<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Gerl, A.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9754/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG): Part II (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29675/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: The first consensus report that had been presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, The Netherlands. Methods: Medical oncologists, urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. Results: The second part of the consensus paper includes the treatment of metastasised disease, residual tumour resection, salvage therapy, follow-up, and late toxicities. Conclusions: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early-stage as well as of advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>European Consensus Conference on Diagnosis and Treatment of Germ Cell Cancer: A Report of the Second Meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus group (EGCCCG): Part I (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29720/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: The first consensus report presented by the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG) in the year 2004 has found widespread approval by many colleagues throughout the world. In November 2006, the group met a second time under the auspices of the Department of Urology of the Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Methods: Medical oncologists, urological surgeons, radiation oncologists as well as pathologists from several European countries reviewed and discussed the data that had emerged since the 2002 conference, and incorporated the new data into updated and revised guidelines. As for the first meeting, the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM) was applied. The results of the discussion were compiled by the writing committee. All participants have agreed to this final update. Results: The first part of the consensus paper describes the clinical presentation of the primary tumor, its treatment, the importance and treatment of testicular intraepithelial neoplasia (TIN), histological classification, staging and prognostic factors, and treatment of stage I seminoma and non-seminoma. Conclusions: Whereas the vast majority of the recommendations made in 2004 remain valid 3 yr later, refinements in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage testicular cancer have emerged from clinical trials. Despite technical improvements, expert clinical skills will continue to be one of the major determinants for the prognosis of patients with germ cell cancer. In addition, the particular needs of testicular cancer survivors have been acknowledged. </description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Predicting Retroperitoneal Histology in Postchemotherapy Testicular Germ Cell Cancer: A Model Update and Multicentre Validation with More Than 1000 Patients (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10708/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-07-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Objectives: Surgical resection of postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph nodes is often
performed in patients with advanced nonseminomatous testicular germ cell cancer. We
previously developed a model to predict the probability that the lymph nodes contain only
necrotic or fibrotic (benign) tissue versus mature teratoma and viable cancer (tumour) to
identify patients who actually need resection. The present study used an updated model
with new patient data and studied the validity of the updated model across various settings.
Methods: We combined data of 544 patients from the original model with data of 550 new
patients and performed a new logistic regression analysis, which included the same six
predictors: histology of the primary tumour, prechemotherapy serum levels of a-fetoprotein,
human chorionic gonadotropin, lactate dehydrogenase, residual mass size measured
on computed tomography, and change in mass size. The validity of the updated model was
studied in individual centres. Calibration of the predicted probabilities was assessed
graphically and with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Discrimination was studied with the
concordance (c)-statistic.
Results: The updated model had slightly different, although more precise, regression
coefficients. Statistically nonsignificant Hosmer-Lemeshow tests confirmed good calibration
in most centres. The c-statistic for all centres except one exceeded 0.80. The updated
model was valid over the complete range of predicted probabilities across a broad spectrum
of centres.
Conclusions: This finding gives confidence in the applicability of the model to select patients
for resection, particularly patients with small residual masses and low predicted probabilities
of benign tissue (i.e., substantial predicted risks of residual tumour).</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Retroperitoneal metastases in testicular cancer: role of CT measurements of residual masses in decision making for resection after chemotherapy (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9359/</link>
      <pubDate>2000-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>PURPOSE: To determine the relative importance of computed tomographic (CT)
          measurements for the prediction of histologic findings in residual masses
          in patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:
          Measurements of the maximum transverse size of retroperitoneal metastases
          before and after chemotherapy were available in 641 patients who underwent
          resection after chemotherapy while their levels of tumor markers were
          normal. Radiologic measurements of mass size and clinical characteristics
          (histologic findings in primary tumor and levels of alpha-fetoprotein,
          human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase before
          chemotherapy) were related to histologic findings in the residual mass
          with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: At resection, 302 patients had
          benign tissue, and 339 had residual tumor (mature teratomas or cancer).
          Tumor was more frequent in larger masses after chemotherapy but was
          unrelated to mass size before chemotherapy. Inclusion of the reduction in
          size significantly improved the logistic regression model, which included
          mass size after chemotherapy. This model was further improved with the
          addition of clinical characteristics. Areas under the receiver operating
          characteristic curves increased from 0.74 to 0.77 and 0.83 with these
          models. CONCLUSION: A small retroperitoneal mass after chemotherapy is an
          important predictor of benign histologic findings in residual masses in
          patients with nonseminomatous testicular cancer. However, better
          predictions can be made when the reduction in size and clinical
          characteristics are considered as well. Decisions regarding resection
          should be based on the combination of these characteristics rather than on
          only mass size after chemotherapy.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>