<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Guerci, A.D.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8656/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Management of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the United States by platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9448/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: A multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
      (Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression
      Using Integrilin Therapy, PURSUIT) demonstrated that the platelet
      glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist eptifibatide reduced the
      incidence of death or myocardial infarction among patients with acute
      ischemic syndromes without ST-segment elevation. Because of expected
      differences in practice patterns, a prospectively planned analysis of
      outcomes as a function of regions of the world was performed. The current
      study provides a detailed assessment of eptifibatide among the subgroup of
      patients enrolled within the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients
      presenting with chest pain within the previous 24 hours and ischemic ECG
      changes or creatine kinase-MB elevation were eligible for enrollment. Of
      the 10 948 patients randomized worldwide, 4035 were enrolled within the
      United States. Patients were allocated to placebo or eptifibatide infusion
      for up to 72 to 96 hours. Other medical therapies and revascularization
      strategies were at the discretion of the treating physician. Eptifibatide
      reduced the rate of the primary end point of death or myocardial
      infarction by 30 days from 15.4% to 11.9% (P=0.003) among patients in the
      United States. The treatment effect was achieved early and maintained over
      a period of 6 months (18.9% versus 15.2%; P=0.004). Bleeding events were
      more common in patients receiving eptifibatide but were predominantly
      associated with invasive procedures. The magnitude of clinical benefit
      from eptifibatide was greater among patients in the United States than
      elsewhere in the world. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
      receptor blockade with eptifibatide reduces the incidence of death or
      myocardial infarction among patients treated for acute ischemic syndromes
      without ST-segment elevation within the United States.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Selection of thrombolytic therapy for individual patients: development of a clinical model (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5550/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We developed a logistic regression model with data from the GUSTO-I trial to predict mortality rate differences in individual patients who received accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) versus streptokinase treatment for acute myocardial infarction. A nomogram was developed from a reduced version of this model that approximated the underlying risk of patients treated with streptokinase, and thus the benefit of TPA. The 30-day mortality rate with accelerated TPA was 0.063 versus 0.073 with streptokinase and subcutaneously administered heparin and 0.074 with streptokinase and intravenously administered heparin. No baseline patient characteristics were significantly associated with a different relative effect of TPA. Older patients and those with anterior infarction, higher Killip classification (except Killip class IV), lower blood pressure, and increased heart rate had the greatest absolute benefit with accelerated TPA. Patients with acute myocardial infarction who had more high-risk characteristics derived a greater absolute benefit from treatment with accelerated TPA versus streptokinase.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/5468/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The relative efficacy of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator and the roles of intravenous as compared with subcutaneous heparin as adjunctive therapy in acute myocardial infarction are unresolved questions. The current trial was designed to compare new, aggressive thrombolytic strategies with standard thrombolytic regimens in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Our hypothesis was that newer thrombolytic strategies that produce earlier and sustained reperfusion would improve survival. METHODS: In 15 countries and 1081 hospitals, 41,021 patients with evolving myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to four different thrombolytic strategies, consisting of the use of streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, streptokinase and intravenous heparin, accelerated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and intravenous heparin, or a combination of streptokinase plus t-PA with intravenous heparin. ("Accelerated" refers to the administration of t-PA over a period of 1 1/2 hours--with two thirds of the dose given in the first 30 minutes--rather than the conventional period of 3 hours.) The primary end point was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The mortality rates in the four treatment groups were as follows: streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin, 7.2 percent; streptokinase and intravenous heparin, 7.4 percent; accelerated t-PA and intravenous heparin, 6.3 percent, and the combination of both thrombolytic agents with intravenous heparin, 7.0 percent. This represented a 14 percent reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 5.9 to 21.3 percent) in mortality for accelerated t-PA as compared with the two streptokinase-only strategies (P = 0.001). The rates of hemorrhagic stroke were 0.49 percent, 0.54 percent, 0.72 percent, and 0.94 percent in the four groups, respectively, which represented a significant excess of hemorrhagic strokes for accelerated t-PA (P = 0.03) and for the combination strategy (P &lt; 0.001), as compared with streptokinase only. A combined end point of death or disabling stroke was significantly lower in the accelerated-tPA group than in the streptokinase-only groups (6.9 percent vs. 7.8 percent, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this large-scale trial indicate that accelerated t-PA given with intravenous heparin provides a survival benefit over previous standard thrombolytic regimens</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>