<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Lokhorst, H.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6965/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Impact of ocular graft-versus-host disease on visual quality of life in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Questionnaire study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/40159/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-04-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: To determine the influence of ocular complications on quality of life (QoL) 3years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Methods: All 54 adult patients that underwent and survived allo-SCT in 2006/2007 in our centre received two questionnaires (VFQ-25: visual function questionnaire-25 and OSDI: ocular surface disease index). In addition, the following data were included: gender, age, underlying disease, presence of chronic and/or ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), number of visits to an ophthalmologist, manifestations of dry eye disease, the duration of follow-up and treatment for ocular GVHD. Results: Ocular GVHD developed in 26% (14 of 54) of patients and 71% (10 of 14) received treatment for ocular GVHD. The presence of ocular GVHD correlated with the severity of systemic GVHD (correlation coefficient: 0.52, p=0.00). The Karnofsky scores were significantly lower in the patients with ocular GVHD compared to the patients with no ocular GVHD (p=0.001). Karnofsky scores were weakly correlated with the severity of systemic GVHD (correlation coefficient: 0.25, p=0.03. Three years after the all-SCT, OSDI and VFQ-25 scores were significantly impaired in patients with ocular GVHD [mean: 76.5; range (46.1-100) and mean: 31.1; range (0-72.9)] compared to patients with no ocular GVHD [mean: 89.4; range (45.2-100) and mean: 12.9; range (0-58.3); p=0.02]. The scores of the VFQ-25 were significantly lower in the domains of general health, ocular pain, social functioning and role difficulties. Conclusion: The long-term vision-related QoL measured by the OSDI and VFQ-25 was impaired in patients with ocular GVHD. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38314/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-26T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In patients with multiple myeloma (MM), risk stratification by chromosomal abnormalities may enable a more rational selection of therapeutic approaches. In the present study, we analyzed the prognostic value of 12 chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 354 MM patients treated within the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial. Because of the 2-arm design of the study, we were able to analyze the effect of a bortezomib-based treatment before and after autologous stem cell transplantation (arm B) compared with standard treatment without bortezomib (arm A). For all analyzed chromosomal aberrations, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were at least equal or superior in the bortezomib arm compared with the standard arm. Strikingly, patients with del(17p13) benefited the most from the bortezomib-containing treatment: the median PFS in arm A was 12.0 months and in arm B it was 26.2 months (P = .024); the 3 year-OS for arm A was 17% and for arm B it was 69% (P = .028). After multivariate analysis, del(17p13) was an independent predictor for PFS (P &lt; .0001) and OS (P &lt; .0001) in arm A, whereas no statistically significant effect on PFS (P &lt; .28) or OS (P &lt; .12) was seen in arm B. In conclusion, the adverse impact of del(17p13) on PFS and OS could be significantly reduced by bortezomib-based treatment, suggesting that long-term administration of bortezomib should be recommended for patients carrying del(17p13). This trial is registered at the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register as IS-RCTN64455289. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>MicroRNA signatures characterize multiple myeloma patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33933/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma according to patient age and vulnerability: A report of the European Myeloma Network (EMN) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33252/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Most patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) are aged &gt; 65 years with 30% aged &gt; 75 years. Many elderly patients are also vulnerable because of comorbidities that complicate the management of MM. The prevalence of MM is expected to rise over time because of an aging population. Most elderly patients with MM are ineligible for autologous transplantation, and the standard treatment has, until recently, been melphalan plus prednisone. The introduction of novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, has improved outcomes; however, elderly patients withMM are more susceptible to side effects and are often unable to tolerate full drug doses. For these patients, lower-dose-intensity regimens improve the safety profile and thus optimize treatment outcome. Further research into the best treatment strategies for vulnerable elderly patients is urgently needed. Appropriate screening for vulnerability and an assessment of cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and neurologic functions, as well as age &gt; 75 years, at the start of therapy allows treatment strategies to be individualized and drug doses to be tailored to improve tolerability and optimize efficacy. Similarly, occurrence of serious nonhematologic adverse events during treatment should be carefully taken into account to adjust doses and optimize outcomes. