<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Forecasting and Simulation</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-E37/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code E37</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Parallel Sequential Monte Carlo for
Efficient Density Combination:
The Deco Matlab Toolbox (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/39840/</link>
      <pubDate>2013-04-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper presents the Matlab package DeCo (Density Combination) which is based on the paper by Billio et al. (2013) where a constructive Bayesian approach is presented for combining predictive densities originating from different models or other sources of information. The combination weights are time-varying and may depend on past predictive forecasting performances and other learning mechanisms. The core algorithm is the function DeCo which applies banks of parallel Sequential Monte Carlo algorithms to filter the time-varying combination weights. The DeCo procedure has been implemented both for standard CPU computing and for Graphical Process Unit (GPU) parallel computing. For the GPU implementation we use the Matlab parallel computing toolbox and show how to use General Purposes GPU computing almost effortless. This GPU implementation comes with a speed up of the execution time up to seventy times compared to a standard CPU Matlab implementation on a multicore CPU. We show the use of the package and the computational gain of the GPU version, through some simulation experiments and empirical applications.


      </description>
      <author>Casarin, R.</author> <author>Grassi, S.</author> <author>Ravazzolo, F.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Posterior-Predictive Evidence on US Inflation using Phillips Curve Models with Non-Filtered Time Series
 (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38747/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Changing time series properties of US inflation and economic activity are analyzed within a class of extended Phillips Curve (PC) models. First, the misspecification effects of mechanical removal of low frequency movements of these series on posterior inference of a basic PC model are analyzed using a Bayesian simulation based approach. Next, structural time series models that describe changing patterns in low and high frequencies and backward as well as forward inflation expectation mechanisms are incorporated in the class of extended PC models. Empirical results indicate that the proposed models compare favorably with existing Bayesian Vector Autoregressive and Stochastic Volatility models in terms of fit and predictive performance. Weak identification and dynamic persistence appear less important when time varying dynamics of high and low frequencies are carefully modeled. Modeling inflation expectations using survey data and adding level shifts and stochastic volatility improves substantially in sample fit and out of sample predictions. No evidence is found of a long run stable cointegration relation between US inflation and marginal costs. Tails of the complete predictive distributions indicate an increase in the probability of disinflation in recent years.


      </description>
      <author>Basturk, N.</author> <author>Cakmakli, C.</author> <author>Ceyhan, P.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Time-varying Combinations of Predictive Densities using Nonlinear Filtering
 (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/38198/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-10-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We propose a Bayesian combination approach for multivariate predictive densities which relies upon a distributional state space representation of the combination weights. Several specifications of multivariate time-varying weights are introduced with a particular focus on weight dynamics driven by the past performance of the predictive densities and the use of learning mechanisms. In the proposed approach the model set can be incomplete, meaning that all models can be individually misspecified. A Sequential Monte Carlo method is proposed to approximate the filtering and predictive densities. The combination approach is assessed using statistical and utility-based performance measures for evaluating density forecasts. Simulation results indicate that, for a set of linear autoregressive models, the combination strategy is successful in selecting, with probability close to one, the true model when the model set is complete and it is able to detect parameter instability when the model set includes the true model that has generated subsamples of data. For the macro series we find that incompleteness of the models is relatively large in the 70's, the beginning of the 80's and during the recent financial crisis, and lower during the Great Moderation. With respect to returns of the S&amp;P 500 series, we find that an investment strategy using a combination of predictions from professional forecasters and from a white noise model puts more weight on the white noise model in the beginning of the 90's and switches to giving more weight to the professional forecasts over time.


      </description>
      <author>Billio, M.</author> <author>Casarin, R.</author> <author>Ravazzolo, F.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Combining Predictive Densities using Nonlinear Filtering with Applications to US Economics Data (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30684/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-11-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We propose a multivariate combination approach to prediction based on a distributional state space representation of the weights belonging to a set of Bayesian predictive densities which have been obtained from alternative models. Several specifications of multivariate time-varying weights are introduced with a particular focus on weight dynamics driven by the past performance of the predictive densities and the use of learning mechanisms. In the proposed approach the model set can be incomplete, meaning that all models are individually misspecified. The approach is assessed using statistical and utility-based performance measures for evaluating density forecasts of US macroeconomic time series and surveys of stock market prices. For the macro series we find that incompleteness of the models is relatively large in the 70's, the beginning of the 80's and during the recent financial crisis; structural changes like the Great Moderation are empirically identified by our model combination and the predicted probabilities of recession accurately compare with the NBER business cycle dating. Model weights have substantial uncertainty attached and neglecting this may seriously affect results. With respect to returns of the S&amp;P 500 series, we find that an investment strategy using a combination of predictions from professional forecasters and from a white noise model puts more weight on the white noise model in the beginning of the 90's and switches to giving more weight to the left tail of the professional forecasts during the start of the financial crisis around 2008.
