<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-D43/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code D43</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Cost advantage cooperations larger than private waste collectors (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38963/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        For refuse collection, we estimate the cost effects of different institutional modes using panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities between 1998 and 2010. The modes we consider are private enterprises, intermunicipal cooperation, municipality-owned enterprises and in-house collection. For private companies, the cost advantage becomes substantially smaller and nonsignificant if municipal fixed effects are included. The cost advantage of intermunicipal cooperation is larger in this case than that of privatization. 
      </description>
      <author>Dijkgraaf, E.</author> <author>Gradus, R.H.J.M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Efficiency Effects of Privatising Refuse Collection: Be careful and Alternatives present (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/26865/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-11-07T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        For refuse collection, we estimate the cost effects of different institutional modes using panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities between 1998 and 2010. The modes we consider are private contracts, intermunicipal cooperation, public provision and own collection. For private companies, the cost advantage is substantially smaller and non-significant if municipal fixed effects are included. The cost advantage of intermunicipal cooperation is larger in this case than that of privatisation. Moreover, if yearly mode dummies and mode duration are also included, we show that for 2004, 2005 and 2006 a large cost increase is visible for privatisation. Which mode offers the most cost-saving opportunity depends strongly on the year and the mode duration. For private contracts, the duration effects lead to lower costs; for municipal cooperation and public provision, there are extra costs to begin with, which disappear after 5 or 6 years.
      </description>
      <author>Dijkgraaf, E.</author> <author>Gradus, R.H.J.M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Unionization structure, licensing and innovation (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20586/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We show the effects of the unionization structure (viz., decentralized and centralized unions) on a firm's incentive for technology licensing and innovation. The incentive for technology licensing is stronger under decentralized unions. We identify circumstances under which the benefit from licensing creates a stronger incentive for innovation under decentralized unions. If the union's preference for employment is high, the benefit from licensing may create higher incentive for innovation under decentralized unions. However, if the union's preference for wage is high enough, the incentive for innovation is higher under a centralized union irrespective of licensing ex-post innovation. If the centralized union decides whether or not to supply workers to all firms, the possibility of higher innovation under decentralized unions increases. We further show that perfectly substitutable workers can be better off under decentralized unions if the labor productivity depends on the unionization structure, which occurs in our analysis when, e.g., licensing after innovation occurs only under decentralized unions or innovation (with no licensing) occurs only under a centralized union.
      </description>
      <author>Mukherjee, A.</author> <author>Pennings, H.P.G.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do Auctions Select Efficient Firms? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21427/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We consider a government auctioning off multiple licences to firms that compete in an aftermarket. Firms have different costs, and cost-efficiency is private information in the auction and in the aftermarket. If only one licence is auctioned, standard results say that the most efficient firm wins the auction as it has the highest valuation for the licence. We analyse conditions under which this result does and does not generalise to the case of auctioning multiple licences and aftermarket competition. Strategic interaction in the aftermarket is responsible for the fact that auctions may select inefficient firms.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Karamychev, V.A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Tainted Food, Low-Quality Products and Trade (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/17664/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper examines international trade in tainted food and other low-quality products. We first find that for a large class of environments, free trade is the trading system that conveys the highest incentives to produce non-tainted high-quality goods by foreign exporters. However, free trade cannot prevent the export of tainted products, and the condition for tainting to arise becomes more easily satisfied, if the marginal cost of high-quality production increases or if errors of testing product quality matter. We also examine cases of imagebuilding investments and sabotage of rivals, and find that a tariff in either case reduces the foreign firm’s incentives to produce high quality, which in turn tends to increase import tainting.
      </description>
      <author>Viaene, J.M.A.</author> <author>Zhao, L.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Signaling quality through prices in an oligopoly (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19988/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Firms signal quality through prices even if the market structure is very competitive and price competition is severe. In a symmetric Bertrand oligopoly where products may differ only in their quality and each firm's product quality is private information (unknown to consumers and to other firms), there exist symmetric fully revealing perfect Bayesian equilibria where low quality firms randomize over an interval of prices and high quality firms charge high prices. Signaling requires that the market power and rent of low quality firms be large enough and often this requires that high quality firms exercise sufficient market power. There is a unique symmetric fully revealing equilibrium satisfying the D1 criterion; in this equilibrium too, both low and high quality firms may exhibit considerable market power. Market power of high quality firms may persist even as the number of firms becomes arbitrarily large. Every D1 equilibrium involves some revelation of information.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Roy, S.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Selective Competition (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16519/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We consider a dynamic (differential) game with three players competing against each other. Each period each player can allocate his resources so as to direct his competition towards particular rivals -- we call such competition selective. The setting can be applied to a wide variety of cases: competition between firms, competition between political parties, warfare. We show that if the players are myopic, the weaker players eventually loose the game to their strongest rival. Vice versa, if the players value their future payoffs high enough, each player concentrates more on fighting his strongest opponent. Consequently, the weaker players grow stronger, the strongest player grows weaker and eventually all the players converge and remain in the game.
