Variants in CHEK2 other than 1100delC do not make a major contribution to breast cancer susceptibility (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8504/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We recently reported that a sequence variant in the cell-cycle-checkpoint
      kinase CHEK2 (CHEK2 1100delC) is a low-penetrance breast
      cancer-susceptibility allele in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
      To investigate whether other CHEK2 variants confer susceptibility to
      breast cancer, we screened the full CHEK2 coding sequence in
      BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer cases from 89 pedigrees with three or more
      cases of breast cancer. We identified one novel germline variant, R117G,
      in two separate families. To evaluate the possible association of R117G
      and two germline variants reported elsewhere, R145W and I157T with breast
      cancer, we screened 737 BRCA1/2-negative familial breast cancer cases from
      605 families, 459 BRCA1/2-positive cases from 335 families, and 723
      controls from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and North America. All
      three variants were rare in all groups, and none occurred at significantly
      elevated frequency in familial breast cancer cases compared with controls.
      These results indicate that 1100delC may be the only CHEK2 allele that
      makes an appreciable contribution to breast cancer susceptibility.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5956/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer, but account for only a small fraction of breast cancer susceptibility. To find additional genes conferring susceptibility to breast cancer, we analyzed CHEK2 (also known as CHK2), which encodes a cell-cycle checkpoint kinase that is implicated in DNA repair processes involving BRCA1 and p53 (refs 3,4,5). We show that CHEK2(*)1100delC, a truncating variant that abrogates the kinase activity, has a frequency of 1.1% in healthy individuals. However, this variant is present in 5.1% of individuals with breast cancer from 718 families that do not carry mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (P = 0.00000003), including 13.5% of individuals from families with male breast cancer (P = 0.00015). We estimate that the CHEK2(*)1100delC variant results in an approximately twofold increase of breast cancer risk in women and a tenfold increase of risk in men. By contrast, the variant confers no increased cancer risk in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This suggests that the biological mechanisms underlying the elevated risk of breast cancer in CHEK2 mutation carriers are already subverted in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, which is consistent with participation of the encoded proteins in the same pathway.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9823/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitor
      (PAI-1) play essential roles in tumor invasion and metastasis. High levels
      of both uPA and PAI-1 are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer
      patients. To confirm the prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in primary
      breast cancer, we reanalyzed individual patient data provided by members
      of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Receptor
      and Biomarker Group (EORTC-RBG). METHODS: The study included 18 datasets
      involving 8377 breast cancer patients. During follow-up (median 79
      months), 35% of the patients relapsed and 27% died. Levels of uPA and
      PAI-1 in tumor tissue extracts were determined by different immunoassays;
      values were ranked within each dataset and divided by the number of
      patients in that dataset to produce fractional ranks that could be
      compared directly across datasets. Associations of ranks of uPA and PAI-1
      levels with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were
      analyzed by Cox multivariable regression analysis stratified by dataset,
      including the following traditional prognostic variables: age, menopausal
      status, lymph node status, tumor size, histologic grade, and steroid
      hormone-receptor status. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Apart from
      lymph node status, high levels of uPA and PAI-1 were the strongest
      predictors of both poor RFS and poor OS in the analyses of all patients.