      </description>
      <author>Billio, M.</author> <author>Casarin, R.</author> <author>Ravazzolo, F.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Analyzing Fixed-event Forecast Revisions (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23785/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        It is common practice to evaluate fixed-event forecast revisions in macroeconomics by regressing current revisions on one-period lagged revisions. Under weak-form efficiency, the correlation between the current and one-period lagged revisions should be zero. The empirical findings in the literature suggest that the null hypothesis of zero correlation between the current and one-period lagged revisions is rejected quite frequently, where the correlation can be either positive or negative. In this paper we propose a methodology to be able to interpret such non-zero correlations in a straightforward manner. Our approach is based on the assumption that forecasts can be decomposed into both an econometric model and expert intuition. The interpretation of the sign of the correlation between the current and one-period lagged revisions depends on the process governing intuition, and the correlation between intuition and news.
      </description>
      <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author> <author>Chang, C.L.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Bayesian Combinations of Stock Price Predictions with an Application to the Amsterdam Exchange Index (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/23459/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-05-02T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We summarize the general combination approach by Billio et al. [2010]. In the combination model the weights follow logistic autoregressive processes, change over time and their dynamics are possible driven by the past forecasting performances of the predictive densities. For illustrative purposes we apply it to combine White Noise and GARCH models to forecast the Amsterdam Exchange index and use the combined predictive forecasts in an investment asset allocation exercise.
      </description>
      <author>Billio, M.</author> <author>Casarin, R.</author> <author>Ravazzolo, F.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Combining Predictive Densities using Bayesian Filtering with Applications to US Economics Data (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22330/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-01-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Using a Bayesian framework this paper provides a multivariate combination approach to prediction based on a distributional state space representation of predictive densities from alternative models. In the proposed approach the model set can be incomplete. Several multivariate time-varying combination strategies are introduced. In particular, a weight dynamics driven by the past performance of the predictive densities is considered and the use of learning mechanisms. The approach is assessed using statistical and utility-based performance measures for evaluating density forecasts of US macroeconomic time series and of surveys of stock market prices.
      </description>
      <author>Billio, M.</author> <author>Casarin, R.</author> <author>Ravazzolo, F.</author> <author>Dijk, H.K. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Evaluating Combined Non-Replicable Forecast (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/21944/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-12-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Macroeconomic forecasts are often based on the interaction between econometric models and experts. A forecast that is based only on an econometric model is replicable and may be unbiased, whereas a forecast that is not based only on an econometric model, but also incorporates an expert’s touch, is non-replicable and is typically biased. In this paper we propose a methodology to analyze the qualities of combined non-replicable forecasts. One part of the methodology seeks to retrieve a replicable component from the non-replicable forecasts, and compares this component against the actual data. A second part modifies the estimation routine due to the assumption that the difference between a replicable and a non-replicable forecast involves a measurement error. An empirical example to forecast economic fundamentals for Taiwan shows the relevance of the methodological approach.
      </description>
      <author>Chang, C.L.</author> <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Combining Non-Replicable Forecasts (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20156/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-28T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Macro-economic forecasts are often based on the interaction between econometric models and experts. A forecast that is based only on an econometric model is replicable and may be unbiased, whereas a forecast that is not based only on an econometric model, but also incorporates an expert’s touch, is non-replicable and is typically biased. In this paper we propose a methodology to analyze the qualities of combined non-replicable forecasts. One part of the methodology seeks to retrieve a replicable component from the non-replicable forecasts, and compares this component against the actual data. A second part modifies the estimation routine due to the assumption that the difference between a replicable and a non-replicable forecast involves a measurement error. An empirical example to forecast economic fundamentals for Taiwan shows the relevance of the methodological approach.
      </description>
      <author>Chang, C.L.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author> <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Are Forecast  Updates Progressive? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19358/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Macro-economic forecasts typically involve both a model component, which is replicable, as well as intuition, which is non-replicable. Intuition is expert knowledge possessed by a forecaster. If forecast updates are progressive, forecast updates should become more accurate, on average, as the actual value is approached. Otherwise, forecast updates would be neutral. The paper proposes a methodology to test whether forecast updates are progressive and whether econometric models are useful in updating forecasts. The data set for the empirical analysis are for Taiwan, where we have three decades of quarterly data available of forecasts and updates of the inflation rate and real GDP growth rate. The actual series for both the inflation rate and the real GDP growth rate are always released by the government one quarter after the release of the revised forecast, and the actual values are not revised after they have been released. Our empirical results suggest that the forecast updates for Taiwan are progressive, and can be explained predominantly by intuition. Additionally, the one-, two- and three-quarter forecast errors are predictable using publicly available information for both the inflation rate and real GDP growth rate, which suggests that the forecasts can be improved.
