Staying Out of Court? Reservations About a Supposed Practice and a Popular Policy

14 Pages Posted: 2 Nov 2009

See all articles by Marc Loth

Marc Loth

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR)

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

The phrase ‘staying out of court’ raises two questions. Firstly, is there really a tendency to stay out of court? Secondly, if this tendency exists, is it a welcome development or a regrettable one? The first question is difficult to answer, as there are opposing inclinations. And since the judicial domain is a multilayered phenomenon, there is no way of telling whether the tendency is pervasive. To gain a clearer overview of the judicial domain, it seems advisable to switch from a quantitative to a qualitative perspective, which conceptualises adjudication as part of the democratic decision-making process. We are then in the position to distinguish different kinds of increase or decline in broad or deep judgments and are also able to identify the drawbacks of a practice or a policy of staying out of court: for example, the loss of common ownership, accessibility, visibility and plurality. These findings set limits to a government policy of staying out of court, both in terms of breadth in large numbers of cases as well as in depth for exemplary and complex cases.

Keywords: out of court settlement, government policy

Suggested Citation

Loth, Marc, Staying Out of Court? Reservations About a Supposed Practice and a Popular Policy (2008). Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 5, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1498401

Marc Loth (Contact Author)

Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) ( email )

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50
3000 DR Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3062PA
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
845
PlumX Metrics