      Moreover, in both lymph node-positive and lymph node-negative patients,
      higher uPA and PAI-1 values were independently associated with poor RFS
      and poor OS. For (untreated) lymph node-negative patients in particular,
      uPA and PAI-1 included together showed strong prognostic ability (all
      P&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis of the EORTC-RBG datasets
      confirmed the strong and independent prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in
      primary breast cancer. For patients with lymph node-negative breast
      cancer, uPA and PAI-1 measurements in primary tumors may be especially
      useful for designing individualized treatment strategies.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thymidine kinase and thymidylate synthase in advanced breast cancer: response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9608/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Thymidylate synthase (TS) is a crucial target for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in
          the de novo pathway of pyrimidine synthesis, which is necessary for DNA
          synthesis. Thymidine kinase (TK) plays a key role in the complementary or
          alternative salvage pathway of pyrimidine synthesis in acute or
          pathological tissue stress. In the present study, the activity levels of
          TS and TK were determined in 257 primary breast tumors of patients who
          received tamoxifen as first-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of
          advanced disease. In 155 (60%) responding patients, the median response
          duration was 23 months for tumors with low TK activity, 15 months for
          tumors with intermediate TK activity, and 13 months for tumors with high
          TK activity (P = 0.003). In Cox multivariate analysis corrected for
          classical predictive factors including estrogen receptor and progesterone
          receptor, patients with intermediate and high levels of TK activity in
          their tumors showed a rapid disease progression (P = 0.0002) and an early
          death (P = 0.002) after start of tamoxifen treatment. Tumor TS activity
          levels were not significantly associated with the efficacy of tamoxifen
          treatment. In 121 patients who became resistant to tamoxifen or additional
          endocrine treatments and who received 5-FU-containing polychemotherapy,
          tumor TK activity was not significantly related to the efficacy of
          chemotherapy. Of the 13 patients with low tumor TS activity, only 1 (8%)
          responded favorably, whereas 46% (43 of 93) of those with intermediate and
          73% (11 of 15) of those with high TS activity responded (P = 0.001). In
          Cox multivariate regression analysis in which TS was the only significant
          variable, intermediate and high TS activities were associated with a slow
          disease progression (P = 0.005) and prolonged survival (P = 0.016) on
          chemotherapy. In conclusion, for patients with recurrent breast cancer,
          high tumor TK activity is a significant marker of poor clinical outcome on
          tamoxifen therapy. Elevated tumor TS activity predicts a favorable outcome
          for 5-FU-containing polychemotherapy when applied after tumor progression
          on endocrine therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High tumor levels of vascular endothelial growth factor predict poor response to systemic therapy in advanced breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9684/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic factor, has
          been reported to be associated with a poor prognosis in primary breast
          cancer and in several other cancer types. In the present study, we have
          measured with ELISA the levels of VEGF in cytosolic extracts of 845
          primary breast tumors of patients who developed a recurrence during
          follow-up. All of the patients received tamoxifen (n = 618) or
          cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) or 5-fluorouracil,
          Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy (n = 227) as first-line
          systemic therapy after diagnosis of advanced disease. VEGF levels were not
          related to age or menopausal status but were negatively related to the
          cytosolic levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor (P &lt;
          0.0001). In patients who relapsed within 1 year after primary surgery,
          tumor VEGF levels were higher than in patients who showed a longer
          disease-free interval (P = 0.0005). In patients with a first relapse in
          the viscera, VEGF levels were higher compared with those that relapsed to
          the bone or soft tissue (P = 0.0004). In univariate analysis for response
          to first-line tamoxifen therapy, patients with high or intermediate levels
          showed a poor rate of response, compared with patients with low tumor-VEGF
          levels (P = 0.0001). Similarly, in multivariate analysis for response to
          tamoxifen treatment, corrected for age, site of relapse, disease-free
          interval, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, VEGF
          status was an independent predictive factor (P = 0.009). In concordance,
          higher levels of VEGF were associated with a short progression-free
          survival and postrelapse overall survival (both, P &lt; 0.0001). On
          first-line chemotherapy, the rate of response decreased with higher tumor
          levels of VEGF, both in univariate (P = 0.003) and in multivariate
          analysis (P = 0.004). Furthermore, higher VEGF levels were associated with
          a short progression-free survival (P = 0.003) and postrelapse overall
          survival (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the tumor VEGF level is an important
          independent marker that predicts a poor efficacy of both tamoxifen and
          chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Knowledge of the tumor level of
          VEGF might be helpful in selecting individual patients who may benefit
          from treatments with antiangiogenic agents combined with conventionally
          used drugs.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9688/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have a high risk of breast cancer and may choose to undergo prophylactic bilateral total
          mastectomy. We investigated the efficacy of this procedure in such women.
          METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 139 women with a pathogenic
          BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who were enrolled in a breast-cancer surveillance
          program at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. At the time of enrollment,
          none of the women had a history of breast cancer. Seventy-six of these
          women eventually underwent prophylactic mastectomy, and the other 63
          remained under regular surveillance. The effect of mastectomy on the
          incidence of breast cancer was analyzed by the Cox proportional-hazards
          method in which mastectomy was modeled as a time-dependent covariate.