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Lenalidomide maintenance after nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma is not feasible: Results of the HOVON 76 Trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33295/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To improve the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in multiple myeloma as part of first-line treatment, we prospectively investigated the feasibility and efficacy of lenalidomide maintenance. Patients started maintenance 1 to 6 months after nonmyeloablative allo-SCT. Lenalidomide was dosed 10 mg on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day schedule for a total of 24 cycles. Peripheral blood samples were taken to evaluate immune modulating effects. Thirty-five eligible patients were enrolled, and 30 started with lenalidomide. After 2 cycles, 14 patients (47%) had to stop treatment, mainly because of the development of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). In total, 13 patients (43%) stopped treatment because of development of GVHD, 5 patients (17%) because of other adverse events, and 5 patients (17%) because of progression. Responses improved in 37% of patients, and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival from start of maintenance was 69% (90% confidence interval, 53%-81%). Lenalidomide increased the frequency of human leukocyte antigen-DR+T cells and regulatory T cells, without correlation with clinical parameters. In conclusion, lenalidomide maintenance 10 mg daily after nonmyeloablative allo-SCT with unmanipulated graft in multiple myeloma patients is not feasible, mainly because of the induction of acute GVHD. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl as #NTR1645. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33859/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥18-24. months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effect of thalidomide with melphalan and prednisone on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a prospective analysis in a randomized trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25980/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-04-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Thalidomide with melphalan/prednisone (MPT) was defined as standard treatment in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) based on five randomized trials. In one of these trials, HOVON49, a prospective health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) study was initiated in order to assess the impact of thalidomide on QoL. Patients aged &gt;65 years with newly diagnosed MM were randomized to receive melphalan plus prednisone (MP) or MPT, followed by thalidomide maintenance in the MPT arm. Two hundred eighty-four patients were included in this side study (MP, n = 149; MPT n = 135). HRQoL was assessed with the EORTC Core QoL Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the myeloma-specific module (QLQ-MY24) at baseline and at predetermined intervals during treatment. The QLQ-C30 subscales physical function (P = 0.044) and constipation (P &lt; 0.001) showed an improvement during induction in favour of the MP arm. During thalidomide maintenance, the scores for the QLQ-MY24 paraesthesia became significantly higher in the MPT arm (P&lt;0.001). The QLQ-C30 subscales pain (P = 0.12), insomnia (P = 0.068), appetite loss (P = 0.074) and the QLQ-MY24 item sick (P = 0.086) scored marginally better during thalidomide maintenance. The overall QoL-scale QLQ-C30-HRQoL showed a significant time trend towards more favourable mean values during protocol treatment without differences between MP and MPT. For the QLQ-C30 subscales emotional function and future perspectives, difference in favour of the MPT arm from the start of treatment was observed (P = 0.018 and P = 0.045, respectively) with no significant 'time × arm' interaction, indicating a persistent better patient perspective with MPT treatment. This study shows that the higher frequency of toxicity associated with MPT does not translate into a negative effect on HRQoL and that MPT holds a better patient perspective. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Mechanisms of peripheral neuropathy associated with bortezomib and vincristine in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a prospective analysis of data from the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21622/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy is a dose-limiting toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma, often requiring adjustment of treatment and affecting quality of life. We investigated the molecular profiles of early-onset (within one treatment cycle) versus late-onset (after two or three treatment cycles) bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy and compared them with those of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy during the induction phase of a prospective phase 3 trial. Methods: In the induction phase of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial, patients (aged 18-65 years) with newly diagnosed Salmon and Durie stage 2 or 3 multiple myeloma were randomly assigned to three cycles of bortezomib-based or vincristine-based induction treatment. We analysed the gene expression profiles and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of pretreatment samples of myeloma plasma cells and peripheral blood, respectively. This study is registered, number ISRCTN64455289. Findings: We analysed gene expression profiles of myeloma plasma cells from 329 (39%) of 833 patients at diagnosis, and SNPs in DNA samples from 369 (44%) patients. Early-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy was noted in 20 (8%) patients, and 63 (25%) developed the late-onset type. Early-onset and late-onset vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy was noted in 11 (4%) and 17 (7%) patients, respectively. Significant genes in myeloma plasma cells from patients that were associated with early-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy were the enzyme coding genes RHOBTB2 (upregulated by 1·59 times; p=4·5×10-5), involved in drug-induced apoptosis, CPT1C (1·44 times; p=2·9×10-7), involved in mitochondrial dysfunction, and SOX8 (1·68 times; p=4·28×10-13), involved in development of peripheral nervous system. Significant