<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Regional, Urban, and Rural Analyses</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/concept/jel-O18/</link>
    <description>Recent publications classified by JEL Code O18</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Determinants of road traffic crash fatalities across indian states (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/37225/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-09-04T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This article explores the determinants of road traffic crash fatalities in India. In addition to income, the analysis considers the sociodemographic population structure, motorization levels, road and health infrastructure and road rule enforcement as potential factors. An original panel data set covering 25 Indian states is analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. Time and state fixed-effects account for unobserved heterogeneity across states and time. The rising motorization, urbanization and accompanying increase in the share of vulnerable road users, that is, pedestrians and two-wheelers, are the major drivers of road traffic crash fatalities in India. Among vulnerable road users, women form a particularly high-risk group. Higher expenditure per police officer is associated with a lower fatality rate. The results suggest that India should focus, in particular, on road infrastructure investments that allow the separation of vulnerable from other road users on improved road rule enforcement and should pay special attention to vulnerable female road users. 
      </description>
      <author>Grimm, M.</author> <author>Treibich, C.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Multilevel Approaches and the Firm-Agglomeration Ambiguity in Economic Growth Studies
 (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/31776/</link>
      <pubDate>2012-02-16T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Empirical studies in spatial economics have shown that agglomeration economies may be a source of the uneven distribution of economic activities and economic growth across cities and regions. Both localization and urbanization economies are hypothesized to foster agglomeration and growth, but recent meta-analyses of this burgeoning body of empirical research show that the results are ambiguous. Recent overviews show that this ambiguity is fuelled by measurement issues and heterogeneity in terms of scale of time and space, aggregation, growth definitions, and the functional form of the models applied. Alternatively, in this paper, we argue that ambiguity may be due to a lack of research on firm-level performance in agglomerations. This research is necessary because the theories that underlie agglomeration economies are microeconomic in nature. Hierarchical or multilevel modeling, which allows micro levels and macro levels to be modeled simultaneously, is becoming an increasingly common practice in the social sciences. As illustrated by detailed Dutch data on firm-level productivity, employment growth and firm survival, we argue that these approaches are also suitable for reducing the ambiguity surrounding the agglomeration-firm performance relationship and for addressing spatial, sectoral and cross-level heterogeneity.


      </description>
      <author>Oort, F.G. van</author> <author>Burger, M.J.</author> <author>Knoben, J.</author> <author>Raspe, O.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19534/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Conceptually, the degrees of spatial and functional integration and urban complementarities in economic network relations are hypothesised to be important. In this paper, data on interfirm relations in the Dutch Randstad are used to test conditions for integration and the existence of economic complementarities. A clear hierarchy is observed in the different types of spatial interdependencies in the Randstad, in which the central place model prevails. Furthermore, no evidence is found for the functional integration of municipalities in the Randstad. It is concluded that, at this moment, the Randstad does not function as a spatially and functionally integrated region and that spatial economic policy can better focus on smaller regions within the Randstad. This also calls into question the applicability of the urban network concept in general, as the Dutch Randstad is usually seen as a prime example of an economically successful polycentric urban system.
      </description>
      <author>Oort, F.G. van</author> <author>Burger, M.J.</author> <author>Raspe, O.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>On the Economic Foundation of the Urban Network Paradigm: Spatial Integration, Functional Integration and Economic Complementarities within the Dutch Randstad (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16214/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-06-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The current debate on polycentric urban development suggests that inter-firm relations are important for the creation and sustainment of urban networks. Conceptually, the degrees of spatial and functional integration and urban complementarities in economic network relations are hypothesised to be important. However, the theoretical economic rationale has not been convincingly tested. In this paper, we use data on inter-firm relations in the Dutch Randstad to test conditions for integration and the existence of economic complementarities within this region. Contrary to the ‘polycentricity hypothesis’, we observe a clear hierarchy in the different types of spatial interdependencies in the Randstad, in which the central place model prevails. Furthermore, we do not find evidence for the functional integration of municipalities in the Randstad. We conclude that at this moment the Randstad does not function as a spatially and functionally integrated region, and that spatial economic policy can better focus on smaller regions within the Randstad when urban economic complementarities and integration are desired. This also calls into question the applicability of the urban network concept in general, as the Dutch Randstad is usually seen as a prime example of an economically successful polycentric urban system.
