http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9214/ List of Publications en http://repub.eur.nl/static-eur/img/logo.png http://repub.eur.nl http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/261/ 2002-12-09T00:00:00Z We examine the relationship between exchange-rate changes and stock returns for a sample of Dutch firms over 1994-1998. We find that over 50% of the firms are significantly exposed to exchange-rate risk. Furthermore, all firms with significant exchange-rate exposure benefit from a depreciation of the Dutch guilder relative to a trade-weighted currency index. This result confirms that firms in open economies, such as the Netherlands, exhibit significant exchange-rate exposure. We collect unique information on the most relevant individual currencies for each firm with respect to their influence on firm value. Our results indicate that the use of a trade-weighted currency index and the use of individual exchange rates are complements. We also measure the determinants of exchange-rate exposure. As expected, we find that firm size and the foreign sales ratio are significantly and positively related to exchange-rate exposure. In contrast with our hypothesis, off-balance hedging using derivatives has no significant effects. Finally, in line with theory, we find that exposure is significantly reduced through on-balance sheet hedging, i.e. through foreign loans and by producing in factories abroad. http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/155/ 2001-01-23T00:00:00Z This paper examines the influence of institutional differences on risk management practices in the US and the Netherlands. This comparison is interesting because the Dutch firms' institutional setting differs from the US setting with respect to shareholder orientation, international trade, disclosure regulation, and reliance on financial markets. In contrast with previous comparisons, we apply a matching and weighting strategy that corrects for differences over industry and size classes across the Dutch and US samples. After these corrections, the remaining results can be attributed more directly to institutional differences. We find that due to the greater openness of the Netherlands, Dutch firms hedge more financial risk, especially more currency risk, than US firms. Dutch firms, however, show a lower level of concern over derivatives usage, which is consistent with having less active minority shareholders and less strict disclosure requirements than the US has. Dutch firms focus le ss on stabilizing accounting earnings with derivatives than US firms, which is likely attributable to the strong shareholder orientation in the US versus the stakeholder orientation in the Netherlands. Whereas Dutch firms tend to rely almost exclusively on OTC-transactions, US firms use exchange-traded derivatives and more counter-parties. This results in US firms imposing stricter requirements on counter-party rating for derivatives transactions. This distinction can be attributed to the differences in the financial environments between the US and the Netherlands. These, and other results, strongly suggest that institutional differences between the US and the Netherlands have an important impact on risk management practices and derivatives use across US and Dutch firms.