      </description>
      <author>Dubovik, A.</author> <author>Parakhonyak, A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Contests with Rank-Order Spillovers (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16514/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper presents a unified framework for characterizing symmetric equilibrium in simultaneous move, two-player, rank-order contests with complete information, in which each player's strategy generates direct or indirect affine "spillover" effects that depend on the rank-order of her decision variable. These effects arise in natural interpretations of a number of important economic environments, as well as in classic contests adapted to recent experimental and behavioral models where individuals exhibit inequality aversion or regret. We provide the closed-form solution for the symmetric Nash equilibria of this class of games, and show how it can be used to directly solve for equilibrium behavior in auctions, pricing games, tournaments, R&amp;D races, models of ligitation, and a host of other contests.
      </description>
      <author>Baye, M.R.</author> <author>Vries, C.G. de</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Oligopolistic Competition in Price and Quality (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14028/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-07-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We consider an oligopolistic market where firms compete in price and quality and where consumers are heterogeneous in knowledge: some consumers know both the prices and quality of the products offered, some know only the prices and some know neither. We show that two types of signalling equilibria are possible. Both are characterised by dispersion and Pareto-inefficiency of the price/quality offers. But, better price/quality combinations are signalled with lower prices in one type and with higher prices in the other type.
      </description>
      <author>Dubovik, A.</author> <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Allocation of Decision Rights in Fruit and Vegetable Contracts in China (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10717/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We empirically examine the determinants of the allocation of decision rights in the context of fruit and vegetable contracting. The main conclusion is that under contract farming, many decision rights are shifted from farmers to firms. Quality, reputation and specific investments by firms positively influence the number of decision rights allocated to agri-business firms under contract farming, while monopsony-oligopsony power and specific investments by farmers have no effect on the allocation of decision rights.
      </description>
      <author>Hu, Y.</author> <author>Hendrikse, G.W.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Signaling Quality through Prices in an Oligopoly (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10748/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-17T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Firms signal high quality through high prices even if the market structure is highly competitive and price competition is severe. In a symmetric Bertrand oligopoly where products may differ only in their quality, production cost is increasing in quality and the quality of each firm’s product is private information (not known to consumers or to other firms), we show that there exist fully revealing equilibria in mixed strategies. In such equilibria, low quality firms enjoy market power when other firms are of high quality. High quality firms charge higher prices than low quality firms but lose business to rival firms with higher probability. Some of the revealing equilibria involve high degree of market power (price close to full information monopoly level) while others are more “competitive”. Under certain conditions, if the number of firms is large enough, information is revealed in every equilibrium.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Roy, S.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Evolution of market shares with repeated purchases and heterogeneous network externalities (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11672/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We investigate how market shares change when a new, superior technology exhibiting network externalities is introduced in a market initially dominated by an old technology. This is done under the assumption that consumers are heterogeneous in their valuation of technology quality and network externalities and that goods are not (perfectly) durable and thus have to be bought repeatedly. When both technologies are unsponsored, the old technology dominates when the quality difference is small, and it disappears when the quality difference is large. When the new technology is sponsored, the relationship between the quality difference and the long-run market share of the new technology is non-monotonic and the old technology always continues to exist
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Mendys, E.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Selection effects in auctions for monopoly rights (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11622/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We demonstrate that auctioning market licenses may result in higher market prices than assigning them via more random allocation mechanisms. When future market profit is uncertain, winning an auction is like winning a lottery ticket. If firms differ in risk attitudes, auctions select the least risk-averse firm, which, in turn, set a higher price (or a higher quantity, in case quantity is the decision variable) in the marketplace than an average firm.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Karamychev, V.A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do Auctions select Efficient Firms? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8345/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper considers a government auctioning off multiple licenses to firms 
who compete in a market after the auction. Firms have different costs, and cost 
efficiency is private information at the auction stage and the market competition stage. 
