<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Manna, D.R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6660/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Standardisation in a Multi-Ethnic World: a Paradox? The validity of guidelines in the treatment of patients with different ethnic backgrounds (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8143/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10234/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether clinical practice guidelines in
      different countries take ethnic differences between patients into
      consideration and to assess the scientific foundation of such ethnic
      specific recommendations. DESIGN: Analysis of the primary care sections of
      clinical practice guidelines. SETTING: Primary care practice guidelines
      for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and asthma developed in the
      USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
      Enumeration of the ethnic specific information and recommendations in the
      guidelines, and the scientific basis and strength of this evidence.
      RESULTS: Different guidelines do address ethnic differences between
      patients, but to a varying extent. The USA guidelines contained the most
      ethnic specific statements and the Dutch guidelines the least. Most ethnic
      specific statements were backed by scientific evidence, usually arising
      from descriptive studies or narrative reviews. CONCLUSION: The attention
      given to ethnic differences between patients in clinical guidelines varies
      between countries. Guideline developers should be aware of the potential
      problems of ignoring differences in ethnicity.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>