<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Stronks, K.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/887/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>A cross-national comparative study of metabolic syndrome among non-diabetic Dutch and English ethnic groups (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38361/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Evidence suggests a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in The Netherlands than in England, although generalized
obesity prevalence is substantially lower in The Netherlands. Metabolic syndrome (MS) is more strongly associated with the risk of progression
to T2D than generalized obesity. Therefore examining MS may help to better understand the differences in T2D between the two
countries. We assessed whether the Dutch and English differences in T2D prevalence reflect similar differences in MS in Whites, South-Asian
Indians and African-Caribbeans living in these two countries. Methods: Secondary analyses of population-based studies of 3010 participants
aged 35–60 years. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were
estimated using regression models. Results: In general, the Dutch ethnic groups had a higher prevalence of MS than their English counterparts.
Adjusted PRs were 1.37[95% confidence interval (CI)1.03–1.82] and 1.52 (1.06–2.19) in White-Dutch men and women compared to
White-English men and women; 2.20 (1.14–4.26) and 1.46 (0.96–2.24) in Dutch-African-Caribbean men and women compared to
English-African-Caribbean men and women and 0.97 (0.74–1.27) and 1.42 (1.00–2.03) in Dutch-Indian men and women compared with
their English-Indian peers, respectively. Similar patterns were also observed for some MS components, e.g. raised fasting glucose in men and
central obesity in women. Conclusion: The comparatively high prevalence of MS among Dutch ethnic groups may contribute to their high
prevalence of T2D. The high levels of some MS components, e.g. raised fasting glucose in men and central obesity in women add to the high
prevalence of MS in Dutch ethnic groups.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Perceived discrimination outside health care settings and health care utilization of Turkish and Moroccan GP patients in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38720/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Problematic interethnic relationships, expressed by feelings of discrimination, may contribute to ethnic variations in health and health care utilization. The impact of daily perceived discrimination on (mental) health has been shown. Less is known about the effect of everyday discrimination on the health care utilization. We examined the relationship between perceived discrimination of Turkish and Moroccan patients on GP health care utilization in the Netherlands and on health services use in the home country. Methods: Cohort study within the second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (2001). Interviews were conducted with 416 Turkish and 381 Moroccan respondents, and repeated in 2005 among respectively 118 and 102 participants. Linear, logistic and zero-inflated binomial regression models were used for the analyses. Results: Perceived discrimination was associated with non-attendance to the GP. Perceived quality of GP care was not a mediator in this relationship. No evidence was found for substitution of health care utilization in the home country to health care in the host country. GP attenders had higher odds of using health care in the home country than non-attenders. Over time, a lasting discrimination feeling was related to persistent non-attendance at the GP practice. Conclusion: Ethnic minority patients who feel discriminated may avoid GP health care. Further research is warranted on magnitude and health effects of such potential underutilization. Information on perceived discrimination within health care settings would increase insight into the profile of non-attenders, and on possible measures to better target interventions at a group at risk of underutilization. 
