<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Business Objectives of the Firm</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-L21/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code L21</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Over de Noodzaak en Wetenschappelijke Uitdagingen van Onderzoek naar Strategische Waarde Creatie van Management Modellen (Farewell Lecture)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34900/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-05-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        De Nederlandse versie van de in het Engels uitgesproken rede ter gelegenheid van het afscheid als Full Professor of Management aan de Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, op 11 mei 2012
      </description>
      <author>Bosch, F.A.J. van den</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>On the necessity and scientific challenges of conducting research into strategic value creating management models (Farewell Lecture)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/34870/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-05-11T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Abstract. In his Farewell Lecture, referring to the statement “Nothing is as practical as
good theory”, Professor Van Den Bosch elaborates on developing “good”
Management Theory and its practical application to business and society.
Management is likely to be the most valuable resource of goal-oriented
organizations. However, nowadays in the media and in public debate the
diminishing legitimacy of managers is coming under discussion. This raises the
challenging question: are managers losing their societal legitimacy? If this is the
case, the second question arises: how can a more solid theoretical foundation of
Management contribute to new insights in terms of its role – as an alternative to
the Market – as a coordinating mechanism for creating value for business and
society?
Regarding both questions, the following four scientific challenges are
addressed. First, the case is made that a managerial perspective on Research into
Management is required. Second, taking a context-neutral approach in defining
Management, it is proposed to focus on generic core activities of Management.
Third, it is suggested that the creation of strategic value for society should be
defined as the purpose of Management of organizations. Fourth, based on
recent contributions to the literature, the importance for practice of strategic
value creating Management Models are discussed, including a current appli -
cation in the context of Shared Value Creation. Finally, the problems and
challenges of changing the Management Model of an organization, i.e.
Management Innovation, are highlighted.
The lecture is concluded with four recommendations. These recommen -
dations are directed to scientists in the field of Research in Management, to
Schools of Management, to the practice of Management, and to governmental
and regulatory agencies. These agencies have to look after Management Models
and their strategic value creation for society. In the context of the present
financial and economic crisis, it is recommended these agencies have to
consider correcting not only the “Invisible Hand” of the Market, but also paying
due attention to its close connection with the “Visible Hand” of Management.
      </description>
      <author>Bosch, F.A.J. van den</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Social Entrepreneurship and Performance: The Role of Perceived Barriers and Risk (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25538/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-06T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This study investigates if and in what way social entrepreneurs are hampered in turning their efforts into sustainable organizations. Using binary logit regressions and unique data containing approximately 26,000 individual-level data points for 36 countries, this study assesses the influences of perceived environmental barriers, risk variables, and socio-demographic variables on the probability of being a social entrepreneur versus a commercial entrepreneur. Our findings confirm that socially motivated entrepreneurs are less likely to survive the earliest levels of entrepreneurial engagement. Several factors have been identified to explain this underperformance. Compared to commercial entrepreneurs, social entrepreneurs perceive more financial and informational start-up barriers, are more afraid of personal failure and bankruptcy, and can be found in the lower and higher age categories. In addition, this study found that social entrepreneurs are more likely to be female and highly educated than are their commercial counterparts. 
      </description>
      <author>Hoogendoorn, B.</author> <author>Zwan, P.W.  van der</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Boards of Directors’ Contribution to Strategy: A Literature Review and Research Agenda (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15144/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-03-10T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Manuscript Type: Literature review.
Research Question/Issue: Over the last four decades, research on the relationship between boards of directors and strategy has proliferated. Yet to date there is little theoretical and empirical agreement regarding the question of how boards of directors contribute to strategy. This review assesses the extant literature by highlighting emerging trends and identifying several avenues for future research.
Research Findings/Insights: Using a content-analysis of 150 articles published in 23 manage-ment journals until 2007, we describe and analyze how research on boards of directors and strategy has evolved over time. We illustrate how topics, theories, settings and sources of data interact and influence insights about board-strategy relationships during three specific periods.
Theoretical/Academic Implications: Our study illustrates that research on boards of directors and strategy evolved from normative and structural approaches to behavioral and cognitive approaches. Our results encourage future studies (i) to examine the impact of institutional and context-specific factors on the (expected) contribution of boards to strategy, and (ii) to apply alternative methods to fully capture the impact of board processes and dynamics on strategy-making.
Practical/Policy Implications: The increasing interest in boards of directors’ contribution to strategy echoes a movement towards more strategic involvement of boards of directors. However, best governance practices and the emphasis on board independence and control may hinder the board contribution to the strategic decision-making. Our study invites investors and policy-makers to consider the requirements for an effective strategic task when they nominee board members and develop new regulations.
