<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Gaast, A. van der</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/676/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Impact of a multidisciplinary tumour board meeting for upper-GI malignancies on clinical decision making: a prospective cohort study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34273/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-12-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background/aims: The Dutch guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of upper-GI malignancies recommend review of patients by a multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect on clinical decision making of an MDT for patients with upper-GI malignancies. Methods: All physicians participating in the MDT completed an electronic standardised case form to delineate their proposed treatment plan for the patients they presented, including the intent of treatment and the modality of treatment. This therapeutic or diagnostic proposal was then compared with the plan on which consensus was reached by the MDT. Results: A total of 252/280 (90.0%) forms were completed and suitable for analysis. In 87/252 (34.5%) of the case presentations, the MDT altered the proposed plan of management. In 29/87 (33.3%) cases, a more extensive diagnostic work-up was decided upon. In 8/87 (9.2%) cases the curative intent of the proposed treatment was altered to palliation only. In 2/75 (2.7%) cases, however, it was decided that a patient could be treated with curative intent instead of the proposed palliative intent. Conclusion: In over 1/3 of cases, the diagnostic work-up or treatment plan is altered after evaluation by a multidisciplinary tumour board. This study supports Dutch guidelines recommending discussion of patients with upper-GI malignancies by a multidisciplinary tumour board. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone in patients with resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25352/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: This is a randomized, controlled trial of preoperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Patients were allocated to chemotherapy, consisting of 2-4 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide, followed by surgery (CS group) or surgery alone (S group). Initial results reported only in abstract form in 1997, demonstrated an advantage for overall survival in the CS group. The results of this trial have been updated and discussed in the timeframe in which this study was performed.Methods: This trial recruited 169 patients with OSCC, 85 patients assigned to preoperative chemotherapy and 84 patients underwent immediate surgery. The primary study endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were disease free survival (DFS) and pattern of failure. Survival has been determined from Kaplan-Meier curves and treatment comparisons made with the log-rank test.Results: There were 148 deaths, 71 in the CS and 77 in the S group. Median OS time was 16 months in the CS group compared with 12 months in the S group; 2-year survival rates were 42% and 30%; and 5-year survival rates were 26% and 17%, respectively. Intention to treat analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for patients in the CS group (P = 0.03, by the log-rank test; hazard ratio [HR] 0.71; 95%CI 0.51-0.98). DFS (from landmark time of 6 months after date of randomisation) was also better in the CS-group than in the S group (P = 0.02, by the log-rank test; HR 0.72; 95%CI 0.52-1.0). No difference in failure pattern was observed between both treatment arms.Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy with a combination of etoposide and cisplatin significantly improved overall survival in patients with OSCC. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phase II trial of Uracil/Tegafur plus leucovorin and celecoxib combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23416/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background and purpose: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a short intensive Uracil/Tegafur (UFT) based chemoradiotherapy scheme combined with celecoxib in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Material and methods: The Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam and the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam enrolled 83 eligible patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer in a prospective multicentre phase II study. Median age was 62 years, median tumour size 40 mm and the majority of the patients (85%) had pancreatic head cancers. Treatment consisted of 20 × 2.5 Gy radiotherapy combined with UFT 300 mg/m2 per day, leucovorin (folinic acid) 30 mg and celecoxib 800 mg for 28 days concomitant with radiotherapy. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Results: Full treatment compliance was achieved in 55% of patients, 80% received at least 3 weeks of treatment. No partial or complete response was observed. Median survival was 10.6 months and median time to progression 6.9 months. Toxicity was substantial with 28% grades III and IV gastro-intestinal toxicity and two early toxic deaths. Conclusions: Based on the lack of response, the substantial toxicity of mainly gastro-intestinal origin and the reported mediocre overall and progression free survival, we cannot advise our short intensive chemoradiotherapy schedule combined with celecoxib as the standard treatment.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23726/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery can improve survival in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer, but not all patients respond. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been proposed to identify nonresponders early during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to determine whether FDG-PET could differentiate between responding and nonresponding esophageal tumors early in the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: This clinical trial comprised serial FDG-PET before and 14 days after start of chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal carcinoma. Histopathologic responders were defined as patients with no or less than 10% viable tumor cells (Mandard score on resection specimen). PET response was measured using the standardized uptake value (SUV). