<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Grilo, I.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/934/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Perceived credit constraints in the European Union (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17699/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-10-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The promotion and support of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) forms an essential ingredient of the policies designed to help improve Europe’s economic performance. A key issue is whether SMEs face difficulty obtaining bank loans. Using pre-crisis survey data from 2005 and 2006 for nearly 3,500 SMEs (firms with fewer than 250 employees) in the European Union (EU), we investigate the determinants of perceived bank loan accessibility at the firm level and at the country level. Based on hierarchical (multi-level) binomial logit regressions, our findings show that the youngest and smallest SMEs have the worst perceptions regarding access to bank loans. The SMEs in nations with concentrated banking sectors are more positive about loan accessibility. In addition, a high fraction of foreign-owned banks is associated with improved perceptions regarding loan accessibility in the EU 15 but not in the EU 10.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Perceived credit constraints in the European Union (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37871/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-10-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The promotion and support of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is an essential component of policies designed to help improve Europe's economic performance. A crucial issue is whether SMEs face difficulty obtaining bank loans. Using pre-crisis survey data from 2005 and 2006 for nearly 3,500 SMEs (firms with fewer than 250 employees) in the European Union (EU), we investigate the determinants of perceived bank loan accessibility at the firm level and at the country level. Based on hierarchical (multi-level) binomial logit regressions, our findings show that the youngest and smallest SMEs have the worst perception of access to bank loans. The SMEs in nations with concentrated banking sectors are more positive about loan accessibility. In addition, a high fraction of foreign-owned banks is associated with improved perception of loan accessibility in the EU 15 but not in the EU 10. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Progress: Climbing the Entrepreneurial Ladder in Europe and the United States (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31978/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This study investigates which countries have the highest potential to achieve entrepreneurial progress. This progress is defined as an entrepreneurial ladder with five successive steps: ‘never thought about starting a business’, ‘thinking about it’, ‘taking steps’, ‘running a young business’ and ‘running a mature business’. The influences of individual-level and country-level variables on the progression through these stages are analysed. Data from twenty-seven European countries and the United States are used (2007 Flash Eurobarometer Survey on Entrepreneurship). Findings show that in the United States many people think about setting up a business, whereas Europeans are better at achieving higher levels of engagement. Country differences can be explained mainly by levels of risk tolerance and economic development. A country's level of administrative complexity does not play a role, but individual perceptions of this complexity are a hindering factor.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23945/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper investigates whether and how a recent entrepreneurial exit relates to subsequent engagement. We discriminate between six levels of engagement including none, potential, intentional, nascent, young and established entrepreneurship. We use individual-level data for 24 countries that participated in the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor during 2004, 2005 and 2006 (some 350,000 observations). Our findings indeed show that a recent exit decreases the probability of undertaking no entrepreneurial activity, whereas it substantially increases the probabilities of being involved in all other engagement levels. Investigating the conditions under which an exit increases engagement in entrepreneurial activities, we find that the probability of entrepreneurial engagement after exit is higher for males, for persons who know an entrepreneur and for persons with a low fear of failure. Educational attainment does not seem to be relevant. Moreover, there exists large cross-country variation in the probability of entrepreneurial engagement after exit. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31422/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper investigates an essential aspect of the entrepreneurial personality: why women's self-employment rates are consistently lower than those of men. It has three focal points. It discriminates between the preference for self-employment and actual involvement in self-employment using a two (probit) equation model. It makes a systematic distinction between different ways in which gender influences the preference for and actual involvement in self-employment (mediation and moderation). It includes perceived ability as a potential driver of self-employment next to risk attitude, self-employed parents and other socio-demographic drivers. A representative data set of more than 8000 individuals from 29 countries (25 EU Member States, US, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) is used (the 2004 Flash Eurobarometer survey). The findings show that women's lower preference for becoming self-employed plays an important role in explaining their lower involvement in self-employment and that a gender effect remains that may point at gender-based obstacles to entrepreneurship. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The entrepreneurial ladder and its determinants (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15775/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We test a new model where the entrepreneurial decision is described
as a process of successive engagement levels, i.e. as an entrepreneurial
ladder. Five levels are distinguished using nearly 12 000 observations
from the 2004 ‘Flash Eurobarometer survey on Entrepreneurship’
