<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Verheugt, F.W.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/785/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The future of clinical trials in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/33665/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: The problem of treatment selection bias (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24643/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>AimsIn several observational studies, revascularization is associated with substantial reduction in mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (nSTE-ACS). This has strengthened the belief that routine early angiography would lead to a reduction in mortality. We investigated the association between actual in-hospital revascularization and long-term outcome in patients with nSTE-ACS included in the ICTUS trial.Methods and resultsThe study population of the present analysis consists of ICTUS participants who were discharged alive after initial hospitalization. The ICTUS trial was a randomized, controlled trial in which 1200 patients were randomized to an early invasive or selective invasive strategy. The endpoints were death from hospital discharge until 4 year follow-up and death or spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) until 3 years. Among 1189 patients discharged alive, 691 (58) underwent revascularization during initial hospitalization. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, in-hospital revascularization was independently associated with a reduction in 4 year mortality and 3 year event rate of death or spontaneous MI: hazard ratio (HR) 0.59 [95 confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.96] and 0.46 (95 CI 0.31-0.68). However, when intention-to-treat analysis was performed, no differences in cumulative event rates were observed between the early invasive and selective invasive strategies: HR 1.10 (95 CI 0.70-1.74) for death and 1.27 (95 CI 0.88-1.85) for death or spontaneous MI.ConclusionThe ICTUS trial did not show that an early invasive strategy resulted in a better outcome than a selective invasive strategy in patients with nSTE-ACS. However, similar to retrospective analyses from observational studies, actual revascularization was associated with lower mortality and fewer MI. Whether an early invasive strategy leads to a better outcome than a selective invasive strategy cannot be inferred from the observation that revascularized patients have a better prognosis in non-randomized studies.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prehospital thrombolysis with reteplase: the Nijmegen/Rotterdam study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5716/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: The objective of this observational study was to assess time from electrocardiogram diagnosis to treatment and time from pain onset to treatment with double bolus reteplase  compared to current therapy with streptokinase or bolus anistreplase in 2 cities (Rotterdam and Nijmegen) in the Netherlands, where prehospital thrombolysis is an established way of treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Methods: Prehospital thrombolysis is performed using electrocardiogram diagnosis by the ambulance service as well as bolus anistreplase for treatment in Nijmegen, and streptokinase infusion in Rotterdam. Reteplase or anistreplase/streptokinase was assigned open label to patients according to order of presentation on a 1-to-1 basis. All patients were treated with nitrates sublingually and aspirin orally. Time intervals were recorded by the ambulance staff. Results: In total, 250 patients were treated between April 1, 1999 and August 1, 2000. Reteplase was used in 120 patients and anistreplase/streptokinase in 130 patients. Using double bolus reteplase resulted in a significantly shorter time to treatment: a median of 81 minutes compared to a median of 104 minutes with the established therapy (P &lt;  .0001). There were no differences in mortality, aborted myocardial infarction, hemorrhagic stroke or the need for rescue angioplasty between the groups. Conclusion: In prehospital thrombolysis, double bolus reteplase is associated with a shorter time to treatment than bolus anistreplase or infusion of streptokinase.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Abciximab in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5612/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: We sought to study the effect of early infusion of abciximab on coronary patency before primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists have proved to be effective in reducing ischemic events associated with coronary angioplasty. The present study explores whether abciximab alone, without administration of thrombolytic therapy, may induce reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: In the Glycoprotein Receptor Antagonist Patency Evaluation pilot study 60 patients with less than 6 h signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction eligible for primary angioplasty received in the emergency room a bolus of abciximab 250 microg/kg followed by a 12-h infusion of 10 microg/min. All patients were also treated with an oral dose of 160 mg aspirin and 5,000 IU of heparin intravenously. As soon as possible a diagnostic angiography was performed to evaluate the patency of the infarct-related artery. RESULTS: The median time between onset of symptoms and the administration of the abciximab bolus was 150 min (range 45 to 345), and the median time between abciximab bolus and first contrast injection in the infarct-related artery was 45 min (range 10 to 150). In 24 patients (40%, 95% confidence interval 28% to 52%) Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 was observed at a median time of 45 min (range 10 to 150) after abciximab bolus; TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 11 patients (18%, 95% confidence interval 9% to 28%). There was no difference in percentage of TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 between patients who received abciximab within 2.5 h after onset of symptoms or thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab therapy given in the emergency room in patients awaiting primary angioplasty is associated with full reperfusion (TIMI flow grade 3) in about 20% and with TIMI flow grade 2 or 3 in about 40% of the patients at a median time of 45 min. These figures are higher than those in primary angioplasty trials without such pretreatment. Randomized controlled trials of very early infusion of abciximab, either prehospital or in-hospital, in patients eligible for angioplasty are warranted.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Vroege trombolyse verbetert de prognose op lange termijn voor patienten met een hartinfarct (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5408/</link>
