<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Hartmann, P.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9631/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Heavy tails and currency crises (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19466/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>In affine models of foreign exchange rate returns, the nature of cross sectional interdependence in crisis periods hinges on the tail properties of the fundamentals' distribution. If the fundamentals exhibit thin tails like the normal distribution, the dependence vanishes asymptotically; while the dependence remains in the case of heavy tailed fundamentals as in case of the Student-t distribution. The linearity of the monetary model and heavy tail distributed fundamentals are sufficient conditions for fundamentals-based repeated joint currency crises. An estimator for the extreme exchange rate interdependencies is obtained and applied to Western, Asian and Latin American currency block data.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Banking system stability: A cross-atlantic perspective (In Book)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12372/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Paper prepared for the NBER project on “Risks of Financial Institutions”. We benefited from suggestions
and criticism by many participants in the NBER project on “Risks of financial institutions”, in particular by
the organizers Mark Carey (also involving Dean Amel and Allen Berger) and Rene Stulz, by our discussant
Tony Saunders and by Patrick de Fontnouvelle, Gary Gorton, Andy Lo, Jim O’Brien and Eric Rosengren.
Furthermore, we are grateful for comments we received at the 2004 European Finance Association Meetings
in Maastricht, in particular by our discussant Marco da Rin and by Christian Upper, at the 2004 Ottobeuren
seminar in economics, notably the thoughts of our discussant Ernst Baltensberger, of Friedrich Heinemann
and of Gerhard Illing, as well as at seminars of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods,
the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the ECB and the University of Frankfurt. Gabe de Bondt and David
Marques Ibanez supported us enormously in finding yield spread data, Lieven Baele and Richard Stehle
kindly made us aware of pitfalls in Datastream equity data. Very helpful research assistance by Sandrine
Corvoisier, Peter Galos and Marco Lo Duca as well as editorial support by Sabine Wiedemann are gratefully
acknowledged. Any views expressed only reflect those of the authors and should not be interpreted as the
ones of the ECB or the Eurosystem. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
This paper derives indicators of the severity and structure of banking system risk from asymptotic
interdependencies between banks’ equity prices. We use new tools available from multivariate
extreme value theory to estimate individual banks’ exposure to each other (“contagion risk”) and to
systematic risk. Moreover, by applying structural break tests to those measures we study whether
capital markets indicate changes in the importance of systemic risk over time. Using data for the
United States and the euro area, we can also compare banking system stability between the two
largest economies in the world. Finally, for Europe we assess the relative importance of cross-border
bank spillovers as compared to domestic bank spillovers. The results suggest, inter alia, that systemic
risk in the US is higher than in the euro area, mainly as cross-border risks are still relatively mild in
Europe. On both sides of the Atlantic systemic risk has increased during the 1990s.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Fundamentals and joint currency crises (Research Report)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12459/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-03-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>It is by now well known that Þnancial returns exhibit heavy tails and
are thus nonnormally distributed. This implies that extreme market
conditions tend to happen more frequently than expected on the basis
of the normal distribution, which is used so often in standard asset pricing approaches. From the point of view of international Þnan-
cial stability and portfolio diversiÞcation, the strength of asset linkages
during crisis periods matters even more, as the linkages determine the
stability of the system as a whole. Several papers talk about increased
correlation between Þnancial assets or markets during crisis periods. As
has been argued before, the use of correlation analysis is not without
problems though. Since the correlation concept is just an intermediary
step in calculating probabilities, we prefer to deÞne market linkages in
terms of conditional probabilities and the expected number of market
crashes.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Asset market linkages in crisis periods (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12376/</link>
      <pubDate>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We characterize asset return linkages during periods of stress by an extremal dependence measure. Contrary to correlation analysis, this nonparametric measure is not predisposed toward the normal distribution and can allow for nonlinear relationships. Our estimates for the G-5 countries suggest that simultaneous crashes between stock markets are much more likely than between bond markets. However, for the assessment of financial system stability the widely disregarded cross-asset perspective is particularly important. For example, our data show that stock-bond contagion is approximately as frequent as flight to quality from stocks into bonds. Extreme cross-border linkages are surprisingly similar to national linkages, illustrating a potential downside to international financial integration.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Asset Market Linkages in Crisis Periods (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6858/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-07-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>We characterize asset return linkages during periods of stress by an extremal dependence measure. Contrary to correlation analysis, this non-parametric measure is not predisposed towards the normal distribution and can account for non-linear relationships. Our estimates for the G-5 countries suggest that simultaneous crashes in stock markets are about two times more likely than in bond markets. Moreover, stock-bond contagion is about as frequent as flight to quality from stocks into bonds. Extreme cross-border linkages are surprisingly similar to national linkages, illustrating a potential downside to international financial integration.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>