          RESULTS: No cases of breast cancer were observed after prophylactic
          mastectomy after a mean (+/-SE) follow-up of 2.9+/-1.4 years, whereas
          eight breast cancers developed in women under regular surveillance after a
          mean follow-up of 3.0+/-1.5 years (P=0.003; hazard ratio, 0; 95 percent
          confidence interval, 0 to 0.36). The actuarial mean five-year incidence of
          breast cancer among all women in the surveillance group was 17+/-7
          percent. On the basis of an exponential model, the yearly incidence of
          breast cancer in this group was 2.5 percent. The observed number of breast
          cancers in the surveillance group was consistent with the expected number
          (ratio of observed to expected cases, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval,
          0.4 to 3.7; P=0.80). CONCLUSIONS: In women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation,
          prophylactic bilateral total mastectomy reduces the incidence of breast
          cancer at three years of follow-up.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bcar1/p130Cas protein and primary breast cancer: prognosis and response to tamoxifen treatment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9229/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The product of the Bcar1/p130Cas (breast cancer
      resistance/p130Crk-associated substrate) gene causes resistance to
      antiestrogen drugs in human breast cancer cells in vitro. To investigate
      its role in clinical breast cancer, we determined the levels of
      Bcar1/p130Cas protein in a large series of primary breast carcinomas.
      METHODS: We measured Bcar1/p130Cas protein in cytosol extracts from 937
      primary breast carcinomas by western blot analysis. The levels of
      Bcar1/p130Cas protein were tested for associations and trends against
      clinicopathologic and patient characteristics, the lengths of relapse-free
      survival and overall survival (n = 775), and the efficacy of first-line
      treatment with tamoxifen for recurrent or metastatic disease (n = 268).
      RESULTS: Bcar1/p130Cas levels in primary tumors were associated with
      age/menopausal status and the levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone
      receptor. In univariate survival analysis, higher Bcar1/p130Cas levels
      were associated with poor relapse-free survival and overall survival (both
      two-sided P =.04; log-rank test for trend). In multivariate analysis, a
      high level of Bcar1/p130Cas was independently associated with poor
      relapse-free survival and overall survival. The response to tamoxifen
      therapy in patients with recurrent disease was reduced in patients with
      primary tumors that expressed high levels of Bcar1/p130Cas. In
      multivariate analysis for response, Bcar1/p130Cas was independent of
      classical predictive factors, such as estrogen receptor status,
      age/menopausal status, disease-free interval, and dominant site of
      relapse. CONCLUSION: Patients with primary breast tumors expressing a high
      level of Bcar1/p130Cas protein appear to experience more rapid disease
      recurrence and have a greater risk of (intrinsic) resistance to tamoxifen
      therapy. Thus, measurement of Bcar1/p130Cas may provide useful prognostic
      information for patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The urokinase system of plasminogen activation and prognosis in 2780 breast cancer patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9256/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The antigen levels of components of the urokinase-type plasminogen
          activator (uPA) system of plasminogen activation are correlated with
          prognosis in several types of cancers, including breast cancer. In the
          present study involving 2780 patients with primary invasive breast cancer,
          we have evaluated the prognostic importance of the four major components
          of the uPA system [uPA, the receptor uPAR (CD87), and the inhibitors PAI-1
          and PAI-2]. The antigen levels were determined by ELISA in cytosols
          prepared from primary breast tumors. The levels of the four factors
          significantly correlated with each other; the Spearman rank correlation
          coefficients (r(s)) ranged from 0.32 (between PAI-2 and PAI-1 or uPAR) to
          0.59 (between uPA and PAI-1). The median duration of follow-up of patients
          still alive was 88 months. In the multivariate analyses for relapse-free
          survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), we defined a basic model
          including age, menopausal status, tumor size and grade, lymph node status,
          adjuvant therapy, and steroid hormone receptor status. uPA, uPAR, PAI-1,
          and PAI-2 were considered as categorical variables, each with two cut
          points that were established by isotonic regression analysis. Compared
          with tumors with low levels, those with intermediate and high levels
          showed a relative hazard rate (RHR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)
          of 1.22 (1.02-1.45) and 1.69 (1.39-2.05) for uPA, and 1.32 (1.14-1.54) and
          2.17 (1.74-2.70) for PAI-1, respectively, in multivariate analysis for RFS
          in all patients. Compared with tumors with high PAI-2 levels, those with
          intermediate and low levels showed a poor RFS with a RHR (95% CI) of 1.30
          (1.14-1.48) and 1.76 (1.38-2.24), respectively. Similar results were
          obtained in the multivariate analysis for OS in all patients. Furthermore,
          uPA and PAI-1 were independent predictive factors of a poor RFS and OS in
          node-negative and node-positive patients. PAI-2 also added to the
          multivariate models for RFS in node-negative and node-positive patients,
          and in the analysis for OS in node-negative patients. uPAR did not further
          contribute to any of the multivariate models. A prognostic score was
          calculated based on the estimates from the final multivariate model for
          RFS. Using this score, the difference between the highest and lowest 10%
          risk groups was 66% in the analysis for RFS at 10 years and 61% in the
          analysis for OS. Moreover, separate prognostic scores were calculated for
          node-negative and node-positive patients. In the 10% highest risk groups,
          the proportion of disease-free patients was only 27 +/- 6% and 9 +/- 3% at
          10 years for node-negative and node-positive patients, respectively. These
          proportions were 86 +/- 4% and 61 +/- 6% for the corresponding 10% lowest
          risk groups of relapse. We conclude that several components of the uPA
          system are potential predictors of RFS and OS in patients with primary
          invasive breast cancer. Knowledge of these factors could be helpful to
          assess the individual risk of patients, to select various types of
          adjuvant treatment and to identify patients who may benefit from targeted
          therapies that are currently being developed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Complete sequencing of TP53 predicts poor response to systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9358/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>TP53 has been implicated in regulation of the cell cycle, DNA repair, and
      apoptosis. We studied, in primary breast tumors through direct cDNA
      sequencing of exons 2-11, whether TP53 gene mutations can predict response
      in patients with advanced disease to either first-line tamoxifen therapy
      (202 patients, of whom 55% responded) or up-front (poly)chemotherapy (41
      patients, of whom 46% responded). TP53 mutations were detected in 90 of
      243 (37%) tumors, and one-fourth of these mutations resulted in a
      premature termination of the protein. The mutations were observed in 32%
      (65 of 202) of the primary tumors of tamoxifen-treated patients and in 61%
      (25 of 41) of the primary tumors of the chemotherapy patients. TP53
      mutation was significantly associated with a poor response to tamoxifen
      [31% versus 66%; odds ratio (OR), 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI),
      0.12-0.42; P &lt; 0.0001]. Patients with TP53 gene mutations in codons that
      directly contact DNA or with mutations in the zinc-binding domain loop L3
      showed the lowest response to tamoxifen (18% and 15% response rates,
      respectively). TP53 mutations were related, although not significantly, to
      a poor response to up-front chemotherapy (36% versus 63%; OR, 0.34; 95%
      CI, 0.09-1.24). In multivariate analysis for response including the
      classical parameters age and menopausal status, disease-free interval,
      dominant site of relapse, and levels of estrogen receptor and progesterone
      receptor, TP53 mutation was a significant predictor of poor response in
      the tamoxifen-treated group (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13-0.63; P = 0.0014).
