<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Employment Determination; Job Creation; Demand for Labor; Self-Employment</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-J23/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code J23</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/20807/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Entrepreneurs exit their businesses due to selection pressures they experience in the market place. In addition to this well-known ex-post decision to exit, entrepreneurs select ex-ante whether they are willing to pursue an entrepreneurial career at all, or to give up their entrepreneurial intentions. Hardly anything is known about the latter selection process in imagined markets that precedes the creation of variation and selection process in real markets. This article explores these two selection processes using survey data on 20,000 individuals in 27 European countries and the United States in 2007. We distinguish business failure from exit by sell-off. Individuals in the United States are less likely to exit imagined markets and are more likely to exit the real market than are Europeans. Individuals in a corporatist welfare state regime have relatively high chances to exit imagined markets but low chances to exit real markets (due to failure). Business owners in metropolitan and urban environments are more likely to fail than their rural counterparts, while individuals with a high risk tolerance and individuals with a self-employed parent are less likely to exit imagined or real markets (via business failure). In short, this study shows that exit in real and in imagined markets is differently affected by individual characteristics as well as by the competitive and institutional environment.
      </description>
      <author>Stam, E.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The entrepreneurial ladder and its determinants (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15775/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-14T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We test a new model where the entrepreneurial decision is described
as a process of successive engagement levels, i.e. as an entrepreneurial
ladder. Five levels are distinguished using nearly 12 000 observations
from the 2004 ‘Flash Eurobarometer survey on Entrepreneurship’
covering the 25 European Union member states and the United
States. The most surprising of the many results is that perception of
lack of financial support is no obstacle for moving to a higher
entrepreneurial engagement level whereas perceived administrative
complexity is a significant obstacle. We also show that the effect of
age on the probability of moving forward in the entrepreneurial
process becomes negative after a certain age implying that if
entrepreneurial engagements are not taken early enough in life they
may well never be taken.
      </description>
      <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Progress: Climbing The Entrepreneurial Ladder in Europe and The US (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16518/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We investigate which countries have the highest potential to achieve entrepreneurial progress. This progress is defined using an entrepreneurial ladder with five successive steps: “never thought about starting a business”, “thinking about starting a business”, “taking steps to start a business”, “running a business for less than three years”, and “running a business for more than three years”. We assess the influence of individual-level and country-level variables on progression through these stages. Data are used from the 2007 “Flash Eurobarometer Survey on Entrepreneurship”, covering 27 European countries and the United States. We find that countries display large variation in the ease with which businesses come into existence and survive. In the US many people think about setting up a business whereas Europeans are better at achieving higher levels of engagement. Particularly in Austria, France and Lithuania there appear to be low probabilities to advance in the process. Our analysis suggests that country differences can be explained by the level of economic development and risk tolerance while the administrative and financial climate play a role for some steps. The paper also provides results on the influence of individual-level demographic and obstacle perception variables.
      </description>
      <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author> <author>Verheul, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Dynamics of Job Creation and Job Destruction: Is Sub-Saharan Africa Different? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/18340/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The Dynamics of Job Creation and Job Destruction: Is Sub-Saharan Africa Different? This paper analyzes the creation, destruction and reallocation of jobs in order to understand the micro-dynamics of aggregate employment change in African manufacturing. The nature and magnitude of gross job flows are examined using a unique panel data of Ethiopian manufacturing establishments over the period 1996-2007. We also assess the relative importance of firm demographics, industry effects and business cycles for job flows. The rates and patterns of job creation and destruction in our sample are comparable to the findings from developed and emerging economies suggesting that African firms adjust their labor force in a manner broadly similar to firms elsewhere and that African labor markets are not uniquely restrictive in terms of undermining job reallocation across firms. We also find, as in many other countries, that job reallocation is relatively higher in industries dominated by smaller and younger establishments. However, unlike other regions, job reallocation in our sample is pro-cyclical and its variation across industries bears little similarity to the patterns found in other developed and emerging economies. Small firms in Africa create jobs mainly at the point of market-entry and play a limited role in terms of contributing to manufacturing employment through post-entry expansion.
      </description>
      <author>Bedi, A.S.</author> <author>Shiferaw, A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Does selfemployment reduce unemployment? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13650/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-11-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper investigates the dynamic relationship between self-employment and unemployment rates. On the one hand, high unemployment rates may lead to start-up activity of self-employed individuals (the “refugee” effect). On the other hand, higher rates of self-employment may indicate increased entrepreneurial activity reducing unemployment in subsequent periods (the “entrepreneurial” effect). This paper introduces a new two-equation vector autoregression model capable of reconciling these ambiguities and estimates it for data from 23 OECD countries between 1974 and 2002. The empirical results confirm the existence of two distinct relationships between unemployment and self-employment: the “refugee” and “entrepreneurial” effects. We also find that the “entrepreneurial” effects are considerably stronger than the “refugee” effects.