      </description>
      <author>Chang, C.L.</author> <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Evaluating Macroeconomic Forecast: A Review of Some Recent Developments (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18604/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Macroeconomic forecasts are frequently produced, published, discussed and used. The formal evaluation of such forecasts has a long research history. Recently, a new angle to the evaluation of forecasts has been addressed, and in this review we analyse some recent developments from that perspective. The literature on forecast evaluation predominantly assumes that macroeconomic forecasts are generated from econometric models. In practice, however, most macroeconomic forecasts, such as those from the IMF, World Bank, OECD, Federal Reserve Board, Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and the ECB, are based on econometric model forecasts as well as on human intuition. This seemingly inevitable combination renders most of these forecasts biased and, as such, their evaluation becomes non-standard. In this review, we consider the evaluation of two forecasts in which: (i) the two forecasts are generated from two distinct econometric models; (ii) one forecast is generated from an econometric model and the other is obtained as a combination of a model, the other forecast, and intuition; and (iii) the two forecasts are generated from two distinct combinations of different models and intuition. It is shown that alternative tools are needed to compare and evaluate the forecasts in each of these three situations. These alternative techniques are illustrated by comparing the forecasts from the Federal Reserve Board and the FOMC on inflation, unemployment and real GDP growth
      </description>
      <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author> <author>McAleer, M.J.</author> <author>Legerstee, R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Revenue Management and Demand Fulfillment: Matching Applications, Models, and Software (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10464/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-08-23T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Recent years have seen great successes of revenue management, notably in the airline, hotel, and car rental business. Currently, an increasing number of industries, including manufacturers and retailers, are exploring ways to adopt similar concepts. Software companies are taking an active role in promoting the broadening range of applications. Also technological advances, including smart shelves and radio frequency identification (RFID), are removing many of the barriers to extended revenue management. The rapid developments in Supply Chain Planning and Revenue Management software solutions, scientific models, and industry applications have created a complex picture, which appears not yet to be well understood. It is not evident which scientific models fit which industry applications and which aspects are still missing. The relation between available software solutions and applications as well as scientific models appears equally unclear. The goal of this paper is to help overcome this confusion. To this end, we structure and review three dimensions, namely applications, models, and software. Subsequently, we relate these dimensions to each other and highlight commonalities and discrepancies. This comparison also provides a basis for identifying future research needs.
      </description>
      <author>Quante, R.</author> <author>Meyr, H.</author> <author>Fleischmann, M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Hourly Electricity Prices in Day-Ahead Markets (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8289/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-01-15T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper focuses on the characteristics of hourly electricity prices in day-ahead markets. In these markets, quotes for day-ahead delivery of electricity are submitted simultaneously for all hours in the next day. The same information set is used for quoting all hours of the day. The dynamics of hourly electricity prices does not behave as a time series process. Instead, these prices should be treated as a panel in which the prices of 24 cross-sectional hours vary from day to day. This paper introduces a panel model for hourly electricity prices in day-ahead markets and examines their characteristics. The results show that hourly electricity prices exhibit hourly specific mean-reversion and that they oscillate around an hourly specific mean price level. Furthermore, a block structured cross-sectional correlation pattern between the hours is apparent.
      </description>
      <author>Huisman, R.</author> <author>Huurman, C.</author> <author>Mahieu, R.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Selecting a Nonlinear Time Series Model using Weighted Tests of Equal Forecast Accuracy (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/1703/</link>
      <pubDate>2003-03-26T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Nonlinear time series models have become fashionable tools to describe and forecast a variety of economic time series. A closer look at reported empirical studies, however, reveals that these models apparently fit well in-sample, but rarely show a substantial improvement in out-of-sample forecasts, at least over linear models. One of the many possible reasons for this finding is that inappropriate model selection criteria and forecast evaluation criteria are used. In this paper we therefore propose a novel criterion, which we believe does more justice to the very nature of nonlinear models. Simulations show that our criterion outperforms currently used criteria, in the sense that the true nonlinear model is more often found to perform better in out-of-sample forecasting  than a benchmark linear model. An empirical illustration for US GDP emphasizes its relevance.
      </description>
      <author>Dijk, D.J.C. van</author> <author>Franses, Ph.H.B.F.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>