<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Sleijfer, D.T.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9752/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Predicting Retroperitoneal Histology in Postchemotherapy Testicular Germ Cell Cancer: A Model Update and Multicentre Validation with More Than 1000 Patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10708/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-07-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: Surgical resection of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph nodes is often
performed in patients with advanced nonseminomatous testicular germ cell cancer. We
previously developed a model to predict the probability that the lymph nodes contain only
necrotic or fibrotic (benign) tissue versus mature teratoma and viable cancer (tumour) to
identify patients who actually need resection. The present study used an updated model
with new patient data and studied the validity of the updated model across various settings.
Methods: We combined data of 544 patients from the original model with data of 550 new
patients and performed a new logistic regression analysis, which included the same six
predictors: histology of the primary tumour, prechemotherapy serum levels of a-fetoprotein,
human chorionic gonadotropin, lactate dehydrogenase, residual mass size measured
on computed tomography, and change in mass size. The validity of the updated model was
studied in individual centres. Calibration of the predicted probabilities was assessed
graphically and with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discrimination was studied with the
concordance (c)-statistic.
Results: The updated model had slightly different, although more precise, regression
coefficients. Statistically nonsignificant Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirmed good calibration
in most centres. The c-statistic for all centres except one exceeded 0.80. The updated
model was valid over the complete range of predicted probabilities across a broad spectrum
of centres.
Conclusions: This finding gives confidence in the applicability of the model to select patients
for resection, particularly patients with small residual masses and low predicted probabilities
of benign tissue (i.e., substantial predicted risks of residual tumour).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Retroperitoneal metastases in testicular cancer: role of CT measurements of residual masses in decision making for resection after chemotherapy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9359/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To determine the relative importance of computed tomographic (CT)
          measurements for the prediction of histologic findings in residual masses
          in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
          Measurements of the maximum transverse size of retroperitoneal metastases
          before and after chemotherapy were available in 641 patients who underwent
          resection after chemotherapy while their levels of tumor markers were
          normal. Radiologic measurements of mass size and clinical characteristics
          (histologic findings in primary tumor and levels of alpha-fetoprotein,
          human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase before
          chemotherapy) were related to histologic findings in the residual mass
          with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: At resection, 302 patients had
          benign tissue, and 339 had residual tumor (mature teratomas or cancer).
          Tumor was more frequent in larger masses after chemotherapy but was
          unrelated to mass size before chemotherapy. Inclusion of the reduction in
          size significantly improved the logistic regression model, which included
          mass size after chemotherapy. This model was further improved with the
          addition of clinical characteristics. Areas under the receiver operating
          characteristic curves increased from 0.74 to 0.77 and 0.83 with these
          models. CONCLUSION: A small retroperitoneal mass after chemotherapy is an
          important predictor of benign histologic findings in residual masses in
          patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. However, better
          predictions can be made when the reduction in size and clinical
          characteristics are considered as well. Decisions regarding resection
          should be based on the combination of these characteristics rather than on
          only mass size after chemotherapy.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prediction of residual retroperitoneal mass histology after chemotherapy for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: multivariate analysis of individual patient data from six study groups. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10632/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To develop a statistical model that predicts the histology (necrosis, mature teratoma, or cancer) after chemotherapy for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: An international data set was collected comprising individual patient data from six study groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the probability of necrosis and the ratio of cancer and mature teratoma. RESULTS: Of 556 patients, 250 (45%) had necrosis at resection, 236 (42%) had mature teratoma, and 70 (13%) had cancer. Predictors of necrosis were the absence of teratoma elements in the primary tumor, prechemotherapy normal alfa-fetoprotein (AFP), normal human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, a small prechemotherapy or postchemotherapy mass, and a large shrinkage of the mass during chemotherapy. Multivariate combination of predictors yielded reliable models (goodness-of-fit tests, P &gt; .20), which discriminated necrosis well from other histologies (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, .84), but which discriminated cancer only reasonably from mature teratoma (area, .66). Internal and external validation confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: The validated models estimate with high accuracy the histology at resection, especially necrosis, based on well-known and readily available predictors. The predicted probabilities may help to choose between immediate resection of a residual mass or follow-up, taking into account the expected benefits and risks of resection, feasibility of frequent follow-up, the financial costs, and the patient's individual preferences.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>