<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Fox, K.A.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/7424/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Highlights of the 2008 Scientific Sessions of the European Society of Cardiology. Munich, Germany, August 30 to September 3, 2008 (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29784/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Uric acid and other renal function parameters in patients with stable angina pectoris participating in the ACTION trial: Impact of nifedipine GITS (gastro-intestinal therapeutic system) and relation to outcome (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35927/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Little data is available concerning the prognostic implications of renal function abnormalities, their evolution over time and the effects of nifedipine on such abnormalities in patients with stable angina pectoris. METHODS: The previously published ACTION trial compared long-acting nifedipine GITS 60 mg once daily to placebo among 7665 patients. Standard laboratory tests including creatinine and uric acid were assessed at baseline, after 6 months, 2 and 4 years, and at the end of follow-up. We assessed the impact of nifedipine on markers of renal dysfunction and determined whether evidence of renal failure alters the impact of nifedipine on the clinical outcome of patients with stable angina. RESULTS: Uric acid was not while creatinine level and estimated creatinine clearance were potent conditionally independent predictors of total mortality and of cardiovascular clinical events. Relative to placebo, nifedipine reduced 6-month uric acid levels by 3% (P &lt; 0.001) of the baseline value. This difference was maintained during long-term follow-up, was present both in normotensives and in hypertensives, and was not explained by differences in diuretic therapy or allopurinol use. Nifedipine had no effect on the occurrence of clinical renal failure. Relative to placebo, the effects of nifedipine on cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-1.17], any stroke or transient ischaemic attack (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.88), new overt heart failure (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95), and the need for any coronary procedure (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) were consistent across strata of markers of renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in patients with stable angina, nifedipine reduces uric acid levels and does not affect other markers of renal dysfunction. Renal dysfunction does not alter the effects of nifedipine on clinical outcome. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10039/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation; recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12883/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The clinical presentations of ischaemic heart disease include stable angina pectoris, silent ischaemia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and sudden death. For many years, unstable angina has been con- sidered as an intermediate ‘syndrome’ between chronic stable angina and acute myocardial infarction. In recent years, its physiopathology has been clarified and there have been major advances in management.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Helvetica Investigators. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5070/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Abstract
Background.
The likelihood of restenosis is a major limitation of coronary angioplasty. We studied whether hirudin, a highly selective inhibitor of thrombin with irreversible effects, would revent restenosis after angioplasty. We compared two regimens of recombinant hirudin with heparin.
Methods.
We randomly assigned 1141 patients with unstable angina who were scheduled for angioplasty to receive one of three treatments: (1) a bolus dose of 10,000 IU of heparin followed  by an intravenous infusion of heparin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (382 patients), (2) a bolus dose of 40 mg of hirudin followed by an  intravenous infusion of hirudin for 24 hours and subcutaneous placebo twice daily for three days (381 patients), or (3) the same hirudin regimen except that 40 mg of hirudin was given subcutaneously instead of placebo twice daily for three days (378 patients). The primary end point was event-free survival at seven months. Other end points were early cardiac events (within 96 hours), bleeding and other complications of the study treatment, and angiographic measurements of coronary diameter at six months of follow-up.
Results.
At seven months, event-free survival was 67.3 percent in the group receiving heparin, 63.5 percent in the group receiving intravenous hirudin, and 68.0 percent
in the group receiving both intravenous and subcutaneous hirudin (P = 0.61). However, the administration of
hirudin was associated with a significant reduction in early cardiac events, which occurred in 11.0, 7.9, and 5.6 percent
of patients in the respective groups (combined relative risk with hirudin, 0.61; 95 percent confidence interval,
0.41 to 0.90; P = 0.023). The mean minimal luminal diameters in the respective groups on follow-up angiography
at six months were 1.54, 1.47, and 1.56 mm (P = 0.08).
Conclusions.
Although significantly fewer early cardiac events occurred with hirudin than with heparin, hirudin had no apparent benefit with longer-term follow-up.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>