      </description>
      <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Carree, M.A.</author> <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Audretsch, D.B.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Child labour and educational success in Portugal (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/22390/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The current debate on child labour focuses on developing countries. However, Portugal is an example of a relatively
developed country where child labour is still a matter of concern as between 8% and 12% of Portuguese children may be
classified as workers. This paper studies the patterns of child labour in Portugal and assesses the consequences of working
on the educational success of Portuguese children. The analysis controls for typically unobserved attributes such as a
child’s interest in school and educational ambitions and uses geographical variation in policies designed to tackle child
labour and in labour inspection regimes to instrument child labour. We find that economic work hinders educational
success, while domestic work does not appear to be harmful. Furthermore, after controlling for a host of socio-economic
variables, factors such as a child’s interest in school and educational ambitions have a large effect on boosting educational
success and reducing economic work.
      </description>
      <author>Goulart, P.</author> <author>Bedi, A.S.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Exit in Real and Imagined Markets (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13671/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Entrepreneurs exit their business due to selection mechanisms experienced in the market place. Next to this well known ex-post decision to exit, entrepreneurs select ex-ante whether they are willing to pursue an entrepreneurial career at all, or to give up these entrepreneurial intentions. This paper compares the role of personal and ecological factors as determinants of these two types of selection: exit in real and in imagined markets. Entrepreneurs in imagined markets are more likely to exit in strong welfare state regimes, while real entrepreneurs are more likely to exit when they have low levels of human capital and when they are located in metropolitan areas.
      </description>
      <author>Stam, E.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment in Japan (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10747/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-10-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper examines the relationship between entrepreneurship (as measured by fluctuations in the business ownership rate) and unemployment in Japan for the period between 1972 and 2002. We find that, although Japan’s unemployment rate has been influenced by specific exogenous shocks, the effects of entrepreneurship on unemployment are not different when compared to other OECD countries. In the past, small firms in Japan benefited from the protective environment of the keiretsu structure. This secure environment no longer exists, and a new market environment conducive to new venture creation and growth has not yet been established. We argue that the Japanese government should actively stimulate an entrepreneurial culture.
      </description>
      <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Verheul, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Entrepreneurial Ladder and its Determinants (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/8134/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-11-22T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We test a new model where the entrepreneurial decision is described as a process of successive engagement levels, i.e., as an entrepreneurial ladder. Five levels are distinguished using nearly 12,000 observations from the 2004 “Flash Eurobarometer survey on Entrepreneurship” covering the 25 European Union member states and the United States. The most surprising of the many results is that perception of lack of financial support is no obstacle for moving to a higher entrepreneurial engagement level whereas perceived administrative complexity is a significant obstacle. We also show that the effect of age on the probability of moving forward in the entrepreneurial process becomes negative after a certain age implying that if entrepreneurial engagements are not taken early enough in life they may well never be taken.
      </description>
      <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15794/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data for 29 countries this study investigates the (differential) impact of several factors on female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. These factors are derived from three streams of literature, including that on entrepreneurship in general, on female labour force participation and on female entrepreneurship. The paper deals with the methodological aspects of investigating (female) entrepreneurship by distinguishing between two measures of female entrepreneurship: the number of female entrepreneurs and the share of women in the total number of entrepreneurs. The first measure is used to investigate whether variables have an impact on entrepreneurship in general (influencing both the number of female and male entrepreneurs). The second measure is used to investigate whether factors have a differential relative impact on female and male entrepreneurship, i.e. whether they influence the diversity or gender composition of entrepreneurship. Findings indicate that – by and large – female and male entrepreneurial activity rates are influenced by the same factors and in the same direction. However, for some factors (e.g. unemployment, life satisfaction) we find a differential impact on female and male entrepreneurship. The present study also shows that the factors influencing the number of female entrepreneurs may be different from those influencing the share of female entrepreneurs. In this light it is important that governments are aware of what they want to accomplish (i.e. do they want to stimulate the number of female entrepreneurs or the gender composition of entrepreneurship) to be able to select appropriate policy measures.