</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The effect on mental health of a large scale psychosocial intervention for survivors of mass violence: A quasi-experimental study in Rwanda (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34660/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: War has serious and prolonged mental health consequences. It is argued that post-emergency mental health interventions should not only focus on psychological factors but also address the social environment. No controlled trials of such interventions exist. We studied the effect on mental health of a large scale psychosocial intervention primarily aimed at social bonding in post-genocide Rwanda. The programme is implemented at population level without diagnostic criteria for participation. It is open to any person older than 15 years, and enables participation of over 1500 individuals per year. We postulated that the mental health of programme participants would improve significantly relative to non-participants. Methods and Findings: We used a prospective quasi-experimental study design with measurement points pre and post intervention and at 8 months follow-up. 100 adults from both sexes in the experimental condition entered the study; follow-up measurements were taken from 81. We selected a control group of 100 respondents with similar age, sex and symptom score distribution from a random community sample in the same region; of these, 73 completed the study. Mental health was assessed by use of the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), a twenty item instrument to detect common mental disorders in primary health care settings. Mean SRQ-20 scores decreased by 2.3 points in the experimental group and 0.8 in the control group (p = 0.033). Women in the experimental group scoring above cut-off at baseline improved with 4.8 points to below cut-off (p&lt;0.001). Men scoring above cut-off at baseline showed a similar trend which was statistically non-significant. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions: A large scale psychosocial intervention primarily aimed at social bonding caused a lasting improvement of mental health in survivors of mass violence in Rwanda. This approach may have a similar positive effect in other post-conflict settings. Trial Registration: Nederlands Trial Register 1120. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Diabetes prevalence in populations of South Asian Indian and African origins: A comparison of england and the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34190/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: We determined whether the overall lower prevalence of type II diabetes in England versus the Netherlands is observed in South-Asian-Indian and African-Caribbean populations. Additionally, we assessed the contribution of health behavior, body size, and socioeconomic position to observed differences between countries. Methods: Secondary analyses of population-based standardized individual-level data of 3386 participants were conducted. Results: Indian and African-Caribbean populations had higher prevalence rates of diabetes than whites in both countries. In crosscountry comparisons (and similar to whites), Indians residing in England had a lower prevalence of diabetes than those residing in the Netherlands; the prevalence ratio (PR) was 0.35 (95% confidence interval = 0.22 to 0.55) in women and 0.74 (0.50 to 1.10) in men after adjustment for other covariates. Among people of African descent as well, diabetes prevalence was lower in England than in the Netherlands; for women, PR = 0.43 (0.20 to 0.89) and for men, 0.57 (0.21 to 1.49). Conclusions: The increasing prevalence of diabetes after migration may be modified by the context in which ethnic minority groups live. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dutch versus English advantage in the epidemic of central and generalised obesity is not shared by ethnic minority groups: comparative secondary analysis of cross-sectional data (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23331/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-02-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background:Ethnic minority groups in Western European countries tend to have higher levels of overweight than the majority populations for reasons that are poorly understood. Investigating relative differences between countries could enable an investigation of the importance of national context in determining these inequalities. Objective:To explore: (1) whether Indian and African origin populations in England and the Netherlands are similarly disadvantaged compared with the White populations in terms of the prevalence of overweight and central obesity; (2) whether the previously known Dutch advantage of relatively low overweight prevalence is also observed in Dutch ethnic minority groups and (3) the contribution of health behaviour and socio-economic position to the differences observed. Methods:Secondary analyses of population-based studies of 16 406 participants from England and the Netherlands. Prevalence ratios were estimated using regression models. Results:Except for African men, ethnic minority groups in both countries had higher rates of overweight and central obesity than their White counterparts. However, the Dutch minority groups were relatively more disadvantaged than English minority groups as compared with the majority populations. The Dutch advantage of the low prevalence of obesity was only seen in White men and women and African men. In contrast, English-Indian (prevalence ratio=0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.93) and English-Caribbean (prevalence ratio=0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.89) women were less centrally obese than their Dutch equivalents. The Dutch-Indian men were very similar to the English-Indian men. The contribution of health behaviour and socio-economic position to the observed differences were small. Conclusion:Contrary to the patterns in White groups, the Dutch ethnic minority women were more obese than their English equivalents. More work is needed to identify factors that may contribute to these observed differences.International Journal of Obesity advance online publication, 15 February 2011; doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.281.