<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Etienne, J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/6988/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Immunogenicity of toxins during Staphylococcus aureus infection (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17671/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AB - BACKGROUND: Toxins are important Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors, but little is known about their immunogenicity during infection. Here, additional insight is generated. METHODS: Serum samples from 206 S. aureus-infected patients and 201 hospital-admitted control subjects were analyzed for immunoglobulin (Ig) G binding to 20 toxins, using flow-cytometry based technology. Antibody levels were associated with polymerase chain reaction-defined presence of toxin genes in homologous S. aureus isolates. RESULTS: IgG levels directed to exfoliative toxin (ET) A, ETB, gamma hemolysin B (HlgB), leukocidin (Luk) D, LukE, LukS, staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) A, SEE, SEH, SEI, and SElM were higher in S. aureus-infected patients than in control subjects ([Formula: see text]). Furthermore, in the S. aureus-infected patient group, IgG levels were higher if genes encoding ETA, ETB, SEA, SEC, SEH, SElQ, toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), or Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) were present in the infectious isolate (P&lt; .05). Levels of anti-SEA IgG increased during infections with sea-positive (median fluorescence intensity from 11,555 to 12,388; P&lt;.05) but not sea-negative strains. In addition, anti-LukS IgG levels increased during skin and soft-tissue infections with luk-PV-positive (median fluorescence intensity from 15,231 to 15,911; P&lt;.05) but not luk-PV-negative strains. Bacteremia was associated with sea (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-10.0) and tst (odds ratio, 5.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-20.8). Skin and soft-tissue infections and bone and joint infections were associated with luk-PV (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Many toxins are expressed in vivo and recognized by the immune system during staphylococcal infections,</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clonal distribution and differential occurrence of the enterotoxin gene cluster, egc, in carriage- versus bacteremia-associated isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13997/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin gene cluster, egc, was detected in isolates from healthy individuals and in those from patients with bacteremia. The egc genes cooccur and are slightly enriched in strains from healthy carriers (present in 63.7% of carriage-associated isolates versus 52.9% of invasive isolates; P = 0.03). Multilocus sequence typing revealed that successful staphylococcal clones usually harbor the egc locus.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8836/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Twenty well-characterized isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
          aureus were used to study the optimal resolution and interlaboratory
          reproducibility of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of DNA
          macrorestriction fragments. Five identical isolates (one PFGE type), 5
          isolates that produced related PFGE subtypes, and 10 isolates with unique
          PFGE patterns were analyzed blindly in 12 different laboratories by
          in-house protocols. In several laboratories a standardized PFGE protocol
          with a commercial kit was applied successfully as well. Eight of the
          centers correctly identified the genetic homogeneity of the identical
          isolates by both the in-house and standard protocols. Four of 12
          laboratories failed to produce interpretable data by the standardized
          protocol, due to technical problems (primarily plug preparation). With the
          five related isolates, five of eight participants identified the same
          subtype interrelationships with both in-house and standard protocols.
          However, two participants identified multiple strain types in this group
          or classified some of the isolates as unrelated isolates rather than as
          subtypes. The remaining laboratory failed to distinguish differences
          between some of the related isolates by utilizing both the in-house and
          standardized protocols. There were large differences in the relative
          genome lengths of the isolates as calculated on the basis of the gel
          pictures. By visual inspection, the numbers of restriction fragments and
          overall banding pattern similarity in the three groups of isolates showed
          interlaboratory concordance, but centralized computer analysis of data
          from four laboratories yielded percent similarity values of only 85% for
          the group of identical isolates. The differences between the data sets
          obtained with in-house and standardized protocols could be the
          experimental parameters which differed with respect to the brand of
          equipment used, imaging software, running time (20 to 48 h), and pulsing
          conditions. In conclusion, it appears that the standardization of PFGE
          depends on controlling a variety of experimental intricacies, as is the
          case with other bacterial typing procedures.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>