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the ability of SUV in distinguishing between histopathologic responders and nonresponders. Results: In 100 included patients, 64 were histopathologic responders. The median SUV decrease 14 days after the start of therapy was 30.9% for histopathologic responders and 1.7% for nonresponders (P = 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.60-0.82). Using a 0% SUV decrease cutoff value, PET correctly identified 58 of 64 responders (sensitivity 91%) and 18 of 36 nonresponders (specificity 50%). The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 76% and 75%, respectively. Background: SUV decrease 14 days after the start of chemoradiotherapy was significantly associated with histopathologic tumor response, but its accuracy in detecting nonresponders was too low to justify the clinical use of FDG-PET for early discontinuation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phase i and pharmacological study of the broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor JNJ-26483327 in patients with advanced solid tumours (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27407/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-09-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background:JNJ-26483327 is an oral, potent, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibiting kinases of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-1,-2 and-4, rearranged during transfection (RET) receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and Src family (Lyn, Fyn, Yes) at low nanomolar concentrations. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of JNJ-26483327.Methods:Nineteen patients with advanced cancers received JNJ-26483327 continuous twice daily (BID) in escalating dose cohorts ranging from 100 to 2100 mg. Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in paired skin biopsies and blood.Results:JNJ-26483327 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg BID, with target-inhibition-related toxicity such as diarrhoea and skin rash, and other common reported toxicities being nausea, vomiting, anorexia and fatigue. At 2100 mg, two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed, consisting of grade 3 anorexia and a combination of grade 3 anorexia and fatigue, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional up to 1500 mg in which plasma levels were obtained showing anti-tumour activity in xenograft mouse models. Pharmacodynamic analysis did not show a substantial effect on expression of Ki-67, p27 kip1, phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphorylated Akt and EGFR, and serum levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-C and VEGF-D remained unchanged. Stable disease was noted in six patients (32%).Conclusion:JNJ-26483327 is well tolerated and shows a predictable pharmacokinetic profile; the recommended dose for further studies is 1500 mg BID. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The addition of pravastatin to chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma: A randomised phase II trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20968/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Statins have for long been considered to play a potential role in anticancer treatment based upon their ability to inhibit the mevalonate synthesis pathway. This randomised phase II trial compared the efficacy and safety of pravastatin added to epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECC versus ECC + P) in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive up to six cycles of 3-weekly ECC with or without pravastatin (40 mg, once daily from day 1 of the first cycle until day 21 of the last cycle). Primary end-point was progression-free rate at 6 months (PFR6months). Secondary end-points were response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. For early termination in case of futility, a two-stage design was applied (P0 = 50%; P1 = 70%; α = 0.05; β = 0.10). Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. PFR6months  was 6/14 patients (42.8%) in the ECC + P arm, and 7/15 patients (46.7%) in the control arm, and therefore the study was terminated after the first stage. In the ECC and ECC + P arm, RR was 7/15 (46.7%) and 5/15 (33.3%), median PFS was 5 and 6 months and median OS was 6 and 8 months, respectively. Toxicity data showed no significant differences, although there was a trend towards more gastrointestinal side-effects such as diarrhoea and stomatitis in the ECC + P arm. Conclusion: In this randomised phase II trial the addition of pravastatin to ECC did not improve outcome in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, further testing of this combination in a randomised phase III trial cannot be recommended.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Review of Meta-Analyses (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17488/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery with surgery alone for locally advanced esophageal cancer have shown no difference in survival between the two treatments. Meta-analyses on neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer, however, are discordant. Methods: For the present study, published meta-analyses on neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer were identified from the PubMed database and critically appraised in order to make a judgment on the applicability of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in clinical practice and decision making. Results: Two of the six meta-analyses examined did not show a significant survival benefit in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Differences in the studies included and statistical methods applied might account for this. Moreover, there was heterogeneity between the RCTs included in the meta-analyses with regard to the patients included, tumor histology, and radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimes. Also, surgical technique was not uniform. No data on individual patients were available for most meta-analyses. The RCTs included in the meta-analyses were of inadequate sample size. All were started in the nineties, and hence methods for diagnosis, staging, treatment delivery, and outcome measurement reflect clinical practice during that decade. Conclusions: The current data on neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer strongly indicate the need for designing future high-quality trials that will contribute to a better understanding of the role of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable cancer of the esophagus and help to identify patient subgroups that would benefit most.