<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Fey, M.F.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8794/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The value of the MDR1 reversal agent PSC-833 in addition to daunorubicin and cytarabine in the treatment of elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in relation to MDR1 status at diagnosis (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8251/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>To determine whether MDR1 reversal by the addition of the P-glycoprotein
      (P-gp) inhibitor PSC-833 to standard induction chemotherapy would improve
      event-free survival (EFS), 419 untreated patients with acute myeloid
      leukemia (AML) aged 60 years and older were randomized to receive 2
      induction cycles of daunorubicin and cytarabine with or without PSC-833.
      Patients in complete remission were then given 1 consolidation cycle
      without PSC-833. Neither complete response (CR) rate (54% versus 48%; P =
          .22), 5-year EFS (7% versus 8%; P = .53), disease-free survival (DFS; 13%
      versus 17%; P = .06) nor overall survival (OS; 10% in both arms; P = .52)
      were significantly improved in the PSC-833 arm. An integrated P-gp score
      (IPS) was determined based on P-gp function and P-gp expression in AML
      cells obtained prior to treatment. A higher IPS was associated with a
      significantly lower CR rate and worse EFS and OS. There was no significant
      interaction between IPS and treatment arm with respect to CR rate and
      survival, indicating also a lack of benefit of PSC-833 in P-gp-positive
      patients. The role of strategies aimed at inhibitory P-gp and other
      drug-resistance mechanisms continues to be defined in the treatment of
      patients with AML.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effect of priming with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the outcome of chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8458/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Sensitization of leukemic cells with hematopoietic growth
      factors may enhance the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy in acute myeloid
      leukemia (AML). METHODS: In a multicenter randomized trial, we assigned
      patients (age range, 18 to 60 years) with newly diagnosed AML to receive
      cytarabine plus idarubicin (cycle 1) and cytarabine plus amsacrin (cycle
      2) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (321 patients) or
      without G-CSF (319). G-CSF was given concurrently with chemotherapy only.
      Idarubicin and amsacrin were given at the end of a cycle to allow the
      cell-cycle-dependent cytotoxicity of cytarabine in the context of G-CSF to
      have a greater effect. The effect of G-CSF on disease-free survival was
      assessed in all patients and in cytogenetically distinct prognostic
      subgroups. RESULTS: After induction chemotherapy, the rates of response
      were not significantly different in the two groups. After a median
      follow-up of 55 months, patients in complete remission after induction
      chemotherapy plus G-CSF had a higher rate of disease-free survival than
      patients who did not receive G-CSF (42 percent vs. 33 percent at four
      years, P=0.02), owing to a reduced probability of relapse (relative risk,
      0.77; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.99; P=0.04). G-CSF did not
      significantly improve overall survival (P=0.16). Although G-CSF did not
      improve the outcome in the subgroup with an unfavorable prognosis, the 72
      percent of patients with standard-risk AML benefited from G-CSF therapy
      (overall survival at four years, 45 percent, as compared with 35 percent
      in the group that did not receive G-CSF [relative risk of death, 0.75; 95
      percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.95; P=0.02]; disease-free survival,
      45 percent vs. 33 percent [relative risk, 0.70]; 95 percent confidence
      interval, 0.55 to 0.90; P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization of leukemic
      cells with growth factors is a clinically applicable means of enhancing
      the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with AML.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>