<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Research Policy</title>
    <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/org/9796/</link>
    <description>List of Publications</description>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
      <title>Aromatase inhibitors in men: Effects and therapeutic options (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24051/</link>
      <pubDate>2011-06-21T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Aromatase inhibitors effectively delay epiphysial maturation in boys and improve testosterone levels in adult men Therefore, aromatase inhibitors may be used to increase adult height in boys with gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty, idiopathic short stature and constitutional delay of puberty. Long-term efficacy and safety of the use of aromatase inhibitors has not yet been established in males, however, and their routine use is therefore not yet recommended.
      </description>
      <author>Ronde, W.A. de</author> <author>Jong, F.H. de</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Sensitization to lupine flour: Is it clinically relevant? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28135/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-10-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Summary Background Lupinus angustifolius (blue lupine) is used for human and animal consumption. Currently, the lupine content in bread varies from 0% to 10% and from 0.5% to 3% in pastry. Although lupine flour is present in many products, anaphylaxis on lupine flour is rarely seen. Objective The aim of our study was to determine the clinical relevance of sensitization to lupine flour. Methods From October 2004 until October 2005, we performed skin prick tests (SPT) with lupine flour, peanut and soy extracts in consecutive patients attending our allergy clinic with a suspected food allergy. In patients sensitized to lupine flour, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) were performed and specific IgE was measured. Results We tested 372 patients. SPTs with peanut, soy and lupine flour were positive in 135, 58 and 22 patients, respectively. Nine patients with sensitization to lupine flour underwent DBPCFC, which was negative in eight cases. In contrast, one patient experienced significant symptoms. Four of these nine patients suspected lupine by history. Two other patients with a positive history to lupine declined from challenges. In these patients, a 3-day dietary record showed that they could consume lupine without symptoms. Specific IgE in the serum was positive for L. angustifolius, peanut and soy in all nine patients. Conclusion These results demonstrate that clinical lupine allergy is very uncommon, even in the presence of sensitization to lupine flour. The estimated prevalence of lupine allergy, among patients with a suspected food allergy, referred to a tertiary allergy centre in the Netherlands is 0.27-0.81%. In most, although not all cases, sensitization is not clinically relevant and is most likely caused by cross-sensitization to peanut. In selected cases, eliciting doses are low, making significant reactions possible. 
      </description>
      <author>Jong, N.W. de</author> <author>Maaren, M.S. van</author> <author>Vlieg-Boersta, B.J.</author> <author>Dubois, A.E.J.</author> <author>Groot, H. de</author> <author>Wijk, R.G. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Rotterdam AMBlyopia screening effectiveness study: Detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27726/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Purpose. The Dutch population-based child health monitoring program includes regular preverbal (age range, 1-24 months) and preschool (age range, 36-72 months) vision screening. This study is on the contribution of an organized vision screening program to the detection of amblyopia. Methods. A 7-year birth cohort study of 4624 children was started in 1996/1997 in Rotterdam. Vision screening data were obtained from the child screening centers. Treating orthoptists working at the regional ophthalmology departments provided information about diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis was reviewed by two experts. The parents provided additional information on their child's eye history through written questionnaires and telephone interviews. At age 7 years, the children underwent a final examination by the study orthoptists. Results. Of the 3897 children still living in Rotterdam by 2004, 2964 (76.1%) underwent the final examination. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 100 (3.4%) of these (95% CI, 2.7-4.0). At age 7, 23% had visual acuity &gt;0.3 logMAR. Amblyopia was caused by refractive error (n = 42), strabismus (n = 19), combined-mechanism (n = 30), deprivation (n = 7), or unknown (n = 2). Eighty-three amblyopia cases had been detected before age 7. Amblyopia detection followed positive results in vision screening in 56 children, either preverbal (n = 15) or preschool (n = 41). Twenty-six other amblyopes were self-referred (n = 12, before a first positive screening test), especially strabismic or combined-mechanism amblyopia; data were uncertain for one other positively screened amblyopic child. Amblyopia remained undetected until age 7 due to unsuccessful referral (n = 4, three with visual acuity &gt;0.3 logMAR at age 7) or false-negative screening (n = 13).Conclusions. Most cases of amblyopia were detected by vision screening with visual acuity measurement. Preverbal screening contributed little to the detection of refractive amblyopia. 