      TP53-mutated and estrogen receptor-negative (&lt;10 fmol/mg protein) tumors
      appeared to be the most resistant phenotype. Interestingly, the response
      of patients with TP53 mutations to chemotherapy after tamoxifen was not
      worse than that of patients without these mutations (50% versus 42%; OR,
      1.35, nonsignificant). The median progression-free survival after systemic
      treatment was shorter for patients with a TP53 mutation than for patients
      with wild-type TP53 (6.6 and 0.6 months less for tamoxifen and up-front
      chemotherapy, respectively). In conclusion, TP53 gene mutation of the
      primary tumor is helpful in predicting the response of patients with
      metastatic breast disease to tamoxifen therapy. The type of mutation and
      its biological function should be considered in the analyses of the
      predictive value of TP53.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen in premenopausal metastatic breast cancer: a randomized study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9380/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Surgical or medical castration and antiestrogenic treatment
          with tamoxifen are common endocrine treatments for premenopausal women
          with breast cancer. However, tamoxifen therapy induces high levels of
          plasma estradiol, with unknown long-term effects. In this study, we
          investigated the effect of combining estrogen suppression with the
          luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist buserelin and estradiol
          receptor blockade with tamoxifen to determine whether the high estradiol
          levels induced by tamoxifen could be reduced and whether the antitumor
          effects would be better. METHODS: In a three-arm, randomized, prospective
          trial, from 1988 through 1995, a total of 161 premenopausal patients with
          advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with buserelin,
          tamoxifen, or both. Patients with steroid receptor-negative tumors or with
          tumors of unknown receptor status who had a disease-free interval of less
          than 2 years were excluded. The median follow-up was 7.3 years, during
          which 76% of the patients died, all of breast cancer. Patient and tumor
          characteristics were well balanced among treatment groups. All P values
          are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Combined treatment with buserelin and
          tamoxifen was superior to treatment with buserelin or tamoxifen alone by
          objective response rate (48%, 34%, and 28% of patients who could be
          evaluated, respectively; P =.11 [chi(2) test]), median progression-free
          survival (9.7 months, 6.3 months, and 5.6 months; P =.03), and overall
          survival (3.7 years, 2.5 years, and 2.9 years; P =.01). Actuarial 5-year
          survival percentages were 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] =
          20.4%-48.0%), 14.9% (95% CI = 3.9%-25.9%), and 18.4% (95% CI =
          7.0%-29.8%), respectively. No differences in antitumor effects were
          observed between single-agent treatment groups. During combined treatment
          or treatment with buserelin alone, plasma estradiol levels were suppressed
          equally; in contrast, during treatment with tamoxifen alone, plasma
          estradiol levels increased threefold to fourfold over pretreatment levels.
          CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with buserelin and tamoxifen was more
          effective and resulted in longer overall survival than treatment with
          either drug alone.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Working Group (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9211/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Presymptomatic DNA testing for autosomal dominant hereditary
          breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) became an option after the identification of
          the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 1994-1995. Healthy female mutation carriers
          have a high lifetime risk for breast cancer (56-87%) or ovarian cancer
          (10-60%) and may opt for intensive breast and ovary surveillance or
          prophylactic surgery (mastectomy/oophorectomy).We studied general and
          cancer related distress in 85 healthy women with a 25% or 50% risk of
          being carrier of a BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation and 66 partners in the six to
          eight week period between genetic counselling/blood sampling and
          disclosure of the test result. Questionnaire and interview data are
          analysed. Associations are explored between levels of distress and (1)
          expected consequences of being identified as a mutation carrier, (2)
          personality traits, (3) sociodemographic variables, and (4) experiences
          related to HBOC.Mean pre-test anxiety and depression levels in women at
          risk of being a carrier and partners were similar to those of a normal
          Dutch population. In about 25% of those at risk of being a carrier and 10%
          of the partners, increased to high levels of general and cancer related
          distress were found. Increased levels of distress were reported by women
          who (1) anticipated an increase in problems after an unfavourable test
          outcome, (2) considered prophylactic mastectomy if found to be mutation
          carrier, (3) had an unoptimistic personality, (4) tended to suppress their
          emotions, (5) were younger than 40 years, and (6) were more familiar with
          the serious consequences of HBOC. Recently obtained awareness of the
          genetic nature of cancer in the family was not predictive of distress.The
          majority of the women and their partners experienced a relatively calm
          period before the disclosure of the test result and seemed to postpone
          distressing thoughts until the week of disclosure of the result. The low
          distress levels may partly be explained by the use of strategies to
          minimise the emotional impact of a possibly unfavourable test outcome.
          However, a minority reported feeling very distressed. Several factors were
          found to be predictive for increased distress levels.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>