<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Meerbeeck, J.P. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8480/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell and limited disease small cell lung cancer: Results from 2 phase I studies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27697/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: The objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pemetrexed and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary objectives include incidence and nature of acute and late toxicities, tumor response and overall survival. Patients and methods: Treatment naïve patients received 1 cycle of cisplatin 80mg/m2in study I (stage III NSCLC), 75mg/m2in study II (LD-SCLC) and pemetrexed 500mg/m2before the phase I part. In study I, patients were treated in cohorts with escalating cisplatin doses (60-80mg/m2), pemetrexed doses (400-500mg/m2) and concurrent escalating radiotherapy doses (66Gy in 33-27 fractions). In study II, patients were treated with cisplatin 75mg/m2and escalating pemetrexed doses (400-500mg/m2) with concurrent escalating radiotherapy doses (50-62Gy). Results: The trials closed prematurely: study I because of poor accrual, study II because of sponsor decision. Thirteen patients were treated: 4 with NSCLC, 9 with LD-SCLC. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. There was no grade 4 toxicity, grade 3 hematological toxicity was mild. One patient developed grade 3 acute esophagitis, but was able to complete radiotherapy without delay. Two patients experienced grade 2 late pulmonary toxicity, 1 complete response, 6 partial responses and 1 progressive disease were observed. Conclusions: Although the studies stopped too early to assess MTD, we have demonstrated that the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed with concurrent radiotherapy up to 66. Gy (33 × 2. Gy) is well tolerated and this new combination shows activity in NSCLC. Pemetrexed is the first 3rd generation cytotoxic found to be tolerable at full dose with concurrent radiotherapy. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A randomized phase II study comparing two schedules of the 21-day regimen of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27580/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Purpose: Carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 ml/min on day 1 with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2on day 1 and day 8 is a widely used regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia are frequent. The aim of this study is to investigate whether toxicity of gemcitabine/carboplatin could be reduced by administering carboplatin on day 8 instead of day 1 without a decrease in response rate (RR). Methods: Patients received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2on days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 (arm A) or day 8 (arm B). Drugs were administered over a 21-day cycle. Toxicity and RR were evaluated weekly and every second cycle, respectively. Results: 71 patients were enrolled into the study. We found 79% (95% CI 61-91%) grade 3-4 toxicity (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) in arm A and 50% (95% CI 32-68%) in arm B; 66% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in arm A and 26% in arm B. We observed 30% grade 4 hematological toxicity in arm A and 3% in arm B. In arm A an overall RR of 20% (95% CI 7.7-38.6%) was seen, and 18.2% (95% CI 7-35.5%) in arm B. Conclusions: Although the study was prematurely closed, the current data are of interest. The schedule with carboplatin on day 8 is associated with substantially lower grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with comparable dose intensity and RR. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in a once-every-three-weeks schedule in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A phase I study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29449/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy is a powerful treatment combination for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). The objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) as a once-every-three-weeks schedule. Patients and methods: Patients with LD-SCLC received a fixed-dose of irinotecan (340 mg) and cisplatin (135 mg) at day 1 in cycles 1 and 4. During cycles 2 and 3, irinotecan and cisplatin were given in a dose-escalation schedule with concurrent TRT (once daily, total dose 45Gray). Results: No DLT was observed at first two levels (irinotecan 100 mg or 120 mg and cisplatin 100 mg at day 1 of cycles 2 and 3). In the first five patients, four episodes of grade III diarrhoea/dehydration were observed at cycles 1 and 4. Therefore, from the sixth patient on, fixed-dose irinotecan at cycles 1 and 4 was reduced to 250 mg. At the subsequent level of irinotecan 140 mg and cisplatin 100 mg in cycles 2 and 3, two DLTs (severe oesophagitis and late vertebral radiation toxicity) were observed in one patient. Conclusion: Irinotecan 140 mg and cisplatin 100 mg with concurrent TRT was considered the MTD. Irinotecan and cisplatin in a once-every-three-weeks schedule is not recommended due to severe toxicity. Irinotecan may be more suited for intermittent weekly administration. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Single-agent pemetrexed for chemonaïve and pretreated patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: Results of an international expanded access program (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30469/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction:: Pemetrexed has established efficacy, and is the backbone for chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). An International Expanded Access Program provided &gt;3000 mesothelioma patients with access to single-agent pemetrexed or pemetrexed plus platinum analogs (cisplatin or carboplatin) in 13 countries. In this article, we report the safety and efficacy data of MPM patients who were treated with single-agent pemetrexed (n = 812). Methods:: Patients with histologically confirmed MPM, not amenable to curative surgery, received pemetrexed (500 mg/m) once (day 1) every 21 days with standard premedication and vitamin supplementation. Investigator-determined response and survival data were recorded at the end of study participation. Myelosuppression data were also collected. Results:: All 812 MPM patients (319 chemonaïve; 493 pretreated) received single-agent pemetrexed (≥1 dose) and were evaluated for safety. A total of 643 patients (247 chemonaïve, 396 pretreated) were evaluated for efficacy. Of the chemonaïve patients evaluated for efficacy (n = 247), the overall response rate was 10.5%, median time to progressive disease (TTPD) was 6.0 months, and median survival was 14.1 month. Of the pretreated patients evaluated for efficacy (n = 396), the overall response rate was 12.1%, median TTPD was 4.9 months, and the median survival was not estimable due to high censoring. Common terminology criteria grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was mild in both groups, with neutropenia (&lt;18%) as the main toxicity. Conclusions:: In the present expanded access program, single-agent pemetrexed demonstrated promising activity in MPM in both chemonaïve and pretreated patients, with TTPD of 6.0 and 4.9 months, respectively, 1-year survival ≥54.7%, and mild hematologic toxicity. Copyright </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35525/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-03-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Induction