<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Production; Capital and Total Factor Productivity; Capacity</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-D24/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code D24</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Productivity Gains from Worker Mobility and their Distribution between Workers and Firms (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/32994/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Using data from the universe of Danish manufacturing firms and workers over the period 1995-2007, we estimate output gains linked to productivity spillovers through worker mobility, and calculate the shares in these gains accrued to firms, to the workers who bring spillovers, and to the rest of the workers. Applying our results to the manufacturing sector as a whole, the total output gains average at 0.16% per year, of which 80% is retained by the firms, 15% by the rest of the workers, and only 5% goes to the workers who bring spillovers. We therefore conclude that output gains through worker mobility are largely a positive externality for hiring firms.
      </description>
      <author>Stoyanov, A.</author> <author>Zubanov, N.V.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Productivity spillovers across firms through worker mobility (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37701/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Using matched firm-worker data from Danish manufacturing, we observe firm-to-firm worker movements and find that firms that hired workers from more productive firms experience productivity gains one year after the hiring. The productivity gains associated with hiring from more productive firms are equivalent to 0.35 percent per year for an average firm. Surviving a variety of statistical controls, these gains increase with education, tenure, and skill level of new hires, persist for several years after the hiring was done, and remain broadly similar for different industries and measures of productivity. Competing explanations for these gains, knowledge spillovers in particular, are discussed.
      </description>
      <author>Stoyanov, A.</author> <author>Zubanov, N.V.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Measuring and decomposing capital input cost (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25740/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The measurement of total factor productivity change (or difference) vis-à-vis labor productivity change crucially depends on the measurement and decomposition of capital input cost. This paper discusses the basics of its measurement and shows that one can dispense with the usual neoclassical assumptions. By virtue of its structural features, the measurement model is applicable to individual establishments and aggregates such as industries, sectors, or economies. © 2011 The Author. Review of Income and Wealth 
      </description>
      <author>Balk, B.M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Some Comments on Egghe’s Derivation of the Impact Factor Distribution (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15184/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-18T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In a recent paper, Egghe [Egghe, L. (in press). Mathematical derivation of the impact factor distribution. Journal of Informetrics] provides a mathematical analysis of the rank-order distribution of journal impact factors. We point out that Egghe’s analysis relies on an unrealistic assumption, and we show that his analysis is not in agreement with empirical data.
      </description>
      <author>Waltman, L.R.</author> <author>Eck, N.J.P. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach to Revenue Management in a Make-to-Stock Production System (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15183/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-12T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In this paper, we consider a make-to-stock production system with known exogenous replenishments and multiple customer classes. The objective is to maximize profit over the planning horizon by deciding whether to accept or reject a given order, in anticipation of more profitable future orders. What distinguishes this setup from classical airline revenue management problems is the explicit consideration of past and future replenishments and the integration of inventory holding and backlogging costs. If stock is on-hand, orders can be fulfilled immediately, backlogged or rejected. In shortage situations, orders can be either rejected or backlogged to be fulfilled from future arriving supply. The described decision problem occurs in many practical settings, notably in make-to-stock production systems, in which production planning is performed on a mid-term level, based on aggregated demand forecasts. In the short term, acceptance decisions about incoming orders are then made according to stock on-hand and scheduled production quantities. We model this problem as a stochastic dynamic program and characterize its optimal policy. It turns out that the optimal fulfillment policy has a relatively simple structure and is easy to implement. We evaluate this policy numerically and find that it systematically outperforms common current fulfillment policies, such as first-come-first-served and deterministic optimization.
      </description>
      <author>Quante, R.</author> <author>Fleischmann, M.</author> <author>Meyr, H.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Domestic Plant Productivity and Incremental Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15143/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We develop a simple test to assess whether horizontal spillover effects from multinational to domestic firms are endogenous to the market structure generated by the incremental entry of the same multinationals. In particular, we analyze the performance of a panel of 10,650 firms operating in Romania in the period 1995-2001. Controlling for the simultaneity bias in productivity estimates through semi-parametric techniques, we find that changes in domestic firms’ TFP are positively related to the first foreign investment in a specific industry and region, but get significantly weaker and become negative as the number of multinationals that enter in the considered industry/region crosses a specific threshold. These changing marginal effects can explain the lack of horizontal spillovers arising in traditional model designs. We also find these effects to vary between manufacturing and service, suggesting as a possible explanation a strategic change in technology transfer decisions by multinational firms as the market structure evolves.
      </description>
      <author>Altomonte, C.</author> <author>Pennings, H.P.G.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Non-Parametric Tests of Productive Efficiency with Errors-in-Variables (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14062/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We develop a non-parametric test of productive efficiency that accounts for errors-in-variables, following the approach of Varian. [1985. Nonparametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error. Journal of Econometrics 30(1/2), 445–458]. The test is based on the general Pareto–Koopmans notion of efficiency, and does not require price data. Statistical inference is based on the sampling distribution of the L∞ norm of errors. The test statistic can be computed using a simple enumeration algorithm. The finite sample properties of the test are analyzed by means of a Monte Carlo simulation using real-world data of large EU commercial banks.
      </description>
      <author>Kuosmanen, T.</author> <author>Post, G.T.</author> <author>Scholtes, S.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>New’ Performance Measures: Determinants of Their Use and Their Impact on Performance (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6993/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-10-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This study investigates the extent to which Dutch organizations use ‘new’ performance measures to deal with the perceived inadequacies of traditional accounting performance measures. In addition, the determinants of the use of these ‘new’ performance measures are documented; finally, the alignment hypothesis is tested. Using survey data from Dutch firms, I find that non-financial measures appear to be used most often in addition to more traditional performance measures; economic value measures and subjective measures appear to be used to a lesser extent. Second, the results indicate that the importance of the shareholder value goal and size are positively related to the use of economic value measures. The importance of the shareholder value goal, a growth mission, task culture and size are all positively associated with the use of non-financial measures. The (relative) use of subjective measures is negatively related to size. Finally, I find no support for the alignment hypothesis that a mismatch between the firm’s strategic and contextual characteristics and its performance measurement system adversely affect performance.
      </description>
      <author>Verbeeten, F.H.M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Search and the City (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6806/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-06-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Can increasing returns to scale in search explain regional differentiation between cities and rural areas? To answer this question, we develop a model of an economy that consists of several regions. Within each region, jobs and workers are heterogeneous by respectively skill and job complexity type. Because of the search frictions, firms and workers in each region must trade-off a better expected match quality against a longer period of non-production. Labor mobility between regions induces the equalization of reservation wages for each skin type and interregional trade of end products yields regional specialization in production. The model predicts that high density areas make use of their scale advantage by producing end products with a high dispersion of skin requirements. Empirical evidence for the United States corroborates the implications of the model.
      </description>
      <author>Teulings, C.N.</author> <author>Gautier, P.A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Technological Inefficiency and the Skewness of the Error Component in Stochastic Frontier Analysis (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6823/</link>
      <pubDate>2002-02-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper concentrates on negatively skewed one-sided distributions as an explanation of the occurence of positive (negative) skewness in the case of stochastic production (cost) frontier analysis. It takes as example the binomial distribution that can have negative or positive skew and derives the method-of-moments estimators.
      </description>
      <author>Carree, M.A.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>