<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Pareren, Y. van</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/951/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Effect of discontinuation of growth hormone treatment on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in adolescents born small for gestational age (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10052/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus type 2, and coronary heart disease have
      been associated with being born small for gestational age (SGA). It has
      been reported that GH treatment induced higher insulin levels, which has
      led to concern regarding the long-term effect of GH treatment in
      predisposed individuals such as children born SGA. In this study, we
      assessed the effect of discontinuation of long-term GH treatment in 47
      adolescents born SGA on oral glucose tolerance tests, blood pressure (BP),
      and serum lipid levels for two GH dosage groups (3 vs. 6 IU/m2 x d). At 6
      months after discontinuation of GH treatment mean (SD) age was 16.0 (2.1)
      yr. Mean duration of GH treatment had been 6.9 (1.5) yr. Fasting glucose
      levels and 120-min area under the curve for glucose 6 months after
      discontinuation of GH treatment showed no difference from pretreatment
      levels for both GH dosage groups. After discontinuation of GH treatment,
      fasting insulin levels returned to pretreatment levels (8.4 mU/liter),
      whereas the 120-min area under the curve for insulin decreased, compared
      with 6-yr levels (P &lt; 0.01), regardless of GH dosage group. No significant
      difference was found when levels were compared with a control group. In
      addition, for both GH dosage groups, no significant changes in systolic
      and diastolic BP SD score, total cholesterol, and atherogenic index (total
      cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) were seen from 6 yr of
      GH until 6 months after discontinuation of GH treatment. In conclusion, in
      children born SGA, the GH-induced insulin insensitivity disappeared after
      discontinuation of GH, even after long-term GH treatment. Furthermore, the
      beneficial effect of GH on BP was not changed after discontinuation of GH,
      and most children had normal lipid levels.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Adult height after long-term, continuous growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children born small for gestational age: results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10202/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The GH dose-response effect of long-term continuous GH treatment on adult
      height (AH) was evaluated in 54 short children born small for gestational
      age (SGA) who were participating in a randomized, double-blind,
      dose-response trial. Patients were randomly and blindly assigned to
      treatment with either 3 IU (group A) or 6 IU (group B) GH/m(2).d (
      approximately 0.033 or 0.067 mg/kg.d, respectively). The mean (+/-SD)
      birth length was -3.6 (1.4), the age at the start of the study was 8.1
      (1.9) yr, and the height SD score (SDS) at the start of the study -3.0
      (0.7). Seventeen of the 54 children were partially GH deficient
      (stimulated GH peak, 10-20 mU/liter). Fifteen non-GH-treated,
      non-GH-deficient, short children born SGA, with similar inclusion
      criteria, served as controls [mean (+/-SD) birth length, -3.3 (1.2); age
      at start, 7.8 (1.7) yr; height SDS at start, -2.6 (0.5)]. GH treatment
      resulted in an AH above -2 SDS in 85% of the children after a mean (+/-SD)
      GH treatment period of 7.8 (1.7) yr. The mean (SD) AH SDS was -1.1 (0.7)
      for group A and -0.9 (0.8) for group B, resulting from a mean (+/-SD) gain
      in height SDS of 1.8 (0.7) for group A and 2.1 (0.8) for group B. No
      significant differences between groups A and B were found for AH SDS (mean
      difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.2, 0.6; P &gt; 0.2) and gain
      in height SDS (mean difference, 0.3 SDS; 95% confidence interval, -0.1,
      0.7; P &gt; 0.1). When corrected for target height, the mean corrected AH SDS
      was -0.2 (0.8) for group A and -0.4 (0.9) for group B. The mean (+/-SD) AH
      SDS of the control group [-2.3 (0.7)] was significantly lower than that of
      the GH-treated group (P &lt; 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated
      the following predictive variables for AH SDS: target height SDS, height
      SDS, and chronological age minus bone age (years) at the start of the
      study. GH dose had no significant effect. In conclusion, long-term
      continuous GH treatment in short children born SGA without signs of
      persistent catch-up growth leads to a normalization of AH, even with a GH
      dose of 3 IU/m(2).d ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg.d).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Puberty in growth hormone-treated children born small for gestational age (SGA) (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10274/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Seventy-five small for gestational age (SGA) children were studied in a
      randomized, double-blind, dose-response GH trial with either 1 or 2 mg
      GH/m(2).d. Mean (SD) age at the start of GH therapy was 7.3 (2.2) yr. Data
      were compared with Dutch reference data. In SGA boys, mean (SD) age at
      onset of puberty was 12.0 (1.0) and 11.6 (0.7) yr, and in SGA girls it was
      10.9 (1.1) and 10.6 (1.2) yr when treated with 1 and 2 mg GH/m(2).d,
      respectively. SGA boys treated with the lower GH dose started puberty
      later than the appropriate for gestational age (AGA) controls; for the
      other GH-dosage groups there was no significant difference in age at onset
      of puberty compared to AGA controls. The age at menarche and the interval
      between breast stage M2 and menarche were not significantly different for
      GH-treated SGA girls compared to their peers. The duration of puberty and
      pubertal height gain of GH-treated SGA boys and girls were not
      significantly different between the two GH-dosage groups and were
      comparable with untreated short children born SGA. In conclusion,
      long-term GH therapy in short SGA children has no influence on the age at
      onset and progression of puberty compared to AGA controls, regardless of
      treatment with a dose of 1 or 2 mg GH/m(2).d. Duration of puberty and
      pubertal height gain were not significantly different between the
      GH-dosage groups.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>