      <pubDate>1990-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In a previously reported clinical study treatment of myocardial infarction with intracoronary streptokinase (269 patients) was compared with conventional therapy (264 patients). To determine the long-term effects of thrombolytic therapy patient data were collected from 3 to 7 years after admission. Three-year survival rates were 87% after thrombolysis and 79% after conventional therapy. Bypass surgery was done in 19% versus 16%, and PTCA in 9% versus 6% of patients. Patients treated with thrombolysis also had a better prognosis after discharge. The difference in survival between the two treatment groups was 6% after 1 year and 10% after 5 years. Benefit was largest in patients with an anterior infarction, patients with extensive myocardial ischaemia and patients treated shortly after onset of infarction. Left ventricular function appeared to be the best determinant predicting survival after discharge. The findings show that early thrombolysis after acute myocardial infarction also results in improved long-term survival.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term benefit of early thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5402/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Patients (n = 533) who participated in the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands Trial were followed up for 3 to 7 years. The 5 year survival rate after thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase was 81% (269 patients) compared with 71% after conventional therapy (264 patients). The greatest improvement in survival was observed in patients with anterior infarction (81% versus 64% with thrombolytic therapy or conventional therapy, respectively), in those with heart failure on admission or a previous infarction and in those with extensive myocardial ischemia on admission. Left ventricular ejection fraction at the time of hospital discharge was better after thrombolytic therapy. In the hospital survivors, long-term outcome was related to left ventricular function at the time of discharge and, to a lesser extent, to the underlying coronary artery disease. The initial therapy (thrombolysis or conventional) was not an independent additional determinant of long-term survival when left ventricular function and coronary status at the time of hospital discharge were taken into account. Thus, the salutary effects of thrombolytic therapy appear to be the result of myocardial salvage. Reinfarction within 3 years was observed more frequently after thrombolytic therapy, particularly in patients with inferior wall infarction and those with greater than or equal to 90% stenosis of the infarct-related vessel at discharge. Coronary bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty were performed more frequently after thrombolytic therapy than in conventionally treated patients. At 5 years, approximately 40% of patients in both groups had an uneventful course without reinfarction or additional revascularization procedures. These observations demonstrate that the benefits of thrombolytic therapy are maintained throughout 5 years of follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Enzyme tests in the evaluation of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5370/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The activity of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, creatine kinase MB and aspartate aminotransferase was measured on serial plasma samples from patients with acute myocardial infarction. The study was part of a multicentre randomised trial of the effect of thrombolytic treatment in the acute phase of acute myocardial infarction. The applicability and comparability of enzyme tests for the estimation of myocardial injury were studied in 76 control patients and 74 patients treated with streptokinase. Treatment with streptokinase caused a considerable acceleration of enzyme release after acute myocardial infarction, both in patients with persistent coronary occlusion and in those with successful reperfusion. But this changed pattern of enzyme release did not affect the rate of enzyme elimination from plasma or the released proportions of different enzymes. Thus the assessment of infarct size by measurement of these enzyme activities can also be applied to patients treated with streptokinase. Moreover, the enzymes measured in the present study are all equally valid markers of myocardial injury.