      </description>
      <author>Groenewoud, J.H.</author> <author>Tjiam, A.M.</author> <author>Lantau, V.K.</author> <author>Hoogeveen, W.C.</author> <author>Faber, J.T.H.N. de</author> <author>Juttmann, R.E.</author> <author>Koning, H.J. de</author> <author>Simonsz, H.J.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Awareness and use of practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch hospitals (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28008/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-07-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Objective: To describe awareness, use and supportiveness for physicians of three practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions, and to identify factors associated with increased awareness of these guidelines. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 793 physicians from 12 hospitals in 2005 (response 52%). Results: Most physicians were aware of the existence of the practice guidelines for euthanasia (75%) and do-not-resuscitate decisions (63%), and 35% were aware of the existence of the guidelines for palliative sedation. Physicians who had read the guidelines and had been in a situation in which they had to consider a euthanasia request, 88% had used the guidelines for euthanasia; corresponding figures are 92% for do-not-resuscitate and 100% for palliative sedation. When used, almost all physicians felt the guideline had been supportive. More positive attitudes towards guidelines and involvement in guideline development were associated with increased awareness of the presence of guidelines. Conclusion: It appears that practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions are useful for physicians: when they are aware of the presence of such guidelines in their institution, they gain support when using them. Practice implications: Health care institutions should be encouraged to disseminate guidelines among caregivers, and also involve them in the development of the guidelines. 
      </description>
      <author>Hesselink, B.A.M.</author> <author>Pasman, H.R.</author> <author>Wal, G. van der</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Occupational allergy in Strawberry Greenhouse workers (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28314/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-04-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Background: Employees in strawberry greenhouses are highly exposed to several (potential) allergenic agents. However, no occupational allergy in this branch has been described before. First, the presence of work-related allergic symptoms in strawberry workers was explored. Second, we aimed to prove the concept that an IgE-mediated allergy could be responsible for work-related symptoms. To test the possibility of an IgE response secondary to cross-reactivity to birch or grass pollen, inhibition experiments were performed. Methods: First, a questionnaire survey concerning work-related allergic symptoms among strawberry workers in the Netherlands was carried out. Second, 3 workers with work-related symptoms were investigated in detail. Skin tests, serum-specific IgE tests with home-made extracts of strawberry pollen and other possible allergenic agents of the strawberry greenhouse environment were executed. Furthermore, immunoblots and nasal provocations with strawberry pollen extract were performed. In addition, inhibition experiments were performed. Results: 29 of 75 questionnaire respondents (38.7%) reported work-related symptoms. Sensitization to strawberry pollen was found in skin tests in all 3 employees with work-related symptoms. ELISA and immunoblotting with strawberry pollen showed positive results in 2 employees. Birch and grass pollen failed to inhibit IgE binding to strawberry pollen in 1 of 2 employees. Partial inhibition was seen in the second employee. Nasal provocation validated clinically relevant allergy to these pollens in 2 of 3 subjects. Conclusions: Allergic symptoms attributable to the workplace are present among a proportion of strawberry greenhouse employees. An IgE-mediated occupational allergy to strawberry pollen may contribute to these symptoms. 
