<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Vedder, E.J.</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/aut/99/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Morbilliviruses in Mediterranean monk seals (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3688/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Two morbilliviruses were isolated from Mediterranean monk seals (Monachus monachus), one from a stranded animal in Greece and the other one from carcasses washed ashore during a mass die-off in Mauritania. From both viruses N and P gene fragments were sequenced and compared to those of other known morbilliviruses. The monk seal morbilliviruses most closely resembled previously identified cetacean morbilliviruses, indicating that interspecies transmission from cetaceans to pinnipeds has occurred.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Continued presence of phocine distemper virus in the Dutch Wadden Sea seal population. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3481/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Canine distemper virus ISCOMS induce protection in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) against phocid distemper but still allow subsequent infection with phocid distemper virus-1. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3441/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-05-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>A candidate canine distemper virus (CDV) ISCOM vaccine has been shown to be effective in protecting harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) from phocid distemper in 1988. However, of the 35 harbour seals receiving this vaccine upon admission to a seal rehabilitation and research centre (Pieterburen, The Netherlands) in 1989, six developed mild inflammatory symptoms of the respiratory tract. Phocid distemper virus-1 (PDV-1) could be isolated from three of these animals. This indicates that the vaccine affords protection from phocid distemper, but may still allow PDV-1 infection of the respiratory tract. Contacts with non-vaccinated seals should then be prevented until no more virus is excreted. It is speculated that this PDV-1 infection of the respiratory tract in CDV-ISCOM vaccinated seals is followed by a lifelong immunity.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Mass mortality in seals caused by a newly discovered morbillivirus. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3401/</link>
      <pubDate>1990-09-24T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>During a recent disease outbreak among harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in the North and Baltic seas, more than 17,000 animals have died. The clinical symptoms and pathological findings were similar to those of distemper in dogs. Based on a seroepizootiological study, using a canine distemper virus (CDV) neutralization assay, it was shown that CDV or a closely related morbillivirus (phocid distemper virus-PDV) was the primary cause of the disease. The virus was isolated in cell culture from the organs of dead seals and characterized as a morbillivirus by serology (immunofluorescence neutralization and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays) and by negative contrast electron microscopy. Experimental infection of SPF dogs resulted in the development of mild clinical signs of distemper and CDV-neutralizing antibodies. The disease was reproduced in seals by experimental inoculation of organ material from animals that had died during the outbreak. However, seals that had been vaccinated with experimental inactivated CDV vaccines were protected against this challenge. This fulfilled the last of Koch's postulates, confirming that the morbillivirus isolated from the seal organs, was the primary cause of the disease outbreak. The recent demonstration of the presence of a similar virus in Lake Baikal seals (Phoca sibirica), which infected these Siberian seals 1 year before the northwestern European seals were infected, raises new questions about the origin of this infectious disease in pinnipeds.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Seal vaccination success (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3351/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Morbillivirus infections in European seals before 1988. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3369/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Vaccination of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) against phocid distemper with two different inactivated canine distemper virus (CDV) vaccines. (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3379/</link>
      <pubDate>1989-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>Two inactivated canine distemper virus (CDV) vaccines--an adjuvanted whole inactivated virus and a subunit ISCOM preparation--were tested for their ability to induce protective immunity in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) against phocid distemper, a disease that recently killed greater than 17,000 harbour seals in the North and Baltic seas, and was shown to be caused by infection with a newly discovered morbillivirus, which is antigenically closely related to CDV. Four CDV seronegative harbour seals were vaccinated three times with the whole-virus vaccine, two with the ISCOM subunit vaccine and two were sham-vaccinated with an antigen-free preparation. Ten days after the last vaccination, when all six vaccinated animals had developed CDV neutralizing antibody titres ranging from 300 to 3000, all eight animals were challenged by the oculonasal and the peritoneal routes, with an organ suspension from dead seals. None of the six vaccinated animals developed clinical signs. The two sham-vaccinated seals died on days 14 and 18, respectively, after having shown a body temperature rise, respiratory symptoms and weight loss. In organs from both dead animals morbillivirus antigen was demonstrated with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an immunofluorescence assay. One of these two animals had developed a low titre of CDV-specific antibodies just before death. These data clearly indicate that seals can be protected from fatal challenge with the phocid distemper virus (PDV), by vaccination with certain inactivated CDV vaccines. They also reconfirm that infection with PDV should be considered the primary cause of the recent epizootic in seals.</description>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Identification of virus causing recent seal deaths. (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/3341/</link>
      <pubDate>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description></description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>