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pilot study evaluating the effects of an intervention to enhance culturally appropriate hypertension education among healthcare providers in a primary care setting (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20182/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-05-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: To improve hypertension care for ethnic minority patients of African descent in the Netherlands, we developed a provider intervention to facilitate the delivery of culturally appropriate hypertension education. This pilot study evaluates how the intervention affected the attitudes and perceived competence of hypertension care providers with regard to culturally appropriate care.Methods: Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were used to measure the attitudes, experienced barriers, and self-reported behaviour of healthcare providers with regard to culturally appropriate cardiovascular and general care at three intervention sites (N = 47) and three control sites (N = 35).Results: Forty-nine participants (60%) completed questionnaires at baseline (T0) and nine months later (T1). At T1, healthcare providers who received the intervention found it more important to consider the patient's culture when delivering care than healthcare providers who did not receive the intervention (p = 0.030). The intervention did not influence experienced barriers and self-reported behaviour with regard to culturally appropriate care delivery.Conclusion: There is preliminary evidence that the intervention can increase the acceptance of a culturally appropriate approach to hypertension care among hypertension educators in routine primary care.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The effect of neighbourhood income and deprivation on pregnancy outcomes in Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24898/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Background: Studies suggest that the neighbourhoods in which people live influence their health. The main objective of this study was to investigate the associations of neighbourhood-level income and unemployment/social security benefit on pregnancy outcomes: preterm delivery, small for gestational age (SGA), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and miscarriage/perinatal death in Amsterdam. Methods: A random sample of 7883 from 82 neighbourhoods in Amsterdam. Individual-level data from the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development (ABCD) study were linked to data on neighbourhood-level factors. Multilevel logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and neighbourhood-level variance. Results: After adjustment for individual-level factors, women living in low-income neighbourhoods (third, second and first quartiles) were more likely than women living in high-income neighbourhoods (fourth quartile) to have SGA births: OR 1.32 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.68), 1.42 (1.11 to 1.82) and 1.62 (1.25 to 2.08) respectively. Women living in the quartile of neighbourhoods with the highest unemployment/social security benefit were more likely than those living in the quartile with the lowest unemployment/social security benefit to have SGA births 1.36 (1.08 to 1.72). The neighbourhood-level variance was significant only for SGA births. No significant associations were found between neighbourhood-level factors and other pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: The findings suggest that neighbourhood income and deprivation are related to SGA births. More research is needed to explore possible mechanisms underlying poor neighbourhood environment and pregnancy outcomes, in particular through stress mechanisms. Such information might be necessary to help improve maternal and fetal health.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Design and evaluation of a regional perinatal audit (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29693/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objective: To describe the experiences of a regional audit of perinatal deaths, including the experiences of the audit members, to discuss similarities and differences with other, existing perinatal audits and to summarize the implications for future implementation. Study design: Perinatal audit with blinded regional auditors. Consecutive cases of perinatal death were analysed for the presence of substandard care. A random selection of cases was reviewed by an external audit panel. The prevalence of substandard care in the Amsterdam audit was compared with other, existing audits. A survey among audit members was executed. Results: Care providers from all Amsterdam hospitals, as well as general practitioners and independent midwives cooperated. One hundred thirty-seven perinatal deaths were reviewed. In 25% of all perinatal death cases, substandard care factors were present. After 23 completed weeks substandard care factors were present in 35% of cases, and in 52% of intrapartum deaths. These figures are comparable with other, non-regional oriented audits. The review of the external panel was also comparable to the review of the regional audit committee. All audit members felt secure to discuss freely the presence of substandard care. Conclusion: First systematic experiences with a regional perinatal audit are described. We conclude that a regional perinatal audit is executable. Cooperation of regional care providers is good. Review of substandard care factors is comparable to other, non-regional oriented perinatal audits. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The development of a strategy for tackling health inequalities in the Netherlands. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13523/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-10-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Over the past decade, the Dutch government has pursued a research-based
      approach to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in health. We report on the
      most recent phase in this approach: the development of a strategy to
      reduce health inequalities in the Netherlands by an independent committee.