      </description>
      <author>Patiwael, J.A.</author> <author>Vullings, L.G.J.</author> <author>Jong, N.W. de</author> <author>Toorenenbergen, A.W. van</author> <author>Wijk, R.G. van</author> <author>Groot, H. de</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Development and dissemination of institutional practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/19887/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Objectives: To describe how Dutch healthcare institutions develop and disseminate institutional practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions and policy statements on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) to relevant parties, and to describe supportiveness of EAS guidelines experienced by Dutch physicians. Methods: Questionnaires to all Dutch health care institutions in 2005. Questionnaire to sample of Dutch clinical specialists and nursing home physicians. Results: In most health care institutions, physicians (79%), ethics committees (79%), board of directors (64%) and nurses (61%) were involved in the development of guidelines. The Euthanasia Act and national guidelines were the most frequently reported sources for the development (73% and 71%, respectively). Not all institutions disseminated their written EAS policy statements and practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions to all relevant parties. Dutch physicians who reported the presence of a written guideline for EAS in their institution, felt supported by it in their decision-making after a patient's request for EAS. Conclusions: It is recommended that more health care institutions pay attention to the dissemination of their policy statements and practice guidelines to relevant parties. This will only lead to improvement in medical practice if this is accompanied by efforts to also stimulate the use of guidelines in practice.
      </description>
      <author>Hesselink, B.A.M.</author> <author>Pasman, H.R.</author> <author>Wal, G. van der</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Physicians' labelling of end-of-life practices: A hypothetical case study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/27974/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Objectives: To investigate why physicians label end-oflife acts as either 'euthanasia/ending of life' or 'alleviation of symptoms/palliative or terminal sedation', and to study the association of such labelling with intended reporting of these acts. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a random, stratified sample of 2100 Dutch physicians (response: 55%). They were asked to label six hypothetical end-of-life cases: three 'standard' cases and three cases randomly selected (out of 47), that varied according to (1) type of medication, (2) physician's intention, (3) type of patient request, (4) patient's life expectancy and (5) time until death. We identified the extent to which characteristics of cases are associated with physician's labelling, with multilevel multivariable logistic regression. Results: The characteristics that contributed most to labelling cases as 'euthanasia/ending of life' were the administration of muscle relaxants (99% of these cases were labelled as 'euthanasia/ending of life') or disproportional morphine (63% of these cases were labelled accordingly). Other important factors were an intention to hasten death (54%) and a life expectancy of several months (46%). Physicians were much more willing to report cases labelled as 'euthanasia' (87%) or 'ending of life' (56%) than other cases. Conclusions: Similar cases are not uniformly labelled. However, a physicians' label is strongly associated with their willingness to report their acts. Differences in how physicians label similar acts impede complete societal control. Further education and debate could enhance the level of agreement about what is physician-assisted dying, and thus should be reported, and what not.
      </description>
      <author>Buiting, H.M.</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Rurup, M.L.</author> <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Borsboom, G.J.J.M.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>End-of-Life Decision Making for Cancer Patients in Different Clinical Settings and the Impact of the LCP (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/28057/</link>
      <pubDate>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Differences in the general focus of care among hospitals, nursing homes, and homes may affect the adequacy of end-of-life decision making for the dying. We studied end-of-life decision-making practices for cancer patients who died in each of these settings and assessed the impact of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient (LCP), a template for care in the dying phase. Physicians and relatives of 311 deceased cancer patients completed questionnaires. The LCP was introduced halfway through the study period. During the last three months of life, patients who died in hospital received anticancer therapy and medication to relieve symptoms more often than those in both other settings. During the last three days of life, patients who died in the hospital or nursing home received more medication than those who died at home. The LCP reduced the extent to which physicians used medication that might have hastened death. Relatives of patients who died in the hospital tended to be least positive about the patient's and their own participation in the decision making. We conclude that cancer patients who die in the hospital are more intensively treated during the last phase of life than those who die elsewhere. The LCP has an impact on the use of potentially life-shortening medication during the dying phase. Communication about medical decision making tends to be better in the nursing home and at home. 
