<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RSM Dissertations in Management prior to 1999</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/col/8027/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>An International Comparison of Corporate Governance Models: a study on the formal independence and governance of one-tier and two-tier corporate boards of directors in  the United States of America, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8028/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-04-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        According to Cochran and Wartick (1988), corporate governance is an umbrella 
term that covers many aspects related to concepts, theories and practices of boards 
of directors and their executive and non-executive directors. It is a field that 
concentrates on the relationship between boards, stockholders, top management, 
regulators, auditors and other stakeholders. A related definition of corporate 
governance comes from Monks and Minow (1995). These authors state: “What is 
corporate governance? It is the relationship among various participants in 
determining the direction and performance of corporations” (Monks and Minow, 
1995:1). In this definition, the group of participants includes shareholders, 
management, members of board of directors, employees, customers, suppliers, 
creditors and other interest groups. The World Bank states: “Corporate governance 
refers to that blend of law, regulation and appropriate voluntary private sector 
practices which enable the corporation to attract financial and human capital, 
perform efficiently, and thereby perpetuate itself by generating long-term economic 
value for its shareholders, while respecting the interests of stakeholders and society 
as a whole. The principal characteristics of effective corporate governance are: 
transparency (disclosure of relevant financial and operational information and 
internal processes of management oversight and control); protection and 
enforceability of the rights and prerogatives of all shareholders; and, directors 
capable of independently approving the corporation's strategy and major business 
plans and decisions, and of independently hiring management, monitoring 
management's performance and integrity, and replacing management when 
necessary” (www.worldbank.org, Jan 1999). Sheridan and Kendall (1992), suggest 
that “ . . . different countries have different ideas as to what constitutes good 
corporate governance [ . . . ] nowhere does anyone appear to have defined corporate 
governance per se.” These and other definitions indicate that the field of corporate 
governance is a rich one. As stated by Tricker (1993:2), “ . . . corporate governance 
can mean many things to those concerned. Institutional investors have a different 
perspective from corporate regulators, board members from researchers. Insights can 
be drawn from the professional and theoretical worlds of organisational behavior, 
jurisprudence, financial economics, accountancy and auditing, as well as from the 
experiential worlds of director behaviour and board practices.” See also Moerland 
(1997) for an overview of corporate governance definitions.
      </description>
      <author>Maassen, G.F.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Effectiveness of Marketing Management Support Systems: an experimental study (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14376/</link>
      <pubDate>1993-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        
      </description>
      <author>Bruggen, G.H. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Prestatieverbetering na Management Buy-Out (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22413/</link>
      <pubDate>1992-11-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Dit proefschrift gaat over de economische prestaties na de management buy-out (MBO) en
beoogt de volgende M~Teneerst'e een bespreking van de ontwikkeling van de MBO
in Nederland gedurende de periode 1980-1990. Ten tweede empirisch te onderzoeken hoe
de economische prestaties van Nederlandse MBO's zich verhouden ten opzichte van de
branchegemiddelde. Ten derde een analyse van de verklaringen die voor het succes van
de MBO in de empiri~tuur worden aangetroffen,~v.:iëide na te gaan welke
additionele verklaring de uitkopende directieleden en financiers van Nederlandse MBO's
geven voor de verbeterde economische prestaties van hun bedrijf. Ten vijfde de
formulering van hypothesen die voor de empirische toetsing van deze additionele
verklaring kunnen worden gebruikt. En ten zesde een analyse van de agentschapsrelatie
tussen uitkopend management-personeel als plausibele verklaringsbron voor de
verbeterde economische prestaties na de afsplitsing.
      </description>
      <author>Bruining, J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>An investigation of brand choice processes (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12481/</link>
      <pubDate>1974-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        
      </description>
      <author>Wierenga, B.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>