chemotherapy before surgical resection increases survival compared with surgical resection alone in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non - small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that, following a response to induction chemotherapy, surgical resection would be superior to thoracic radiotherapy as locoregional therapy. Methods: Selected patients with histologic or cytologic proven stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC were given three cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy. Responding patients were subsequently randomly assigned to surgical resection or radiotherapy. Survival curves were estimated using Kaplan - Meier analyses from time of randomization. Results: Induction chemotherapy resulted in a response rate of 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 57% to 65%) among the 579 eligible patients. A total of 167 patients were allocated to resection and 165 to radiotherapy. Of the 154 (92%) patients who underwent surgery, 14% had an exploratory thoracotomy, 50% a radical resection, 42% a pathologic downstaging, and 5% a pathologic complete response; 4% died after surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to 62 (40%) of patients in the surgery arm. Among the 154 (93%) irradiated patients, overall compliance to the radiotherapy prescription was 55%, and grade 3/4 acute and late esophageal and pulmonary toxic effects occurred in 4% and 7%; one patient died of radiation pneumonitis. Median and 5-year overall survival for patients randomly assigned to resection versus radiotherapy were 16.4 versus 17.5 months and 15.7% versus 14%, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.35). Rates of progression-free survival were also similar in both groups. Conclusion: In selected patients with pathologically proven stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC and a response to induction chemotherapy, surgical resection did not improve overall or progression-free survival compared with radiotherapy. In view of its low morbidity and mortality, radiotherapy should be considered the preferred locoregional treatment for these patients. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Lessons to learn from EORTC study 08981: A feasibility study of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35863/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The present EORTC phase II feasibility study in stage IIIB (T4-N3) NSCLC was conducted to investigate whether an induction regimen with concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery after restaging by re-mediastinoscopy and/or fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emisson tomography (FDG-PET) was feasible in a multicenter setting. Unfortunately, the study closed prematurely because of poor accrual. The combination of more stringent selection criteria, the incorrect prevailing view of Ethical Boards that a tri-modality approach is too toxic, competing studies in the participating centers and the fact that patients with N3 disease could only be enrolled if a re-mediastinoscopy could be performed, underlie the low accrual. Although this study illustrates that the conduct of a tri-modality study across Europe appeared to be difficult at that time, the number of centers with highly qualified and experienced specialists involved in this kind of multi-modality approaches is rapidly increasing. Future initiatives should, therefore, certainly be encouraged. Minimally invasive procedures such as EUS and EBUS should preferably be used for up-front mediastinal staging, mediastinoscopy with or without EUS should preferably be reserved for restaging, and especially right-sided pneumonectomies should be avoided. Though evident, the feasibility to complete this kind of studies within a reasonable time period is still a condition sine qua non. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Proteomic analysis of exosomes isolated from human malignant pleural effusions. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13308/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Exosomes are membrane vesicles from endosomal origin secreted by various
      cells such as hematopoietic, epithelial, and tumor cells. Exosomes
      secreted by tumor cells contain specific antigens potentially useful for
      immunotherapeutic purposes. Our aim was to determine if exosomes are
      present in human cancerous pleural effusions and to identify their
      proteomic content. Exosomes were purified by sucrose gradient
      ultracentrifugation, and electron microscopy was used to check both
      concentration and purity of exosomes. Proteins were separated by
      one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
      and protein bands were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption
      ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and Western blotting. Exosomes
      were present in pleural fluid obtained from patients suffering from
      mesothelioma (n = 4), lung cancer (n = 2), breast cancer (n = 2), and
      ovarian cancer (n = 1). As previously reported by others,
      antigen-presenting molecules, cytoskeletal proteins, and signal
      transduction-involved proteins were present. Proteins not previously
      reported were identified (SNX25, BTG1, PEDF, thrombospondin 2). Different
      types of immunoglobulins and complement factors were abundantly present in
      the sucrose fractions containing exosomes. Exosome-directed specificity of
      these immunoglobulins was not observed. In conclusion, sucrose gradient
      ultracentrifugation allows isolation of exosomes from malignant pleural
      effusions. However, pleural fluid proteins and especially immunoglobulins
      are coisolated and may hamper the use of exosomes isolated from malignant
      effusion for immunotherapy programs.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>High postoperative risk after pneumonectomy in elderly patients with right-sided lung cancer (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9848/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The present study investigated postoperative mortality (POM), its
      predictors and relationship with long-term survival in patients who
      underwent surgery for lung cancer. The 30-day mortality after thoracotomy
      in 1,830 patients from the Flemish multicentre hospital-based lung cancer
      registry was analysed according to patient, tumour, treatment and hospital
      characteristics and compared with 5-yr survival figures for the same
      patients. Overall POM was 4.4%. In univariate analysis age, extent of
      surgery and low hospital volume were associated with a higher POM. In
      multiple regression analysis age, extent of surgery and side of the
      pneumonectomy proved to be independent predictors of POM. In patients aged
          &gt;70 yrs who underwent right-sided pneumonectomy POM was 17.8%. Overall,
      mortality was comparable to published series from referral centres. Age
      and extent of resection are the main predictors of postoperative mortality
      in lung-cancer patients. In the operable elderly patient, age alone does
      not justify denying the survival benefit experienced by resection of lung
      cancer. The high mortality after right-sided pneumonectomy in elderly
      patients warrants caution, as the treatment benefit may become marginal.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>