<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Ezabella, M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/7950/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>A homozygous mutation in the luteinizing hormone receptor causes partial Leydig cell hypopla phenotype (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8843/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Leydig cell hypoplasia (LCH) is characterized by a decreased response of
      the Leydig cells to LH. As a result, patients with this syndrome display
      aberrant male development ranging from complete pseudohermaphroditism to
      males with micropenis but with otherwise normal sex characteristics. We
      have evaluated three brothers with a mild form of LCH. Analysis of their
      LH receptor (LHR) gene revealed a homozygous missense mutation resulting
      in a substitution of a lysine residue for a isoleucine residue at position
      625 of the receptor. In vitro analysis of this mutant LHR, LHR(I625K), in
      HEK293 cells indicated that the signaling efficiency was significantly
      impaired, which explains the partial phenotype. We have compared this
      mutant LHR to two other mutant LHRs, LHR(A593P) and LHR(S616Y), identified
      in a complete and partial LCH patient, respectively. Although the
      ligand-binding affinity for all three mutant receptors was normal, the
      hormonal response of LHR(A593P) was completely absent and that of
      LHR(S616Y) and LHR(I625K) was severely impaired. Low cell surface
      expression explained the reduced response of LHR(S616Y), while for
      LHR(I625K) this diminished response was due to a combination of low cell
      surface expression and decreased coupling efficiency. For LHR(A593P), the
      absence of a reduced response resulted from both poor cell surface
      expression and a complete deficiency in coupling. Our experiments further
      show a clear correlation between the severity of the clinical phenotype of
      patients and overall receptor signal capacity, which is a combination of
      cell surface expression and coupling efficiency.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>