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with carcinoma of the distal esophagus and celiac lymph node involvement. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17955/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Patients with carcinoma of the distal esophagus and metastatic celiac lymph nodes (M1a) have a poor prognosis and are often denied surgery. In this study, we evaluated our treatment strategy of chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with M1a disease. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who received chemotherapy for carcinoma of the distal esophagus with celiac lymph node involvement between 2000 and 2007 were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and histopathological responses to chemotherapy were analyzed and follow-up comprised review of medical charts. RESULTS: Twelve non-responding patients were not eligible for surgery. Twenty-six patients with partial responses or stable disease were operated on. The resectability rate was 96% (25/26) and tumor-free resection margins (R0) were achieved in 68% (17/25). The overall survival of patients with M1a disease was 16 months. Patients who received chemotherapy alone had a median survival of 10 months; patients who underwent additional surgery had a median survival of 26 months (log-rank P &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall survival of patients with carcinoma of the distal esophagus and clinical celiac lymph node involvement is poor. Tumor-free resection margins (R0) in M1a patients with clinical response to chemotherapy are likely to be achieved and contributes to prolonged survival. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pathological analysis after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: The Rotterdam experience (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24100/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Multimodality treatment is increasingly used in the treatment for esophageal cancer. We determined the tumor regression grade after preoperative chemoradiation and correlated the effect of specific pathologic and clinical findings to overall survival. For this purpose esophageal biopsies and surgical specimens of 67 patients treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin concurrent with radiotherapy were reviewed. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy led to a significant downstaging. Complete tumor regression was found in 24% of the patients resulting in a trend towards better survival. It was found more frequently in poorly differentiated tumors. Patients with pre-treatment nodal involvement, assessed by endoscopic ultrasound, had a significantly worse survival compared to patients without. Contrastingly, this was not found for post-treatment nodal involvement, as determined by pathological examination, speculating that survival is more determined by (submicroscopic) distant disease, than by locoregional tumor cells. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: A randomised trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25075/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-13T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Between January 2004 and February 2006, 109 patients after intentionally curative surgery for oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer were randomised to standard follow-up of surgeons at the outpatient clinic (standard follow-up; n=55) or by regular home visits of a specialist nurse (nurse-led follow-up; n=54). Longitudinal data on generic (EuroQuol-5D, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) and disease-specific quality of life (EORTC QLQ-OES18), patient satisfaction and costs were collected at baseline and at 6 weeks and 4, 7 and 13 months afterwards. We found largely similar quality-of-life scores in the two follow-up groups over time. At 4 and 7 months, slightly more improvement on the EQ-VAS was noted in the nurse-led compared with the standard follow-up group (P=0.13 and 0.12, respectively). Small differences were also found in patient satisfaction between the two groups (P=0.14), with spouses being more satisfied with nurse-led follow-up (P=0.03). No differences were found in most medical outcomes. However, body weight of patients of the standard follow-up group deteriorated slightly (P=0.04), whereas body weight of patients of the nurse-led follow-up group remained stable. Medical costs were lower in the nurse-led follow-up group (\[euro]2600 vs \[euro]3800), however, due to the large variation between patients, this was not statistically significant (P=0.11). A cost effectiveness acceptability curve showed that the probability of being cost effective for costs per one point gain in general quality-of-life exceeded 90 and 75% after 4 and 13 months of follow-up, respectively. Nurse-led follow-up at home does not adversely affect quality of life or satisfaction of patients compared with standard follow-up by clinicians at the outpatient clinic. This type of care is very likely to be more cost effective than physician-led follow-up. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Adjuvant intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus surgery alone in resectable pancreatic and periampullary cancer a prospective randomized controlled trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29162/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Success of surgical treatment for pancreatic and periampullary cancer is often limited due to locoregional recurrence and/or the development of distant metastases. Objective: The survival benefit of celiac axis infusion (CAI) and radiotherapy (RT) versus observation after resection of pancreatic or periampullary cancer was investigated. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 120 consecutive patients with histopathologically proven pancreatic or periampullary cancer received either adjuvant treatment consisting of intra-arterial mitoxantrone, 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatinum in combination with 30 × 1.8 Gy radiotherapy (group A) or no adjuvant treatment (group B). Groups were stratified for tumor type (pancreatic vs. periampullary tumors). Results: After surgery, 120 patients were randomized (59 patients in the treatment group, 61 in the observation group). The median follow-up was 17 months. No significant overall survival benefit was seen (median, 19 vs. 18 months resp.). Progressive disease was seen in 86 patients: in 37 patients in the CAI/RT group, and in 49 patients in the observation group (log-rank P &lt; 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed significantly less liver metastases after adjuvant treatment in periampullary tumors (log-rank P &lt; 0.03) without effect on local recurrence. Nonetheless, there was no significant effect on overall survival in these patients (log-rank P &lt; 0.15). In patients with pancreatic cancer, CAI/RT had no significant effect on local recurrence (log-rank P &lt; 0.12) neither on the development of liver metastases (log-rank P &lt; 0.76) and consequently, no effect on overall survival. Conclusion: This adjuvant treatment schedule results in a prolonged time to progression. For periampullary tumors, CAI/RT induced a significant reduction in the development of liver metastases, with a possible effect on overall survival. Especially in these tumors, CAI/RT might prove beneficial in larger groups and further research is warranted. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery versus surgery alone for patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (CROSS) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30339/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background. A surgical resection is currently the preferred treatment for esophageal cancer if the tumor is considered to be resectable without evidence of distant metastases (cT1-3 N0-1 M0). A high percentage of irradical resections is reported in studies using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone and in trials in which patients are treated with surgery alone. Improvement of locoregional control by using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might therefore improve the prognosis in these patients. We previously reported that after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly administrations of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel combined with concurrent radiotherapy nearly always a complete R0-resection could be performed. The concept that this neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen improves overall survival has, however, to be proven in a randomized phase III trial. Methods/design. The CROSS trial is a multicenter, randomized phase III, clinical trial. The study compares neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer, with inclusion of 175 patients per arm. The objectives of the CROSS trial are to compare median survival rates and quality of life (before, during and after treatment), pathological responses, progression free survival, the number of R0 resections, treatment toxicity and costs between patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone for surgically resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Over a 5 week period concurrent chemoradiotherapy will be applied on an outpatient basis. Paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and Carboplatin (Area-Under-Curve = 2) are administered by i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. External beam radiation with a total dose of 41.4 Gy is given in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 fractions a week. After completion of the protocol, patients will be followed up every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for the second year, and then at the end of each year until 5 years after treatment. Quality of life questionnaires will be filled out during the first year of follow-up. Discussion. This study will contribute to the evidence on any benefits of neoadjuvant treatment in esophageal cancer patients using a promising chemoradiotherapy regimen. Trial registration. ISRCTN80832026. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: Pharmacokinetics and clinical outcome of paclitaxel and carboplatin treatment (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15940/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Administration of chemotherapy in patients with renal failure, treated with hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is still a challenge and literature data is scarce. Here we present a case study of a patient on CAPD, treated with weekly and three-weekly paclitaxel/ carboplatin for recurrent ovarian cancer. Experimental: During the first, second and ninth cycle of treatment, blood, urine and CAPD samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis of paclitaxel and total and unbound carboplatin-derived platinum. Results: Treatment was well tolerated by the patient. No excessive toxicity was observed and at the end of treatment she was in a complete remission. The plasma pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were unaltered compared to historical data, with neglectable urinary and CAPD clearance. In contrast, the pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were altered, with doubled half-lives compared to patients with normal renal function. Of the administered carboplatin dose, up to 20% was cleared via the dialysate, while only up to 8% was cleared via the urine. Conclusion: Paclitaxel and carboplatin can be safely administered to patients with chronic renal failure on CAPD. For paclitaxel the generally applied dose can be administered, and although for carboplatin dose-adjustment is required due to the diminished renal function, the dose can be calculated using Calvert's formula.