<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rijntjes, E.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/7141/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Intranasal cold dry air is superior to histamine challenge in determining the presence and degree of nasal hyperreactivity in nonallergic noninfectious perennial rhinitis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8837/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The objective of the study was to compare cold dry air (CDA) and histamine
          in differentiating patients with nonallergic noninfectious perennial
          rhinitis (NANIPER) from control subjects. Nasal reactivity (nasal patency,
          mucus production, and sneezing) in 16 symptomatic nonsmoking patients with
          NANIPER and seven nonsmoking control subjects was measured with
          standardized CDA and histamine provocation series in a randomized
          crossover study. Intranasal CDA resulted in increased mucus production and
          nasal blockage in a dose-dependent manner in patients with NANIPER but not
          in control subjects. Sneezing did not occur. The reproducibility of CDA
          for patency and mucus production was good. Sensitivity for CDA was 87%
          compared with 100% for histamine. However, specificity was 71% for CDA and
          0% for histamine. It is concluded that the new standardized intranasal CDA
          provocation method uses a recognizable natural nonspecific stimulus and
          seems to be more suitable than histamine for characterizing and assessing
          the presence and degree of nasal reactivity in NANIPER.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>