Diagnosis of urinary schistosomiasis: a novel approach to compare bladder pathology measured by ultrasound and three methods for hematuria detection
January 2004
Article
| Related Files |
|---|
|
(15238697.pdf, 0.1MB) |
We aggregated published data from field studies documenting prevalence of Schistosoma haematobium infection and bladder pathology determined by ultrasonography or hematuria detected by reagent strip, questionnaire, or visual examination. A mathematical expression was used to describe the associations between prevalence of pathology/morbidity and infection. This allows for indirect comparison of these methods, which are rarely used simultaneously. All four methods showed a similar, marked association with infection. Surprisingly, ultrasound revealed higher prevalences of pathology in schools than in communities with the same prevalence of infection, implying a need for age-related cut-off values. Reagent strip testing yielded a higher prevalence than questionnaire, which in turn was higher than by visual examination. After correction for morbidity due to other causes, a consistent ratio in prevalence of hematuria of 3:2:1 resulted for the three respective methods. The simple questionnaire approach is not markedly inferior to the other techniques, making it the best option for field use.
- Humans
- Prevalence
- Morbidity
- Urine/parasitology
- Bladder/*ultrasonography
- Hematuria/*diagnosis/epidemiology
- Schistosomiasis haematobia/epidemiology/*ultrasonography
- infection
- prevalence
- haematobium
- community
- schistosoma haematobium infection
- study
- bladder pathology
- pathology
- schistosomiasi
- school
- schistosoma
- hematuria
- strip
- reagent
- morbidity
- method
- questionnaire
- bladder
- association
- haematobium infection