<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Kumar, K.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8177/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Towards Agility In Design In Global Component- Based Development (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13600/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The article discusses component-based development (CBD) methodologies, examining the manner in which component-based (CB) architecture will enable CB software development teams to create products with more agility. The study analyzes two CB project teams, located around the world, exploring how each team handled inter-site coordination and challenges to their communication. Other topics include building software systems by integrating pre-existing software components, shorter time-to-market periods, and reduced development costs.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Intense Collaboration In Globally Distributed Teams: Evolving Patterns Of Dependencies And Coordination (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1446/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-08-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>As multi-national firms and major offshore outsourcing companies develop experience with global work, their globally distributed teams face the challenge of collaborating intensely without the common interaction advantages associated with collocated work. This chapter analyzes the sources of intense collaboration. It then introduces strategies that organizations have developed to reduce the intensity of collaboration (sequentializing work, using mediating artifacts, modularity), or to enable intense teamwork (real time contact, boundary spanners). Strategy properties and deployment opportunities and constraints are indicated in order to equip managers and researchers with a framework for handling or analyzing globally distributed teamwork.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Importance of Sociality for Understanding Knowledge Sharing Processes in Organizational Contexts (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/179/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-03-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper explores how different models of sociality can contribute to a
better understanding of the dynamics of knowledge sharing within different
organizational settings. It is asserted that the dynamics of knowledge
sharing is organized according to a mix of four relational models
distinguished by the relation models theory (Fiske, 1991). It is described
how each of these models (communal sharing, authority ranking, equality
matching and market pricing) have their own implications for
understanding and supporting the knowledge sharing process. What model
of social relations is in use, is influenced by cultural implementation rules,
the kind of activity with its division of labor and the characteristics of
knowledge being shared and technologies being used. By knowing
according to what relational model(s) knowledge is being shared, one can
better understand and consequently better facilitate the organizational and
technical conditions for sharing knowledge (and vice versa).</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>