      </description>
      <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Veerbeek, L.</author> <author>Swart, S.</author> <author>Rijt, C.C.D. van der</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Zuylen, L. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Effects of oestradiol on gonadotrophin levels in normal and castrated men (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24769/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Context Testosterone inhibits gonadotrophin release in men either directly or after aromatization to oestradiol. We hypothesized that in males the androgen receptor-mediated effect of testosterone on LH release is negligible relative to that of oestradiol. Objective To compare the effect of experimentally induced variations of plasma oestradiol levels on LH levels in normal (physiological testosterone levels) and castrated men (very low testosterone levels). Design Prospective, open label, intervention. Subjects and interventions We suppressed endogenous oestradiol in 10 young men with letrozole 2·5 mg once daily. In these men and in 10 young healthy castrated men, we restored plasma oestradiol levels with oestradiol patches (first week 100 μg/day, second week 50 μg/day, third week 25 μg/day and fourth week no oestradiol patch). Measurements The effect of the intervention on plasma levels of LH were monitored and compared between the groups. Results With the intervention, the mean plasma oestradiol level in the two groups varied from supraphysiological to below the lower reference range. Levels of LH mirrored plasma oestradiol levels in both the groups, as did testosterone in the intact group. Despite similar oestradiol levels, mean levels of LH were significantly higher in the castrated group compared to the intact group for all doses of oestradiol, and supraphysiological levels of oestradiol were unable to suppress LH into the physiological range in the castrated group. Conclusions Physiological plasma oestradiol levels have a substantial suppressive effect on LH in men. However, low-normal testosterone levels are a prerequisite for suppression of LH into the normal range. 
      </description>
      <author>Ronde, W.A. de</author> <author>Kulve, J. ten</author> <author>Woerdeman, J.</author> <author>Kaufman, J.M.</author> <author>Jong, F.H. de</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Reporting of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands: Descriptive study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24958/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Background: An important principle underlying the Dutch Euthanasia Act is physicians' responsibility to alleviate patients' suffering. The Dutch Act states that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are not punishable if the attending physician acts in accordance with criteria of due care. These criteria concern the patient's request, the patient's suffering (unbearable and hopeless), the information provided to the patient, the presence of reasonable alternatives, consultation of another physician and the applied method of ending life. To demonstrate their compliance, the Act requires physicians to report euthanasia to a review committee. We studied which arguments Dutch physicians use to substantiate their adherence to the criteria and which aspects attract review committees' attention. Methods: We examined 158 files of reported euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide cases that were approved by the review committees. We studied the physicians' reports and the verdicts of the review committees by using a checklist. Results: Physicians reported that the patient's request had been well-considered because the patient was clear-headed (65%) and/or had repeated the request several times (23%). Unbearable suffering was often substantiated with physical symptoms (62%), function loss (33%), dependency (28%) or deterioration (15%). In 35%, physicians reported that there had been alternatives to relieve patients' suffering which were refused by the majority. The nature of the relationship with the consultant was sometimes unclear: the consultant was reported to have been an unknown colleague (39%), a known colleague (21%), otherwise (25%), or not clearly specified in the report (24%). Review committees relatively often scrutinized the consultation (41%) and the patient's (unbearable) suffering (32%); they had few questions about possible alternatives (1%). Conclusion: Dutch physicians substantiate their adherence to the criteria in a variable way with an emphasis on physical symptoms. The information they provide is in most cases sufficient to enable adequate review. Review committees' control seems to focus on (unbearable) suffering and on procedural issues. 
      </description>
      <author>Buiting, H.M.</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philpsen, B.</author> <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Rurup, M.L.</author> <author>Tol, D. van</author> <author>Gevers, J.K.M.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Policy statements and practice guidelines for medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions: Developments in the past decade (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24376/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Objectives: To describe the existence of policy statements on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and practice guidelines for all medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions in 2005, whether the existence of practice guidelines is related to characteristics of institutions, and to compare the existence of policies in 2005 and 1994. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 566 institutions (all Dutch hospitals, nursing homes, general psychiatric hospitals, institutions for the mentally disabled, hospices) from October 2005 through March 2006. Results: Most institutions (70%) had a written policy statement concerning EAS. EAS was usually allowed under specific conditions (75%). Institutions mainly had practice guidelines for EAS and do-not-resuscitate decisions (62% and 63%). A minority had guidelines on palliative sedation (27%), alleviation of symptoms (27%) and withdrawing or withholding treatment (33%). In general, there were more practice guidelines in 2005 than in 1994. Larger institutions and institutions with an ethics committee more often had practice guidelines. Religious affiliation of an institution did not seem to be related to the existence of guidelines. Conclusions: Since many institutions still do not have practice guidelines for medical end-of-life decisions, they should be stimulated to introduce practice guidelines, being a first step in improving the quality of the care on institutional level. 