      </description>
      <author>Verheul, I.</author> <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants of self-employment preference and realization among women and men in Europe and the United States (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9702/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Female
self-employment rates are consistently lower than those of men. This
untapped female potential has drawn the attention of policy makers. In the
present paper the determinants of selfemployment rates of both men and
women are investigated in the context of a two-equation model explaining
both actual self-employment and the preference for self-employment. A
systematic distinction is made between different ways in which gender can
exert influence on (preference for) self-employment, including moderation,
mediation and direct effects. Using Flash Eurobarometer data of about
8,000 individuals from 29 countries (including the 15 old EU member
states, 10 new EU member states and the United States) probit equations
are estimated explaining the (preference for) self-employment. Next to
gender, explanatory variables include age, education, social capital, risk
attitude, locus of control and perceptions of the entrepreneurial
environment. Findings show that at least part of the explanation of the
lower female self-employment rate is caused by a lower preference for
women to become self-employed. We do not find evidence for a moderating
effect of gender on the relationship between self-employment and the
preference for self-employment, indicating that   other things equal  
women and men who have a preference to become self-employed do not differ
with respect to the impact of this preference on its materialization. 
Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting.
      </description>
      <author>Verheul, I.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining engagement levels of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9705/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper investigates
differences between opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs in terms of
socio-demographics, attitudes and perception of  obstacles . We use the
2004 Flash Eurobarometer Survey data. Explanatory variables include
gender, age, education level and self-employed parents, risk tolerance,
locus of control, perceptions of four  obstacles  and country effects. The
 obstacle  variables include the perception of availibility of financial
support; administrative complexity; of access to information on new
venture creation and an unfavorable economic climate. Using probit
equations we investigate differences in the preference for self-employment
of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. A probit equation is estimated
relating the explanatory variables to opportunity versus necessity
entrepreneurship. Moreover, differences in the entrepreneurial engagement
of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs are investigated on the basis
of a (ordered) multinomial logit model. Findings indicate that opportunity
entrepreneurs have a higher preference for self-employment because of
family encouragement. Also, opportunity entrepreneurs are found to
perceive of administrative complexity and an unfavorable economic climate,
negatively influencing their entrepreneurial involvement, while this is
not the case for necessity entrepreneurs.
      </description>
      <author>Bhola, R.</author> <author>Verheul, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Explaining Female and Male Entrepreneurship at the Country Level (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7172/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-19T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Using Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data for 29 countries this study investigates the (differential) impact of several factors on female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. These factors are derived from three streams of literature, including that on entrepreneurship in general, on female labor force participation and on female entrepreneurship. The paper deals with the methodological aspects of investigating (female) entrepreneurship by distinguishing between two measures of female entrepreneurship: the number of female entrepreneurs and the share of women in the total number of entrepreneurs. The first measure is used to investigate whether variables have an impact on entrepreneurship in general (influencing both the number of female and male entrepreneurs). The second measure is used to investigate whether factors have a differential relative impact on female and male entrepreneurship, i.e., whether they influence the diversity or gender composition of entrepreneurship. Findings indicate that – by and large – female and male entrepreneurial activity rates are influenced by the same factors and in the same direction. However, for some factors (e.g., unemployment, life satisfaction) we find a differential impact on female and male entrepreneurship. The present study also shows that the factors influencing the number of female entrepreneurs may be different from those influencing the share of female entrepreneurs. In this light it is important that governments are aware of what they want to accomplish (i.e., do they want to stimulate the number of female entrepreneurs or the gender composition of entrepreneurship) to be able to select appropriate policy measures.
      </description>
      <author>Verheul, I.</author> <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Latent and Actual Entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: Some Recent Developments (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15796/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15 old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000. While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship. Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.
      </description>
      <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9857/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Based upon two strands of literature, this paper hypothesizes a U-shaped relationship between a country’s rate of entrepreneurial dynamics and its level of economic development. This would imply a different scope for entrepreneurship policy across subsequent stages of development. Regressing GEM’s 2002 data for nascent entrepreneurship in 36 countries on the level of economic development as measured either by per capita income or by an index for innovative capacity, we find support for a U-shaped relationship. Testing our results against several control variables, evidence is again found for this relationship with economic development, in addition to significant effects of the business ownership rate (+), social security expenditure (-), aggregate taxes (+) and population growth (+). The results suggest that a ‘natural rate’ of nascent entrepreneurship is to some extent governed by ‘laws’ related to the level of economic development. For the most advanced nations, improving incentive structures for business start-ups and promoting the commercial exploitation of scientific findings offer the most promising approach for public policy. Developing nations, however, may be better off pursuing the exploitation of scale economies, fostering foreign direct investment and promoting management education.
      </description>
      <author>Wennekers, A.R.M.</author> <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Reynolds, P.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Determinants of Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in Europe and the US (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9862/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Determinants from different streams of literature and spanning different disciplines are used to explain entrepreneurial decisions. A multinomial logit model and survey data from the old 15 EU member states, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and the US are used to establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various entrepreneurial engagement levels. These engagement levels range from “never thought about starting a business” to “thinking about it”, “taking steps for starting up”, “having a young business”, “having an older business” and “no longer being an entrepreneur”. Data of two Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer surveys (2002 and 2003) containing over 20,000 observations are used. Other than demographic variables, the set of explanatory variables used includes the perception by respondents of ad-ministrative complexities, of availability of financial support and of risk tolerance, the respondents’ prefer-ence for self-employment and country specific effects. The most striking result is that the perception of lack of financial support has no discriminative effect across the various levels of entrepreneurial engagement.