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Quality of Life During Neoadjuvant Treatment and After Surgery for Resectable Esophageal Carcinoma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29633/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Because of the trade-off between the potentially negative quality-of-life (QoL) effects and uncertain favorable survival effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer, we assessed heath-related QoL (HRQoL) for up to 1 year postoperatively in these patients treated with preoperative CRT with a non-platinum-based outpatient regimen followed by esophagectomy. Methods and Materials: Patients undergoing neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy concurrent with radiotherapy followed by surgery completed standardized HRQoL questionnaires before and after CRT and at regular times up to 1 year postoperatively. We analyzed differences in generic Qol core questionnaire [QLQ-C30] and condition-specific (esophageal site-specific [OES-18]) HRQoL scores over time by using a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Mean scores of most HRQoL scales deteriorated significantly during neoadjuvant CRT. The largest deterioration was observed for physical and role-functioning scales. All except two symptom scores worsened significantly. Postoperatively, most mean HRQoL scores improved until recovery to baseline level. Speed of improvement varied. Average taste score returned to baseline 3 months postoperatively, whereas it took 1 year for the average role-functioning score to restore. The emotional-functioning score showed a different pattern; it was worst at baseline and increased over time during CRT and postoperatively. Dysphagia and pain scores worsened considerably during CRT, restored to baseline 3 months postoperatively, and were even significantly better 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions: Preoperative CRT with paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with resectable esophageal cancer had a considerable temporary negative effect on most aspects of HRQoL. Nonetheless, all HRQoL scores were restored or even improved 1 year postoperatively. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: A comparative study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35212/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background and Objectives: Both ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) can be used to detect supraclavicular lymph node metastases. Aim was to compare US, US plus fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA), CT, US + CT, and US-FNA + CT for the detection of these metastases in esophageal or gastric cardia cancer patients. Methods: Between 1994 and 2004, 567 patients underwent US and CT for esophageal or gastric cardia cancer staging. Gold standard was postoperative detection of lymph nodes in the resected specimen, FNA, or a radiological result with follow-up. Results: Sensitivities of US (75%), US-FNA (72%), US + CT (80%), and US-FNA + CT (79%) were higher than sensitivity of CT alone (25%) (P &lt; 0.001). Specificities were high for US-FNA (100%), CT (99%), and US-FNA + CT (99%), whereas those of US alone (91%) and US + CT (91%) were lower (P &lt; 0.001). In 4/65 (6%) patients with true-positive malignant lymph nodes, CT was positive with US and/or US-FNA being negative. However, in 36/65 (55%) patients, US and/or US-FNA were positive with CT being negative. Conclusion: US-FNA seems the preferred diagnostic modality for the detection of supraclavicular lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Sensitivity of metastases detection only slightly improves if US-FNA is combined with CT. A prospective, comparative study is however needed. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>First-line treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer: A phase II study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35421/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-05-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Fifty-one eligible patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg m-2intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg m-2orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 in a 21-day treatment cycle as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in one patient and anaemia in another patient. No grade 4 haematological toxicities were observed. Grade 4 non-haematological toxicity (lethargy) occurred in one patient (2%). Grade 3 non-haematological toxicity was seen in 14 (27%) patients (vomiting and polyneuropathy (8%); nausea (6%); lethargy and hand-foot syndrome (4%); and anorexia, diarrhoea, and hyperbilirubinaemia (each in one patient)). In 22% of the patients, toxicity was the reason for stopping the treatment. The overall response rate was 39%. The median overall survival was 8 months; the 1-year survival rate was 26%. In the quality of life (QoL) analysis, the emotional well-being improved during treatment, but the physical functioning scores declined. The fatigue score on the symptom scales increased. Overall, the global QoL score did not change during treatment. In conclusion, the activity of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is comparable with other chemotherapy regimens in advanced oesophageal cancer with a low frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity. Because this treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, it is probably less toxic than cisplatin-based therapy and preserves QoL during treatment, it is a viable treatment option in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prophylaxis of irinotecan-induced diarrhea with neomycin and potential role for UGT1A1*28 genotype screening: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14085/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-09-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: Delayed-type diarrhea is a common side effect of irinotecan and is associated with a bacterial-mediated formation of the active irinotecan metabolite SN-38 from its glucuronide conjugate in the intestine. Based on a pilot study, we hypothesized that concomitant administration of the antibiotic neomycin would diminish exposure of the gut to SN-38 and ameliorate the incidence and severity of diarrhea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with irinotecan in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients received irinotecan (350 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks) combined with neomycin (660 mg three times daily for three consecutive days, starting 2 days before chemotherapy) or combined with placebo. Blood samples were obtained for additional pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were evaluable for the toxicity analysis. Baseline patient characteristics, systemic SN-38 exposure, and UGT1A1*28 genotype status (i.e., an additional TA repeat in the promoter region of uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1) were similar in both arms. Although distribution, severity, and duration of delayed-type diarrhea did not differ significantly between arms, grade 3 diarrhea tended to be less frequent in the neomycin arm. The presence of at least one UGT1A1*28 allele was strongly related to the incidence of grade 2-3 diarrhea. In the neomycin arm, grade 2 nausea was significantly more common. CONCLUSION: Our results do not suggest a major role for neomycin as prophylaxis for irinotecan-induced delayed-type diarrhea. It is suggested that the UGT1A1*28 genotype status could be used as a screening tool for a priori prevention of irinotecan-induced delayed-type diarrhea.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phase I and pharmacologic study of PKI166, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13931/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: This phase I study was conducted to assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the oral, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor PKI166 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: PKI166 was first given once daily continuously and in the second part of the study once daily for 2 weeks every 4 weeks to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Ten additional patients were studied at MTD to acquire additional safety information and characterize the effect of food intake on PKI166 pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetics of PKI166 were characterized after single and multiple doses at all dose levels. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received a total of one hundred sixteen 28-day cycles of PKI166. Dose-limiting transaminase elevations were observed in two of seven and two of eight patients using 50 and 100 mg PKI166 continuously. In the second part with PKI166 once daily for 2 weeks every 4 weeks, MTD was set at 750 mg. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of diarrhea, skin rash, and transaminase elevations. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed fast absorption, a linear dose-response relationship without drug accumulation after multiple doses. At MTD, no significant influence of food intake on PKI166 pharmacokinetics was observed. Stable disease for more than two cycles was observed in 11 patients. CONCLUSIONS: PKI166 given once daily for 2 weeks every 4 weeks is well tolerated with linear pharmacokinetics, compatible with once daily dosing, and without significant effect of food intake on absorption. The recommended dose for further studies is 750 mg once daily for 2 weeks every 4 weeks.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10326/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and
      pharmacokinetics of a fixed dose of paclitaxel followed by increasing
      doses of carboplatin, given weekly to patients with advanced esophageal or
      gastric junction cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Paclitaxel was administered
      on day 1 as a 1-h infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m(2) followed by a
      1-h infusion of carboplatin targeting an area under the curve (AUC) of 2-5
      mg x min/ml, with cycles repeated on days 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43. RESULTS:
      Forty patients [36 males; median (range) age, 57 (40-74) years] were
      enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at a carboplatin AUC of 5 mg
      x min/ml and consisted of treatment delay attributable to
      myelosuppression. No grade 3/4 treatment-related nonhematological toxicity
      was observed. The highest dose intensity (&gt;95% of the planned dose over
      time) was achieved with a carboplatin AUC of 4 mg x min/ml. The mean
      (+/-SD) AUCs of unbound (Cu) and total paclitaxel were 0.662 +/- 0.186 and
      7.37 +/- 1.33 micro M x h, respectively. Clearance of Cu was 188 +/- 44.6
      liter/h/m(2), which is not significantly different from historical data (P
          = 0.52). Cremophor EL clearance was 123 +/- 23 ml/h/m(2), similar to
      previous findings. Of 37 patients evaluable for response, 1 had complete
      response, 19 had partial response, and 10 had stable disease, accounting
      for an overall response rate of 54%. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen is very
      tolerable and effective, and the recommended doses for additional studies
      are paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)), with carboplatin targeting an AUC of 4 mg x
      min/ml.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phase II study of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin given every 2 weeks for patients with a resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10195/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: We have previously reported a favourable response rate in
      patients with advanced esophageal cancer after treatment with a biweekly
      regimen of paclitaxel and cisplatin. In this study we investigate the
      feasibility and efficacy of this regimen in a neo-adjuvant setting.
      PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of
      the esophagus received paclit-axel 180 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)
      every 2 weeks. Patients received three courses and responding patients
      received three additional courses; thereafter, patients were referred for
      surgery. Patient characteristics of 50 eligible patients were as follows:
      male, 60%; median age, 62 years (range 45-78); median World Health
      Organization performance status of 1 (range 0-2). RESULTS: Ninety-four per
      cent of patients received at least three courses of chemotherapy.
      Haematological toxicity consisted of National Cancer Institute-Common
      Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 71% of patients, with
      neutropenic fever occurring in only two patients (4%). The overall
      response rate was 59%. Pathological examination showed tumour-free margins
      in 38 patients. In seven patients no residual tumour was found. The median
      overall survival was 20 months and the 1- and 3-year survival rates were
      68% and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This dose-dense schedule of
      paclitaxel and cisplatin administered biweekly is well tolerated and the
      observed overall and complete response rates are promising.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of brostallicin (PNU-166196), a new DNA minor-groove binder, administered intravenously every 3 weeks to adult patients with metastatic cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10201/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: Brostallicin (PNU-166196) is a cytotoxic agent that binds to the
      minor groove of DNA with significant antitumor activity in preclinical
      studies. This trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose,
      the toxicity profile, and the pharmacokinetics of Brostallicin in cancer
      patients. Experimental Design: Patients were treated with escalating doses
      of Brostallicin ranging from 0.85 to 15 mg/m(2) administered as a 10-min
      i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis
      were collected during the first and second course, and analyzed by
      liquid-chromatography with tandem-mass spectrometric detection. RESULTS:
      Twenty-seven evaluable patients received a total of 73 courses. Grade 4
      neutropenia was the only dose-limiting toxicity at 12.5 mg/m(2), whereas
      grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1 patient) and grade 4 neutropenia (2 patients)
      were the dose-limiting toxicities at 15 mg/m(2). Other side effects,
      including thrombocytopenia and nausea, were generally mild. The maximum
      tolerated dose was defined at 10 mg/m(2). The clearance and terminal
      half-life of Brostallicin were dose-independent, with mean (+/-SD) values
      of 9.33 +/- 2.38 liters/h/m(2) and 4.69 +/- 1.88 h, respectively. There
      was no significant accumulation of Brostallicin with repeated
      administration. Significant relationships were observed between systemic
      exposure to Brostallicin and neutrophil counts at nadir. One partial
      response was observed in a patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor.
