<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>AE-reeks</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/col/9717/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Redistributive Politics with Distortionary Taxation (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14438/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper proposes a first step towards a positive theory of tax instruments. We present a model that extends models of redistributive politics by Myerson (1993) and Lizzeri and Persico (2001). Two politicians compete in terms of targeted redistributive promises nanced through distortionary
taxes. We solve for the case of both targetable and non-targetable taxes. We prove that there is an imperfect efficiency-targetability trade off on the tax side. Politicians prefer targetable taxes over non-targetable ones, especially
when the latter are less efficient. Yet, targetable taxation is always used even when it is very inefficient compared to non-targetable taxes.
      </description>
      <author>Crutzen, B.S.Y.</author> <author>Sahuguet, N.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Party Organization and Electoral Competition (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14437/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We propose a model in which two parties select the internal organization that helps them
win the election. Party choices provide incentives to the politicians who represent them.
Depending on whether politicians are opportunistic or partisan, we identify four effects.
First, a selection effect: intraparty competition gives parties more candidates to choose
from. Second, an incentive effect: intraparty competition adds a hurdle and impacts on
candidates’ incentives. Third, a trust effect: because of the incentive effect, intraparty
competition is a signal to uninformed voters. Finally, with partisan preferences, an ideology
effect appears. Ideology is a public good in a competitive party and induces free riding.
Intraparty competition is valuable when voters are badly informed or interparty competition
is weak. These results rationalize the introduction of direct primaries in the U.S.,
the organizational changes in Western European parties since 1960 and the organizational
differences between centrist and extreme parties.
      </description>
      <author>Castanheira, M.</author> <author>Crutzen, B.S.Y.</author> <author>Sahuguet, N.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>