      </description>
      <author>Pasman, H.R.</author> <author>Wolf, J.E.H.d.</author> <author>Hesselink, B.A.M.</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Wal, G. van der</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Two decades of research on euthanasia from the Netherlands. What have we learnt and what questions remain? (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24235/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Two decades of research on euthanasia in the Netherlands have resulted into clear insights in the frequency and characteristics of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions in the Netherlands. These empirical studies have contributed to the quality of the public debate, and to the regulating and public control of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. No slippery slope seems to have occurred. Physicians seem to adhere to the criteria for due care in the large majority of cases. Further, it has been shown that the majority of physicians think that the euthanasia Act has improved their legal certainty and contributes to the carefulness of life-terminating acts. In 2005, eighty percent of the euthanasia cases were reported to the review committees. Thus, the transparency envisaged by the Act still does not extend to all cases. Unreported cases almost all involve the use of opioids, and are not considered to be euthanasia by physicians. More education and debate is needed to disentangle in these situations which acts should be regarded as euthanasia and which should not. Medical end-of-life decision-making is a crucial part of end-of-life care. It should therefore be given continuous attention in health care policy and medical training. Systematic periodic research is crucial for enhancing our understanding of end-of-life care in modern medicine, in which the pursuit of a good quality of dying is nowadays widely recognized as an important goal, in addition to the traditional goals such as curing diseases and prolonging life. 
      </description>
      <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>End-of-life decisions in the United Kingdom. [letter] (Letter To Editor)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/16353/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-07-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        
      </description>
      <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Deliens, L.</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Trends in the Use of Opioids at the End of Life and the Expected Effects on Hastening Death (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/24435/</link>
      <pubDate>2009-02-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The aim of our study was to describe trends in opioid use and perceptions of having hastened the end of life of a patient. In 2005, a questionnaire was sent to 6860 physicians in The Netherlands who had attended a death. The response rate was 78%. In 1995 and 2001 similiar studies were done. Physicians less often administered opioids with the intention to hasten death in 2005 (3.1% of the non-sudden deaths) than in 2001 and in 1995 (7% and 10%, respectively). Physicians gave similar dosages of opioids in 2005, 2001, and 1995, but physicians in 2005 less often thought that life was actually shortened than in 2001 and 1995 (37% in 2005, 50% in 2001, and 53% in 1995). Of the physicians in 2005 who did think that the life of the patient was shortened by opioids, 94% did not give higher dosages than were, in their own opinion, required for pain and symptom management. Physicians in 2005 more often took hastening death into account when they gave higher dosages of opioids when the patient experienced more severe symptoms and with female patients. In older patients (≥80 years), physicians took the hastening of death into account more often, but the actual dosages of opioids were lower. These data indicate that physicians in The Netherlands less often thought that death was hastened by opioids and less often gave opioids, with the intention to hasten death in 2005 than in 2001 and 1995. 