      </description>
      <author>Oort, F.G. van</author> <author>Burger, M.J.</author> <author>Raspe, O.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Functional Polycentrism and Urban Network Development in the Greater South East UK: Evidence from Commuting Patterns, 1981-2001 (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16213/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-06-25T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In contemporary literature on changing urban systems, it is often argued that the traditional central place conceptualisation is outdated and should be replaced by a network view that emphasises the increasing criss-crossing pattern of interdependencies between spatial units. This paper tests for urban network development by looking at commuting patterns in the Greater South East UK. The analysis is based on census commuting interaction data for three points in time during the past three decades (1981, 1991, and 2001). Although the empirical results indicate that the Greater South East UK can still not be characterized as a polycentric urban region or integrated urban network, there is some evidence for urban network development at the local, intra-urban, level as well as a decentralization of the system at the regional, inter-urban, level.
      </description>
      <author>Goei, B. de</author> <author>Burger, M.J.</author> <author>Oort, F.G. van</author> <author>Kitson, M.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Health Penalty of China's Rapid Urbanization (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14944/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Rapid urbanization could have positive and negative health effects, such that the net impact on population health is not obvious. It is, however, highly pertinent to the human welfare consequences of development. This paper uses community and individual level longitudinal data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey to estimate the net health impact of China’s unprecedented urbanization. We construct an index of urbanicity from a broad set of community characteristics and define urbanization in terms of movements across the distribution of this index. We use difference-in-differences estimators to identify the treatment effect of urbanization on the self-assessed health of individuals. The results reveal important, and robust, negative causal effects of urbanization on health. Urbanization increases the probability of reporting fair or poor health by 5 to 15 percentage points, with a greater degree of urbanization having larger health effects. While people in more urbanized areas are, on average, in better health than their rural counterparts, the process of urbanization is damaging to health. Our measure of self-assessed health is highly correlated with subsequent mortality and the causal harmful effect of urbanization on health is confirmed using more objective (but also more specific) health indicators, such as physical impairments, disease symptoms and hypertension.
      </description>
      <author>Van de Poel, E.</author> <author>O'Donnell, O.A.</author> <author>Doorslaer, E.K.A. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Financial Centres of Shanghai and Hong Kong: Competition or Complementarity? (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/10516/</link>
      <pubDate>2007-09-13T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The contemporary rise of China in the new geo-economy is increasingly pressurising the spatial distribution of financial activity in mainland China and Hong Kong. With the re-emergence of Shanghai, many people foresee the furture demise of Hong Kong as the most important financial centre for the China mainland. This paper shows that conviction seems rather premature. Bases on the concepts of comparative advantage and market segmentation, the extent to which Shanghai and Hong Kong can be considered complementary financial centres is assessed. By using the listings of mainland China based companies on the stock exchange of each financial centre, it is shown that both cities do not only appear to have distinct hinterlands but they also differ strongly in terms of sectoral specialisation.
      </description>
      <author>Karreman, B.</author> <author>Knaap, G.A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Agglomeration Economies and Entrepreneurship in the ICT Industry (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7639/</link>
      <pubDate>2006-03-29T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        In this study indicators of agglomeration economies and their effect on entrepreneurship in the ICT industry are analysed in diverse urban contexts. Agglomeration economies have a stronger impact on new firm formation than on the growth of incumbent firms. Concentration and diversity both have a positive effect on new firm formation as well as on the growth of incumbent firms, while competition only has a positive effect on new firm formation. It is especially the effects of industrial diversity that are revealed to be sensitive to urban contexts: positive effects on new firm formation are attached to the connected cities and to the highly urbanized Randstad, and positive effects on firm growth to the intermediate zone, the connected cities and urban municipalities.
      </description>
      <author>Oort, F.G. van</author> <author>Stam, F.C.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The Impact of New Firm Formation on Regional Development in the Netherlands (Research Paper)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/7131/</link>
      <pubDate>2005-11-30T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        This paper examines the relationship between new firm formation and regional employment change in the Netherlands. Using a new regional data base for the period 1988-2002, we examine the time lags involved in the relationship. We also investigate whether the relationship differs by time period, by sector and by degree of urbanization. We find that the maximum effect of new businesses on regional development is reached after about six years. Our results also suggest that the overall employment impact of new-firm startups is positive but that the immediate employment effects may be small in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we find that the relation between new businesses and regional development has been stable during the period under investigation, that the employment impact of new firms is strongest in manufacturing industries and that the employment impact of new firms is stronger in areas with a higher degree of urbanization.
      </description>
      <author>Stel, A.J. van</author> <author>Suddle, K.</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>