      In addition, we will reflect on the way the report of this committee has
      influenced health policy and practice.A 6-year research and development
      program was conducted which covered a number of different policy options
      and consisted of 12 intervention studies. The study results were discussed
      with experts and policy makers. A government advisory committee developed
      a comprehensive strategy that intends to reduce socioeconomic inequalities
      in disability-free life expectancy by 25% in 2020. The strategy covers 4
      different entry-points for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in health,
      contains 26 specific recommendations, and includes 11 quantitative policy
      targets. Further research and development efforts are also
      recommended.Although the Dutch approach has been influenced by similar
      efforts in other European countries, particularly the United Kingdom and
      Sweden, it is unique in terms of its emphasis on building a systematic
      evidence-base for interventions and policies to reduce health
      inequalities. Both researchers and policy-makers were involved in the
      process, and there are clear indications that some of the recommendations
      are being adopted by health policy-makers and health care practice,
      although more so at the local than at the national level.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A strategy for tackling health inequalities in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8252/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center
      Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
      mackenbach@mgz.fgg.eur.nl</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining educational differences in mortality: the role of behavioral and material factors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9067/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVES: This study examined the role of behavioral and material
      factors in explaining educational differences in all-cause mortality,
      taking into account the overlap between both types of factors. METHODS:
      Prospective data were used on 15,451 participants in a Dutch longitudinal
      study. Relative hazards of all-cause mortality by educational level were
      calculated before and after adjustment for behavioral factors (alcohol
      intake, smoking, body mass index, physical activity, dietary habits) and
      material factors (financial problems, neighborhood conditions, housing
      conditions, crowding, employment status, a proxy of income). RESULTS:
      Mortality was higher in lower educational groups. Four behavioral factors
      (alcohol, smoking, body mass index, physical activity) and 3 material
      factors (financial problems, employment status, income proxy) explained
      part of the educational differences in mortality. With the overlap between
      both types of factors accounted for, material factors were more important
      than behavioral factors in explaining mortality differences by educational
      level. CONCLUSIONS: The association between educational level and
      mortality can be largely explained by material factors. Thus, improving
      the material situation of people might substantially reduce educational
      differences in mortality.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Role of childhood health in the explanation of socioeconomic inequalities in early adult health (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8826/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the contribution of childhood health to the
          explanation of socioeconomic inequalities in health in early adult life.
          DESIGN: Retrospective data were used, which were obtained from a postal
          survey in the baseline of a prospective cohort study (the Longitudinal
          Study on Socio-Economic Health Differences in the Netherlands). Adult
          socioeconomic status was indicated by educational level, while health was
          indicated by perceived general health. Childhood health was measured by
          self reported periods of severe disease in childhood. Relations were
          analysed using logistic regression models. The reduction in odds ratios of
          "less than good" perceived general health for different educational groups
          after adjustment for childhood health was used to estimate the
          contribution of childhood health. SETTING: The population of the city of
          Eindhoven and surroundings in the south east of the Netherlands in 1991.
          PARTICIPANTS: 2511 respondents, aged 25-34 years, men and women, of Dutch
          nationality, were included in the analysis. MAIN RESULTS: There was a
          clear association between childhood health and adult health, as well as an
          association between childhood health and adult socioeconomic status.
          Approximately 5% to 10% of the increased risk of the lower socioeconomic
          groups of having a "less than good" perceived general health can be
          explained by childhood health. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood health contributes
          to the explanation of socioeconomic inequalities in early adult health.
          Although this contribution is not very large, it cannot be ignored and has
          to be interpreted largely in terms of selection on health.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Does childhood socioeconomic status influence adult health through behavioural factors? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8874/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess to what extent the
          effect of childhood socioeconomic status on adult health could be
          explained by a higher prevalence of unhealthy behaviour among those with
          lower childhood socioeconomic status. METHODS: Data were obtained from the
          baseline of a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands (13 854
          respondents, aged between 25 and 74). Childhood socioeconomic group was
          indicated by occupation of the father, and adult health was indicated by
          perceived general health, health complaints and mortality. Adult
          socioeconomic status was measured by current occupation. Behavioural
          factors were smoking, alcohol consumption, Body Mass Index and physical
          activity. Relations were analysed using logistic regression models.