      </description>
      <author>Rurup, M.L.</author> <author>Borgsteede, S.D.</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>A comparison of physicians' end-of-life decision making for non-western migrants and Dutch natives in the Netherlands (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30221/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-12-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Background: Non-western migrants have a different cultural background that influences their attitudes towards healthcare. As the first wave of this relatively young group is growing older, we investigated, for the first time, whether end-of-life decision-making practices for non-western migrants differ from Dutch natives. Methods: In 2005, we sent questionnaires to physicians who attended deaths identified from the central death registry of Statistics Netherlands (n = 9651; non-western migrants: n = 627, total response: 78%). We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex and cause of death. Results: Of all deaths of non-western origin, 54% were non-sudden, whereas 67% of all deaths with a Dutch origin were non-sudden (P = 0.00). A relatively large number of non-suddenly deceased persons of non-western origin had died under the age of 65 (53%) as compared to Dutch natives (15%). Euthanasia was performed in 2.4% of all non-suddenly deceased persons in the non-western migrant group as compared to 2.7% in the native Dutch group (adjusted odds ratio = 0.82, P = 0.63). Alleviation of symptoms with a potential life-shortening effect was somewhat lower for non-western migrants (30% vs. 38%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.78, P = 0.07). Physicians decided to forgo potentially life-prolonging treatment in comparable rates (26% vs. 23%; adjusted odds ratio = 1.1, P = 0.73). Yet, the type of treatments forgone and underlying reasons differed. Conclusion: Euthanasia was not less common among non-suddenly deceased non-western migrants as compared to Dutch natives. However, intensive symptom alleviation was used less frequently and forgoing potentially life-prolonging treatment involved different characteristics. These findings suggest that cultural factors may affect end-of-life decision making. 
      </description>
      <author>Buiting, H.M.</author> <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/13685/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-10-31T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Objectives To study the practice of continuous deep sedation in 2005 in the Netherlands and compare it with findings from 2001.

Design Questionnaire study about random samples of deaths reported to a central death registry in 2005 and 2001.

Setting Nationwide physician study in the Netherlands.

Participants Reporting physicians received a questionnaire about the medical decisions that preceded the patient’s death; 78% (n=6860) responded in 2005 and 74% (n=5617) in 2001.

Main outcome measures Characteristics of continuous deep sedation (attending physician, types of patients, drugs used, duration, estimated effect on shortening life, palliative consultation). Requests for euthanasia.

Results The use of continuous deep sedation increased from 5.6% (95% confidence interval 5.0% to 6.2%) of deaths in 2001 to 7.1% (6.5% to 7.6%) in 2005, mostly in patients treated by general practitioners and in those with cancer (in 2005, 47% of sedated patients had cancer v 33% in 2001). In 83% of cases sedation was induced by benzodiazepines, and in 94% patients were sedated for periods of less than one week until death. Nine per cent of those who received continuous deep sedation had previously requested euthanasia but their requests were not granted. Nine per cent of the physicians had consulted a palliative expert.

Conclusions The increased use of continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands and the limited use of palliative consultation suggests that this practice is increasingly considered as part of regular medical practice.
      </description>
      <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Buiting, H.M.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Dutch criteria of due care for physician-assisted dying in medical practice: A physician perspective (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/14229/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        Introduction: The Dutch Euthanasia Act (2002) states that euthanasia is not punishable if the attending physician acts in accordance with the statutory due care criteria. These criteria hold that: there should be a voluntary and well-considered request, the patient's suffering should be unbearable and hopeless, the patient should be informed about their situation, there are no reasonable alternatives, an independent physician should be consulted, and the method should be medically and technically appropriate. This study investigates whether physicians experience problems with these criteria in medical practice. Methods: In 2006, questionnaires were sent to a random, stratified sample of 2100 Dutch physicians (response rate: 56%). Physicians were asked about problems in their decision-making related to requests for euthanasia or assisted suicide after enforcement of the 2002 Euthanasia Act. Results: Of all physicians who had received a request for euthanasia or assisted suicide (75%), 25% had experienced problems in the decision-making with regard to at least one of the criteria of due care. Physicians who had experienced problems mostly indicated to have had problems related to evaluating whether or not the patient's suffering was unbearable and hopeless (79%) and whether or not the patient's request was voluntary or well considered (58%). Discussion: Physicians in The Netherlands most frequently reported problems related to aspects in which they have to evaluate the patient's subjective perspective(s). However, it can be questioned whether placing emphasis on these subjective aspects is an adequate fulfilment of the duties imposed on physicians, as laid down in the Dutch Euthanasia Act.