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Cost benefit analysis of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase. Twelve month follow up report of the randomised multicentre trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5371/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The costs and benefits of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction were compared in a randomised trial. All hospital admissions were recorded and the functional class was assessed at visits to the outpatient clinic during a 12 month follow up of 269 patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment and of 264 allocated to conventional treatment. Mean survival during the first year was calculated for patients with inferior and with anterior infarction and adjusted for impaired quality of life in cases where there were symptoms or hospital admission. In patients with inferior infarction mean survival was 337 days (out of a total follow up of 365 days) for patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment and 327 days for controls. Quality adjusted survival was seven days longer in the thrombolysis group (307 vs 300 days in controls). In patients with anterior infarction mean survival was significantly longer (35 days) in the thrombolysis group than in the control group as was quality adjusted survival (38 days) (304 vs 266 days in controls). The gain in life expectancy with thrombolytic treatment was 0.7 years for patients with inferior infarction, 2.4 years for patients with anterior infarction, and 3.6 years for the subset of patients with large anterior infarction who were admitted within two hours of the onset of symptoms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intracoronary thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: The Netherlands randomized trial and current status (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4240/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>--</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Acute coronary thrombolysis with recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator: initial patency and influence of maintained infusion on reocclusion rate (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4241/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>An intravenous infusion of 40 mg of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was given intravenously over 90 minutes to 123 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) of less than 4 hours' duration. A coronary angiogram was recorded at the end of the infusion in 119 patients. Central assessment of the angiograms revealed a patent infarct-related artery in 78 patients (patency rate 66%, 95% confidence limits 57 to 74%). Patients with a patent infarct-related artery at the first angiogram were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive a subsequent 6-hour infusion of either 30 mg of rt-PA or placebo. All patients had received an initial bolus of 5,000 IU of heparin and then 1,000 IU/hour until a second angiogram was recorded 6 to 24 hours after the start of the second perfusion. At central assessment of the second coronary angiogram the reocclusion rate was 2 of 36 patients who received rt-PA at the second infusion and 3 of 37 patients not receiving this drug (or the 2 groups combined 7%, 95% confidence limits 2 to 15%). Three of 60 patients (5%, 95% confidence limits 1 to 14%) with patent arteries on both previous angiograms had a later occlusion as judged on the angiogram recorded at hospital discharge. No difference in late reocclusion rates between the 2 treatment groups was observed.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Value of admission electrocardiogram in predicting outcome of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5347/</link>
      <pubDate>1987-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To determine the value of the admission 12-lead electrocardiogram to predict infarct size limitation by thrombolytic therapy, data were analyzed in 488 of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from a randomized multicenter study. All patients had typical electrocardiographic changes diagnostic for an AMI and were admitted within 4 hours after the onset of chest pain; 245 patients were allocated to thrombolytic treatment and 243 to conventional treatment. Cumulative 72-hour release into plasma of myocardial alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH) was used as a measure of infarct size. In general, the amount of infarct limitation due to thrombolytic therapy was proportional to the size of the area at risk. Patients with new Q waves, high QRS score and high ST-segment elevation or depression had the largest enzymatic infarct size in both treatment groups, irrespective of location of the AMI. Compared with conventionally treated patients, patients with anterior AMI treated with streptokinase had significant infarct size limitation (480 U/liter HBDH, 37%), and limitation was most prominent in those with Q waves (820 U/liter HBDH) or high ST elevation (750 U/liter HBDH). Infarct size limitation in inferior AMI was less impressive (330 U/liter HBDH, 33%) and patients with high ST-segment elevation (460 U/liter HBDH) or marked contralateral ST-segment depression (430 U/liter HBDH) had the most notable infarct limitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Verbeterde prognose als gevolg van vroeg thrombolyse bij patienten met een acuut hartinfarct (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4179/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Twee behandelingen werden vergeleken in een gerandomiseerd onderzoek waaraan 533 patiënten met een acuut infarct deelnamen, 264 patiënten werden conventioneel behandeld (groep 1) en 269 kregen een behandeling die gericht was op snelle rekanalisatie van de veelal afgesloten coronairarterie (groep 2). Bij de eerste 152 patiënten in groep 2 werd uitsluitend intracoronair streptokinase gegeven (250.000 eenheden), onmiddellijk na coronariografie. Bij de volgende 117 patiënten werd deze intracoronaire behandeling voorafgegaan door intraveneuze toediening van streptokinase (500.000 eenheden). Bij 198 van de 234 patiënten bij wie angiografie werd verricht in de acute fase van het infarct, was de met het infarct samenhangende coronairarterie doorgankelijk aan het eind van de ingreep (85).

De sterfte was lager bij patiënten uit groep 2 gedurende de gehele follow-up-periode. De éénjaarsoverleving was 91 bij patiënten in groep 2 en 84 in groep 1. Het voorkomen van ventrikelfibrilleren, pericarditis en cardiogene shock in groep 2 was lager dan in de controlegroep. Daarentegen traden bij patiënten uit groep 2 vaker bloedingen en, in het bijzonder bij patiënten met een onderwandinfarct, vaker recidiefinfarcering op.

