<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Meuleman, M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/8841/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Private equity syndication: Agency costs, reputation and collaboration (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16853/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Syndicates are a form of inter-firm alliance in which two or more private equity firms invest together in an investee firm and share a joint pay-off, and are an enduring feature of the leveraged buyout (LBO) and private equity industry. This study examines the relationship between syndication and agency costs at the investor-investee level, and the extent to which the reputation and the network position of the lead investor mediate this relationship. We examine this relationship using a sample of 1,122 buyout investments by 80 private equity companies in the UK between 1993 and 2006. Our findings show that where agency costs are highest, and hence ex-post monitoring by the lead investor is more important, syndication is less likely to occur. The negative relationship between agency costs and syndication, however, is alleviated by the reputation and network position of the lead investor firm.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Why Do European Venture Capital Companies Syndicate? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/252/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-11-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Financial theory, resource-based theory and access to deal flow are
used to explain syndication practices among European venture capital
(VC) firms.  The desire to share risk and increase portfolio
diversification is a more important motive for syndication than the
desire to access additional intangible resources or deal flow. Access
to resources is, however, more important for non-lead than for lead
investors.  When resource-based motives are more important, the
propensity to syndicate increases.  Syndication intensity is higher
for young VC firms and for VC firms, specialised in a specific
investment stage. Finally, syndication strategies are similar across
European countries, but differ from North American strategies.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>