SNPs in the same patients included those located in the apoptosis gene caspase 9 (odds ratio [OR] 3·59, 95% CI 1·59-8·14; p=2·9×10-3), ALOX12 (3·50, 1·47-8·32; p=3·8×10-3), and IGF1R (0·22, 0·07-0·77; p=8·3×10-3). In late-onset bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy, the significant genes were SOD2 (upregulated by 1·18 times; p=9·6×10-3) and MYO5A (1·93 times; p=3·2×10-2), involved in development and function of the nervous system. Significant SNPs were noted in inflammatory genes MBL2 (OR 0·49, 95% CI 0·26-0·94; p=3·0×10-2) and PPARD (0·35, 0·15-0·83; p=9·1×10-3), and DNA repair genes ERCC4 (2·74, 1·56-4·84; p=1·0×10-3) and ERCC3 (1·26, 0·75-2·12; p=3·3×10-3). By contrast, early-onset vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy was characterised by upregulation of genes involved in cell cycle and proliferation, including AURKA (3·31 times; p=1·04×10-2) and MKI67 (3·66 times; p=1·82×10-3), and the presence of SNPs in genes involved in these processes-eg, GLI1 (rs2228224 [0·13, 0·02-0·97, p=1·18×10-2] and rs2242578 [0·14, 0·02-1·12, p=3·00×10-2]). Late-onset vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy was associated with the presence of SNPs in genes involved in absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion-eg, rs1413239 in DPYD (3·29, 1·47-7·37, 5·40×10-3) and rs3887412 in ABCC1 (3·36, 1·47-7·67, p=5·70×10-3). Interpretation: Our results strongly suggest an interaction between myeloma-related factors and the patient's genetic background in the development of treatment-induced peripheral neuropathy, with different molecular pathways being implicated in bortezomib-induced and vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy. Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Dutch Cancer Foundation Queen Wilhelmina, European Hematology Association, International Myeloma Foundation, Erasmus MC, and Janssen-Cilag Orthobiotech.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>European Myeloma Network: The 3rd Trialist Forum Consensus Statement from the European experts meeting on multiple myeloma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28277/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Over the past two decades, not only treatment options, but also the diagnosis, staging, and risk assessment of multiple myeloma (MM), have undergone significant development, partially due to a deeper understanding of MM pathogenesis. Conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization are routinely assessed in MM, and when combined with ISS stage may attain an even better predictive potential. In order to achieve even more effective and individualized therapies, one crucial goal is the identification of genes and gene combinations that predict for response or resistance to chemotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) still remains the standard therapy for younger patients, with novel agents now being included in both pre-transplant regimens and post-transplant consolidation/maintenance approaches. Similarly, novel agents are also being incorporated into allogeneic SCT for selected patients. In the treatment of elderly patients with MM, novel agents have been successfully incorporated into less intensive regimens, including melphalan/prednisone, low-dose dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide/ dexamethasone. While second-generation proteasome inhibitors are currently being intensively investigated, the subcutaneous administration of bortezomib, being equivalent to the established i.v. route, is now entering clinical practice. Supportive care remains a crucial aspect in the management of MM. The European Myeloma Network Trialist Group aims to address these contemporary aspects in MM. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Micro-RNA-15a and micro-RNA-16 expression and chromosome 13 deletions in multiple myeloma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27795/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We have used copy number variation (CNV) analysis with SNP mapping arrays for miRNA-15a and miRNA-16-1 expression analysis in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with or without deletion of chromosome 13q14. MiRNA-15a and miRNA-16 display a range of expression patterns in MM patients, independent of the chromosome 13 status. These findings suggest that genes other than miR-15a and miR-16 may explain the prognostic significance of 13q14 deletions. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A randomized phase 3 study on the effect of thalidomide combined with adriamycin, dexamethasone, and high-dose melphalan, followed by thalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27457/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-02-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The phase 3 trial HOVON-50 was designed to evaluate the effect of thalidomide during induction treatment and as maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma who were transplant candidates. A total of 556 patients was randomly assigned to arm A: 3 cycles of vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone, or to arm B: thalidomide 200 mg orally, days 1 to 28 plus adriamycin and dexamethasone. After induction therapy and stem cell mobilization, patients were to receive high-dose melphalan, 200 mg/m2, followed by maintenance with α-interferon (arm A) or thalidomide 50 mg daily (arm B). Thalidomide significantly improved overall response rate as well as quality of the response before and after high dose melphalan. Best overall response rate on protocol was 88% and 79% (P = .005), at least very good partial remission 66% and 54% (P = .005), and complete remission 31% and 23% (P = .04), respectively, in favor of the thalidomide arm. Thalidomide also significantly improved event-free survival from median 22 months to 34 months (P &lt; .001), and prolonged progression free from median 25 months to 34 months (P &lt; .001). Median survival was longer in the thalidomide arm, 73 versus 60 months; however, this difference was not significant (P = .77). Patients randomized to thalidomide had strongly reduced survival after relapse. This trial was registered on www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN06413384. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prospective evaluation of coagulopathy in multiple myeloma patients before, during and after various chemotherapeutic regimens (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29434/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs frequently in multiple myeloma patients, especially during induction treatment with thalidomide in combination with anthracyclines and/or dexamethasone. Several coagulation abnormalities have been described in untreated myeloma patients, but these have not been prospectively evaluated during and after treatment. Patients and methods: We performed a prospective study in 138 multiple myeloma patients in whom coagulation factor levels were evaluated longitudinally before, during induction and after intensification. Patients were randomized to induction treatment consisting of adriamycin and dexamethason, in combination with either vincristin (VAD), thalidomide (TAD), or bortezomib (PAD) followed by high-dose melphalan (HDM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Results: Factor VIII:C (FVIII:C) and von Willebrand factor (VWF) were significantly elevated before treatment (median FVIII:C 2.26 U/ml, VWF:Ag 1.95 U/ml). Irrespective of the type of induction regimen, these variables increased strongly during induction therapy (FVIII:C 2.55 U/ml and VWF:Ag 2.96 U/ml). Fibrinogen also showed a significant increase after induction therapy (3.5 g/l pre-treatment and 4.0 g/l after treatment, respectively, P &lt; 0.001). This was significantly higher in TAD than VAD treated patients. Three to six month after ASCT levels of VWF and FVIII:C had decreased to values lower than observed before treatment (1.71 and 1.67 U/ml respectively). There was no correlation between the increased levels at start and the response of multiple myeloma to treatment. High levels of VWF, fibrinogen and FVIII:C before start of treatment were significantly associated with mortality. Fourteen patients (10%) developed a venous thrombotic event (VTE). The coagulation factor abnormalities before and during treatment were not associated with the development of VTE. Conclusion: During induction treatment several changes in coagulation factor levels are observed, which may result in a prothrombotic state. Larger studies are required to establish whether the changes in these coagulation factors during induction treatment contribute to the increased risk of venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Extramedullary relapses after allogeneic non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients do not negatively affect treatment outcome (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29555/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Recent literature suggests that after non-myeloablative allogeneic (NMA) stem cell transplantation (SCT), the incidence of extramedullary (EM) relapse in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is increased and that these relapses have a poor prognosis. However, numbers on incidence and treatment outcome are scarce. We collected data from 54 relapsed MM patients from a total group of 172 treated with sequential autologous and allogeneic NMA SCT at seven transplantation centres. There were 43 (79.6%) systemic relapses, including 6 with concurrent EM localisation. Five patients had a local EM relapse only. Six patients relapsed with only bone involvement. Patients with deletion of chromosome 13 had a higher incidence of EM relapse (30.8 versus 5.6%, P = 0.06). EM relapses were treated with donor lymphocyte infusion, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy, especially with novel agents. The response rate was 45.5%, which was not different when compared to patients without EM disease (54.1%). Overall survival and progression-free survival were not significantly different in patients with EM disease, when compared to those without EM disease. In conclusion, the incidence of relapse with EM disease following allogeneic NMA SCT was 20.4%. There was no negative impact of EM relapse on response rate, overall survival and progression-free survival.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intermediate-dose melphalan compared with myeloablative treatment in multiple myeloma: Long-term follow-up of the Dutch Cooperative Group HOVON 24 trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36063/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background and Objectives: The Dutch-Belgian HOVON group performed a randomized phase 3 trial to compare single non-myeloablative intensive treatment with double, intensive treatment in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Design and Methods: Three hundred and three patients with stage II/III MM were randomized after VAD induction chemotherapy to receive two cycles of non-myeloablative intermediate-dose melphalan (70 mg/m2) (single treatment) or the same regimen followed by cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg iv plus total body irradiation (TBI) 9 Gy and autologous stem cell transplantation (double, intensive treatment). In both treatment arms interferon alia was given as maintenance until relapse/progression. Results: A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved a complete remission (CR) on protocol treatment with double, intensive therapy (32% vs 13%, p&lt;0.001). Double treatment produced better outcome in terms of event-free survival (median 22 vs 21 months, 28% vs 14% at 4 years and 15% vs 7% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.013; univariate HR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.94), progression-free survival (median 27 vs 24 months, 33% vs 16% at 4 years, and 17% vs 9% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.006; HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91), but