      </description>
      <author>Thurik, A.R.</author> <author>Grilo, I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in the European Union (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15798/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        A multinomial logit model and survey data from the 25 EU member states and the US are
used to establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various entrepreneurial
engagement levels. These engagement levels range from “never thought about starting a business”
to “thinking about it”, “taking steps for starting up”, “having a young business”, “having an older
business” and “no longer being an entrepreneur”. Data of the 2004 Entrepreneurship Flash
Eurobarometer survey containing over 13,500 observations is used. Other than demographic
variables such as gender, age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the set of
explanatory variables used includes country specific effects, measures of risk tolerance, internal and
external locus of control and four perceptions of ’obstacles’. The ‘obstacle’ variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of financial support, of
accessibility of information for start-up and whether the current economic climate is favorable.
Among the four perception variables only administrative complexities displays an unambiguous
obstacle profile in that its presence has a significant negative impact on higher entrepreneurial
engagement levels. Country effects suggest a clear underperformance of Europe relative to the US
in less mature entrepreneurial phases.
      </description>
      <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurship in the old en new Europe (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9706/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Developing a dynamic SME sector is essential for
countries transforming their centrally planned economy into a market
oriented one. New firm formation is the major driver of this transition.
Obviously, entrepreneurial energy is a necessary condition for new firm
formation. This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 25 EU member states
and the US to explain country differences in entrepreneurial energy. This
energy is captured as latent and actual entrepreneurship. Latent
entrepreneurship is measured by the probability of a declared preference
for self-employment over employment. Next to demographic variables such as
gender, age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the
set of explanatory variables used includes country specific effects,
measures of risk tolerance, internal and external locus of control and
four perceptions of  obstacles . The  obstacle  variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability
of financial support, of accessibility of information for start-up and
whether the current economic climate is favorable. Specific attention is
devoted to differences between the eight former communist member states
and the 17 other EU member states. The most striking result is the higher
influence of risk tolerance in shaping both latent and actual
entrepreneurship in transition economies relative to market economies.
      </description>
      <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Entrepreneurial engagement levels in the European Union (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9708/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        A multinomial logit model
and survey data from the 25 EU member states and the US are used to
establish the effect of demographic and other variables on various
entrepreneurial engagement levels. These engagement levels range from 
never thought about starting a business  to  thinking about it ,  taking
steps for starting up ,  having a young business ,  having an older
business  and  no longer being an entrepreneur . Data of the 2004
Entrepreneurship Flash Eurobarometer survey containing over 13,500
observations is used. Other than demographic variables such as gender,
age, education level and whether parents are self-employed, the set of
explanatory variables used includes country specific effects, measures of
risk tolerance, internal and external locus of control and four
perceptions of  obstacles . The  obstacle  variables include the
perception by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability
of financial support, of accessibility of information for start-up and
whether the current economic climate is favorable. Among the four
perception variables only administrative complexities displays an
unambiguous obstacle profile in that its presence has a significant
negative impact on higher entrepreneurial engagement levels. Country
effects suggest a clear underperformance of Europe relative to the US in
less mature entrepreneurial phases.
      </description>
      <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Latent and actual entrepreneurship in Europe and the US: some recent developments (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9710/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper uses 2004 survey data from the 15
old EU member states and the US to explain country differences in latent
and actual entrepreneurship. Other than demographic variables such as
gender, age and education, the set of covariates includes the perception
by respondents of administrative complexities, of availability of
financial support and of risk tolerance as well as country-specific
effects. A comparison is made with results using a similar survey in 2000.
While a majority of the surveyed population identifies lack of financial
support as an obstacle to starting a new business, the role of this
variable in both latent and actual entrepreneurship appears to be even
more counterintuitive in 2004 than in 2000: it has no impact on actual
entrepreneurship and is positively related to latent entrepreneurship.
Administrative complexities, also perceived as an obstacle by a large
majority of the population, have the expected negative impact both for
latent and actual entrepreneurship in both years. Country-specific effects
are important both for latent and actual entrepreneurship and the
comparison of 2000 and 2004 results suggests that, once all other factors
are controlled for, an improvement in actual entrepreneurship in the EU
relative to the US has taken place in the last four years. However, in
terms of unweighted averages actual entrepreneurship remained about the
same. Latent entrepreneurship dropped while this drop seems to have
occurred evenly in the US and the EU member states.
      </description>
      <author>Grilo, I.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>