<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Pleumeekers, H.J.C.M.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9750/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Selecting subjects for ultrasonographic screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: four different strategies (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9159/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>BACKGROUND: We studied whether the effectiveness of ultrasound screening
          for abdominal aortic aneurysms could be increased by preselecting
          high-risk subjects, based on the presence of risk indicators for the
          disease. METHODS: In a population-based screening programme for abdominal
          aortic aneurysms among 5328 subjects living in Rotterdam, The Netherlands,
          we studied four different strategies to select subjects for ultrasound
          screening of the abdominal aorta, based on risk indicators for abdominal
          aortic aneurysm disease. Risk indicators used in each strategy were
          entered in a logistic regression model to predict the probability of an
          individual having an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Using several cutoff
          values for the probability of a subject having an aneurysm for each
          strategy, we estimated the proportion of subjects that should be referred
          for ultrasound screening and the proportion of aneurysms that would be
          diagnosed by each strategy (sensitivity). RESULTS: When a probability of
          1.5% of having an aneurysm is chosen as the cutoff point above which
          ultrasound screening is indicated, the proportion of subjects that would
          be referred for screening ranged from 36% (first strategy) to
          approximately 50% (other strategies), while 80% (first strategy) to
          approximately 94% (other three strategies) of all aneurysms would be
          detected. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness in screening for abdominal aortic
          aneurysms can be increased by selecting subjects by means of a short
          medical questionnaire, filled out by the screening candidates, including
          questions on medical history.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Clinical epidemiology of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22144/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-01-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>