      </description>
      <author>Buiting, H.M.</author> <author>Gevers, J.K.M.</author> <author>Rietjens, J.A.C.</author> <author>Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Delden, J.J.M. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Using the LCP: Bereaved relatives' assessments of communication and bereavement (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/30127/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-06-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) is aimed at improving care and communication in the dying phase. The authors studied whether use of the LCP affects relatives' retrospective evaluation of communication and their level of bereavement. An intervention study was conducted. During the baseline period, usual care was provided to dying patients. During the intervention period, the LCP was used for 79% of the patients. In total, bereaved relatives filled in a questionnaire for 57% of the patients, on average 4 months after death. In the intervention period, relatives had lower bereavement levels when compared with relatives in the baseline period (P =.01). Communication was evaluated similarly for both periods. We conclude that LCP use during the dying phase seems to moderately contribute to lower levels of bereavement in relatives. 
      </description>
      <author>Veerbeek, L.</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author> <author>Vogel-Voogt, E. de</author> <author>Bakker, R. de</author> <author>Rijt, C.C.D. van der</author> <author>Swart, S.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Zuylen, L. van</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>The effect of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the dying: A multi-centre study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/29462/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-03-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        We studied the effect Of the Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) on the documentation of care, symptom burden and communication in three health care settings. Between November 2003 and February 2005 (baseline period), the care was provided as usual. Between February 2005 and February 2006 (intervention period), the LCP was used for all patients for whom the dying phase had started. After death of the patient, a nurse and a relative filled in a questionnaire. In the baseline period, 219 nurses and 130 relatives filled in a questionnaire for 220 deceased patients. In the intervention period, 253 nurses and 139 relatives filled in a questionnaire for 255 deceased patients. The LCP was used for 197 of them. In the intervention period, the documentation of care was significantly more comprehensive compared with the baseline period, whereas the average total symptom burden was significantly lower in the intervention period. LCP use contributes to the quality of documentation and symptom control. 
      </description>
      <author>Veerbeek, L.</author> <author>Zuylen, L. van</author> <author>Swart, S.</author> <author>Maas, P.J. van der</author> <author>Vogel-Voogt, E. de</author> <author>Rijt, C.C.D. van der</author> <author>Heide, A. van der</author>
    </item> <item>
      <title>Estimating the effectiveness of screening for scoliosis: a case-control study (Article)</title>
      <link>http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/15179/</link>
      <pubDate>2008-01-01T00:00:00Z</pubDate>
      <description>
        
        OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that screening for scoliosis is effective in reducing the need for surgical treatment. METHODS: The study was a case-control study. A total of 125 consecutive patients who were treated surgically for idiopathic scoliosis between January 2001 and October 2004 and who were born on or after January 1, 1984, were invited; 108 agreed to participate. A total of 216 control subjects were selected randomly and anonymously, matched with respect to age and gender. For 279 adolescents, exact screening exposure and outcomes could be analyzed. Case subjects were recruited from 4 university and 6 nonuniversity Dutch hospitals; control subjects were recruited from all 37 municipal health services in The Netherlands. RESULTS: Screen-detected patients received diagnoses at a significantly younger age than did otherwise-detected patients (10.8 +/- 2.6 vs 13.4 +/- 1.7 years). In total, 32.8% of the surgically treated patients had been screened between 11 and 14 years of age, compared with 43.4% of the control subjects. The odds ratio for being exposed to screening was 0.64. In total, 28% of the patients were diagnosed as having scoliosis before 11 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no evidence that screening for scoliosis reduced the need for surgery. Abolishing screening seems justified, especially because the effectiveness of early treatment with bracing is still strongly debated. A randomized, controlled trial on the effectiveness of treating patients with idiopathic scoliosis with bracing is urgently needed.
      </description>
      <author>Bunge, E.M.</author> <author>Juttmann, R.E.</author> <author>Biezen, F.C. van</author> <author>Creemers, H.</author> <author>Hazebroek-Kampschreur, A.A.J.M.</author> <author>Luttmer, B.C.F.</author> <author>Wiegersma, P.A.</author> <author>Koning, H.J. de</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>