<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Backx, B.A.M.W.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/7486/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Three-Year Outcome After Coronary Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel Disease (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4671/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-03-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background— The primary results of Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study reported a greater need for repeated revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI). However, PCI was less expensive than coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and offered the same degree of protection against death, stroke, and myocardial infarction.

Methods and Results— Patients with multivessel disease (n=1205) were randomly assigned to either CABG or PCI and followed up for up to 3 years. Survival rates without stroke or myocardial infarction were similar in each group at 1 year and 3 years (90.5% versus 91.4% for PCI versus CABG at 1 year and 87.2% versus 88.4% for PCI versus CABG at 3 years). However, the respective repeat revascularization rates were 21.2% and 26.7% at 1 and 3 years in patients allocated to PCI, compared with 3.8% and 6.6% in patients allocated to CABG (P&lt;0.0001). Diabetes (P&lt;0.0009) and maximal pressure for stent deployment (P&lt;0.002) are the strongest independent predictors of events at 3 years after PCI, whereas left anterior descending coronary artery grafting (P&lt;0.006) is the best predictor of event-free survival at 3 years after CABG. The incremental cost of surgery compared with PCI for an event-free patient was 19 257  at 1 year but decreased to 10 492  at 3 years. It remained at 142 391  at 3 years when revascularization procedures were excluded in the efficacy end point, however.

Conclusions— Three-year survival rates without stroke and myocardial infarction are identical in both groups, and the cost/benefit ratio of stenting is determined primarily by the increasing need for revascularization in the PCI group.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>TAXUS III Trial: In-Stent Restenosis Treated With Stent-Based Delivery of Paclitaxel Incorporated in a Slow-Release Polymer Formulation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10088/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-02-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The first clinical study of paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo lesions showed promising results. We performed the TAXUS III trial to evaluate the feasibility and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS AND RESULTS: The TAXUS III trial was a single-arm, 2-center study that enrolled 28 patients with ISR meeting the criteria of lesion length &lt; or =30 mm, 50% to 99% diameter stenosis, and vessel diameter 3.0 to 3.5 mm. They were treated with one or more TAXUS NIRx paclitaxel-eluting stents. Twenty-five patients completed the angiographic follow-up at 6 months, and 17 of these underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination. No subacute stent thrombosis occurred up to 12 months, but there was one late chronic total occlusion, and additional 3 patients showed angiographic restenosis. The mean late loss was 0.54 mm, with neointimal hyperplasia volume of 20.3 mm3. The major adverse cardiac event rate was 29% (8 patients; 1 non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, 1 coronary artery bypass grafting, and 6 target lesion revascularization [TLR]). Of the patients with TLR, 1 had restenosis in a bare stent implanted for edge dissection and 2 had restenosis in a gap between 2 paclitaxel-eluting stents. Two patients without angiographic restenosis underwent TLR as a result of the IVUS assessment at follow-up (1 incomplete apposition and 1 insufficient expansion of the stent). CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation is considered safe and potentially efficacious in the treatment of ISR. IVUS guidance to ensure good stent deployment with complete coverage of target lesion may reduce reintervention.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4798/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the clinical benefit of additional stent implantation after achieving an optimal result of balloon angioplasty (BA) in long coronary lesions (&gt;20 mm). BACKGROUND: Long coronary lesions are associated with increased early complications and late restenosis after BA. Stenting improves the early outcome, but stent restenosis is also related to both lesion length and stent length. METHODS: A total of 437 patients with a single native lesion 20 to 50 mm in length were included and underwent BA, using long balloons matched to lesion length and vessel diameter (balloon/artery ratio 1.1) to achieve a diameter stenosis (DS) &lt;30% by on-line quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). "Bail-out stenting" was performed for flow-limiting dissections or &gt;50% DS. Patients in whom an optimal BA result was achieved were randomized to additional stenting (using NIR stents) or no stenting. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at nine months, and core laboratory QCA was performed on serial angiograms. RESULTS: Bailout stenting was necessary in 149 patients (34%) and was associated with a significantly increased risk of peri-procedural infarction (p &lt; 0.02). Among the 288 randomized patients, the mean lesion length was 27+/-9 mm, and the vessel diameter was 2.78+/-0.52 mm. The procedural success rate was 90% for the 143 patients assigned to BA alone (control group), as compared with 93% in the 145 patients assigned to additional stenting (stent group), which resulted in a superior early minimal lumen diameter (0.54 mm, p &lt; 0.001) and led to reduced angiographic restenosis (27% vs. 42%, p = 0.022). Freedom from MACE at nine months was 77% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of provisional stenting for long coronary lesions led to bailout stenting in one-third of patients, with a threefold increase in peri-procedural infarction. Additional stenting yielded a lower angiographic restenosis rate, but no reduction in MACE at nine months.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Studies on erythropoiesis in the myelodysplastic syndrome (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22032/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-11-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A variety of primary hematologic disorders were described, all characterised by
ineffective hematopoiesis, peripheral blood cytopenias, and hypercellular bone marrow
(Bjorkman, 1956, Rheingold et aJ., 1963, Linman et aJ., 1978). Lack of uniform
definitions for these disorders, often referred to as smoldering leukemia, preleukemia or
refractory anemia, resulted in both difficulties in classification and problems in predicting
disease outcome. In an effort to resolve these problems, in 1982 the French-AmericanBritish
(F AB) Cooperative Study group proposed a new classification system for these
bone marrow disorders and termed them myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)(Bennett et aJ.,
1982). Based on cellular morphology and on the number of blast cells in the peripheral
blood and bone marrow, five subtypes of MDS were defined: Refractory anemia (RA),
refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) , refractory anemia with excess blasts
(RAEB), refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEB-t), and chronic
myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML).</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>