<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Rosing, K.E.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/862/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Heuristic Concentration and Tabu Search: A Nose to Nose Comparison (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7802/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-04-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In 1997 two papers applying the metaheuristics Tabu Search (TS) and Heuristic Concentration (HC) to the p-median problem were published in consecutive volumes of the European Journal of Operational Research. Here we apply the method of HC some of the data sets which were used for computational experience in the paper on TS and briefly set out the results.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Optimal development of the North Sea's oil fields - the reply (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15285/</link>
      <pubDate>1977-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We consider that Wall et al's technical criticisms of our monograph are irrelevant or ill-confused. Their volumetric analytic method is inadequate and their approach to the platform/wells location question conflicts with oil industry views. On the economic aspects, Wall et al avoid the central issue we considered - on how to resolve company-government conflict - and instead take up an issue - on the overall speed of North Sea development - which we did not discuss. We show, moreover, how this criticism of our study is largely unsubstantiated personal opinion and, as such, unworthy of consideration, even if many of Wall et al's arguments were not erroneous.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>