<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Manusama, E.R.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/7568/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32736/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Necrotizing pancreatitis with infected necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and death. Standard treatment is open necrosectomy. The outcome may be improved by a minimally invasive step-up approach. Methods: In this multicenter study, we randomly assigned 88 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and suspected or confirmed infected necrotic tissue to undergo primary open necrosectomy or a step-up approach to treatment. The step-up approach consisted of percutaneous drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy. The primary end point was a composite of major complications (new-onset multiple-organ failure or multiple systemic complications, perforation of a visceral organ or enterocutaneous fistula, or bleeding) or death. Results: The primary end point occurred in 31 of 45 patients (69%) assigned to open necrosectomy and in 17 of 43 patients (40%) assigned to the step-up approach (risk ratio with the step-up approach, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.87; P = 0.006). Of the patients assigned to the step-up approach, 35% were treated with percutaneous drainage only. New-onset multiple-organ failure occurred less often in patients assigned to the step-up approach than in those assigned to open necrosectomy (12% vs. 40%, P = 0.002). The rate of death did not differ significantly between groups (19% vs. 16%, P = 0.70). Patients assigned to the step-up approach had a lower rate of incisional hernias (7% vs. 24%, P = 0.03) and new-onset diabetes (16% vs. 38%, P = 0.02). Conclusions: A minimally invasive step-up approach, as compared with open necrosectomy, reduced the rate of the composite end point of major complications or death among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and infected necrotic tissue. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13975868.). Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Isolated limb perfusion for local gene delivery: efficient and targeted adenovirus-mediated gene transfer into soft tissue sarcomas (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9540/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for
      efficient and tumor-specific adenovirus-mediated gene transfer in
      sarcoma-bearing rats. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A major concern in
      adenovirus-mediated gene therapy in cancer is the transfer of genes to
      organs other than the tumor, especially organs with a rapid cell turnover.
      Adjustment of the vector delivery route might be an option creating tumor
      specificity in therapeutic gene expression. METHODS: Rat hind limb
      sarcomas (5-10 mm) were transfected with recombinant adenoviruses.
      Intratumoral luciferase expression after ILP was compared with systemic
      administration, regional infusion, or intratumoral injection using a
      similar dose of adenoviruses carrying the luciferase marker gene.
      Localization studies using lacZ as a marker gene were performed to
      evaluate the intratumoral distribution of transfected cells after both ILP
      and intratumoral injection. RESULTS: Intratumoral luciferase activity
      after ILP or intratumoral administration was significantly higher compared
      with regional infusion or systemic administration. After ILP, luciferase
      gene expression was minimal in extratumoral organs, whether outside or
      inside the isolated circuit. Localization studies demonstrated that
      transfection was confined to tumor cells lying along the needle track
      after intratumoral injection, whereas after ILP, lacZ expression was found
      in viable tumor cells and in the tumor-associated vasculature.
      CONCLUSIONS: Using ILP, efficient and tumor-specific gene transfection can
      be achieved. The ILP technique might be useful for the delivery of
      recombinant adenoviruses carrying therapeutic gene constructs to enhance
      tumor control.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>TNFa-based isolated limb perfusion in the rat : development of a model and analysis of efficacy determining factors (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17509/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-11-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Isolated limb perfusion (lLP) with high dose TNFa in combination with IFNr and melphalan
in patients with melanoma in transit metastases confined to the limb has recently been
reported to result in much higher complete tumor response rates than after the standard
therapy of ILP with melphalan alone: 90 % vs 54 % complete remissionl .'. Moreover the
same protocol of ILP when applied as an induction bio-chemotherapy in patients with
irresectabIe extremity soft tissue sarcomas. was reported to result in about 85 % response
rates rendering most tumors resectable and resulting in a &gt; 80% limb salvage rate'·'. The
tumor response in many patients in both patient groups was characterized by an immediate
(within 3 days) and grossly visible reaction to treatment, which shows a remarkable similarity
to that observed in animal tumor models after systemic administration of TNFa.
ILP became the first setting, in which effective concentrations of TN Fa could be reached and
a reproducible antitumor effect could be measured. In patients Lv. administration of TN Fa
is limited to much lower doses than the effective doses in mice, since TNFa causes severe
hypotension in man and is known to play a key role as a mediator in septic shock.
Pathophysiologically, TNFa is a paracrine (and autocrine) mediator that is released at the
inflammation site, with severe hypotensive effects when it is released systemically. Therefore
the trials of systemic administration of TNFa, either alone or in combination with other
cytokines or chemotherapy had marginal results.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>