Op grond van deze gegevens concluderen wij dat trombolyse een aanwinst is bij de behandeling van patiënten met een acuut hartinfarct.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Preservation of global and regional left ventricular function after early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4184/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of early myocardial reperfusion (within 4 hours after onset of symptoms) on regional left ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction has been quantitated by analysis of segmental wall motion. Of 533 patients randomized either to conventional coronary care unit therapy or to a reperfusion strategy, in 332 high quality angiograms were obtained 2 to 8 weeks after the onset of myocardial infarction. In those assigned to thrombolytic therapy, angiographic data were also available after acute reperfusion. Analysis on an "intention to treat" basis revealed significant preservation of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy (ejection fraction 53%) compared with conventional treatment (ejection fraction 47%). In addition, wall motion analysis showed significant improvement of regional function in the infarct zone in both inferior and anterior infarction. In addition, significant changes occurred in regional function of the remote "noninfarct zone" in the acute as well as the chronic stage. It is concluded that improved regional and global left ventricular function can be achieved with early reperfusion and that this is the likely explanation for the reduction of early and late mortality after thrombolysis observed in this study.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: limitation of infarct size and improved survival (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4185/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on infarct size, left ventricular function, clinical course and patient survival was studied in a randomized trial comparing thrombolysis (269 patients) with conventional treatment (264 control patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hours after the onset of symptoms related to the infarction. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Informed consent was requested only of patients allocated to thrombolysis; no angiography was performed in 35. The infarct-related artery was patent in 65 patients and occluded in 169. Recanalization was achieved in 133 patients. The median time to angiographic documentation of vessel patency was 200 minutes after the onset of symptoms. The clinical course in the coronary care unit was more favorable after thrombolysis. Infarct size, estimated from myocardial enzyme release, was 30% lower after thrombolysis. In patients admitted within 1 hour after the onset of symptoms the reduction of infarct size was 51%, in those admitted between 1 and 2 hours it was 31% and in those admitted later than 2 hours it was 13%. Left ventricular function measured by radionuclide angiography before hospital discharge was better after thrombolysis (ejection fraction 48 +/- 15%) than in control patients (44 +/- 15%). Similar improvement was observed in patients with a first infarct only (thrombolysis 50 +/- 14%, control subjects 46 +/- 15%), in patients with anterior infarction (thrombolysis 44 +/- 16%, control subjects 35 +/- 14%) and in those with inferior infarction (thrombolysis 52 +/- 12%, control subjects 49 +/- 12%). Similar results were obtained by contrast angiography. Mortality was lower after thrombolysis. After 28 days 16 patients allocated to thrombolysis and 31 control patients had died. One year survival rates were 91 and 84%, respectively. On the other hand, nonfatal reinfarction occurred more frequently after thrombolysis (36 patients) than in control subjects (16 patients). Early thrombolysis by intracoronary streptokinase leads to a smaller infarct size estimated by enzyme release, preserves left ventricular function at the second week and leads to improved 1 year survival.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Which patients benefit most from early thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4213/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function, and early mortality was studied in subsets of patients in a randomized trial. Early thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase (152 patients) or with intracoronary streptokinase preceded by intravenous streptokinase (117 patients) was compared with conventional treatment (264 patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hr after onset of symptoms indicative of acute myocardial infarction. Four hundred eighty-eight patients were eligible for this detailed analysis, and 245 of these were allocated to thrombolytic therapy and 243 to conventional treatment. Early angiographic examinations were performed in 212 patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy. Patency of the infarct-related artery was achieved in 181 patients (85%). Enzymatic infarct size, as measured from cumulative alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase release, was smaller in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (median 760 vs 1170 U/liter in control patients, p = .0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by radionuclide angiography before discharge from the hospital was higher after thrombolytic therapy (median 50% vs 43% in control patients, p = .0001). Three month mortality was lower in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (6% vs 14% in the control group, p = .006). With the use of multivariate regression analysis, infarct size limitation, improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, and three month mortality were predicted by sum of the ST segment elevation, time from onset of symptoms to admission, and Killip class at admission. Thrombolysis was most effective in patients admitted within 2 hr after onset of symptoms and in patients with a sum of ST segment elevation of 1.2 mV or more. On the other hand, no beneficial effects of streptokinase on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function, or mortality were observed in the subset of patients with a sum of ST segment elevation of less than 1.2 mV who were admitted between 2 and 4 hr after onset of symptoms.