<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Liu, M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8370/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Determinants of a regional port-centric logistics hub: The case of East Africa (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23834/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Demand for port capacity in East Africa is rising rapidly, and possibilities for expansion in the existing ports are limited. Studies indicate that, by 2016, a new port north of Dar es Salaam (Tanzania) should be operational, serving, as a regional hub, the needs of the total (captive and non-captive) hinterland of East African ports. The objective of this article is to assess the economic potential, in terms of logistics costs of alternative hub-port locations. To that effect we first describe the flow of goods in the Nairobi - Durban port range and the landlocked countries; the available inland transport options; and the related transport costs and quality of service aspects. The inland and maritime transport costs are investigated and compared next, for the import-export routings of 18 different trade combinations between six landlocked countries (Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, DRC Great Lakes/Copper Belt, Zambia and Malawi) and five ports (Mombasa, Dar es Salaam, Durban, Beira and Nacala). The article estimates the parameters of a multinomial logit model by comparing the differences in logistics costs of routings via Dar es Salaam and other ports. A port demand function is derived as a result. The article concludes that, in view of its distance from the arterial maritime container trade routes, the new port could only function as a regional lower-tier hub and distribution centre for the trade of Tanzania and Kenya, and of landlocked countries ranging from Uganda in the north to Zambia in the south. At present, this role is mostly played by ports in the Middle East, whereas East African ports serve merely as transit points. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Operations research methods in maritime transport and freight logistics (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18411/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The current decade has witnessed a remarkable growth in container transportation and vessel sizes. This has come alongside an increasing need for optimisation
of both on the seaside and on the landside. As the linking nodes,
container terminals are facing great challenges in handling, stacking and transferring large numbers of containers, and high productivity is the key factor in maintaining terminal competitiveness. At the same time, terminals’ major customers demand reliability and efficiency at low costs. The changes that have taken place in the liner shipping industry require terminal operators and logistics service providers to continuously
improve their performance and guarantee seamless operations. In particular, the increasing integration of container supply chains and the consequent higher vulnerability of the chains to disruptions in container flows and operations, place more pressure on controlling and improving the performance
of the various segments of the chain.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A Grounded Theory Analysis of E-Collaboration Effects for Distributed Project Management (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1448/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-08-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The emergence and widespread use of collaborative technologies for distributed project management has brought opened up a myriad of opportunities for business. While the opportunities for off-shore outsourcing and collaborative development are enticing, most tools and techniques for project management focus on on-site, long term relationships and sourcing strategies at a time when inter-organizational relationships are becoming dynamic and temporary. This paper uses grounded theory to analyze data on virtual teams. The analysis uncovers “effects” in the way distributed projects are managed. These effects relate to coordination, communication and adaptation to distributed electronic work environments. Following an analysis of these eCollaboration “effects”, a model for distributed project management is presented.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>