<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions (hiring, firing, turnover, part-time, temporary workers, seniority issues)</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-M51/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code M51</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Effects of Prize Spread and Noise in Elimination Tournaments: A Natural Field Experiment (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/25711/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We conduct a field experiment in a large retail chain to test basic predictions of tournament theory regarding prize spread and noise. A random subset of the 208 stores participates in two-stage elimination tournaments. Tournaments differ in the distribution of prize money across winners of the first and second round of the tournament. As predicted by theory, we find that a more convex prize spread increases performance in the second round at the expense of first-round performance, although the magnitude of these effects is small. Moreover, the treatment effect is significantly larger for stores that historically have relatively stable performance as compared to stores with more noisy performance.
      </description>
      <author>Delfgaauw, J.</author> <author>Dur, A.J.</author> <author>Non, J.A.</author> <author>Verbeke, W.J.M.I.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reciprocity and Incentive Pay in the Workplace (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14035/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-03T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We study optimal incentive contracts for workers who are reciprocal to management attention. When neither worker's effort nor manager's attention can be contracted, a double moral-hazard problem arises, implying that reciprocal workers should be given weak financial incentives. In a multiple-agent setting, this problem can be resolved using promotion incentives. We test these predictions using German Socio-Economic Panel data. We find that workers who are more reciprocal are significantly more likely to receive promotion incentives, while there is no such relation for individual bonus pay.
      </description>
      <author>Dur, A.J.</author> <author>Non, J.A.</author> <author>Roelfsema, H.J.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>