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of early intracoronary streptokinase on infarct size estimated from cumulative enzyme release and on enzyme release rate: A randomized trial of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4214/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effects of early intracoronary streptokinase (SK) on enzymatic infarct size and rate of enzyme release were studied in a randomized multicenter trial. A total of 533 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were allocated to either the SK treatment group (n = 269) or the conventional (control) treatment group (n = 264). Enzymatic infarct size was represented by the cumulative quantity of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH) released by the heart per liter of plasma in the first 72 hours. Rate of enzyme release was represented by the ratio of HBDH quantities released in 24 hours and 72 hours. On an "intention to treat" basis, the SK group had a smaller (by 30%; p = 0.0001) median enzymatic infarct size and a higher (by 35%; p = 0.0001) median rate of enzyme release than the control group. Limitation of infarct size was less apparent in patients treated with intracoronary SK only (25%) than in patients treated with intravenous plus intracoronary SK (34%). Compared to the control group, the enzyme release rate in patients treated with intracoronary SK only was slightly less (34%) than that in patients treated with intravenous plus intracoronary SK (38%). Patients with a patent infarct-related coronary artery at acute angiography had a median infarct size which was 55% (p = 0.0001) smaller than the median infarct size of the control group, and the median rate of enzyme release was 38% (p = 0.001) higher than the median release rate of the control group. Patients with successful recanalization during intracoronary SK infusion had a median infarct size which was 31% (p = 0.002) smaller than the median infarct size of the control group and a median rate of enzyme release which was 42% (p = 0.0001) higher than the median release rate of the control group. Patients with persistent coronary occlusion in spite of thrombolytic therapy had a median infarct size which was 11% (NS) higher than the median infarct size of the control group, although the median rate of enzyme release was still 23% (p = 0.02) higher than the median release rate of the control group. It is concluded that thrombolysis in the early phase of AMI limits infarct size and that intracoronary SK treatment itself accelerates the process of enzyme release from infarcted myocardium, independent of the angiographic result.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Long term improvement in global left ventricular function after early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4225/</link>
      <pubDate>1986-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The effect of reperfusion achieved by early intracoronary streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction on left ventricular function was studied in 533 patients enrolled in a prospective randomised multicentre study. Two hundred and sixty four patients were allocated to conventional treatment and 269 patients to thrombolysis. At the end of the procedure patency of the infarct related vessel was achieved in 198 (85%) of 234 patients in whom coronary angiography was performed. The median interval from onset of symptoms till the angiographic documentation of patency was 200 minutes. Data were analysed according to the original treatment allocation. Global left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide angiography in 418 patients within two days of admission, in 361 patients after two weeks, and in 307 patients after three months. Global left ventricular function remained unchanged throughout the observation period in the control group, whereas it improved during the first two weeks in patients allocated to thrombolytic treatment. Improved function in these patients persisted up to three months after the infarction. Global left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly better in the thrombolysis group than in the control group at two days, two weeks, and at three months. In patients with anterior myocardial infarction the left ventricular ejection fraction was 9% better than in the control group at two weeks and at three months. In the patients with inferior myocardial infarction differences between the two treatment groups were smaller because of photon attenuation within the body. Angiographic evidence suggested that the improvement in function seen after thrombolysis is indeed associated with the patency of the infarct related artery.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bleeding complications of intracoronary fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of risk in a randomised trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/4152/</link>
      <pubDate>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The risk of bleeding associated with intracoronary infusion of streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction was determined in a randomised controlled trial containing 302 patients under the age of 70. Intracoronary streptokinase infusion was given to 152 patients and 150 patients were treated conventionally. Bleeding was seen in 24 (16%) patients in the streptokinase group and in two of the conventionally treated patients. Bleeding was most common (28%) in patients over the age of 60 years. The groin was the site of bleeding in all patients except one. In the first 48 hours after admission the haematocrit in streptokinase treated patients with manifest bleeding fell by 0.07 (0.04) (mean (SD)). The fall in haematocrit in the streptokinase treated patients without manifest bleeding was 0.05 (0.04) and in the conventionally treated patients it fell by 0.03 (0.04). Sixty six units of packed cells were transfused in the streptokinase group (50 units to those who bled); the control group required only 17 units. There were no deaths due to bleeding. The occurrence of bleeding and the fall in haematocrit in the streptokinase group correlated with the occurrence of systemic fibrinolysis but not with the dose of streptokinase given. Thus, in about 15% of patients treatment with intracoronary streptokinase resulted in significant non-fatal bleeding from the femoral puncture site that required substantial transfusion support. Furthermore, there was a significant drop in haematocrit in patients without manifest bleeding. These results emphasise the need for more specific fibrinolytic agents.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>