<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Mohammedamin, R.S.A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9448/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Self-reported prevalence of warts in children and GP consultation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30286/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reported incidence and treatment of dermatophytosis in children in general practice: A comparison between 1987 and 2001 (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/35996/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Introduction: Dermatophytosis is a common skin infection in children. Although the epidemiology is relatively unknown it is becoming a major health problem in some countries. We determine the incidence and management of dermatophytosis in Dutch general practice in 1987 and 2001. Methods: We used data of all children aged 0-17 years derived from two national surveys performed in Dutch general practice in 1987 and 2001 respectively. All diagnoses, prescriptions and referrals were registered over a 12 months period by the participating general practitioners (GPs), 161 and 195 respectively. Data were stratified for socio-demographic characteristics. Results: Compared to 1987, in 2001 the total reported incidence rate of dermatophytosis in children in general practice increased from 20.8 [95%CI 18.9-22.8] to 24.6 [95%CI 23.5-25.7] per 1,000 person years. Infants (&lt;1 year), girls, children in rural areas and children of non-western immigrants more often consulted the GP for dermatophytosis in 2001. In both surveys GPs treated the majority of children with dermatophytosis with topical drugs, especially with azoles. Conclusions: The reported incidence rate of dermatophytosis in children in general practice increased; however it is unclear whether this is a consequence of an increasing prevalence in the population or a changing help seeking behaviour. GPs generally follow the national guideline for the treatment of dermatophytosis in children. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Infectious Skin Diseases in Children in General Practice: epidemiology and management (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8656/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-02-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The increasing proportion of skin diseases, especially infectious and allergic skin diseases, 
encountered in general practice represents a substantial part of the morbidity in 
children. Only limited information is available about the epidemiology of skin diseases 
in children in general practice and many questions in this field are still unanswered. In 
this thesis, after a general overview of all skin related morbidity in children in general 
practice, we will focus on the changes in the incidence and management of infectious 
skin diseases during the past decades. 
Moreover, we aim to identify determinants that are associated with the incidence of 
infectious skin diseases in children encountered in general practice in order to provide 
tools for improvement of general practice care and prevention of infectious skin diseases 
and their complications. 
We performed an observational study comparing data of the two Dutch national surveys. 
The setting of the research was general practice as, in the Netherlands, the majority 
of skin diseases were diagnosed and treated by general practitioners. 

In chapter 2 we compared incidence rates of all skin diseases presented by children 
aged 0 – 17 years in general practice between 1987 and 2001.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Association between skin diseases and severe bacterial infections in children: case-control study. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14084/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-08-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Sepsis or bacteraemia, however rare, is a significant cause of high mortality and serious complications in children. In previous studies skin disease or skin infections were reported as risk factor. We hypothesize that children with sepsis or bacteraemia more often presented with skin diseases to the general practitioner (GP) than other children. If our hypothesis is true the GP could reduce the risk of sepsis or bacteraemia by managing skin diseases appropriately. METHODS: We performed a case-control study using data of children aged 0-17 years of the second Dutch national survey of general practice (2001) and the National Medical Registration of all hospital admissions in the Netherlands. Cases were defined as children who were hospitalized for sepsis or bacteraemia. We selected two control groups by matching each case with six controls. The first control group was randomly selected from the GP patient lists irrespective of hospital admission and GP consultation. The second control group was randomly sampled from those children who were hospitalized for other reasons than sepsis or bacteraemia. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A two-sided p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant in all tests. RESULTS: We found odds ratios for skin related GP consultations of 3.4 (95% CI: [1.1-10.8], p = 0.03) in cases versus GP controls and 1.4 (95% CI: [0.5-3.9], p = 0.44) in cases versus hospital controls. Children younger than three months had an odds ratio (cases/GP controls) of 9.2 (95% CI: [0.81-106.1], p = 0.07) and 4.0 (95% CI: [0.67-23.9], p = 0.12) among cases versus hospital controls. Although cases consulted the GP more often with skin diseases than their controls, the probability of a GP consultation for skin disease was only 5% among cases. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that children who were admitted due to sepsis or bacteraemia consulted the GP more often for skin diseases than other children, but the differences are not clinically relevant indicating that there is little opportunity for GPs to reduce the risk of sepsis and/or bacteraemia considerably by managing skin diseases appropriately.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Increasing incidence of skin disorders in children? A comparison between 1987 and 2001. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13990/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-03-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: The increasing proportion of skin diseases encountered in general practice represents a substantial part of morbidity in children. Only limited information is available about the frequency of specific skin diseases. We aimed to compare incidence rates of skin diseases in children in general practice between 1987 and 2001. METHODS: We used data on all children aged 0-17 years derived from two consecutive surveys performed in Dutch general practice in 1987 and 2001. Both surveys concerned a longitudinal registration of GP consultations over 12 months. Each disease episode was coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care. Incidence rates of separate skin diseases were calculated by dividing all new episodes for each distinct ICPC code by the average study population at risk. Data were stratified for socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence rate of all skin diseases combined in general practice decreased between 1987 and 2001. Among infants the incidence rate increased. Girls presented more skin diseases to the GP. In the southern part of the Netherlands children consulted their GP more often for skin diseases compared to the northern part. Children of non-Western immigrants presented relatively more skin diseases to the GP. In general practice incidence rates of specific skin diseases such as impetigo, dermatophytosis and atopic dermatitis increased in 2001, whereas warts, contact dermatitis and skin injuries decreased. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence rate of all skin diseases combined in general practice decreased whereas the incidence rates of bacterial, mycotic and atopic skin diseases increased.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Impetigo: incidence and treatment in Dutch general practice in 1987 and 2001 - results from two national surveys. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17755/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: Impetigo is a common skin infection in children. The epidemiology is relatively unknown, and the choice of treatment is subject to debate. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the incidence and treatment of impetigo in Dutch general practice, and to assess trends between 1987 and 2001. METHODS: We used data from the first (1987) and second (2001) Dutch national surveys of general practice. All diagnoses, prescriptions and referrals were registered by the participating general practitioners (GPs), 161 and 195, respectively. RESULTS: The incidence rate of impetigo increased from 16.5 (1987) to 20.6 (2001) per 1000 person years under 18 years old (P &lt; 0.01). In both years, the incidence was significantly higher in summer, in rural areas and in the southern region of the Netherlands, compared with winter, urban areas and northern region, respectively. Socioeconomic status was not associated with the incidence rate. From 1987 to 2001, there was a trend towards treatment with a topical antibiotic (from 43% to 64%), especially fusidic acid cream and mupirocin cream. Treatment with oral antibiotics (from 31% to 14%) and antiseptics (from 11% to 3%) was prescribed less often. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown an increased incidence of impetigo in the past decade, which may be the result of an increased tendency to seek help, or increased antibiotic resistance and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Further microbiological research on the marked regional difference in incidence may contribute to understanding the factors that determine the spread of impetigo. Trends in prescribing for impetigo generally follow evidence-based knowledge on the effectiveness of different therapies, rather than the national practice guideline.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>