          RESULTS: A clear association between childhood socioeconomic circumstances
          and adult health was shown, as well as an association between childhood
          socioeconomic circumstances and health-related behaviour, even after
          adjustment for current socioeconomic status. Physical activity shows the
          strongest relation with childhood socioeconomic circumstances. Behavioural
          factors explain the relation between childhood socioeconomic status and
          adult health for approximately 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Childhood socioeconomic
          circumstances have an independent effect on adult health and
          health-related behaviour: the risk of health problems and health damaging
          behaviour is higher in lower childhood socioeconomic groups. The
          independent effect of childhood circumstances on adult health operates for
          a small part through unhealthy behaviour.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9048/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the impact of different categories of
          working conditions on the association between occupational class and
          self-reported health in the working population. METHODS: Data were
          collected through a postal survey conducted in 1991 among inhabitants of
          18 municipalities in the southeastern Netherlands. Data concerned 4521
          working men and 2411 working women and included current occupational class
          (seven classes), working conditions (physical working conditions, job
          control, job demands, social support at work), perceived general health
          (very good or good versus less than good) and demographic confounders.
          Data were analysed with logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: For both
          men and women we observed a higher odds ratio for a less than good
          perceived general health in the lower occupational classes (adjusted for
          confounders). The odds of a less than good perceived general health was
          larger among people reporting more hazardous physical working conditions,
          lower job control, lower social support at work and among those in the
          highest category of job demands. Results were similar for men and women.
          Men and women in the lower occupational classes reported more hazardous
          physical working conditions and lower job control as compared to those in
          higher occupational classes. High job demands were more often reported in
          the higher occupational classes, while social support at work was not
          clearly related to occupational class. When physical working conditions
          and job control were added simultaneously to a model with occupational
          class and confounders, the odds ratios for occupational classes were
          reduced substantially. For men, the per cent change in the odds ratios for
          the occupational classes ranged between 35% and 83%, and for women between
          35% and 46%. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial part of the association between
          occupational class and a less than good perceived general health in the
          working population could be attributed to a differential distribution of
          hazardous physical working conditions and a low job control across
          occupational classes. This suggests that interventions aimed at improving
          these working conditions might result in a reduction of socioeconomic
          inequalities in health in the working population.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Socio-economic inequalities in health : individual choice or social circumstances? (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18068/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-04-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Being in good health is seen as one of the most valuable goods in life.
Therefore it is viewed as unfair that certain groups within society, for
example unmanied people or some ethnic groups, do not appeal' to enjoy
an equal share of good health compared to other sections of the population.
The perceived injustice is even more emphatic if differences in
health correspond with the distribution of other goods (see Schuyt 1987).
This is the case with inequalities in health between socio-economic
groups which are the focus of this thesis.
Empirical studies in many countries show that people who are worst
off as far as their socio-economic position is concerned are also worst off
when it comes to health. This thesis addresses the background of these
socio-economic inequalities in health as well as the consequences for
health policy. This chapter contains a brief introduction to the concept of
social stratification and specifies roughly the objectives of this thesis.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The interrelationship between income, health and employment status (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8702/</link>
      <pubDate>1997-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that the
          relatively strong association between income and health compared to that
          between education/occupation and health, can partly be interpreted in
          terms of an association between employment status and health. METHODS:
          Health indicators used were the prevalence of one or more chronic
          conditions, and perceived general health. Data were generated from a
          postal survey, part of the baseline data collection of a Dutch prospective
          cohort study on socioeconomic inequalities in health. RESULTS: After
          controlling for differences in other socioeconomic indicators, the
          association between income and health was found to be stronger than that
          between occupation or education and health. Most of the difference in
          strength was found to be due to employment status, especially among men.
          Controlling for employment status, and controlling for the distribution of
          those with a long-term work disability in particular, reduced the risks of
          lower income groups, whereas the risks of lower educational and
          occupational groups hardly changed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest
          that the relatively strong association between income and health can for a
          large part be interpreted in terms of an interrelationship between
          employment status, income and health. More specifically, it is largely due
          to the concentration of the long-term disabled in lower income groups.
          This indicates the importance of the selection mechanism, as these groups
          are excluded from paid employment because of their health status, leading
          to a lowering of income. However, income was still found to be related to
          perceived general health after controlling for employment status
          especially among women. This suggests that an explanation in terms of an
          effect of material factors on health may also be important.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>