<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Miltenburg-van Zijl, A.J.M. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6741/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Unstable angina: good long-term outcome after a complicated early course (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5568/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives. This study was performed to investigate the long-term outcome of patients with unstable angina within subgroups of the Braunwald classification.

Background. Long-term follow-up studies of patients with unstable angina are rare and date from more than two decades ago. This study was performed to establish the prognosis of different subgroups of patients with unstable angina (Braunwald criteria) during a 7-year follow-up period.

Methods. We registered a well defined group of 417 consecutive patients, admitted to the hospital for suspected unstable angina. The definite diagnosis was unstable angina in 282 patients (68%) and evolving myocardial infarction in 26; in 109 patients (26%), the symptoms were attributed to other or nonspecific causes. Patients with definite unstable angina were subclassified according to the Braunwald classification. Survival, survival without infarction and survival without infarction or intervention were determined for each class.

Results. After a median follow-up period of 94 months, the mortality rate in the first year was 6% and 2% to 3% in the following years. The frequency of revascularization was 47% in the first year, and that for myocardial infarction was 11% in the first year and 1% to 3% thereafter. The Braunwald classification appeared to be appropriate for risk stratification in the first year. However, at 7 years the event rates in all classes were similar. In particular, the Braunwald classification had no long-term impact on mortality or infarction rates. However, patients with acute angina at rest or postinfarction angina and patients with extensive anginal treatment had high intervention rates.

Conclusions. To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that despite a complicated course during the first year, current management results in good long-term outcome in patients with unstable angina.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cardiologists' Use of clinical information for management decisions for patients with unstable angina: a policy analysis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5549/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-07-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Previous studies of management of unstable angina have revealed substantial differences in management between different hospitals, especially with respect to the use of coronary angiography. Physicians in a hospital with angiography facilities were more inclined to perform angiography than were physicians in hospitals without these facilities, even when differences in patient populations were taken into account. The authors compared the management strategies of 18 cardiologists, working in hospitals with and without angiography facilities, using a series of paper-case summaries, in order to assess the contribution of individual variability between physicians to practice differences. Physicians who worked in a hospital with in-house angiography facilities were more inclined to request angiography in similar case summaries, but the inter-individual variation exceeded the between-hospital variation. The variation in individual policies with respect to the decision to initiate coronary angiography could be associated with differences in weighting clinical information. These results confirm that practice variations may have many causes: variability in patients' characteristics, variations in how physicians react to these, differences in the availability of services, and variability in thresholds for action.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Variation in the use of coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina is related to differences in patient population and availability of angiography facilities, without affecting prognosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5535/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: Examination of the difference in management strategies with respect to coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina pectoris, and the consequences of this difference on prognosis. DESIGN: Prospective registration of consecutive patients admitted to two different hospitals. SETTING: University and a large community hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Patients under 80 years, without recent (&lt; 4 weeks) infarction or recent (&lt; 6 months) coronary revascularization procedure, admitted for chest pain suspected to indicate unstable angina pectoris. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision to initiate coronary angiography or to continue on medical treatment. At 6 months the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction was measured. RESULTS: Clinical variables associated with the decision to initiate angiography were young age, male gender, progression of angina, multiple pain episodes and use of beta-blocker or calcium antagonists before admission, abnormal ST-T segment on baseline ECG, recurrent pain in hospital, and ECG changes during pain. These associations did not differ between hospitals. Nevertheless, angiography was performed more often in the presence of angiography facilities (university hospital), independent of the variable case-mix. Survival and infarct-free survival were similar in both hospitals, 96% and 90% respectively. CONCLUSION: The difference in angiography rate for unstable angina can be explained in part by differences in patient population and hospital facilities, but no difference was observed in physicians' assessment of patient characteristics. The observed practice variation did not affect prognosis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Antiplatelet therapy in therapy-resistant unstable angina: A pilot study with REO PRO (c7E3) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5513/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Patients with unstable angina, refractory to intensive medical therapy, are at high risk of developing thrombotic complications, such as myocardial infarction and coronary occlusion during coronary angioplasty. As platelet aggregation and thrombus formation play an important role in this ongoing ischaemic process, a monoclonal platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antibody (c7E3) has been designed to modify the clinical course and underlying coronary lesion morphology. To evaluate whether c7E3 could influence the incidence of complications, we randomized 60 patients to c7E3 or placebo after initial angiography had demonstrated a culprit lesion amenable for angioplasty. All patients exhibited dynamic ECG changes and recurrent pain attacks, despite intensive medical therapy. After study drug bolus and infusion, angiography was repeated and angioplasty performed. Recurrent ischaemia during study drug infusion occurred in nine and 16 patients from the c7E3 and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.06). Major events defined as death, myocardial infarction or urgent intervention occurred in one and seven patients, respectively (P = 0.03). One patient from the placebo group died as a result of recurrent infarction. Resolution of clots was only observed in the c7E3 group, combined with improvement in TIMI flow grade in 20% of patients. Quantitative angiography showed an improvement in percentage diameter stenosis in the c7E3 group, which was not observed in the placebo group, although the difference between the two treatment groups was not significant. No excess bleeding was observed in the treatment group. Thus, c7E3 bolus and infusion, combined with heparin and aspirin improved the clinical course, the coronary lesion morphology and rheology in patients with unstable angina, refractory to medical treatment.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Randomized trial of a GPIIb/IIIa platelet receptor blocker in refractory unstable angina (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5475/</link>
      <pubDate>1994-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Patients with unstable angina despite intensive medical therapy, ie, refractory angina, are at high risk for developing thrombotic complications: myocardial infarction or coronary occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Chimeric 7E3 (c7E3) Fab is an antibody fragment that blocks the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor and potently inhibits platelet aggregation. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate whether potent platelet inhibition could reduce these complications, 60 patients with dynamic ST-T changes and recurrent pain despite intensive medical therapy were randomized to c7E3 Fab or placebo. After initial angiography had demonstrated a culprit lesion suitable for PTCA, placebo or c7E3 Fab was administered as 0.25 mg/kg bolus injection followed by 10 micrograms/min for 18 to 24 hours until 1 hour after completion of second angiography and PTCA. During study drug infusion, ischemia occurred in 9 c7E3 Fab and 16 placebo patients (P = .06). During hospital stay, 12 major events occurred in 7 placebo patients (23%), including 1 death, 4 infarcts, and 7 urgent interventions. In the c7E3 Fab group, only 1 event (an infarct) occurred (3%, P = .03). Angiography showed improved TIMI flow in 4 placebo and 6 c7E3 Fab patients and worsening of flow in 3 placebo patients but in none of the c7E3 Fab patients. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvement of the lesion in the patients treated with c7E3 Fab, which was not observed in the placebo group, although the difference between the two treatment groups was not significant. Measurement of platelet function and bleeding time demonstrated &gt; 90% blockade of GPIIb/IIIa receptors, &gt; 90% reduction of ex vivo platelet aggregation to ADP, and a significantly prolonged bleeding time during c7E3 Fab infusion, without excess bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with c7E3 Fab, heparin, and aspirin appears safe. These pilot study results support the concept that effective blockade of the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors can reduce myocardial infarction and facilitate PTCA in patients with refractory unstable angina.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>