<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Levy, H.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/847/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Risk aversion and skewness preference (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12607/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Empirically, co-skewness of asset returns seems to explain a substantial part of the cross-sectional variation of mean return not explained by beta. This finding is typically interpreted in terms of a risk averse representative investor with a cubic utility function. This paper questions this interpretation. We show that the empirical tests fail to impose risk aversion and the implied utility function takes an inverse S-shape. Unfortunately, the first-order conditions are not sufficient to guarantee that the market portfolio is the global maximum for this utility function, and our results suggest that the market portfolio is more likely to represent the global minimum. In addition, if we do impose risk aversion, then co-skewness has minimal explanatory power.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Does Risk Seeking Drive Stock Prices? A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Aggregate Investor Preferences and Beliefs (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14058/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We use various stochastic dominance criteria that account for (local) risk seeking to analyze market portfolio efficiency relative to benchmark portfolios formed on market capitalization, book-to-market equity ratio and price momentum. Our results suggest that reverse S-shaped utility functions with risk aversion for losses and risk seeking for gains can explain stock returns. The results are also consistent with a reverse S-shaped pattern of subjective probability transformation. The low average yield on big caps, growth stocks, and past losers may reflect investors’ twin desire for downside protection in bear markets and upside potential in bull markets.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Does Risk Seeking drive Asset Prices? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6802/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-07-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explain the cross-sectional pattern0 of stock returns. For this purpose, we analyze the stochastic dominance efficiency classification of the value-weighted market portfolio relative to benchmark portfolios based on market capitalization, book-to-market equity ratio and momentum. We use various existing and novel stochastic dominance criteria that account for the possibility that investors exhibit local risk seeking behavior. Our results suggest that Markowitz type utility functions, with risk aversion for losses and risk seeking for gains, can capture the cross-sectional pattern of stock returns. The low average yield on big caps, growth stocks and past losers may reflect investors' twin desire for downside protection in bear markets and upside potential in bull markets.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Does Risk Seeking Drive Asset Prices? A stochastic dominance analysis of aggregate investor preferences (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/204/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-05-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explain
the cross-sectional pattern of stock returns. For this purpose, we analyze the stochastic
dominance efficiency classification of the value-weighted market portfolio relative to
benchmark portfolios based on market capitalization, book-to-market equity ratio and
momentum. We use various existing and novel stochastic dominance criteria that account
for the possibility that investors exhibit local risk seeking behavior. Our results suggest
that Markowitz type utility functions, with risk aversion for losses and risk seeking for
gains, can capture the cross-sectional pattern of stock returns. The low average yield on
big caps, growth stocks and past losers may reflect investors' twin desire for downside
protection in bear markets and upside potential in bull markets.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>