covering the 25 European Union member states and the United
States. The most surprising of the many results is that perception of
lack of financial support is no obstacle for moving to a higher
entrepreneurial engagement level whereas perceived administrative
complexity is a significant obstacle. We also show that the effect of
age on the probability of moving forward in the entrepreneurial
process becomes negative after a certain age implying that if
entrepreneurial engagements are not taken early enough in life they
may well never be taken.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Progress: Climbing The Entrepreneurial Ladder in Europe and The US (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16518/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We investigate which countries have the highest potential to achieve entrepreneurial progress. This progress is defined using an entrepreneurial ladder with five successive steps: “never thought about starting a business”, “thinking about starting a business”, “taking steps to start a business”, “running a business for less than three years”, and “running a business for more than three years”. We assess the influence of individual-level and country-level variables on progression through these stages. Data are used from the 2007 “Flash Eurobarometer Survey on Entrepreneurship”, covering 27 European countries and the United States. We find that countries display large variation in the ease with which businesses come into existence and survive. In the US many people think about setting up a business whereas Europeans are better at achieving higher levels of engagement. Particularly in Austria, France and Lithuania there appear to be low probabilities to advance in the process. Our analysis suggests that country differences can be explained by the level of economic development and risk tolerance while the administrative and financial climate play a role for some steps. The paper also provides results on the influence of individual-level demographic and obstacle perception variables.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants of entrepreneurial engagement levels in Europe and the US (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14697/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-11-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In this article, the process of the entrepreneurial decision is decomposed in seven engagement levels ranging from "never thought about starting a business" to "gave up," "thinking about it," "taking steps for starting up," "having a young business," "having an older business," and "no longer being an entrepreneur." By using a multinomial logit model, we allow the effect of covariates to differ across the various entrepreneurial engagement levels. Data from two Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer surveys (2002 and 2003) containing over 20,000 observations of the 15 old EU Member States, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and the United States are used. Other than demographic variables, the set of explanatory variables used includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support, and of risk tolerance, the respondents' preference for self-employment and country-specific effects. Among our results, we find that the perception of lack of financial support has no discriminative effect across the various levels of entrepreneurial engagement while perception of administrative complexities plays a negative role only for high levels of engagement.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining Preferences and Actual Involvement in Self-Employment: New Insights into the Role of Gender (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10979/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper investigates why women’s self-employment rates are consistently lower than those of men. It has three focal points. It discriminates between the preference for self-employment and actual involvement in self-employment using a two (probit) equation model. It makes a systematic distinction between different ways in which gender influences the preference for and actual involvement in self-employment (mediation and moderation). It includes perceived ability as a potential driver of self-employment next to risk attitude, self-employed parents and other socio-demographic drivers. A representative data set of more than 8,000 individuals from 29 countries (25 EU member states, US, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) is used (the 2004 Flash Eurobarometer survey). The findings show that women’s lower preference for becoming self-employed plays an important role in explaining their lower involvement in self-employment and that a gender effect remains that may point at gender-based obstacles to entrepreneurship.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Climbing the Entrepreneurial Ladder: The Role of Gender (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10888/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We investigate whether women and men differ with respect to the steps they take in the entrepreneurial process, distinguishing between five successive steps described by the following positions: (1) "never thought about it"; (2) "thinking about starting up a business"; (3) "taking steps to start a business"; (4) "running a business for less than three years"; (5) "running a business for more than three years". This paper provides insights into the manner in which women and men climb the entrepreneurial ladder and the factors that influence their position on the ladder. We use data from the 2006 "Flash Eurobarometer survey on Entrepreneurship" consisting of more than 10,000 observations for 25 member states of the European Union, Norway, Iceland and the United States. Findings suggest that for men it is easier to climb the ladder and that this may be attributed partly to their higher tolerance of risk.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Entrepreneurial Ladder and its Determinants (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8134/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We test a new model where the entrepreneurial decision is described as a process of successive engagement levels, i.e., as an entrepreneurial ladder. Five levels are distinguished using nearly 12,000 observations from the 2004 “Flash Eurobarometer survey on Entrepreneurship” covering the 25 European Union member states and the United States. The most surprising of the many results is that perception of lack of financial support is no obstacle for moving to a higher entrepreneurial engagement level whereas perceived administrative complexity is a significant obstacle. We also show that the effect of age on the probability of moving forward in the entrepreneurial process becomes negative after a certain age implying that if entrepreneurial engagements are not taken early enough in life they may well never be taken.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants of self-employment preference and realization among women and men in Europe and the United States (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9702/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Female
