<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Schoemaker, R.G.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8066/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Circulating rather than cardiac angiotensin-(1-7) stimulates cardioprotection after myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28709/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) attenuates the development of heart failure. In addition to its local effects on cardiovascular tissue, Ang-(1-7) also stimulates bone marrow, which harbors cells that might complement the therapeutic effect of Ang-(1-7). We studied the effects of Ang-(1-7) either produced locally in the heart or subcutaneously injected during the development of heart failure induced by myocardial infarction (MI) and explored the role of cardiovascular progenitor cells in promoting the effects of this heptapeptide. Methods and Results: Effects of Ang-(1-7) on bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells in rodents, particularly endothelial progenitor cells, were investigated in vitro and in vivo in rats, in mice deficient for the putative Ang-(1-7) receptor Mas, and in mice overexpressing Ang-(1-7) exclusively in the heart. Three weeks after MI induction through permanent coronary artery occlusion, effects of Ang-(1-7) either produced locally in the heart or injected into the subcutaneous space were investigated. Ang-(1-7) stimulated proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells isolated from sham or infarcted rodents. The stimulation was blunted by A779, a Mas receptor blocker, or by Mas deficiency. Infusion of Ang-(1-7) after MI increased the number of c-kit-and vascular endothelial growth factor-positive cells in infarcted hearts, inhibited cardiac hypertrophy, and improved cardiac function 3 weeks after MI, whereas cardiomyocyte-derived Ang-(1-7) had no effect. Conclusions: Our data suggest circulating rather than cardiac Ang-(1-7) to be beneficial after MI. This beneficial effect correlates with a stimulation of cardiac progenitor cells in vitro and in vivo. This characterizes the heptapeptide as a promising new tool in stimulating cardiovascular regeneration under pathophysiological conditions. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in cardiovascular progenitor cell function (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32670/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Intervention in the RAAS (renin - angiotensin - aldosterone system) is one of the leading pharmacotherapeutic strategies, among others, used for the treatment of cardiovascular disease to improve the prognosis after myocardial infarction and to reduce hypertension. Recently, regenerative progenitor cell therapy has emerged as a possible alternative for pharmacotherapy in patients after myocardial infarction or ischaemic events elsewhere, e.g. in the limbs. Angiogenic cell therapy to restore the vascular bed in ischaemic tissues is currently being tested in a multitude of clinical studies. This has prompted researchers to investigate the effect of modulation of the RAAS on progenitor cells. Furthermore, the relationship between hypertension and endothelial progenitor cell function is being studied. Pharmacotherapy by means of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has varying effects on progenitor cell levels and function. These controversial effects may be explained by involvement of multiple mediators, e.g. angiotensin II and angiotensin-(1-7), that have differential effects on mesenchymal stem cells, haematopoietic progenitor cells and endothelial progenitor cells. Importantly, angiotensin II can either stimulate endothelial progenitor cells by improvement of vascular endothelial growth factor signalling, or invoke excessive production of reactive oxygen species causing premature senescence of these cells. On the other hand, angiotensin-(1-7) stimulates haematopoietic cells and possibly also endothelial progenitor cells. Furthermore, aldosterone, bradykinin and Ac-SDKP (N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro) may also affect progenitor cell populations. Alternatively, the variability in effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on cardiovascular progenitor cells might reflect differences between the various models or diseases with respect to circulating and local tissue RAAS activation. In the present review we discuss what is currently known with respect to the role of the RAAS in the regulation of cardiovascular progenitor cells. © The Authors Journal compilation </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Genomic and nongenomic effects of aldosterone in the rat heart: why is spironolactone cardioprotective? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13783/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>1. Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonism with spironolactone reduces mortality in heart failure on top of ACE inhibition. To investigate the underlying mechanism, we compared the actions of both aldosterone and spironolactone to those of angiotensin (Ang) II in the rat heart. 2. Hearts of male Wistar rats were perfused according to Langendorff. Ang II and aldosterone increased left ventricular pressure (LVP) by maximally 11+/-4 and 9+/-2%, and decreased coronary flow (CF) by maximally 36+/-7 and 20+/-4%, respectively. Spironolactone did not significantly affect LVP or CF. 3. In hearts that were exposed to a 45-min coronary artery occlusion and 3 h of reperfusion, a 15-min exposure to spironolactone prior to occlusion reduced infarct size (% of risk area) from 68+/-2 to 45+/-3%, similar to the reduction (34+/-2%) observed following 'preconditioning' (15 min occlusion followed by 10 min reperfusion) prior to the 45-min occlusion. Aldosterone exposure did not affect infarct size (71+/-5%). 4. In cardiomyocytes, aldosterone decreased [(3)H]thymidine incorporation maximally by 73+/-3%, whereas in cardiac fibroblasts it decreased [(3)H]proline incorporation by 33+/-7%. Spironolactone inhibited both effects. Ang II increased DNA and collagen synthesis, and these effects were reversed by aldosterone. 5. In conclusion, aldosterone induces positive inotropic and vasoconstrictor effects in a nongenomic manner, and these effects are comparable to those of Ang II. Aldosterone reduces DNA and collagen synthesis via MR activation, and counteracts the Ang II-induced increases in these parameters. MR blockade reduces infarct size and increases LVP recovery following coronary artery occlusion. The MR-related phenomena may underlie, at least in part, the beneficial actions of spironolactone in heart failure.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9789/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To investigate the functional consequences of postinfarct cardiac
      angiotensin (ANG) type 2 (AT(2)) receptor upregulation, rats underwent
      coronary artery ligation or sham operation and were infused with ANG II
      3-4 wk later, when scar formation is complete. ANG II increased mean
      arterial pressure (MAP) more modestly in infarcted animals than in sham
      animals. The AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan, but not the AT(2)
      receptor antagonist PD123319, decreased MAP and antagonized the ANG
      II-mediated systemic hemodynamic effects. Myocardial (MVC) but not renal
      vascular conductance (RVC) was diminished in infarcted versus sham rats.
      ANG II did not affect MVC and reduced RVC in all rats. MVC was unaffected
      by irbesartan and PD123319 in all animals. However, with PD123319, ANG II
      reduced MVC in sham but not infarcted animals, and, with irbesartan, ANG
      II increased MVC in infarcted but not sham animals. Irbesartan increased
      RVC and antagonized the ANG II-mediated renal effects in all animals. RVC,
      at baseline or with ANG II, was not affected by PD123319 in infarcted and
      sham animals. In conclusion, coronary but not renal AT(2) receptor
      stimulation results in vasodilation, and this effect is enhanced in
      infarcted rats.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bradykinin mediates cardiac preconditioning at a distance (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9344/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Preconditioning the heart by brief coronary (CAO) or mesenteric artery
          occlusion (MAO) can protect against damage during subsequent prolonged CAO
          and reperfusion. The role of bradykinin (BK) in remote cardiac
          preconditioning by MAO is investigated by antagonizing the BK B(2)
          receptor [Hoechst 140 (HOE-140)] or simulating local BK release by
          mesenteric intra-arterial infusion. Anesthetized male Wistar rats (n =
          6-8) were treated with HOE-140 or saline before starting the
          preconditioning protocol, CAO, MAO, or non-preconditioned control. Infarct
          size related to risk area [ratio of infarct area to area at risk (IA/AR)]
          was determined after 3 h of reperfusion following a 60-min CAO. IA/AR was
          62 +/- 5% in controls and not affected by HOE-140 (58 +/- 6%). CAO as well
          as MAO significantly protected the heart (IA/AR, 37 +/- 3 and 35 +/- 5%),
          which was prevented by HOE-140 (IA/AR, 71 +/- 6 and 65 +/- 7%,
          respectively). Brief intramesenteric BK infusion mimicked MAO (IA/AR, 26
          +/- 3%). Pretreatment with hexamethonium could abolish this protection
          (IA/AR, 67 +/- 4%). These data indicate an important role for BK in remote
          preconditioning by MAO. Results support the hypothesis that remote
          preconditioning acts through sensory nerve stimulation in the ischemic
          organ.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>