not overall survival (median 50 vs 55 months, 52% vs 56% at 4 years and 39% vs 36% at 6 years after randomization; logrank p=0.51; HR=1.10, 95% CI 0.83-1.46). The achievement of a CR had a favorable prognostic impact on event-free survival (HR=0.60, 95% CI=0.44 -0.82, p=0.001) and progression-free survival (HR=0.62, 95% CI=0.45 - 0.84, p=0.002). Interpretation and Conclusions: Double, intensive treatment resulted in a better CR rate, event-free survival and progression-free survival but not overall survival compared to single non-myeloablative treatment in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36280/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34+cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 × 106/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 × 106/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 × 106/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 × 106/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34+cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 × 106/kg CD34+cells.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Influence of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3AS, GSTP1, GSTM1, GSTT1 and MDR1 genes on survival and therapy-related toxicity in multiple myeloma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/36131/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We investigated the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes encoding for drug-metabolizing enzymes in 209 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in a clinical trial comparing single with double intensive therapy. We observed no significant association between polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, MDR1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 and outcome either after treatment with induction chemotherapy or after high-dose therapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Abnormalities of chromosome 1p/q are highly associated with chromosome 13/13q deletions and are an adverse prognostic factor for the outcome of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35603/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The prognostic value of chromosomal abnormalities was studied in untreated multiple myeloma patients who were registered into a prospective randomised multicentre phase 3 study for intensified treatment (HOVON24). A total of 453 patients aged less than 66 years with stage II and III A/B disease were registered in the clinical study. Cytogenetic analysis was introduced as a standard diagnostic assay in 1998. It was performed at diagnosis in 160 patients and was successful in 137/160 patients (86%). An abnormal karyotype was observed in 53/137 (39%) of the patients. Abnormalities of chromosome 1p and 1q were found in 19 (36% of patients with an abnormal karyotype) and 21 patients (40%). There was a strong association between chromosome 1p and/or 1q abnormalities and deletion of chromosome 13 or 13q (n = 27, P &lt; 0.001). Patients with karyotypic abnormalities had a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than patients with normal karyotypes. Complex abnormalities, hypodiploidy, chromosome 1p abnormalities, chromosome 1q abnormalities, and chromosome 13 abnormalities were associated with inferior OS on univariate analysis, as well as after adjustment for other prognostic factors. In conclusion, chromosome 13 abnormalities and chromosome 1p and/or 1q abnormalities were highly associated, and are risk factors for poor outcome after intensive therapy in multiple myeloma. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Overall and event-free survival are not improved by the use of myeloablative therapy following intensified chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective randomized phase 3 study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8236/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We compared the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy followed by
      myeloablative therapy and autologous stem cell rescue with intensified
      chemotherapy alone in patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma.
      There were 261 eligible patients younger than 66 years with stage II/III
      multiple myeloma who were randomized after remission induction therapy
      with vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone (VAD) to receive intensified
      chemotherapy, that is, melphalan 140 mg/m(2) administered intravenously in
      2 doses of 70 mg/m(2) (intermediate-dose melphalan [IDM]) without stem
      cell rescue (n = 129) or the same regimen followed by myeloablative
      therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, total body irradiation, and
      autologous stem cell reinfusion (n = 132). Interferon-alpha-2a was given
      as maintenance. Of the eligible patients, 79% received both cycles of IDM
      and 79% of allocated patients actually received myeloablative treatment.
      The response rate (complete remission [CR] plus partial remission [PR])
      was 88% in the intensified chemotherapy group versus 95% in the
      myeloablative treatment group. CR was significantly higher after
      myeloablative therapy (13% versus 29%; P =.002). With a median follow-up
      of 33 months (range, 8-65 months), the event-free survival (EFS) was not
      different between the treatments (median 21 months versus 22 months; P
          =.28). Time to progression (TTP) was significantly longer after
      myeloablative treatment (25 months versus 31 months; P =.04). The overall
      survival (OS) was not different (50 months versus 47 months; P =.41).
      Intensified chemotherapy followed by myeloablative therapy as first-line
      treatment for multiple myeloma resulted in a higher CR and a longer TTP
      when compared with intensified chemotherapy alone. However, it did not
      result in a better EFS and OS.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>