<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Branger, P.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/9760/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Electronic messaging between primary and secondary care: a four-year case report (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9659/</link>
      <pubDate>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>OBJECTIVE: To observe how electronic messaging between a hospital
          consultant and general practitioners (GPs) in 15 practices about patients
          suffering from diabetes evolved over a 3-year period after an initial
          1-year study. DESIGN: Case report. Electronic messages between a hospital
          consultant and GPs were counted. The authors determined whether a message
          sent by the consultant was integrated into the receiving GP's electronic
          medical record system. After the observation period, the GPs answered a
          questionnaire. MEASUREMENTS: The number of electronic messages and the
          percentage of messages integrated into the electronic medical record.
          RESULTS: The volume of messages was maintained during the 3 years after
          the original study. In the original study, the percentage of the messages
          integrated by the GPs increased during the year. After that study,
          however, seven GPs stopped integrating data from messages. The extent to
          which received messages were integrated varied widely among practices.
          CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that extrapolation of the results of the
          original study would have led to incorrect conclusions. Although the
          volume of messages remained stable after the original study, GPs changed
          their method of handling messages. Initially, all GPs used the opportunity
          to copy data from the messages into their own records. At the end of the
          observation period (that is, the 3 years after completion of the original
          study), more than 50 percent of GPs had ceased copying data from the
          messages into their own records. The majority of GPs, however, wanted to
          expand the use of electronic messaging.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Computer-based shared care : a study on electronic data interchange applied to diabetes care (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21985/</link>
      <pubDate>1995-09-13T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>The need for information for the delivery of good quality health care is
growing rapidly. As in other areas of society, computer technology plays an
ever-growing role in managing this information. Hammond, reviewing
the development of Hospital Information Systems, indicates that health care
has failed to keep pace with the rise in computing power and
communications technology, possibly because of the complexity of health
care and the large variety of individuals working with the systems. He
underlines the importance of these systems for collecting, storing,
processing, retrieving, and communicating patient-related data, not only
between hospital departments but also between hospitals and other care
providers. He concludes that "clinical information is not the property of a
single facility but rather [ .. ] part of a global resource which focuses on the
patient-centered record". Buffone and Beck support this view: "Patient care
typically requires that multiple providers share data and information in a
facile and relevant manner"</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>