Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An explanation of the growth of social security disability transfers

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this paper is to provide an explanation for the growth of one of the most important components of social security income transfers: disability benefits to people who withdraw from the labour market as a consequence of becoming disabled. We use a disability model and apply this to branches of industry for the Netherlands (1968-1979). The main conclusion is that the growth of disability incidence rates can to a large degree be explained by worsening of the economic situation. In addition to this a change in another variable, namely perception of health, plays a role in the explanation of the growth fo disability transfers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R.J. and G.M. MacDonald, ‘Social Security and Consumer Spending in an International Cross Section,’Journal of Public Economics, XI 1979, pp. 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, F.A.J. van den and C. Petersen,Hidden Unemployment and Disability, Discussion Paper Series 7913/G, Institute for Economic Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch F.A.J. van den and C. Petersen, Arbeidsongeschiktheid en economische ontwikkeling, (with a summary in English), Discussion Paper Series 8102/G, Institute for Economic Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1981a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, F.A.J. van den and C. Petersen,Disability as Economic Concept, in: L. Söderström (ed.), ‘Arne Ryde Symposium on Social Insurance,’ Contributions to Economic Analysis, Amsterdam, 1983 (forthcoming).

  • Bosch, F.A.J. van den and C. Petersen, ‘Een economische analyse van de non-participatiegraad: de invloed van arbeidsongeschiktheid,’Maandschrift Economie, XLVI 1982, pp. 307–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, F.A.J. van den, ‘Naar een jaargangen benadering van arbeid,’Economisch Statistische Berichten, LXVII 1982, pp. 1300–1305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of European Communities,Comparative Tables of Social Security Systems, Brussels, 1978.

  • Copeland, L.S., ‘International Trends in Disability Program Growth,’Social Security Bulletin, XLIV (1981), pp. 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, S., R. Haveman and R. Plotnick, ‘How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review,’Journal of Economic Literature, XIX (1981), pp. 975–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N.A., ‘National Insurance and Absence from Work,’Economic Journal, XIM (1979), pp. 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R. and V. Halberstadt, ‘Public Income Support to Disabled Workers: Issues of Program Growth, Costs, and Labor Supply in a Cross-national Context,' in: M. Pfaff (ed.),Effeciency and Effectiveness of Public Transfer Policy, (forthcoming).

  • Hambor J.C.,Unemployment and Disability: an Econometric Analysis with Time Series Data, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Office of Research and Statistics, Staff Paper, no. 20, Washington, 1975.

  • Lando, M.E., ‘The Effect of Unemployment on Application for Disability Insurance,’Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, 1974, pp. 438–442.

  • OECD, ‘The Netherlands,’Economic Surveys, Paris, 1981.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van and V. Halberstadt, ‘Towards an Economic Theory of Non-employability: A First Approach,’ in: K.W. Roskamp (ed.)Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, Hamburg, 1978, Paris, 1980.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van and H. Emanuel,On the Concept of Non-Employability with Respect to a Non-Homogeneous Labour Force, in: L. Söderström (ed.), ‘Arne Ryde Symposium on Social Insurance,’ Contributions to Economic Analysis, Amsterdam, 1983 (forthcoming).

  • Schechter, E.S., ‘Commitment to Work and the Self-Perception of Disability,’Social Security Bulletin, XLIV (1981), pp. 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

A draft of this paper was presented at the symposium ‘Some Economic Aspects of Disability,’ Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, October 1981. Both authors are affiliated with the Department of Economics of the Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam. They wish to thank especially Professor Jan Tinbergen; Professor Bernard van Praag, Mr. Philip de Jong and Mr. Peter Kooiman for their interest in the subject and their valuable comments on a earlier draft of this paper. The authors are grateful to Saam de Mooy for his computational assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van den Bosch, F.A.J., Petersen, C. An explanation of the growth of social security disability transfers. De Economist 131, 65–79 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676418

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676418

Keywords

Navigation