If only one license is auctioned, standard results say that the most efficient firm wins the 
auction (license) as it will get the highest profit in the aftermarket, i.e., it has the highest 
valuation for the license. This paper argues that this result does not generalize to the 
case of multiple licenses and aftermarket competition. In particular, we determine 
conditions under which auctions may select inefficient firms and therefore lead to an 
inefficient allocation of resources. Strategic interactions in the aftermarket, in particular 
firms’ preferences to compete with the least cost-efficient firms rather than with the 
most efficient firms, are responsible for our result.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Karamychev, V.A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11253/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In this paper we analyse whether collusion exists in the Dutch waste collection market, which shows a high degree of concentration. Although scale effects might be in accordance with this market outcome, the question is whether this concentration is in fact a result of fair competition. Using data for (nearly) all Dutch municipalities we estimate whether collusion exists and what the impact is on tariffs for waste collection. The results indicate that high concentration increases prices and therefore (partly) offsets the advantage of contracting out. The presence of competing public firms might be essential to ensure more and fair competition.
      </description>
      <author>Dijkgraaf, E.</author> <author>Gradus, R.H.J.M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Tariffs, Licensing and Market Structure (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/12068/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper challenges the conventional wisdom that exclusive owners of an advanced technology are always better off when producing as a monopolist than when competing against another firm. Competition against a less-efficient firm weakens the power that a host country can exert on the incumbent in the form of its tariff policy. We show that this gives a motive for a monopolist to license its technology to another foreign firm. A host country gains more from increased competition if it can induce the foreign incumbent to transfer technology to the host country firm. We show that the host country can do so by tariff commitment. We also discuss the implications of bargaining under licensing and Bertrand competition in the product market. Hence, this paper qualifies and extends the recent work of Kabiraj and Marjit [Protecting consumers through protection: The role of tariff-induced technology transfer. European Economic Review 47, 113–124].
      </description>
      <author>Mukherjee, A.</author> <author>Pennings, H.P.G.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Search Costs (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7510/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-02-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In a recent paper Hong and Shum (forthcoming) present a structural methodology to estimate search cost distributions. We extend their approach to the case of oligopoly and present a maximum likelihood estimate of the search cost distribution. We apply our method to a data set of online prices for different computer memory chips. The estimates of the search cost distribution suggest that consumers have either quite high or quite low search costs so they either search for all prices in the market or for at most three prices. According to Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit tests, we cannot reject the null hypothesis that the observed prices are generated by the mode.
      </description>
      <author>Moraga-Gonzalez, J.L.</author> <author>Wildenbeest, M.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Unionization Structure, Licensing and Innovation (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7427/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Taking technological differences between firms as given, we show that the technologically advanced firm has a stronger incentive for technology licensing under a decentralized unionization structure than with centralized wage setting. Furthermore, We show that, in presence of licensing, the incentive for innovation may also be stronger under decentralized unions. Unions have a clear preference for centralization only if productivity improvements are relatively small.
      </description>
      <author>Mukherjee, A.</author> <author>Pennings, H.P.G.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do Daily Retail Gasoline Prices adjust Asymmetrically? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6585/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper analyzes adjustments in the Dutch retail gasoline prices. We estimate an error correction model on changes in the daily retail price for gasoline (taxes excluded) for the period 1996-2004 taking care of volatility clustering by estimating an EGARCH model. It turns out the volatility process is asymmetrical: an unexpected increase in the producer price has a larger effect on the variance of the producer price than an unexpected decrease. We do not find strong evidence for amount asymmetry. However, there is a faster reaction to upward changes in spot prices than to downward changes in spot prices. This implies timing or pattern asymmetry. This asymmetry starts three days after the change in the spot price and lasts for four days.
      </description>
      <author>Bettendorf, L.J.H.</author> <author>Geest, S.A. van der</author> <author>Kuper, G.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Internet Retailing as a Marketing Strategy (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/6586/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We analyze the incentives for incumbent bricks-and-mortar firms and new entrants to start an online retail channel in a differentiated goods market. To this end we set up a two-stage model where firms first decide whether or not to build the infrastructure necessary to start an online retail channel and then compete in prices using the channels they have opened up. Consumers trade-off the convenience of online shopping and the ease to compare prices, with online uncertainties. Without a threat of entry by a third pure online player we find that for most parameter constellations firms' dominant strategy is not to open an online retail channel as this cannibalizes too much on their conventional sales. As the cannibalization effect is not present for a pure Internet player, we show that these firms will start online retail channels under a much wider range of parameter constellations. The threat of entry may force incumbent bricks-and-mortar firms to deter entry by starting up an Internet retail channel themselves. We also show that a low cost of building up an online retail channel or online shopping conveniences may not be to the benefit of online shopping as the strategic interaction between firms may be such that no online retail channel is built when the circumstances seem to be more favourable.
      </description>
      <author>Janssen, M.C.W.</author> <author>Noll, R. van der</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>