self-employment rates are consistently lower than those of men. This
untapped female potential has drawn the attention of policy makers. In the
present paper the determinants of selfemployment rates of both men and
women are investigated in the context of a two-equation model explaining
both actual self-employment and the preference for self-employment. A
systematic distinction is made between different ways in which gender can
exert influence on (preference for) self-employment, including moderation,
mediation and direct effects. Using Flash Eurobarometer data of about
8,000 individuals from 29 countries (including the 15 old EU member
states, 10 new EU member states and the United States) probit equations
are estimated explaining the (preference for) self-employment. Next to
gender, explanatory variables include age, education, social capital, risk
attitude, locus of control and perceptions of the entrepreneurial
environment. Findings show that at least part of the explanation of the
lower female self-employment rate is caused by a lower preference for
women to become self-employed. We do not find evidence for a moderating
effect of gender on the relationship between self-employment and the
preference for self-employment, indicating that   other things equal  
women and men who have a preference to become self-employed do not differ
with respect to the impact of this preference on its materialization. 
Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining engagement levels of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9705/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper investigates
differences between opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs in terms of
socio-demographics, attitudes and perception of  obstacles . We use the
2004 Flash Eurobarometer Survey data. Explanatory variables include
gender, age, education level and self-employed parents, risk tolerance,
locus of control, perceptions of four  obstacles  and country effects. The
 obstacle  variables include the perception of availibility of financial
support; administrative complexity; of access to information on new
venture creation and an unfavorable economic climate. Using probit
equations we investigate differences in the preference for self-employment
of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. A probit equation is estimated
relating the explanatory variables to opportunity versus necessity
entrepreneurship. Moreover, differences in the entrepreneurial engagement
of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs are investigated on the basis
of a (ordered) multinomial logit model. Findings indicate that opportunity
entrepreneurs have a higher preference for self-employment because of
family encouragement. Also, opportunity entrepreneurs are found to
perceive of administrative complexity and an unfavorable economic climate,
negatively influencing their entrepreneurial involvement, while this is
not the case for necessity entrepreneurs.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15796/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15 old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000. While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship. Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants of Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in Europe and the US (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9862/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Determinants from different streams of literature and spanning different disciplines are used to explain entrepreneurial decisions. A multinomial logit model and survey data from the old 15 EU member states, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and the US are used to establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various entrepreneurial engagement levels. These engagement levels range from “never thought about starting a business” to “thinking about it”, “taking steps for starting up”, “having a young business”, “having an older business” and “no longer being an entrepreneur”. Data of two Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer surveys (2002 and 2003) containing over 20,000 observations are used. Other than demographic variables, the set of explanatory variables used includes the perception by respondents of ad-ministrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance, the respondents’ prefer-ence for self-employment and country specific effects. The most striking result is that the perception of lack of financial support has no discriminative effect across the various levels of entrepreneurial engagement.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in the European Union (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15798/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A multinomial logit model and survey data from the 25 EU member states and the US are
used to establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various entrepreneurial
engagement levels. These engagement levels range from “never thought about starting a business”
to “thinking about it”, “taking steps for starting up”, “having a young business”, “having an older
business” and “no longer being an entrepreneur”. Data of the 2004 Entrepreneurship Flash
Eurobarometer survey containing over 13,500 observations is used. Other than demographic
variables such as gender, age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the set of
explanatory variables used includes country specific effects, measures of risk tolerance, internal and
external locus of control and four perceptions of ’obstacles’. The ‘obstacle’ variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support, of
accessibility of information for start-up and whether the current economic climate is favorable.