      </description>
      <author>Pugliese, A.</author> <author>Bezemer, P.J.</author> <author>Zattoni, A.</author> <author>Huse, M.</author> <author>Bosch, F.A.J. van den</author> <author>Volberda, H.W.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Pharmaceutical Research Strategies (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13670/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-05-08T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This study analyses 1400 research projects of the top 20 R&amp;D-spending pharmaceuticals to identify the determinants of successful research projects. We provide clear evidence that externally sourced projects and projects involving biotechnologies perform better than internal projects and chemical projects, respectively. Controlling for these effects, we find that big pharma should either build a critical mass of disease area knowledge or diversify projects over different DA’s in order to obtain higher success probabilities. Projects in which a firm has built a critical mass of disease knowledge (through at least 10 projects per DA) are significantly more likely to reach clinical testing. Moreover, within large disease areas, the success probabilities of internal projects increases when a few (less than 20%) externally sourced projects are involved. We interpret this finding as knowledge spillovers from external to internal projects, as the limited number of external projects enables the same people to be involved in both external and internal research projects and apply externally generated knowledge internally.
      </description>
      <author>Phlippen, S.M.W.</author> <author>Vermeersch, A.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Do Foreign Greenfields Outperform Foreign Acquisitions or Vice Versa? An Institutional Perspective (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/11558/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-05T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Prior studies of the comparative performance of greenfields and acquisitions have advanced competing arguments, with some arguing that greenfields should outperform acquisitions because acquisitions are costlier to integrate, and others that acquisitions should outperform greenfields because greenfields suffer from a liability of newness. Moreover, while the costs of integration and the liability of newness are at their greatest during a subsidiary’s first years, prior studies have tested their competing arguments on samples containing older subsidiaries. We extend these prior studies by (1) developing an institutional theory-based framework that simultaneously considers the costs of integration and the liability of newness, (2) recognizing that both types of costs vary with the level of subsidiary integration, and (3) focusing on the stage of their life during which subsidiaries predominantly incur these costs. To measure subsidiary performance, we ask managers of Dutch multinationals how their ex ante performance expectations compare to the subsidiary’s ex post performance during its first two years. Analyzing a sample of 191 foreign subsidiaries and controlling for entry mode self-selection and other factors, we find that acquisitions outperform greenfields at low and intermediate levels of subsidiary integration, but that greenfields outperform acquisitions at higher integration levels.
      </description>
      <author>Slangen, A.H.L.</author> <author>Hennart, J-F.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A Process Model of Locational Change in Entrepreneurial Firms: An Evolutionary Perspective (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7633/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-03-27T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        How do changes in the spatial organization of entrepreneurial firms come about? This paper provides a conceptualisation of the process of locational change. A process model of locational change is constructed on the basis of an empirical study of 109 locational events during the life course of 25 young firms in knowledge intensive sectors (knowledge services and biomedicals). This process model of locational change maps both internal and external variation and selection processes. This model contributes to the development of a causal process theory of the spatial development of (new) firms.
      </description>
      <author>Stam, F.C.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Are small firms really sub-optimal?: compensating factor differentials in small dutch manufacturing firms (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/9719/</link>
      <pubDate>1999-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The advent of a growing share of small firms in modern economies
raises some intriguing questions. The most intriguing question
undoubtedly is why so many smaller firms, which have traditionally
been classified as sub-optimal scale firms, can exist. We suggest that,
through pursuing a strategy of compensating factor differentials, that
is by remunerating and deploying factors of production differently
than their larger counterparts, small firms are able to compensate for
size-inherent cost disadvantages. Using a sample of over seven thousand
Dutch manufacturing firms, we find considerable evidence that
such a strategy of compensating factor differentials is pursued within
a European context. When viewed through a static lens, the existence
of such a strategy, while making small and sub-optimal scale
firms viable, suggests that they impose a net welfare loss on the
economy. However, when viewed through a dynamic lens, the findings
of a positive relationship between firm age and employee compensation
as well as firm age and firm productivity suggest that there
may be at least a tendency for the inefficient firm of today to become
the efficient firm of tomorrow.
5
Are Small Firms Really Sub-Optimal?
      </description>
      <author>Audretsch, D.B.</author> <author>Leeuwen, G. van</author> <author>Menkveld, A.J.</author> <author>Thurik, A.R.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A model of pricing behavior: An econometric case study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15928/</link>
      <pubDate>1998-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Empirical pricing studies are scarce in the modern literature in spite of their obvious importance for understanding competition. The present study employs a structural model to identify deviations of individual pricing routines from the commonly assumed single-period profit maximization. It is applied to individual wholesale firms, because wholesale pricing has a decisive influence on the price formation in the entire economic system and because hardly any research exists in this area. The results show that wholesale firms operate in imperfectly competitive world markets providing a highly differentiated service package. Traders apply pricing rules consistent with cost mark-up pricing. The mark-up varies among traders with the extent to which a firm's pricing strategy deviates from full profit maximization. This divergent behavior is associated with firm size, the type of buyers served and other aspects of the wholesale service package.
      </description>
      <author>Dalen, J. van</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>