      CONCLUSION: Brostallicin was found to be well tolerated, with neutropenia
      being the principal toxicity. The recommended dose for additional
      evaluation in this schedule is 10 mg/m(2).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Randomized clinical trial of adenosine 5'-triphosphate in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9253/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Extracellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) is involved in
          the regulation of a variety of biologic processes, including
          neurotransmission, muscle contraction, and liver glucose metabolism, via
          purinergic receptors. In nonrandomized studies involving patients with
          different tumor types including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), ATP
          infusion appeared to inhibit loss of weight and deterioration of quality
          of life (QOL) and performance status. We conducted a randomized clinical
          trial to evaluate the effects of ATP in patients with advanced NSCLC
          (stage IIIB or IV). METHODS: Fifty-eight patients were randomly assigned
          to receive either 10 intravenous 30-hour ATP infusions, with the infusions
          given at 2- to 4-week intervals, or no ATP. Outcome parameters were
          assessed every 4 weeks until 28 weeks. Between-group differences were
          tested for statistical significance by use of repeated-measures analysis,
          and reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were
          allocated to receive ATP treatment and 30 received no ATP. Mean weight
          changes per 4-week period were -1.0 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] =
          -1.5 to -0.5) in the control group and 0.2 kg (95% CI = -0.2 to +0.6) in
          the ATP group (P =.002). Serum albumin concentration declined by -1.2 g/L
          (95% CI= -2.0 to -0.4) per 4 weeks in the control group but remained
          stable (0.0 g/L; 95% CI = -0.3 to +0.3) in the ATP group (P =.006). Elbow
          flexor muscle strength declined by -5.5% (95% CI = -9.6% to -1. 4%) per 4
          weeks in the control group but remained stable (0.0%; 95% CI= -1.4% to
          +1.4%) in the ATP group (P =.01). A similar pattern was observed for knee
          extensor muscles (P =.02). The effects of ATP on body weight, muscle
          strength, and albumin concentration were especially marked in cachectic
          patients (P =.0002, P =.0001, and P =. 0001, respectively, for ATP versus
          no ATP). QOL score changes per 4-week period in the ATP group showed
          overall less deterioration than in the control group-physical scores
          (-0.2% versus -2.4%; P =. 0002); functional scores (+0.4% versus -5.5%; P
          =.02); psychologic scores (-0.7% versus -2.4%; P =.11); overall QOL score
          (+0.1% versus -3.5%; P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial
          demonstrates that ATP has beneficial effects on weight, muscle strength,
          and QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The orally administered P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 does not alter the plasma pharmacokinetics of docetaxel (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9348/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This Phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of combining
          docetaxel with the new P-glycoprotein inhibitor R101933 and to determine
          the dose limiting toxicity of this combination. Fifteen patients received
          oral R101933 alone at a dose escalated from 200 to 300 mg twice daily
          (b.i.d.; cycle 0), an escalating i.v. dose of docetaxel (60, 75, and 100
          mg/m2) as a 1-h infusion (cycle 1), and the combination (cycle 2 and
          further). Dose limiting toxicity consisting of mucositis and neutropenic
          fever was reached at the combination of docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933,
          300 mg b.i.d., and the maximum tolerated dose was established at
          docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and R101933, 200 mg b.i.d. Plasma concentrations of
          R101933 achieved in patients were in the same range as required in
          preclinical rodent models to overcome paclitaxel resistance. The plasma
          pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not influenced by the R101933 regimen
          at any dose level tested, as indicated by plasma clearance values of 26.5
          +/- 7.78 liters/h/m2 and 23.4 +/- 4.52 liters/h/m2 (P = 0.15) in cycles 1
          and 2, respectively. These findings indicate that the contribution of a
          P-glycoprotein inhibitor to the activity of anticancer chemotherapy can
          now be assessed in patients for the first time independent of its effect
          on drug pharmacokinetics.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Chemotherapy in metastatic cancer of unknown primary (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22459/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-05-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In general a patient is considered ta have a carcinoma of
unknown primary site if na primary tumor ean be identified
af ter a thorough history and physical examination, and a
reasonabIe laboratory and radiologie work-up. This definition
a180 requires a histological diagnosis of carcinoma. The
importance of histologie (re)examination in the management of
patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site has been
emphasized by several authors. Light microscopie examinat
ion may al ready provide a clue ta suggest the site of origin. lnununohistochemistry and/or electron microscopy are
of additional value, particularly in patients with undifferentiated
tumors. A substantial number of patients with a light
microscopie diagnosis of anaplastic tumor or undifferentiated
carcinoma ultimately prove to have a lymphomas.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>