Among the four perception variables only administrative complexities displays an unambiguous
obstacle profile in that its presence has a significant negative impact on higher entrepreneurial
engagement levels. Country effects suggest a clear underperformance of Europe relative to the US
in less mature entrepreneurial phases.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurship in the old en new Europe (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9706/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Developing a dynamic SME sector is essential for
countries transforming their centrally planned economy into a market
oriented one. New firm formation is the major driver of this transition.
Obviously, entrepreneurial energy is a necessary condition for new firm
formation. This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 25 EU member states
and the US to explain country differences in entrepreneurial energy. This
energy is captured as latent and actual entrepreneurship. Latent
entrepreneurship is measured by the probability of a declared preference
for self-employment over employment. Next to demographic variables such as
gender, age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the
set of explanatory variables used includes country specific effects,
measures of risk tolerance, internal and external locus of control and
four perceptions of  obstacles . The  obstacle  variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability
of financial support, of accessibility of information for start-up and
whether the current economic climate is favorable. Specific attention is
devoted to differences between the eight former communist member states
and the 17 other EU member states. The most striking result is the higher
influence of risk tolerance in shaping both latent and actual
entrepreneurship in transition economies relative to market economies.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial engagement levels in the European Union (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9708/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A multinomial logit model
and survey data from the 25 EU member states and the US are used to
establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various
entrepreneurial engagement levels. These engagement levels range from 
never thought about starting a business  to  thinking about it ,  taking
steps for starting up ,  having a young business ,  having an older
business  and  no longer being an entrepreneur . Data of the 2004
Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer survey containing over 13,500
observations is used. Other than demographic variables such as gender,
age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the set of
explanatory variables used includes country specific effects, measures of
risk tolerance, internal and external locus of control and four
perceptions of  obstacles . The  obstacle  variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability
of financial support, of accessibility of information for start-up and
whether the current economic climate is favorable. Among the four
perception variables only administrative complexities displays an
unambiguous obstacle profile in that its presence has a significant
negative impact on higher entrepreneurial engagement levels. Country
effects suggest a clear underperformance of Europe relative to the US in
less mature entrepreneurial phases.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: some recent developments (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9710/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15
old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent
and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as
gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception
by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of
financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific
effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000.
While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial
support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this
variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even
more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual
entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship.
Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large
majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for
latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects
are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the
comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors
are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU
relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in
terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the
same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have
occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants Of Entrepreneurship In Europe (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1823/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-12-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>This paper uses an Eclectic Framework explaining entrepreneurship incorporating different streams of literature and spanning different disciplines. The Eclectic Framework integrates factors shaping the demand for entrepreneurship on the one hand, with those influencing the supply of entrepreneurs on the other hand. It also creates insight into the role of public policy identifying the channels through which the demand or the supply of entrepreneurship can be shifted. In its empirical part the present paper estimates a multinomial logit using survey data from the 15 EU member states, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and the US to establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various entrepreneurial engagement levels. Data of two Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer surveys (2003 and 2004) containing over 20,000 observations are used. Other than demographic variables, the set of explanatory variables used includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support, a rough measure of risk tolerance, the respondents’ preference for self-employment and country specific effects. The most striking result is that the perception of lack of financial support has no discriminative effect across the various levels of entrepreneurial engagement.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>