<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Econometric and Statistical Methods: General</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-C10/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code C10</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>What Makes a Great Journal Great in the Sciences? Which Came First, the Chicken or the Egg? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21946/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI Web of Science database (hereafter ISI). Various ISI RAM that are calculated annually or updated daily are defined and analysed, including the classic 2-year impact factor (2YIF), 5-year impact factor (5YIF), Immediacy (or zero-year impact factor (0YIF)), Eigenfactor, Article Influence, C3PO (Citation Performance Per Paper Online), h-index, Zinfluence, PI-BETA (Papers Ignored - By Even The Authors), Impact Factor Inflation (IFI), and three new RAM, namely Historical Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (H-STAR), 2 Year Self-citation Threshold Approval Rating (2Y-STAR), and Cited Article Influence (CAI). The RAM data are analysed for the 6 most highly cited journals in 20 highly-varied and well-known ISI categories in the sciences, where the journals are chosen on the basis of 2YIF. The application to these 20 ISI categories could be used as a template for other ISI categories in the sciences and social sciences, and as a benchmark for newer journals in a range of ISI disciplines. In addition to evaluating the 6 most highly cited journals in each of 20 ISI categories, the paper also highlights the similarities and differences in alternative RAM, finds that several RAM capture similar performance characteristics for the most highly cited scientific journals, determines that PI-BETA is not highly correlated with the other RAM, and hence conveys additional information regarding research performance. In order to provide a meta analysis summary of the RAM, which are predominantly ratios, harmonic mean rankings are presented of the 13 RAM for the 6 most highly cited journals in each of the 20 ISI categories. It is shown that emphasizing THE impact factor, specifically the 2-year impact factor, of a journal to the exclusion of other informative RAM can lead to a distorted evaluation of journal performance and influence on different disciplines, especially in view of inflated journal self citations.
      </description>
      <author>Chang, C.L.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author> <author>Oxley, L.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Genome-wide association studies in economics and entrepreneurship research: promises and limitations (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19581/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The recently developed genome-wide association study (GWAS) design enables the identification of genes specifically associated with economic outcomes such as occupational and other choices. This is a promising new approach for economics research which we aim to apply to the choice for entrepreneurship. However, due to multiple testing issues, very large sample sizes are needed to differentiate between true and false positives. For a GWAS on entrepreneurship, we expect that a sample size of at least 30,000 observations is required.
      </description>
      <author>Koellinger, Ph.D.</author> <author>Loos, M.J.H.M. van der</author> <author>Groenen, P.J.F.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Rivadeneira Ramirez, F.</author> <author>Rooij, F.J.A.  van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Block Structure Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17523/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Most multivariate variance models suffer from a common problem, the “curse of dimensionality”. For this reason, most are fitted under strong parametric restrictions that reduce the interpretation and flexibility of the models. Recently, the literature has focused on multivariate models with milder restrictions, whose purpose was to combine the need for interpretability and efficiency faced by model users with the computational problems that may emerge when the number of assets is quite large. We contribute to this strand of the literature proposing a block-type parameterization for multivariate stochastic volatility models.
      </description>
      <author>Asai, M.</author> <author>Caporin, M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Which brands gain share from which brands? Inference from store-level scanner dat (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13799/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Market share models for weekly store-level data are useful to understand competitive structures by delivering own and cross price elasticities. These models can however not be used to examine which brands lose share to which brands during a specific period of time. It is for this purpose that we propose a new model, which does allow for such an examination. We illustrate the model for two product categories in two markets, and we provide share-switching estimates. We also demonstrate how our model can be used to decompose own and cross price elasticities.
      </description>
      <author>Oest, R.D. van</author> <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Differentiated Bayesian Conjoint Choice Designs (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/320/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-04-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Previous conjoint choice design construction procedures have produced a single design that is administered to all subjects. This paper proposes to construct a limited set of different designs. The designs are constructed in a Bayesian fashion, taking into account prior uncertainty about the parameter values. A computational procedure is developed that enables fast and easy implementation in practice. Even though the number of such different designs in the optimal set is small, it is demonstrated through a Monte Carlo study that substantial gains in efficiency are achieved over aggregate designs.
      </description>
      <author>Sándor, Z.</author> <author>Wedel, M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Controlling Inventories in a Supply Chain (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6783/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This article studies specific aspects of the joint replenishment problem in a real supply chain setting. Particularly we analyze the effect on inventory performance of having minimum order quantities for the different products in the joint order, given a complex transportation cost structure. The policies suggested have been tested in a simulation model with real data.
      </description>
      <author>Porras Musalem, E.</author> <author>Dekker, R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Outlier robust unit root analysis (Doctoral Thesis)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10454/</link>
      <pubDate>1996-01-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This book focuses on statistical methods for discriminating between competing models for the long-run behavior of economic time series. Traditional methods that are used in this context are sensitive to outliers in the data. Therefore, this book considers alternative methods that take into account the possibility that not all observations are generated by the postulated model. These methods are called outlier robust. The basic principle underlying outlier robust methods is that discordant observations are downweighted automatically. The use of weights has important consequences for the statistical properties of the methods discussed. These consequences are studied by means of asymptotic theory, Monte-Carlo simulations, and empirical illustrations. Based on the results of this study, it is argued that outlier robust methods provide useful tools for applied researchers as the methods disclose valuable additional information about the long-run behavior of economic processes.
      </description>
      <author>Lucas, A.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>